EJP Issues a Deserved Retraction to Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Frank O’Collins

Posted by on Oct 5th, 2010 and filed under Gallery, Mail. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Map of Satanic Pentagram; Great Vatican Jesuit Ley Lines of Evil During World War II, 1944

Dear Frank,

Apparently, we have some misunderstandings between us.

First, I have praised your work with regard to the satanic Pentagram you mapped out connecting the Nazi Death Camps within that Pentagram.  I posted that work and it is still available in my “Archives.”  I recommend it  and it can be viewed here.  Again, I say well done.

Map of the Jewish Pale of Settlement, 1900

Secondly, I have praised your work as to your rightly connecting Stalin and Hitler working together in exterminating the Jews of the geographical area within that Pentagram, the Old Pale of Settlement first established by that pawn of the Jesuits, Catherine II “the Great” of Russia.  That work of yours is also posted in my “Archives.”  I recommend it.  Again, well done.  This is your “meat” which I encourage all to “eat” while on your website.

However, I have never agreed with you on the following points indicated in your missive below:

1.  That Venice or “the Venetians” control anything—Never!  I have always said that the Jesuits control Venice and thus the Venetian leaders in general.  The Order has maintained a death grip over Venice and its blue-blood “Venetians” since no later than 1797.  In that year, the Order’s “Great Avenger,” Napoleon Bonaparte I, destroyed the “liberal,” pro-Reformation, Republic of Venice.  Further, within the Secret Instructions of the Jesuits, it focuses special attention on “the Venetians” as their enemies, enemies submitted to the Black Pope by no later than 1800 and remain so today.  Of the Order’s disdain for the Venetians we read in its Secret Instructions, Chapter XIV, Section VI on pages 129 and 131in Brownlee’s 1857 edition:

“Nor let such [disaffected Jesuits] by any means be retained as either openly oppose their superiors, on, in public or private, make complaints against them to their fellow-members, but especially to strangers; or such as condemn, to their associates, or strangers, the conduct of the Society in the amassing or management of temporal goods, or any other of our methods of proceeding; as for instance, our suppressing, and keeping under all either disaffected to, or expelled from our order, &c. or that admit in conversation, or defend the Venetians, French, or others, who by hindering us from getting a footing among them, have done the Society intolerable damages.”  [Emphasis in bold]

This “Venetian distraction” away from the nexus of world political power now wielded by Jesuit Superior General Adolfo Nicolas is a typical Jesuit tactic.  Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Webster Tarpley is given over to this same misinformation, and this same tactic is now employed by you.  Frank, do you really believe that the ubiquitous Jesuit Order now ruling New York City, Washington, DC, Moscow, Paris, Berlin, London, Madrid, Brussels, Beijing, Tokyo, Lisbon, Istanbul, etc., does not rule Venice via its Masonic agents and Roman Hierarchy, specifically Venetian Patriarch Cardinal Angelo Scola?  Apparently you do believe in “the Venetian Power” and advocate such misinformation.

2.  That the Venetians control the Vatican.  This is tacitly absurd on anyone’s part to believe such Jesuit propaganda especially in light of Napoleon’s Jesuit-ordered destruction of the Republic of Venice, which “liberal” Roman Catholic republic had banned the Order due to Pope Clement XIV’s Bull of Suppression and Extinction promulgated in 1773, which bull was honored in Venice as a matter of obedience to the pope.  This same obedience was rendered by the Roman Catholic nobility of Bavaria (Wittelsbachs) and Austria (Habsburgs) for which reason Napoleon attacked and humbled both Roman Catholic countries.  Further, at the Congress of Vienna in 1815, Pope Pius VII, who had just restored the Order in August of 1814, was given back his Papal States, he returning to the title of “King of the Papal States,” and Venice was given to Roman Catholic Austria ruled by Knight of Malta Prince von Metternich, or as the Saxons called him, “Prince Midnight.”  No, the Venetians control Nothing!  They are like us Americans—licking the boots of our resident Jesuits or Roman Hierarchy as they rule from a distance.

