Posted by 
We are witnessing the pope’s final destruction of the “heretic and liberal” peoples of once White Protestant Western Civilization. For these “accursed heretics and liberals” must be “extirpated” if the once high Western cultures, born out of the Protestant Reformation, are to be destroyed. Further, the White Roman Catholics of Europe and North America are no longer “good Catholics” as they were during the pope’s Dark Ages. They have become “liberal” while they enjoy the rights of freedom of speech, press and conscience—originally secured by anti-papal Protestants! Further, Europe and North America remain cultural and economic havens for three fourths of the world’s racial Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites. Therefore the following questions must have arisen within the secret council chambers of the Jesuit Order:
1. “How can we finally destroy the once Bible-based cultures of White Western nations born out of the Protestant Reformation such as those in Northern Europe, North America and those nations formerly under the protection of the once White Protestant British Empire such as South Africa, Rhodesia (Zimbabwe), Australia and New Zealand? These nations have rejected the Reformation Bible from its councils and thus are apostate: their final, political destruction will be much easier then their spiritual destruction that we effected during the 2oth Century.
2. “How can we unite these nations into economic and military blocks when their peoples are so disunited by race, nationality and religious belief systems remembering these nations are far from being consciously submitted to the pope’s Spiritual and Temporal powers?”
3. “What common enemy can we raise up within those historically White Protestant Western nations that would accomplish three things: 1) unite the White nationalities into one people within Europe; 2) persecute and/or kill the “heretic” Reformation Bible-believing people openly resisting our New World Order in both Europe and North America; 3) and persecute the racial and religious Jews in both Europe and North America, in which nations these people have enjoyed—for the last 400 years—the greatest amount of civil, religious and political liberty during their Diaspora?”
4. “How can we rid the Middle East, especially the nations adjacent to the pope’s ‘Kingdom of Jerusalem,’ of tens of millions of ‘wild’ (Ishmael’s descendants), ‘warring’ (Esau’s descendants) Arab Muslims (Islam being a creation of the Vatican) that will otherwise continue their destructive and intolerant behavior thereby rendering us unable to build our Third Hebrew Temple for the pope?”
Answer: “We will bring tens of millions of Arab Muslims into European nations (apostate Roman Catholic, apostate Protestant and atheist). We will also bring these people into North America. Both immigrations will be financed by our economic powerhouse, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (created by us in 1932), so that these Muslim Arabs will reproduce without any economic restraint, while the Whites of those nations are financially broken and struggling to make ends meet from week to week. We will then incite Muslim violence and crime, while giving them preference in the culture over the natives. Our agents running the governments in Europe and North America will follow our directions until the financial and cultural desperation becomes intolerable among the natives so as to drive all the Whites to their knees begging deliverance from the very enemy we created and by which we destroyed their once White Protestant cultures. We will then give them OUR deliverance as planned for over 100 years—Jesuit Fascism imposed by our military dictator. United and seeking vengeance, our White Fascist Armies will totally annihilate the Muslims as well as the Blacks having committed millions of Black-on-White crimes for over half a century.”
Dutch statesman Geert Wilders is right on all of his points—generally speaking. But little does he know that by not blaming the papacy for the Islamic invasion and cultural onslaught into Europe and North America, he will never propose the right solutions to the problems imposed upon Western Civilization. Enjoy the video.
Other or Related Posts of Interest:
- EJP Replies to Oxley’s Improved Video “The 12th Crusade—Zionism v. Islam—World War III,” Suggesting a Title Change to “Romanism vs. Islam”
- September 24, 2009: Prophecy: European Union
- EJP Replies: Tenets of Islam Resembling Romanism
- Video: “Did the Vatican Create Islam?” Alberto Rivera Revealed the Secret
- Arab Brother-in-Christ Refutes the Antichrist Doctrines of Islam
- Craig Oxley’s Video Series 2: World War III–Islam v. Zionism/Kolvenbach and Carlos
- November 6, 2009: Biblical Nationalism Incompatible with Islam
I forget to mention his hair is painted blond.
