This is indeed a wonderful, insightful quote that only a Man of God (the sole phrase written on his tombstone) having walked-the-walk could have written.

Brother Eric

___________________________________

Christian and Missionary Alliance Preacher, Author and Man of God, A. W. Tozer

“That Incredible Christian”

“The Christian believes that in Christ he has died, yet he is more alive than before and he fully expects to live forever. He walks on earth while seated in heaven and though born on earth he finds that after his conversion he is not at home here. Like the nighthawk, which in the air is the essence of grace and beauty but on the ground is awkward and ugly, so the Christian appears at his best in the heavenly places but does not fit well into the ways of the very society into which he was born.

“The Christian soon learns that if he would be victorious as a son of heaven among men on earth he must not follow the common pattern of mankind, but rather the contrary. That he may be safe he puts himself in jeopardy; he loses his life to save it and is in danger of losing it if he attempts to preserve it. He goes down to get up. If he refuses to go down he is already down, but when he starts down he is on his way up.

“He is strongest when he is weakest and weakest when he is strong. Though poor he has the power to make others rich, but when he becomes rich his ability to enrich others vanishes. He has most after he has given most away and has least when he possesses most.

“He may be and often is highest when he feels lowest and most sinless when he is most conscious of sin. He is wisest when he knows that he knows not and knows least when he has acquired the greatest amount of knowledge. He sometimes does most by doing nothing and goes furthest when standing still. In heaviness he manages to rejoice and keeps his heart glad even in sorrow.

“The paradoxical character of the Christian is revealed constantly. For instance, he believes that he is saved now, nevertheless he expects to be saved later and looks forward joyfully to future salvation. He fears God but is not afraid of Him. In God’s presence he feels overwhelmed and undone, yet there is nowhere he would rather be than in that presence. He knows that he has been cleansed from his sin, yet he is painfully conscious that in his flesh dwells no good thing.

“He loves supremely One whom he has never seen, and though himself poor and lowly he talks familiarly with One who is King of all kings and Lord of all lords, and is aware of no incongruity in so doing. He feels that he is in his own right altogether less than nothing, yet he believes without question that he is the apple of God’s eye and that for him the Eternal Son became flesh and died on the cross of shame.

“The Christian is a citizen of heaven and to that sacred citizenship he acknowledges first allegiance; yet he may love his earthly country with that intensity of devotion that caused John Knox to pray:

‘O God, give me Scotland or I die.’

“He cheerfully expects before long to enter that bright world above, but he is in no hurry to leave this world and is quite willing to await the summons of his Heavenly Father. And he is unable to understand why the critical unbeliever should condemn him for this; it all seems so natural and right in the circumstances that he sees nothing inconsistent about it.

“The cross-carrying Christian, furthermore, is both a confirmed pessimist and an optimist the like of which is to be found nowhere else on earth.

“When he looks at the cross he is a pessimist, for he knows that the same judgment that fell on the Lord of glory condemns in that one act all nature and all the world of men. He rejects every human hope out of Christ because he knows that man’s noblest effort is only dust building on dust.
“Yet he is calmly, restfully optimistic. If the cross condemns the world the resurrection of Christ guarantees the ultimate triumph of good throughout the universe. Through Christ all will be well at last and the Christian waits the consummation.

“Incredible Christian!”

USS Maine: Blown up by Jesuit agents in Havana Harbor; Begins Spanish-American War, 1898; Subsequent Treaty protects every piece of Roman Catholic Church property in American Empire

Dear Brother William,

Thank you for your most excellent missive below.

Personally, I believe war will be declared on Shia Iran AFTER Prince Hall Rite Freemason Barry Davis Obama is returned to office, AFTER Republican candidate Knight of Malta Newt Gingrich is defeated (further angering all Whites in general due to election fraud), and then AFTER the USS Enterprise is sunk in the Persian Gulf.  (The formula for igniting war on a targeted enemy includes two components: a Democratic US president and a planned naval incident.)  The sinking of the USS Enterprise will be blamed on Iran (when the real culprit is the pope’s Office of Naval Intelligence having planted a few bombs on the carrier as was done to the USS Arizona and the USS Indianapolis) due to Iranian fighter flyovers dropping a few bombs and strafing the deck with machine gun fire.