Now, as to my claim that you are anti-Jew, basically supporting the Jesuit propaganda that the Jews rule the world, I will retract upon a few clarifications on my part.  First, as per below, you claim the term “Jew” is a “fraud and a hoax.”  You then seek to prove your claim based upon certain “facts” upon which you rely.  They are:

A.  That the southern tribe of Judah (English “J”) or Yehudah (Hebrew “Y”) was not known as “Judah.”  As a matter of semantics, I will cede your claim providing we agree that either term designates the same racial people—in addition to the tribe of Benjamin.  These people are known as “Yehudim,” (Hebrew) or “Y’hudai” (Aramaic) or “Iudaeum” (Latin) or “Jude” (German) or “Judio” (Spanish) or “Jews” as we English-speakers know the term.  Same racial people, same tribal name, but spelled differently as per the language in question.  Further, the book of Jeremiah is clear in that both a “Hebrew” and a “Jew” are identical peoples (Jeremiah 34:9):

“That every man should let his manservant, and every man his maidservant, being an Hebrew or an Hebrewess, go free; that none should serve himself of them, to wit, of a Jew his brother.”

B.  That the people of the Northern Kingdom were never known as “Israelites.”  It is a matter of established biblical and secular history that upon the death of King Solomon and the accession of his son King Rehoboam, the nation of Israel split.  That split resulted in the ten tribes to the north called “Israel” and the two tribes to the south called “Judah.”  This is reflected throughout the writings of the prophets, Jeremiah being one of them.  In Jeremiah 31:31-34, the promise is that God would establish a New Covenant with “the house of Israel” and with “the house of Judah.” Verse 31 reads:

“Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:”

Thus, your claim that the people of the Northern Kingdom were never known as “Israelites” is utterly without historical foundation or biblical merit.

C.  That the people of the Northern Kingdom in general were not known as “Israelites,” but as “Sarmatians.”  This is utter nonsense!  Amidst the 10 tribes of Israel inhabiting the Northern Kingdom its capital being Samaria, there were a people called “Samaritans,” not “Sarmatians” as there was no such place as “Sarmara.”  These Samaritans were racially half-Israelite and half-Assyrian.  They were not “Jews” according to the conversation of Jesus the Messiah with the Samaritan woman at the well in the region of Samaria (John 4:22).  (During the First Century, Samaria was a small region within the land of the Northern Kingdom to which these racially half-Hebrew/Israelites were confined and the racial Hebrew/Israelites had no dealings with them.  They were regarded as racially impure, which impurity was provable through the genealogical records within the Second Temple.)  Now there are such a people as “Sarmatians” connected with the Scythians, but they are of no relation to the topic at hand.  In fact, to use the term Sarmatian in attempting to connect it to people of the Northern Kingdom of Israel without distinguishing the real Sarmatian people as per above, is misleading at best and dishonest at worst.  By this position of yours, you confuse the real identity of the 10 tribes of Israel in the north having in fact descended from the Jew, Abraham.  Yes, Abraham was the physical progenitor of the racial Jews who opposed Christ the Jew (John 8:22, 37).  Thus, in deliberately confusing the identity of the racial Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites, are you not in fact anti-Jew?  Hitler knew who “the Jews” were, for he called them “Hebrews,” “Israelites” and “Jews” in his speeches and throughout Jesuit-trained Joseph Goebbels’ propaganda, spoken and written.

D.  That the theology and worship of the Northern Kingdom was not the same as the worship of the Southern Kingdom.  For a time, this was true.  The ten northern tribes had given themselves over to the worship of Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians, Chemosh the god of the Moabites, and Milcom the god of the children of Ammon (I Kings 11:33).  For this idolatry, Israel was taken captive by Assyria in 723 BC; later Judah would be taken captive by Babylon in 606 BC.  Further, according to Jeremiah 32:32-35 both the children of Israel and the children of Judah sacrificed to Molech (having no relation to an Owl) and to Baal.  Thus, the worship of both kingdoms was Satanic and anti-Jehovah God.