His real color of hair is dark.
…
Well, I watched the first part, but it’s the usual Dutch propaganda junk.
In order to get Wilders in politics, he was shown 3 hours on TV every day. He’s more an actor, than anything else. This was after I went to have a look as Dutch Jesuit websites; they where all working on refugee work. I saw many other clergy busy in refugee work, while Hans Kolvenbach is an Arabist. And I also meet certain immigrants, in the most overpopulated country of Europe. But the attention Wilders gets for his real issue’s avoiding story, like because our country started with an 80 year war against the Roman Catholics having alliances with moslems because the same enemy, that attention is ridiculous. In some way the Roman Catholics have succeeded in ending all anti-papist forces in Dutch information. Alex Jones type disinformers are drawing the attention from the real issues. The Bible is over here always put in the media in a bad light, Calvinists are portrayed as loonatics by the Dutch Media. No information can enter than in several occasions, in order to work as a smoke screen, in order to hide the fact, that it is controlled propaganda. And it works, most intellectuals my age do not see that it is propaganda. It looks to me 90% of the Dutch haven’t even thought about the fact that 9/11 was an inside job. But our army is in Afganistan because of that.
I am sad to see, that many of the British and it seems a large amount of the Dutch people seem to believe that Wilders is for real.
Wilders was born and raised in a very Roman Catholic part of Holland. Limburg, where George Bush would also travel, when he visited The Netherlands in his presidency. There are images of tortured men on large wooden torture machines in the streets, the old fashion snuff movies. Roman punishment. Fashioned in a way the Jesuits like them, sexy and all. Very horrible. But your president would rather visit to that horrible gay place, that is compared to Amsterdam’s Redlight District and Torture museum, filthy with blasphemous pleasure in unrighteousness by the papists. I say: Make such statues prohibited, as they actually are according to the Constitution of the Dutch Republic!
Wilders is recruiting for a Crusade for the Pope.
The first politician that tried defend against te moslem invasion by Roman Catholic sympathizer Joop den Uyl from the Fabian Socialists, that are referred to in European politics as Social Democrats, was Drs. Janmaat. Drs. Janmaat was anti-papist, and was attacked and accused of Fascism by the Popish and leftwing media and schools. In fact, the intellectuals here are leftwing, because of the control the Roman Catholic Church has over education. They prefer to train higher intellectuals, protestant or anti-papist teachers can get sabotaged, so often end up on lower education. Rightwing is the anti-theses of leftwing, while leftwing always represents more state control. This leftwing state control is opposed by fascism, and this is what any one cares to read Wilders’s program will see: An enforcing police state.
For which is necessary an enemy. That is the same enemy of the USA: Al Quaida. Because of this terrible Al Qciada, a police state is defended. These are very simple politics, the real fascism that has already been enforced on the people here is blamed on a Dutch Reformed Prime Minister, while the fact that Adolph Hitler was a Roman catholic is lied about and kept secret, while the Dictator under that time was also Dutch Reformed…
Anti-Calvinist propaganda.
It’s not the moslems that want to lynch that man over here….
Thank you Eric for allowing me here.
I am getting very sick of these Jesuits NWO stuff, and as if we are all here to talk about nothing, to live for nothing, but to be immersed in all these elitist stuff, and that we do not have a life of our own. Everything I read is so very disturbing, and there is now an ongoing onslaught of the people of the world which is a form of conditioning the masses for the end times. There is so much propaganda, so much comabt writings, and we all end up in numerous hostile groups, and the elites will impose a system – after some portion of the masses are murdered in wars etc. The propagandas are as old as those which end up in the Holy Bible, and they are no better (in fact worse) – because in those old days there were no internet and CNN etc.
One of the most staggering propagandas I have here is that the Vatican created Islam – based on Alberto Rivera’s assertion (taken from Cardinal Bea) – which is itself the crux of the matter. It is the same case like 911, if we are to believe those 19 middle eastern jerks took the 4 planes on one fine day.