Thus, Satan’s Jesuit Order, controlling the International Vatican Empire with all attendant knightly orders, is slowly moving its US/EU military colossus into position to begin the war on Shia Iran.  Israel cannot be blamed, as it is the pope’s “Revived Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem” intended survive this war and subsequently prosper including the building of the Third Hebrew Temple.  Thus, it appears that 2013 is the year for the attack on Iran.

Lord bless,

Brother Eric

___________________________________________________

Dear Brother Eric,

I was interested this past week when you actually mentioned troops being deployed to Kuwait, because my unit, 1st Brigade, 4th ID is going to Kuwait in February 2013, makes me think that they are planning to start the war with Iran at the end of 2012 perhaps?  The chain of command says it’s we’re going to act as a reserve force incase anything hits up in Iraq again, but I know that’s a lie; it’s to prepare for the invasion of Iran, possibly through Iraq, some of my NCO’s even mentioned that.

I’m continuing to pray and occasionally fast (I’m going to do it more often now) for God to help me get out of the Army.  I love listening to your shows when you talk about Great Christian Military leaders like Cromwell, Stonewall Jackson, George Washington and Andrew Jackson.  It saddens me to see today that the leaders of the Military today from the highest General to the newest team leader (E-4) are mostly power hungry and sex driven and live on getting drunk every weekend.  All those great Christian leaders always had respect for the lower enlisted men who in return actually respected their leaders and prayed with them for victory and would give their lives in a heartbeat to protect them.  Today, I see NO leader that I would be willing to lay my life down for, and very few that I actually respect.  As long as this country is led by anti-Christian leaders, and anti-Christian Military leaders, this country will never win a war again, and I hate to see it, but for everything this country has done for the past 150 years, we deserve what is coming to this nation: it’s all judgement for our sins.

Also an interesting piece of information I remembered when I listened to your latest interview with the Count about why Iran is called Iran and not Persia.  I read somewhere before that during World War II, when Hitler was making allies with the Sunni Muslim Arabs in the Middle East (which were made into a Muslim SS division that were used to persecute millions of Jews and Orthodox Serbs in Eastern Europe I believe) I read Hitler actually renamed Persia “Iran” since ‘Iran” is ‘Aryan” in Arabic and the whole Nazi Aryan belief system comes from Indo-Persia.  I can’t say that it’s completely true, but it does seem likely.

Anyways keep up the great work Brother!

Brother in Christ,

William

American Army Flag

This post is for all the American Bible-Believing Patriots now fighting the Pope’s Crusade in the Middle East, the “crusade” (in the words of ex-President George W. Bush!) soon to launch into in Iran.  Please read Brother William’s email followed by your Editor’s metered response.

_________________________________

Dear Brother Eric,

I hope the videos had good information to help connect the dots as to how the Papacy is using “aliens” and pagan prophecies like 2012 to bring all Anti Christ religions together under the Pope when I assume will act as if he did something to stop some catastrophic event (which will probably all be fake using holographic and sound technology) in December 2012.

I’m replying to ask for some prayers to help get me out of a situation which will at some point arise for me probably not in the far future.  My problem is that I’m in the US Army and I realized, especially after listening to your podcasts since April 2011 and reading you’re many articles on Vatican Assassins, that I’ve made a huge mistake by joining.  The Jesuit control of the military is very clear to me, it’s like a mixture of fascism and communism.  On a daily basis all I see is fellow soldiers being all gung ho about invading Iran and Newt Gingrich should be the next President, etc., then at the exact same time it’s full of political correctness (equal opportunity program) – affirmative action basically anti-White.  When I was at Fort Benning, Georgia, over the Summer for Basic Training I could see the blatant anti-White racism from the predominantly (98%) Black civilians that work on post at the Dfac and in processing center.  A lot of them were among the rudest people I’ve ever seen, yet they were much more polite and nice when interacting with a black or hispanic recruit.  Then there’s the fact that the Army is nowadays just full of sin; everyone is always bragging how many women they have slept with every weekend, there is far too much blasphemy using the Lord’s name in vain and then the homosexual acts that go on, even if it’s jokingly, it’s still disgusting.  They all seem to find it funny that I am still a 19-year old virgin and it’s their mission to get me laid.  I’d rather wait until marriage.  But those are all petty issues compared to the main problem I face, and that is what you talk about the coming fascism to come to the US, and I do not want to be a part of it.