E.  That there were priests of “Yahud” who were called “Cohen Gadol” or “Cohen” while the priests of the “Sarmatians” by the fourth century AD were called “Rabbi.”  This assertion would be laughable if not so diabolical in its ramifications.  First, the priests for the Northern Kingdom were the same family of priests for the Southern Kingdom.  They were called “Levites.”  These Levites were descended from Levi, one of the 12 sons of Jacob/Israel.  The priesthood could only be fulfilled by the racial sons of Levi, just as the High Priest could only be filled by the pure, racial sons of Aaron, Moses’ brother of the tribe of Levi.  The Cohen name is widespread and is connected to the tribe of Levi, but it is a family name and one of the 24 courses of the Levitical priesthood, not a separate priesthood from the Levites.  The term “Rabbi” was applied to the racial Jew, racial Son of David, the Lord Jesus Christ of Nazareth himself (John 1:49).  Thus “Rabbi” is a biblical term that can be applied to any learned individual of the children of Israel, regardless of the tribe to which he belongs.  Again, this distinction which you espouse is false, is nonexistent and leads to confusion as to the real identity of just who are the real Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites of scripture and antiquity.  Is this not essentially anti-Jewish propaganda?

F.  That it is an “absurdity, a fiction bearing not truth to the past” to combine the people of both the Northern Kingdom of Israel and the Southern Kingdom of Judah under one term.  According to the historical record in the Word of God—the Reformation English Bible translated from the Hebrew Masoretic Text and Greek Textus Receptus, you are dead wrong.  According to the foremost writers of history throughout the 19th century, you again are wrong.  All 12 tribes (13 in fact, as the tribe of Joseph was split into Manasseh and Ephraim) are racially descended from Jacob through four different women.  They are a race of people called the “Hebrews” (Exodus 1:16; 3:18) as Abraham, the father of the nation, was called a “Hebrew” (Genesis 14:13).  They are called “the children of Israel” (Exodus 1:7, 12) as Jacob’s name was also “Israel” (Genesis 49:1).  Jacob’s son Joseph was a “Hebrew” (Genesis 39:14), thus Joseph’s two sons who would father two of the ten Northern tribes were also “Hebrews.”  To this nation was committed the Mosaic Law, the people of that nation of Israel being called “Jews” by the Apostle Paul (Romans 3:1-2).  The Apostle Paul was an Israelite, of the tribe of Benjamin and a Hebrew (Philippians 3:5; II Corinthians 11:22) yet also a “Jew” (Acts 22:3) speaking in the “Hebrew” language (Acts 22:2).  Indeed, the people of both Northern and Southern kingdoms are racial Hebrews, are racial Israelites and are racial “Jews.”  According to the Bible, to create a difference, other than specific tribal distinctions, is dishonest, misleading and ultimately seeks to remove the conscious reality of the Genesis 12:1-3 curse put upon any nation persecuting these racial people of the unconditional Abrahamic Covenant misidentified by you as not being racial “Jews,” but rather “Yehudim.”

G.  That is impossible to derive the English word “Jew” from the Hebrew “Yehuda.”  Your disdain for the word “Jew” impairs your logic and your ability to be objective.  “Yhuwdah” is merely the Hebrew for “Judah;” “Yhuwdiy” the Hebrew for “Judaite” or in the English, “Jew.”  “Ioudaios” is Greek for “Jew” as attests the work of both Strong’s and Young’s Concordances.    In fact, every concordance, dictionary, lexicon, Greek-English interlinear text and systematic theology that I have ever seen all translate both proper nouns as “Jew.”  Your position cannot stand the test of either biblical and historical scrutiny.  Therefore, why do you propose such a novel theory—the same exact theory that my ex-Jesuit adviser put upon me when I was revising Vatican Assassins I?  Frank, in resisting the use of the English word “Jew” you are falsely propounding a theory that ultimately leads to anti-Jewish fury.  This is the same doctrine taught by the Identity cult, the KKK cult and other hatefully racist, White Supremacist cults.  Frank, I know these people and they have vehemently advocated this exact, same, lying, anti-Bible, anti-”Jew” doctrine.