Now, if the basis is not correct – what do we have? Yes, exactly, PROPAGANDA!
What is really going on? Now you people talk about this Islamic invasion etc – or is this not of your own creation?
The Protestents once said – BETTER TURKISH THAN ROMANISH, fine, now you begin to see how the Protestants would prefer to be Turkish.
Now you turn around and say… Vatican created Islam, that Vatican created Black Muslims – all these to fight the Protestants!
Which side are you?
The Muslims are fighting for theor own victory – this is their belief and coinviction. It is the Christians – both Protesttants and Catholic who as making the Muslims as scapegoats.
The bottom line is – WHY NOT YOU CHRISTIAN RACES UNITE AND FIGHT THE MUSLIMS ASA YOU DID IN THE CRUSADES?
But did the Christians really win the crusades? Most of the times they lost badly.
Even now, when they did 911 – they blamed the Muslims – when the White Christians did that themselves. Latest on the news – to put on board a dubious Nigerian black man and charged him trying to explode a huge plabe with firecrackers.
Now, pass the buck to the Black Man – yes, you have one sitting in the White House.
Remember, Pilate WASHED HIS HANDS? The Romans were innocent.
Clever yeah?
I am calling the human race to respect each other, to love each other. Stop this sickness, NOW! Or, you will see the Jesuits taking over the world as you all predicted.
The Ten Kingdoms were over, ended with Constantine. But the Christians are so abstinate, they want to invent the Ten Kingdoms so that they can still play around with the prophecy of Daniel.
In that case, I do believe that Jesus Christ will come back to CORRECT YOU ALL!
Hail Jesus, come now and see what these Christians have done.
Cheers.
“Those are the key words: ‘I am respectable and successful.’
If the 30 million Muslims manage to ignore these provocations and to channel their anger in support of the Prophet Muhammad and of Islam into becoming walking propaganda machines, each person should say: ‘I am an ambassador for Islam.’ And they should all take action throughout Europe, in the companies where they work, in sports clubs, and in any place where they can mingle and fit in with the Europeans, and where they can show them their moral values and their success, we really need ten years for the Muslims in Europe to become firmly established and very successful.”
Raised as a Roman Catholic, Geert Wilders cares at least about freedom of speech (there is something to enjoy in this six part interview). He doesn’t seem to have been that much incorporated by the imperial mentality of the church of the Papists.
“Islam means submission” – exactly what Catholicism means and Jesuitism in particular.
Could Robert Spencer’s Jihad Watch be an ally for an anti-blind-obedience, Jesuit-Watch coalition? “No major Muslim group has ever repudiated the doctrines of armed jihad. The theology of jihad, which denies unbelievers equality of human rights and dignity, is available today for anyone with the will and means to bring it to life.” Probably not because he keeps his Links section clean from web appearances of conspiracy scientists.
When the Moors ruled in Europe: “And in Cordoba the new Catholic rulers did something unbelievable: In a daring act of what can only be described as inspired vandalism, architects gorged out the centre of the mosque and at its place built one of the most spectacular cathedrals in Spain. The result is a shocking and blasphemous conflation of two of the world’s most powerful religions. It is unnervingly beautiful but posesses an underlying schizophrenia, as if a terrible and silent battle is being carried out in the very architecture of the building. [...] For a very long time, people have protested and urged that history be truthfully told, that they not be fed this nonsense. But this is the inheritance of the Inquisition. The Inquisition’s character is alive and well. I can tell you one thing: Spanish people have a tendency to prevent others from speaking their minds, a tendency to try and control the way others behave and think. You can be sure that when you try to speak the truth, you pay for it.”