First and foremost, I would like to tell you that I’ve been stationed at Fort Carson, Colorado which worried me when I first found out at Basic Training.  Because I read your articles about the Denver International Airport underground bunker/concentration camp and how Denver will become the new headquarters of the Jesuit leadership in the US soon.  If that’s the case Ft. Carson would probably play a major role in their plans.  I’ll state now that if I was ever given the order to fire on American civilians or take part of anything like that (civilians from any country for that matter) I’d refuse and rather take a bullet to the head from my fellow soldiers for it.  But I’d rather not even get to that point.  Plus there is the fact that it looks like the Jesuits, based on all the news, that it looks like WW3 is about to break loose to be obviously another controlled war on both sides to kill off the world’s population (Jews and Bible-believing Christians the main targets of course).  Obviously when Russia and China invade the US I have no qualms about fighting them to the end, but the problem is the Jesuits would have already planned on them destroying the US military which I know you already stated the Military will be betrayed in the Middle East (probably after invading Iran, which then Russia and China would invade us).  Since these are planned and controlled wars I don’t see the point in throwing my own life away like that for no reason; my main fear is that I won’t be able to get my family saved, especially my parents, with all the info I’ve gathered from you and others about the Jesuits, the NWO, and Bible Prophecy I am sure I could show them the truth; well, the Holy Spirit through me would show them the truth but I fear with the impending fascist rule to come and wars that I may not be able to show them and get them to follow the Lord Jesus Christ.  I’ve prayed to the Lord to somehow get me away from the Army and allow me to return home so that I could show my family the truth, either somehow one way or another get me a medical or general discharge.  Obviously, I would rather not get a dishonorable discharge for any reason, but for now just not being part of this corrupt govt. is my main concern and educating my family.

But sometimes I do wonder if I was placed at Fort Carson (because the govt. knew of my viewing habits on the internet and they wanted to keep a close eye on me) if God has some sort of plan for me here.  But I would like some prayers for the Lord to help me get out of the Pope’s Army so that I don’t have to partake in the coming holocaust to come in this nation and that instead I could stand against it.  Also some prayers for my family to accept Lord Jesus as their savior and see the truth if I am not able to help them find it myself.  When everything hits the fan in this country, I’d rather be with my family, hopefully getting them to know the Lord and Bible prophecy using info I’ve gathered from you and others, instead of fighting some controlled war in Iran or fighting off a Chinese invasion which we are doomed to fail since the Lord is pouring judgement on this country for all our sins (homosexuality, abortion, atheism/new age religions, etc., etc.).  Thank you for your time if you read this entire email, it would mean a lot to me if you sent me some prayers and I will continue to pray to the Lord to help my family get saved.  Until something happens I will do my best to educate my family over the internet/phone.

Thank you for your time, and keep up the great work Brother Eric,

Brother in Christ,

William

____________________________________________

Dear Brother William,

What an incredible email you have just written.

As to your family’s salvation in Christ, I shall pray for them that God would open their understanding to the light of the true gospel of the risen Lord Jesus Christ as stated in I Corinthians 15:1-4.  We shall plant and water; God will give the increase dear brother.

Thank you for being truthful on all points addressed which includes the blatant anti-White, Black hateful racism against all Whites in general.  I experienced this same outrageous treatment when in the Air Force from 1972-1977.  The US military is pro-Black/anti-White, pro-sodomite/anti-straight, pro-female/anti-male, and as you said, is a combination of fascism and communism.  And why has the Order done this to the once greatest military fighting force in world history?  To ensure its demoralization, debauchery and future defeat in the coming war with China, Russia and the united Muslim world of nations.

Therefore, you made a mistake in joining the US military, but it was done in ignorance and God will be gracious to you now that you seek to reverse your course.  You have repented and turned to the right path of seeking to exit the military.  I have prayed for you in the quest to leave without a dishonorable discharge, something to be avoided at all costs.  You must remain credible and maintain your honor, both of which would be lost to a DD.

The following is what I would do.  First, I would compose a letter to your commanding officer nearly identical with what you have written above.  Tell him of the hateful Black-on-White racism and the pro-sodomite, pro-female policies of the Army, all of which is intolerable as a heterosexual White man and as a Bible Believing Christian.  I would then tell him of your conviction that the Jesuits ruling the Vatican control the American military and are using it for Rome’s purposes of restoring the pope’s Temporal Power around the world—including the present papal crusade against Shia Islam.  I would then tell your commander that you believe 911 was a “black-op” of the American Intelligence Community overseen by Cardinal Egan’s key Knight of Malta and DCI at the time, Jesuit Georgetown University-trained George J. Tenet.  And thus, every drop of blood that has been shed in Afghanistan and Iraq is innocent blood for which we will be held accountable by the One True God and his Son, the Risen Lord Jesus Christ.