H.  That the Venetians are the slavemasters of the Jesuits and the Vatican.  Again, this is absurd and refuted above as said position is nothing more than Jesuit casuistry.

But on to the most pressing issue of your attack upon the Apostle Paul of the New Testament.  On your website, you consider this man of God to be one of the most evil men who ever lived.  Now this is quite fascinating, although extremely grievous, as I have addressed this with you privately before.  In attacking the man whom God used to write 14 of the 27 books of the New Testament, you attempt to destroy the very doctrines championed during the Protestant Reformation.  Remembering that the Reformation brought the world out of the Pope’s Dark Ages by 1648, your attack furthers the Jesuit Order’s Counter Reformation by encouraging men to turn away from the true testimony of the Risen Lord Jesus Christ and seek another way of salvation or “religion.”  You undermine the very foundation of the predominantly Calvinistic, White Protestant Western Nations.  In so doing, you render my peoples helpless in resisting the Satanic Jesuit Order’s ceaseless attack upon the Protestant Bibles, Protestant Constitutions and Protestant liberties secured by those written Constitutions.  A Jesuit under Extreme Oath of Induction could do no better; your uncle, a powerful Vatican Jesuit, would be proud of you.

In conclusion, I will continue to refer to you as a Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor for the following reasons as per above and summarized below:

1.  You twist the meaning of the underlying Hebrew and Greek words translated “Jews” into another meaning that is incorrect and ultimately leads to anti-Jewish fury.

2.  You blame the Venetians as being the real power behind the Jesuit Order and the Vatican Empire, which immense global Empire that Society of Jesus rules with an iron fist in a velvet glove.

3.  You seek to undermine the Pauline Epistles which provide the theological basis for Luther, Calvin and Knox’s Protestant Reformation, i.e., sola scriptura, sola fidei, etc.

HOWEVER, I will retract and correct my statement alleging that you teach there is a World Jewish Conspiracy. You are however only a heartbeat away from said doctrine once another Jesuit comes along and attempts to prove “the Venetians,” who, according to your theory, rule the world, are in fact “crypto Jews.”  Both Roman Catholics Lyndon LaRouche and Webster Tarpley advocate your Venetian world-rule-theory and they are indeed Jesuit Temporal Coadjutors.

It is good that prayer be made for you Frank, as there is only salvation and forgiveness of sins in the finished work of the risen and reigning Lord Jesus Christ.  I will be praying, that if you be one of God’s elect, He will grant you repentance from your sins and faith in believing the glorious gospel of the grace of God in Christ.  For there is no other name under heaven whereby we must be saved, save the name of Jesus Christ in antithesis to Satan’s wicked pope of Rome bolstered by his Praetorian Guard, the Company of Jesus.

I consider this discussion closed and thank you for your correction in measure.

Sincerely in faith,

Brother Eric


Dear Eric,

It has been some time since we have conversed. The last time I think was regarding the important insights concerning anecdotal evidence of the Great Jesuit Vatican Pentagram of Evil in WWII- a 300 mile wide satanic Pentagram that is perfectly geometrically formed from the very worst Death Camps – pointing directly North to the North Pole/North Star and symbol of the United Nations.

At the time you praised the importance of this research in revealing the murder of millions in the name of religion – particularly those of the Jewish faith – was an orchestrated religious sacrifice by the Venetian controlled Jesuits and Vatican, not a racist motivated genocide.  Most importantly, you showed deep respect and belief in the truth that this information came directly from dream and vision-  I believe from those who died and now seek the truth to be revealed.