Both herds of more than a billion enthusiastic monotheists each, who are devout subjects to their priestly shepherds, who form monolithic brotherhoods based on secret oaths with a (quasi-)military hierarchy as the eventual outcome, are in its core, in my opinion, political empires of militant intellectualism. Because it’s always the educational hegemony combined with fanatic ruthlessness that precedes and overpowers financial might in principle (it has to be said because some seem to believe that only presidents of states could be killed by Mafia-like organizations like our beloved Papal Knights and not also presidents of big international banks, Herrhausen, for example, or the Titanic-”9/11″ incident before the Fed came into existence – to still think private banks were in fact private is almost ridiculous in my eyes, even more after we have seen a communism that really existed and exists). Therefore the question ought to be asked: Could there actually be such a kind of intellectual dominion on earth today, as a guarantor, so to speak, for the N.W.O., and if so who’s behind, who rules everybody else out intellectually, in whose hand is this supreme knowledge? Or in other words, do “the Jews”, or “the Zionists”, or “the Illuminati”, or “the Freemasons”, my dear fellow Catholic citizens, do they run over one hundred first class universities around the world instead of “the Jesuses quasi praesens”, the ressurected Knights Templar as the ultimate secret weapon of “your holy father”, who is desperate to become the noncontentious monarch of the world at all costs?
Anyway, I think, the whole documentary is, in any case, a good lesson for every cultural/religious/racial supremacist, especially part 9/11 (part 9 of 11). “a global struggle that confronts democrats and theocrats”
“Auschwitz, the Soviet gulags, and the killing fields of Cambodia are not examples of what happens to people when they become too reasonable. To the contrary, these horrors testify to the dangers of political and racial dogmatism. It is time that Christians stop pretending that a rational rejection of your faith entails the blind embrace of atheism as a dogma. The problem with religion – as with Nazism, Stalinism, or any other totalitarian mythology – is the problem of dogma itself. I know of no society in human history that ever suffered because its people became too desirous of evidence in support of their core beliefs.” Sam Harris – quite a brilliant kind of guy, isn’t he
That’s the most fascinating point from a piety-theoretical perspective: Where science rules by positivist truths, meaning hard facts based on falsifiability, religion rules by romantic mysteries and its widely accepted, alleged ability to transform mythical stories into a kind of felt moral science which considers itself superior to any other moral standards, and here it comes: Most people like, or better love, or even better choose a nice romance, a romantic not-so-bad side, a more convenient explanation, over a less comfortable, “uglier”, and usually also more difficult to understand, deeper, and more complicated combination. I mean, that’s part of “the truth” too!
Yes, there is a “naked truth”, Eric, but what if nobody wants to know about it and even wants to hear it at all?
To take away this nudity (of conspiracist thinking) can be defined as main purpose of my approach of focusing on aspects of piety of all sorts that are determining identities, loyalties, authorities and so forth and so on.
Good points, but there is nothing to enjoy in this video.
“Millions of black-on-white crimes” – millions, Eric?
I mean, millions of white-on-black crimes – that’s for sure.
And by the way, the Dark Ages were also “Bible-based”, weren’t they.
I know. Nevertheless, they were it after all.
The priests (with the professors, politicians, psychologists etc. at their side) rule for the most part simply with words. They dominate the public (the collective consciousness) and therefore our souls through their elaborate vocabulary, their soapy language, this warm and foggy balsam of most extrem mendaciousness – “civilization of love” and so forth. And you, Sir, are not really a great help to break this particular power with your, you know, always almost barbarian, at least nearly military or police choice of words! I’m afraid to see you remaining an exotic with this kind of eternal fanatic rant. Preaching against the priests, preaching against the most sophisticated false flag benefactors – what an impressive, what a convincing, what a new strategy above all, indeed, especially for the cyberspace! Oh, I forgot: “there is nothing new under the sun”, right? Because “it’s written”. Letterpress? “Nothing new.” No middle ground with the Bible, right Sir?! “The fact of the matter is, everything is black and white, there are no shades of grey. It is either right or it is either wrong. It is either good or it is either evil. It is either glorifying God or it’s fulfilling the desires of ‘The Devil’.” (Biblical Truth in History and Prophecy broadcast on May 19, 2008)