EJP Replies to John concerning the Unbiblical Doctrine of Race/Nation Mixing

Dear John,

Thank you for your kind, thoughtful and objective missive. Such are always appreciated.

Concerning the Biblical doctrine of non-hateful racism that I hold to and advocate for Whites as well as for all races, this kind of racial preference to the end of separating from other nations/races is the only solution to the hateful racist problem plaguing the Pope’s 14th Amendment American Empire. As you may know, the Blacks of this nation—in general (I call them the “Majority Savage Blacks”)—are the paramount, hateful racists perpetrating tens of millions of violent crimes (assaults, thefts, rapes and murders) against Whites every year. Unless you live in any major US city, you are unaware of the magnitude of this terrible blight on historic, Reformation AV1611 Bible-based, White Western culture.

The only solution is not to give these Majority Savage Blacks more money or education at the expense of the White working class—further destroying the Middle Class born out of the Reformation. Rather, racial separation of Whites from Blacks—and Latinos—unto separate nationhood is the Biblical answer. Let the Black sons of Ham, the Latino and Oriental sons of Shem rise or fall on their own obedience or disobedience to the Word of God as will be the case with us White sons of Japheth. We White believers-in-Christ owe no man anything save the gospel. Federally-mandated, domestic “welfare” as well as “foreign aid” to any country has no basis in the Constitution—the Constitution as intended by the framers—and thus are crimes against the historic White Anglo-Saxon Protestant and Baptist middle class of America. For the Jesuits to restore the Pope’s Dark Ages, they must destroy the Middle Class—”by any means necessary.”

Concerning miscegenation, mutts are good dogs, but they are mutts—just as Obama calls himself. Are you advocating that all dogs should be miscegenated into only one breed of dog? Are you advocating that we should breed out of existence the differences in horses? But then again, even though there are differences between the races of man according to non-hateful studies relating to those racial differences (that field of science being “eugenics”), the sons of Adam cannot be likened to the animal kingdom; thus we must look to the Scriptures to justify racial separation unto nationhood.

It is clear: the three sons of Noah are the fathers of the three major races. All Bible-reading nations believed this verifiable social science until about the advent of the Jesuit Order’s doctrines of racial “universal equality,” “socialist-communism” and “evolution” during the mid-Nineteenth Century. All three of these doctrines now imbibed by the Roman Catholic Institution, as well as by the present, Masonically-infected, Protestant and Baptist “churches of unbelief,” have justified the imposition of the greatest crimes in history—crimes that perpetrate the abolition of the sovereign nation state composed of a people denoted for their specific race, specific language, specific culture while living within specific geographical boundaries. To amalgamate is to abolish nationhood and thus Biblical nationalism. And nationalism must be destroyed if Rome is to impose its international socialist-communist rule of the final pope, murdered and risen from the dead, then to be the Antichrist. Please reconsider your position, as it is incorrect and will lead to the utter demolition of every White nation born out of the Protestant Reformation—as plotted by the Counter Reformation Society of Jesus.

Concerning OT provisions of strangers being brought into the racial nation of Israel, indeed there were. But this was the exception to the rule, those provisions never being intended to abolish by amalgamation the distinctive 13 tribes of the racial Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites (the tribe of Joseph being split into Ephraim and Manassah). There was never any command given to the Israelites, when serving as an example to the world in worshipping the one true God, to amalgamate with all the proselytes to the end of reducing Israel to a nation of racial nondescripts. Ezra and Nehemiah dealt specifically with the problem of miscegenation of racial Jews with racial non-Jews/Gentiles, the future fulfillment of the unconditional Abrahamic Covenant resting upon a strictly racial promise. And nowhere in Ezra 10 and Nehemiah 13 does one guilty man state that his foreign wife is a believer in the God of Israel—as I am sure a few of those wives must have been. The Hebrew language was being abandoned and the racially-based, Aaronic priesthood was being destroyed. The issue in those chapters was entirely racial, never religious. True, the Lord Jesus Christ had at least two Gentile forebears in his lineage—Rachab and Ruth, the great grandmother of the prophet, King David. But this is the same Lord Jesus Christ who instructed his disciples, commissioned to preach the gospel/good news of the impending re-establishment of the Davidic kingdom in that generation, not to go to the Samaritans—racially half-Jews—, many of whom were also looking for Messiah (Matthew 10:5; John 4:25). Again, let us not make the exception the rule.

Therefore, even though there is no difference as to the status of the individuals in Christ (Galatians 3:28), we still must hold to the racial distinction of Jew and Gentile. If not, why the New Testament book of Hebrews? Why Romans 9-11? And if we are to carry your argument to its logical conclusion, there is no difference between male and female (Gal. 3:28), thereby laying the foundation for sodomite marriage, wickedly called “gay” marriage. And if we rightly hold to the racial distinction between Jew and Gentile, we must hold to the distinction of racial differences within Gentile peoples—the sons of Japheth (Whites), sons of Shem (Orientals) and sons of Ham (Blacks).

Concerning intellectual supremacy of Whites over Blacks in general, no fact is more provable; few facts have been more suppressed. Where are the manufacturing plants in Africa—apart from once White-ruled South Africa now undergoing its Majority Savage Black demolition? Where are the watchmakers and diamond cutters in Africa? Where are the aircraft and auto manufacturers in Africa? Where are the weapons manufacturers in Africa?