Since you have been in close contact with very senior Venetians and others, I am now saddened to see you now not only repudiate this research done in the memory of those murdered by liars, anti-Semitics and religious fanatics, but now openly accuse me of being the very thing I have been working against.

You are perfectly entitled to repudiate the very things you claim you wish to expose- the Luciferian agenda of Jesuits, their Venetian Controllers, the Vatican and their Knights of Malta.

You are not the first “truth researcher” to want to try and hide and discredit such historic revelations as the 300 mile wide pentagram in Poland that links to form a perfect “square” at the north pole (symbol of UN power) with its smaller satanic pentagon cousin in Washington and founded on September 11, 1941.

How you happily live your life and sleep at night with such contradictions is between you and the Divine.

But to know the source of this information on the Vatican-Jesuit Pentagram of Evil and to still print such awful lies, to deliberately want to discredit this background by attacking me as some kind of anti-Semite is quite simply the act of a man without an ounce of integrity, morality or belief in God.

The other possibility is that you have been convinced by “others” to say and write such rubbish. You are perfectly entitled to write, speak or say anything you like – even to conclude whatever criticism you may of me. But not to lie and claim me as anti-Semitic.

I formerly request you retract your most recent assertion that I have ever in my writings blamed the “Jews” or subscribe to the “Great Jewish Conspiracy” as you have written.

If you do not retract such false claims, then I can only assume you are far from what you say you are and indeed are the very reverse of what you claim.

Just as the pamphlet “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” first published in 1903 in Russia is a horrible fraud and hoax, so too is the very word “Jew” itself.

The original inhabitants of the southern Kingdom we now know as the “Kingdom of Judah” were known as the Yahudi of Yahudah, not Judah.  Nor were the people of the northern kingdom known as “Israelites” but Sarmatians of Sarmara.

These groups were poles apart in their outlook on life, theology and ritual.  The Yahudi worshipped a monotheistic supreme being, while the Sarmatians worshipped a pantheon of demons, most notably Ba’al Moloch- the ancient incarnation of Satan/The Devil and Lucifer. The priests of the Yahud were called Cohen Gadol or Cohen, while the priests of the Sarmatians by the 4th Century were called “Rabbi”
Prior to the 16th Century there simply was no “universal word” that combined these two separate groups, with separate religions –because to force these two separate kingdoms and groups of priest kings into one term would have represented an absurdity—a fiction bearing no truth to the past.

The 16th Century term “Jew” is variously claimed said to come from Old French giu, which is supposed to come from an earlier version juieu and then from latin iudeus and Greek Ioudaios. However this is cleverly and deliberately misleading. Ioudaios  is the Greek equivalent of the term Yahudah not Jew. It is impossible to get the word “Jew” from Ioudaios as it is from Yahudah.

Therefore, please do not falsely paint me as “anti-semitic” for I continue to use accurate labels that have nothing to do with the false word “Jew”.

Finally, I will pray for your soul. For no more wicked there be than the deceivers who stand and claim as truth, but curse the name of God.

I pray you will be forgiven for such awful hatred towards the visions and revelations from those murdered by the Jesuits, the Vatican and their Venetian Slavemasters.

Cheers

Frank


Other or Related Posts of Interest:

  1. Dogmas of Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Christopher Story Critiqued by Adviser to EJP: Update I
  2. Morris Dees: Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor & Founder of Southern Poverty Law Center: Update
  3. Troy Space of London on anti-Jew, Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Fritz Springmeier
  4. Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Tim Russert Murdered for Disobedience to Jesuit Papacy
  5. Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Ian Paisley Exposes the Jesuit Order Ruling Ireland
  6. Count Vittorio and EJP Answer Andreas on Black Pope’s Roman Council of Ten; Update and Retraction
  7. Harry Connick, Sr.: Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor in JFK Assassination and Cover-up
Categories: Gallery, Mail
Tags:

3 Responses for “EJP Issues a Deserved Retraction to Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Frank O’Collins”

  1. Geus says:

    I would want to thank Phazon for his great list of links, and off course Brother Eric for this article. In my emotions I had a hard time, after reading the accusation of Tupper Saussy being a Jesuit Coadjutor, that is uploaded over here;
    http://www.tuppersaussy.com/museum/html/writings/articles/phelpschallenge.htm

    To tell the truth, I liked the interviews that Frank O’Collins did with Greg Szymanski a lot, and he kinda impressed me with his knowledge. At the same time, I warned Lenny Bloom and Mrs. Steele about a year ago on Webster Tarpley being an Agent, because Tarpley puts the blame on the Anglo-American Empire, that is a very much other thing than the truth. The Council of Trent (1545-1563), is acknowledged by all historians as a fact, and it speaks for itself. Although I like the interviews, I didn’t agree with Frank O’Collins on significant parts of his description of a Global Conspiracy, because he called Roman Catholicsm a Cult, and not what it is, an institution that started off as the secret service of Emperor Nero, that would hunt the Christians. My source for this definition of Roman Catholicism is Alberto Rivera, who discovered this in his research, that, if I am not wrong, was partly thanks to research Alberto Rivera SJ did in the Vatican Library. Roman Catholicism not being a Religion, but a cover for a secret service, it explains to many things to be discarded.

    After visiting some links given to us by by Phazon, especially the page with the Bible according to Frank O’Collins, I must say I agree with Brother Eric.
    Some quotes from this page;
    http://one-faith-of-god.org/final_testament/bible_of_god.htm
    1 Macabees
    2 Macabees

    These books are known Roman forgeries. They are put in Roman Catholic Bibles only, I have been reading one of them, and decided to stop reading, because it would me take me 30 years whatever, to analyze them. A waste of time. The Quran can be analyzed in half an hour, and the Macabee books might have been written to confuse people, why bother. The Jesuits tried to place them in the King James 1611 Bible, this was discovered, they where taken out. Alberto Rivera mentions this in one of his cartoons. I know this, because the Catholics tried to put them in Dutc Bible translations for some 5 centuries now, and finally succeeded in a Bible with Macabees in it in 2000. These are common known facts. That book is only found in Roman Catholic Bibles.
    Sefer Yetzirah (Kabbalah)
    I know this book as a forgery. This book is written by the Vatican, and from Jewish research it is called the Pseudo-Kabbalah. I just discovered that last week, where the pseudo-kabbalah is explained by Doreen Dotan
    The Vatican, Talmud and Kabbalah 1/3
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iul7_yw2xKc
    I currently have no other source, but I think this is the right video, where she explained the history of the Kabbalah, and how the pseudo Kabbalah was created by the Vatican. It is clear, that when some where knowledge is found, the Vatican wants to control it. Or destroy it, if they can’t steal it. And much knowledge is destroyed by forgeries by the Vatican. That I in my own writing prefer to call “The Roman Catholics”, because they pay a lot contribution, and ever so often even contribute their children.
    The Emerald Tablet of Hermes
    This is a forgery concerning real gnosticism. My source for that, is that I know that that book is from the Rosecrusian library, and a teacher told me, that the first Christians the Ecumenical Council of Nicea would persecute, where the people that had knowledge of the real Jesus Christ, and knowledge in Greek, that was a common language at the time of the Ecumenical Council of Nicea, 325 AD, is Gnosis.Not to confuse with the meaning of Gnosticism today. Rosecrusians base their philosophy on gnosis, knowing in Greek, and it’s a mixture of deceit and truth today, as most thing are today. Any ways, the book is pagan, and the content can be compared to Freemason style literature. Legend, mythology, made convincing by an air of common sense.
    The Legends of Orpheus
    Sacred Hymns to Orpheus

