Posted by 
Eat the meat and throw away the bones of this video!
Other or Related Posts of Interest:
- Jesuit Coadjutor Alex Jones Refuses to take Questions about “Vatican Assassins”
- Adventists Claim Alex Jones and Ron Paul are Protectors of Jesuit Vatican Papacy
- Adventist James Arrabito Interviews Ex-Jesuit Alberto Rivera Over 20 years Ago
- Craig Oxley’s New Video on Things to Come with the Fall of Western Civilization
- Coadjutor Jones Against Vatican Assassins
- Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Ian Paisley Exposes the Jesuit Order Ruling Ireland
- Craig Oxley’s Incisive New Video “The American Republic is Crumbling Rapidly”
Jesuit Temporal Coajdutor Alex Jones' ?The Fall of the Republic ……
I found your entry interesting do I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)…
Yes for sure I sent Alex an e-mail about his fence sitting. Of course there was no response. The purpose he serves is that people think that if talks about these things he is doing something about it which of course is bogus. The people that are involved in this don’t care if we know, satan himself told the most high that he would take his thrown, so he will tell us what he is going to do to us! But do not fear as Eric says, he’s a dog on a leash and can only render judgement on those whom the most high deems.
It’s May again and, yet again, Mr. Jones “tries to understand” the Catholic connection …
The 2009 version: Alex the Joker how he’s joking around with former BBC radio journalist Tony Gosling who promotes, for example, “Judaism is opposed to Zionism” (which I think is true for the most part) on his website and at the same time the kind of Makow’s impersonator interpretation of Blair’s converting (which I think doesn’t be the case and thus is definitely an appropriate mem to sell by the marching monotheistic, more or less monolithic Catholic Column of “lay believers” that, of course, is always defending its episcopal brotherhood of “holy priest soldiers of the one god”, no matter what organizations they are members of).
@4min) “Now, I don’t get involved in Protestants’ and Catholics’ fighting, I don’t get into this, you know, religious craziness – this is a radio show, a news program. And I have found that, you know, there are some crowds out there that obsess on Catholics, and Catholic intrigue, and Catholic secret societies, and everybody is a secret agent of it. And so, you know, for years thought that was discredited, and stupid, and silly, because some of the proponents out there were so ridiculous. But then, through being attacked, I did actually look at it deeper. And then I was doing research for Endgame on the founding of Bilderberg, European Union, all of that, the Nazi connections, the Catholic Church connections, the Treaty of Rome 1957, how they say the EU will be The New Holy Roman Empire. And I went: Wow, that’s actually true! And then how Tony Blair is converted to Catholicism so he can be a new EU head, and they denied that, and now they are talking about it, and then all these weird P2 lodges interconnecting, and then Józef Retinger, and all of that – I mean, there really is something there at the bottom of it.”
Look at him!
I’d say kudos to EricIndiana a.k.a. Orwell’s Ghost (He had also made a terrific video about when he was calling into Jones’ live show, confronting the self-declared “T-Rex of Political Talk” with two of his “own articles”: one and two. Unfortunately this video has gone for no reason. And in case you read this, OG, please contact me because I’m highly interested in your material from your deleted MySpace account) and to you, Sir Eric Jon Phelps, here with Lenny Bloom again. And by the way, Naomi Wolf former Clinton associate, was interviewed at Georgetown on Oct 20, 2007 by Viet Dinh in person, and it even was on Youtube! Just for a while …
May 15, 2007 EJP exposes AJC, Alex Joker the Coadjutor:
Eric) Alex Jones is the topic: He refuses to deal with the Jesuit Order.
Lenny) They don’t want the truth to get out. They are hiding the truth.
Right. But the deception here is his great credibility on most every other topic: on “9/11″ – The Demolition of the WTC, Oklahoma City, you know, the whole nine yards, The Destruction of Waco – he is absolutely credible on all those other topics. And that’s what suck the people into following him away from Vatican control.
Lenny) That’s a half-truth. That’s how he gets people. Create a half-truth, hook them in!
Eric) So, this is typical Jesuit casuistry at its best. And we always have to watch out for this and be aware that there is always somebody trying to seduce the listener away from realizing that Rome is the Mother of Harlots and Abominations of the Earth: Rome is that great city which rules all the kings on the earth. So, and I would welcome a debate with Alex Jones. I’ll welcome any confrontation with him, if he seeks to refute me about this or correct me. For final analysis all I ask is that he deals with the Jesuit Order. It doesn’t have to be me, I’m nothing. But that subject is everything, and he must deal with it if he use to maintain his credibility.
Lenny) Well, he has to stay in the shadows. He can’t afford to let the light shine on and has to stay under his rock. And the thing is this, he will not enter into any neutral debate with you. He’ll have to have his finger on the button at his radio station. He is too frightened and he doesn’t have the debating expertise or intelligence or lateral thinking enough to move into that area of expertise and go one on one with you. But he can buster and fuel people with cleverly devised fables. Alex Jones is a Jesuit coadjutor, a fake.