Further, it is yet another established fact that forced amalgamation of the public schools have not raised Black intellectual accomplishments in general; rather, the 1954 Brown decision has contributed to the lowering of White intellectual accomplishments. The public schools are war zones as well as incubators for social change imbibing doctrines of “universal equality”—secretly intended for the for the benefit of Blacks and to the detriment of Whites. Whites separated from Blacks will always produce superior cultures evidenced by casually observing White European civilization as opposed to Black African civilization. White Cultural supremacy arises from White intellectual supremacy—in general—regardless if the White nations under consideration are pagan or Bible-believing. Pagan Greece and pagan Rome are undeniable examples illustrating the foregoing conclusion. Koine Greek, the most definitive language ever written and ordained by God to record the First and Second Coming of His only begotton Son, was created by pagan Greeks. Put the Bible into the hands of White nations and you have White Protestant Western Civilization for the last 500 years—the greatest boon to the sons of Adam of every race in world history. Denying obvious intellectual differences among the races (including obvious intellectual differences between racial Jews and racial Arabs) is an outworking of the damnable religion of socialist-communism—a religion born of the Arminian Jesuit Papacy via the father of socialist-communism, Sir Thomas More—the papal murderer of William Tyndale, father of the AV1611 Reformation English Bible.

Further, as stated many times on the broadcast, God created the races so as to keep mankind separated ensuring that the sons of Adam would never unite against God as was done prior to the Great Flood when there was only once race, one language and one land mass. Two other judgments put upon the Gentile sons of Noah would follow so as to further separate the races: languages (Genesis 11) and the dividing of the one land mass (earth) into the continents (Genesis 10:25). If you advocate the miscegenation of the races, then you must, by logical extension, advocate the creation of one universal human language and the abolition of all national boundaries of nations. Race-mixed, nation-mixed, culture-mixed humanity would be living under one flag. (Just think: no Olympic games during which nations now compete with each other! Ha Ha!!!) The sociological outcome of this forcefully race-mixed (Whites now being forced by law to live, work and be educated among Blacks), unidentifiable humanity would be chaos and anarchy (tribal gang warfare—the reversion back to racial identities, this phenomenon also having occurred after the fall of the race-mixed Roman Empire) thereby giving rise to absolutist military dictators (evidenced by absolutist European monarchs of Rome’s Dark Ages)—as I prove in my power point offered on my website.

Concerning the belief that the White race is in fact the nation of Israel in Diaspora, America being “Manasseh” and Britain being “Ephraim,” this is not a Bible doctrine nor is it provable in true history. No such recorded migration ever occured out of Israel into Northern Europe. The doctrine of British-Israelism is purely a Masonic doctrine held by the absolutist monarchs of Western Europe. We Whites are racial Gentiles, not racial Jews, even though the two sons of Joseph were half-White via Joseph’s White Egyptian wife, Asenath. Please reconsider this doctrine that is completely alien to the literal reading of the Word of God.

Concerning Ireland, I too grieve for my racial people who are now awaking to their spiritual thralldom and sexual abuse via the Jesuit Papacy. Ex-priest Jeremiah Crowley, our dear Irish brother-in-Christ who became an American citizen back in the early 1900s, stated that if the power of the Jesuit Papacy was ever to be broken again, only Ireland could do it. As you know, once the Irish are committed to a cause, they will die to the last man contending for it. (Yes, this is a racial trait of the Irish—quite superior to that of the English or Scots—dear brother!)

Lord Bless,

Brother Eric

Dear Eric,

I have come across your talks and lessons some way or another on the Internet, and I find you to be a very intelligent, eloquent, informed, and passionate speaker. I thank you for your messages. I have recently been gripped by the doctrines of Grace (commonly known as Calvinism, but I’m reluctant to use a mere man’s name, even if it is the name of a man who started a civilization), through the teachings of James White and others, and am pleased to hear you also have this faith. Your humility and faith come through the things you say, though they seem “out there.”

But I would caution you against the racism you hold—In Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek. I understand, that it is a thoughtful position, and one free of any hatred, and you wish to respect other cultures, and enjoy them for what they are. Very commendable. Vive la difference! But I don’t understand your position against miscegenation. I’ve always believed that mutts are the smartest and most robustly healthy animals. It is true that Isaac and Rebekah were grieved at Esau’s choice of a Canaanite wife (or was it Ishmaelite? I forgot…), but there were provisions in the OT for strangers to be incorporated into Israel.

You look back and see rightly that it is White Protestant nations that have produced both the greatest good (promulgation of the Gospel, and—way beneath that in goodness, but still good—Western Civilization) and the greatest evil (propping up and hosting the whore of Babylon, secret societies, western decadence), but I disagree with your conclusion as to the cause—the innate superiority of the White race. Rather, we are Israel. The lost tribes of Israel were never lost to God—He made the world forget their identity and moved them westward from the Middle East, across Europe in many waves over the centuries, until they found their resting places in Northern and Western Europe, the United States, Canada, and on down to Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa. Many of the promises in the OT (many nations, many kings, great nation, they’ll possess the gates of their enemies, the perpetuity of David’s dynasty) apply to them. Any ‘superiority’ that we Israelites have (for good or evil) comes from the fact that we are God’s chosen people, in the natural, to bring about blessing upon the world. Whoever blesses us will be blessed. Not just whoever blesses the current nation of Israel (which I also believe is part of Israel, actually Judah more specifically).

This is a humbling truth, and one that comes with great responsibility. The OT talks about the wickedness of Israel and Judah, wickedness that made even the pagans blush. The same is true today. But God has promised to restore and preserve all of Israel, not just the current nation called Israel. But not without going through Jacob’s trouble. I believe the USA (aka, Manasseh) and Britain (aka, Ephraim), will survive, but not before being greatly humbled.

By the way, I am of Irish descent (like yourself), born and raised Roman Catholic, but by the grace of God escaped. I greatly grieve over the spiritual captivity of my people, and long for the days when they will follow God with a pure heart again like they did in the days of Patrick, Columba, and Columbanus.

Anyway, God bless and protect you in your ministry, and may you grow in grace and holiness and faith.

cheers,

John