    This was the most ridiculous book I saw in Frank O’Collins Bible. I’ve read that book, it’s written by Homer. Many movies where made on it, and there is no common sense whatsoever found in that book. Phantasy, a fairy tale, looks like the literature by Roman Catholic author Tolkien, Lord of the Rings. He might put that one there also maybe…

    I hope that other readers here also see, that Brother Eric no where accused mister O’Collins of antisemitism. The only thing that was said, was that certain reasoning would lead to antisemitism. As a result. That Frank O’Collins accuses Brother Eric of such a thing, that is not truth, gives me the impression, that Frank is not very sportive. The worst thing I find, is that he is promoting the Books of Makkabees, that are a known forgery, and a threat to the texttus receptus. The content of the books is about Revolution, a dangerous thing to interfere in the Bible, by people that seek to destroy the Bible, that is all Catholics. I had conversations on William Tyndale and Erasmus last weeks, and the terrible damage the Bible has to suffer from such attacks. Some putting himself in a camp, posing himself as a historian, but not understanding anything about printing as it was invented and improved mostly by printing Bibles in the 16th century, nor the bible as an intellectual effort and a fruit of seeking the truth. Millions of people sacrificed themselves that we can know the truth on Jesus Christ. Promoting so many books from Roman Catholic origen in a Bible proposal, but at the same time make an impression to be informed, let us pray he repents from his deceived ways.

  2. mclark4 says:

    I think Frank exposes himself quite clearly with the following statement in his missive to Eric.

    “I pray you will be forgiven for such awful hatred towards the visions and revelations from those murdered by the Jesuits, the Vatican and their Venetian Slavemasters.”

    I humbly refer to Deuturonomy 18:

    18:10 There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch.

    18:11 Or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer.

    18:12 For all that do these things are an abomination unto the LORD: and because of these abominations the LORD thy God doth drive them out from before thee.

    Visions and revelations from the dead fall under the above scripture and are an abomination to the Lord.

  3. Phazon says:

    Dear Brother Eric,

    This Frank O’Collins is a huge Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor as you rightly point out.

    According to his own website he was “educated by the Jesuits at Xavier College, Melbourne” – http://www.ucadia.com/frank/frank_professional.htm

    Check-out some of his other websites

    http://heal-the-earth.org/ (Pushes Climate Change & a Pole Shift and that the United Nations isn’t bad but just needs to be reformed & that NGOs like the World Health Organisation and GreenPeace are good)

    http://protect-the-earth.org/ (“Organisation for the design and management of Global Defence Network for Earth”)

    http://give-mars-life.org/ (“Organisation for the constuction of the Phoenix Moon to bring life to Mars”)

    http://one-corp.org/ (One Corporation)

    http://one-jerusalem.org/ (Pushes that Jerusalem become a Sovereign State and International City)

    http://africans-union.org/
    http://americas-union.org/
    http://arabian-union.org/
    http://asia-union.org/
    http://euro-union.org/
    http://oceanic-union.org/

    (Pushes the formation of 6 Unions: Africans Union, Americas Union, Arabian Union, Asia Union, Euro Union and Oceanic Union)

    http://one-faith-of-god.org/ (Shows a satanic hexagram within a circle and pushes the unity of all Christians and Jews into one faith that doesn’t follow the KJV Bible but instead a “bible” on his site called The Supreme Bible – http://one-faith-of-god.org/final_testament/bible_of_god.htm and as part of this “covenant of one-faith-of-god a Messiah is to be elected and according to the covenant the candidate for this is guess who… the Pope)

    http://one-islam.org/ (Similar deal with the unification of all Islamic people)

    http://one-spirit-tribe.org/ (Similar deal with the unification of all Hindus, Buddhists, New Agers etc..)

    http://one-heaven.org/ (A covenant of One Heaven for all members of the one-faith-of-god, one-islam and one-spirit-tribe. Part of this covenant is “The Treaty of Lucifer” that forgives Lucifer and his angels and accepts them into this One Heaven also.)

Comments are closed

Advertisement

Photo Gallery



Log in /