Eric) That’s absolutely right.
Jones is laughable. He has a fear and trepidation of upsetting *anyone*.
So Jones has invented the ‘Germanic Dreath Cult conspiracy. In his desperate attempt to play up to all and sundry, he creates a theory which is likely to upset – no one – as there can be few Nazis left to get tearful.
His groveling to CNP people such as Craig Paul Roberts and Pat Buchanan is – revolting.
Every gatekeeper helps in this circus of (genuine/authentic and false flag/dogmatically acting) conspiracist criminalistics where you have to figure out all of their tricks like in every computer game, before you can pass through them up to the next level. Every major contributor helps in this open and ongoing fight between open-minded researchers and their well-shepherded, well-protected opponents, the controlled controversialists: political instruments like “cultural gods/trendsetters”, “icons/celebrities”, “experts/professors”, “agents”, “journalists”, “lawyers”, “actors”, “politicians”, “soldiers” and so on and so forth. Could it be possible to escape from such a monstrous labyrinthian trap of modern dialectics for the purpose of preserving control over the public mind as it worked for millennia? How could one break through this nerve-racking and contemptuous theatre of half-truths? How to not only cut through it but make “the matrix” literally transparent without missing the point? Well, I think, it’s not that much of an unsolvable problem, in fact, it’s relatively easy. I mean, of course, only for those who are really open-minded, who don’t try to protect a certain piety for themselves, a certain personal romantic spiritual home – only then it will work.
OG said, “it is not always a matter of one person being right and the other being wrong. Often times both can be right,” while my impression is that a lot of squabble about “lying” and “saying the truth” can simply be ascribed as outgrowths of impreciseness. So where is the way out?
Let’s take a look at Webster Tarpley. I listed him kind of in a category of high-level academics which was a big mistake. It is ridiculous to think of him as an outstanding scientist or so, I’ll never do that again, because the more intense you’re learing, the quicker he’ll lose his reputation as an unprejudiced investigator and turns into an blatantly helpless false flag historian. Why do I know he is a disinformation artist like his buddy Alex Jones and many others? I can see the parameters wherein they operate. Webster, for instance, never goes as far as Jordan. Why not? Is the subject maybe not interesting enough for him or too complexe or something? Is it not worth to ask for details and to focus on the origins of our beloved ingrained Roman British corporatocracy? He seems to be immune to the whole legal fiction fraud that’s going on for centuries. He can’t either verify nor falsify such coherences. All what remains for him is to deny it or joking around. And at this point, you have found the contours of Mr. Tarpley’s grid square of propaganda where you can take the next step: mapping out this labyrinth of post-”9/11″ conspiracy theories and theorists, mapping out this virtually confusing battlefield of all varieties of professional psychological warfare technics. From Noam Chomsky to the-guy-who-is-not-Steve-Doocy – map them out! Define the actual pieties – that’s the key! Because once you have them, once you are aware of the frontiers in the spirit of corporate as well as conspiratorial mainstream protagonists, you will come up with a new level, a new dimension of not only unanswered but yet unproposed questions, and this then will become a complete different game, a complete different fight with complete different rules.
All of those methodologically predominant and scientifically sophisticated academics that Terry Melanson swears by can’t stand a debate with an expert on the field of historical research concerning the Knights of Jesus as the real possessors of political power, and so can’t he. There is no chance, so they won’t try. Henry Makow does actually pretend to “wonder what the Jesuits’ source of power is”, playing not being able to make the connection between the radical loss of his Church’s most important psychic instrument, the book, for political dominance based on “morale superiority” through letterpress and following Protestant Reformation and – as last exit – the resurrection/refoundation of the Knights Templar with a new livery: Jesuit blackness. Sure, “why should anyone obey the” secret service, the SS/CIA of the Vatican? As a Catholic, to boot! Not mysticism, moneytheism rules in the eyes of Henry. As if the Catholic Empire had conquered Europe and the world with money instead of Jesus/Horus. Remember those blood-curdling secret oaths of the bankers … Listen, Dear Sir, it’s simply to memorize: mystery, military, then comes the money – it’s always the same succession since the fuehrers were called “pharaohs”, and “9/11″ is the absolute paramount example for this little secret. What a job you have choosen! Not enviable at all.
I agree. Still good for newbies to the New World Order.
Zero mention of Jesuits as I recall, but that may not be a bad thing. Have to ease most people into the FACT that Catholicism is not even Christian.
I like to tell people how the Catholic Church removed the 2nd Commandment and split one of the latter ones to make up for it….and, my oh my, which Commandment was THAT which was removed? Let’s think….
The fish head hats and sun/saturn-worshiping skull caps are some other fun facts to wake people up.