I would then conclude with these facts:

“1.  I can no longer carry out my oath in good faith as a soldier of the US Army.  For this Army that I joined, thinking that I was contributing in protecting my country, is really a killing machine for the pope of Rome.  We are garrisoned around the world for one reason: the benefit of the Jesuit papacy.  This renders me unable to carry out orders in the field, the Pope of Rome being my real commander.

“2.  I am concerned for the future domestic safety of my country and family and would rather defend America within our borders from traitors within and invaders without, including the Alien Roman Catholic Mexican invaders filling the southwest with robbery, rape and murder.  My Army refuses to protect Americans from these threats to the nation’s very survival.  This makes me a party to the crime.

“3.  I am also concerned over the developing White backlash (due to the anti-White Middle class policies of the present Obama Administration) that is leading to the establishment of a New Right, fascist military dictatorship which, in the end, intends to kill every Jew in North America.  My Army will be “the sword” in the hand of this coming dictator.  This will make me a party to that unthinkable crime that will result in the curse upon all those who persecute the racial seed of Abraham—the Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites—pronounced in Genesis 12:1-3.

“4.  I am concerned that Roman Catholic Knight of Malta Newt Gingrich will become the next American president, who may well launch the attack into Iran.  I believe his will be the final straw the will break the proverbial camel’s back.  Russia will enter the war and from then on, it will be an orchestrated annihilation of targeted populations, Americans being one of those targets.  This will make me a party to the crime of domestic and foreign civilian murder under the guise of fighting “the War on Terror.”

“Based upon the above, I am now requesting an honorable discharge or a medical discharge from active military service.  I love my country and love the legal purpose of my American Army, which is to protect and defend America from domestic insurrection and foreign invasion.  But since this is not the real purpose of the US Army of which I voluntarily joined, I hereby request an immediate meeting with you, my commander, to converse with you personally and begin the necessary paperwork for my honorable discharge from active duty.  I can no longer be a knowing party to the crimes of the American military serving the criminal, imperialistic designs of the Jesuit-ruled, Roman papacy.”

Such  would be my approach, dear brother William.

Lord bless,

Brother Eric

Beauty of Distinct Races Created by God through Noah and his Three Sons

The following exchange is between Omar and your Editor as to how a new Black American Nation could be established here in North America according to Biblical maxims.

______________________________________

DEAR ERIC,

THANK YOU VERY MUCH ERIC…YOU ARE GREATLY APPRECIATED…I HAVE A QUESTION THOUGH…

IN REFERENCE TO THE RACE TO WHICH I BELONG NAMELY THE FALSELY BRANDED “BLACK RACE”…I WHOLE HEARTEDLY AGREE WITH YOU THAT

WILLING SEPARATION OF THE RACES IN THIS LAND IS SENSIBLE…I AM NOT A HATEFUL RACIST I HAVE LIVED THE MAJORITY OF MY LIFE IN

A PREDOMINATELY “WHITE” SUBURB…MY QUESTION BEING

WHAT WOULD YOU RECOMMEND AS THE CORRECT STRATEGY FOR BLACKS TO IMPLEMENT ESTABLISHING THEIR SOVEREIGNTY AND

SEPARATION FROM THE U.S. CORPORATION?  I HEARD YOU RECOMMEND FOR WHITE PEOPLE TO SECEDE…WHAT SHOULD BLACKS DO

I AM AWARE OF MARCUS GARVEY…HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF THE NUWAUBIAN NATION CULT THAT SOUGHT OUT TO ESTABLISH

IN GEORGIA AND WERE ASSAULTED WITH ONE OF THE BIGGEST RAIDS IN FEDERAL HISTORY?

____________________________________________

Dear Omar,

I never heard of that raid, but know this: the pope’s Masonic/Papal Knight White Power Structure will NEVER allow Blacks to establish their own nation free from papal control.  This is why Malcolm X was murdered.  This is why Marcus Garvey was falsely charged, convicted and sent to prison later to be deported back to Jamaica.  This is why Black Protestant Liberia (created by White American Protestants and Baptists including Thomas Buchanan, brother of President James Buchanan) was destroyed by the Jesuits, and this is why Lincoln was assassinated for seeking to repatriate Blacks back to Africa.  Blacks are to be forced to live among Whites here in America to be used for the destruction of once high White Protestant/Baptist race and culture, the Blacks then to be “extirpated” after this diabolical use.

Now the correct strategy for American Blacks to establish their own nation within North America is a difficult question.  First, North America is the land of Shem, not Japheth or Ham.  All the Canadian and American Indian tribes are Shemitic.  According to Genesis 9, the racial sons of Japheth (both wicked “in Adam” and righteous “in Christ”) were given permission to live in the tents or lands of Shem.  This is why we see White peoples living in North America as well as in Central America, South America, Australia and the Far East.  The reason why Black descendants of Ham/Canaan also live in these lands is due to the fact of their pronounced “curse” of subordination to the sons of Japheth and sons of Shem as per Genesis 9:25.  (Remember, the White sons of Japheth and the Arab sons of Shem conducted the slave trade aided by subordinate Black tribal chiefs who captured certain African Black Hamites and sold them to the traders.)  So if there is to be a new Black nation to be established in the land of Shem (here in North America), that Black nation must be in some sort of subordination to a White nation in that land of Shem.  For Blacks have not been given permission to live in the tents of Shem, rather they have been subordinated to the sons of Shem, remembering the sons of Shem have never done anything for Black Africans—ever—except enslave them and force the diabolical religion of the pope’s Islam down their throats!  (Just this last August, 2011, the Shemitic Cherokee Supreme Court revoked tribal citizenship of racial Black Cherokees!  See the article here.)

Therefore, if North American Blacks wish to have their own nation somewhere here in this land of Shem, they must establish their nation via migration to a certain area.  Then they must declare their independence from the pope’s “Holy Roman” Fourteenth Amendment American Empire (1868-Present).  Once they have established their independence, they then can enter into a treaty with a White nation which treaty will indicate their submission to that existing White nation in North America.  This treaty of submission in exchange for protection from foreign invaders is called, in the law, a treaty of “suzerainty.”  My new White Protestant/Baptist/Calvinist nation of ProBaptiCal could enter into such a treaty with your Black nation.  My nation would be your overlord evidenced by a treaty between us in agreement with Genesis 9:25.  Your people would each pay a tribute tax to my nation of say ONE DOLLAR per year, which in turn would be given back to you for internal development of your nation.  Hence, we both have obeyed Genesis 9, but your people would benefit by our benevolent return of your tribute tax.

Now with the protection of ProBaptiCal, your Bible-believing nation of say “Africa America” could then be devoted to the survival and development of American Blacks without negative influence of Whites among you.  All citizens of AA are to be Black and only they can own land and vote.  There will be no foreign land ownership—ever!  And if AA is to prosper and be in health, it would need the oversight of my White nation in protecting it from the pope’s White Power Structure; for it takes righteous White men to successfully resist wicked White men.  Neither Blacks, nor Hispanics nor Asians have that ability if we are to learn from the history of the last 500 years.

This is the only way I see the success of an English-speaking, Black North American nation—which must be founded upon the AV1611 Reformation English Bible.

And I will do all that I can to make this happen.  Racial separation unto nationhood is the only answer to the present plight of both Whites and Blacks in North America.  This is the only way to avert the coming race war that the Jesuit papacy is stoking at this very minute via both Black and White Jesuit Temporal Coadjutors.

I trust this is helpful.

Lord bless,

Brother Eric

Dear Brother Hans,

What an email!  I never knew several of the facts  you have just written below.

I shall post this immediately.

May we both continue to pray for the Count and the Lord’s protection of his dear family.

Lord bless,

Brother Eric

_______________________________________

Dear Eric Jon Phelps,

Due to internet defamation, and identity theft, performed by enemies of the gospel, my online relationship with the Count of Venice has suffered
greatly in the past.  I have decided to publicize my experience with him, nothing but the truth, to once and for all dispel the myths surrounding your show.  Maybe you will be interested to read the following:

I would like to inform you that a year ago I was unsure as to the legacy of your work, and so I decided to visit one of the people who act as your
advisors, to verify whether they are who they claim to be online.  The person I contacted, Vittorio Viviano Vivaldi, also known as Count of Venice, would welcome me into his world only about a month thereafter.  I had heard many stories about him, and to be frank, I did not really know what to expect.  Other people that knew him claimed he was a Satanist, a Muslim, a Freemason or even a Knight of Malta secretly acting on behalf of the Jesuits.  As I arrived at Venice’s railway station, which was erected by Benito Mussolini’s fascists almost a century prior, I immediately recognized the Count waiting for me at the gate together with his wife Carla and one of his half-Palestinian children.

What was that?  I had expected to be met by some low-life, wanna-be aristocrat who was mainly living out of his father’s purse; instead, and much to my surprise, I saw a beautiful and joyous little family greet me immdediately after I stepped out of the train.

“Hans! Finally, we are so glad you are here!” were the Count’s words, and they admittedly made me feel very welcome in a city, which I had previously disdained for its excessive amount of tourists on a visit years before.  The Count and his little family surpassed any experience of hospitality I had ever encountered.  I was astonished to be invited to sleep over at his home, after he suggested he would pay for my booking’s cancellation fee at the hotel.

The moment I entered the Count’s home I felt the spirit of Christ in the surrounding atmosphere.  From the warnings I had received online, I expected to find a Satanic Bible somewhere on one of his bookshelves, ghost stories on his bedside, or at least some freemasonic idolatry.  Instead I was grateful to see that the Count keeps several Protestant Bibles within his walls, at least one in every major room.  One of them, a late 19th century Lutheran translation of the holy scriptures, was one of his gifts upon my departure. To this day it remains with me, and strenghtens the spirit of Christ within my soul.  For most of my time in Venice, the Count sacrificed his own precious time and hard-earned wealth to show me around the place and to make me more metaphysically familiar with his surroundings.  We visited Churches, a Synagogue, a Jewish Museum, as well as a charity the Count founded to support poor African immigrants that are stranded in Italy.

Unfortunately, due to our interest in the Jewish culture, we were attacked at one time during our walk throughout the city.  A group of young Muslim Turks (Identifiable due to their soccer shirts), waiting outside the Synagogue were hungry for visitors they could assault.  Hadn’t it been for the Count and his courage, we may have severely suffered in the process.  His knowledge of Turkish language and culture allowed us to escape the scene, as he diverted the scoundrels attention using his wits.  The Count grabbed my arm, and signalled me to make our way away from there and into the nearest local Carabiniere (Italian Police) station, which ironically was located right next to the Jesuit Church, inside the Jesuits’ disbanded Venetian headquarters.  We were lucky:  the criminals appeared to have lost track of us, as the Carabiniere refused to offer their help.  Instead they were furious, claiming the Count was on their watchlist and would stay on it due to his attempts at reforming his local media and Church.  In my opinion, they were simply unhappy to see an enemy of the Jesuits right inside their disbanded headquarters!

As I would find out, he is one of the most well-known men in Venice, famed for his labor not merely concerning his excellent musical instruments, but also in exposing bad deeds performed by seemingly “good men.”  My time in Venice concluded with a happy ending, as I was able to visit one of the Count’s organ concerts in a local Church.  His excellent skills on the harpsichord, the piano and organ allowed him the affection of the head of the Venetian Catholic Church, who, despite the Count’s determined will to Church reformation and a return to family values,  as well as increased support for a separation of protestant culture, supports the Count by allowing his musical talents to be expressed within Church ceremonies.

I would like to underline that I truly enjoyed my stay with the Count and his lovely family.  May his continued labor bring many lost Catholic souls in communication with your work and may he help to lead these towards the path of the one and true Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ!

I would like to thank you dear Mr. Phelps for your continued work and the great guests you have on your show.  I hope my story serves as an inspiration for fellow listeners to maybe leave their homes more often and to go on adventures that will truly benefit them in many ways.  As the Count said:

“Do not watch their movies my friend, live your own movie.  Feel the spirit of Christ enfold your heart as you live by his example.”

Hans

Daniel Interprets Nebuchadnezzar's Dream, Babylon, 580 BC

Brother Eric,

Here is a recent exchange I had with Brother Daniel Ben Shual, a Sephardic/Messianic/Christ-believing Jewish man from Israel. He and I communicate via Youtube regularly.

Lord Bless,

Brother Nick

________________________________________

Shalom brother Nick,

I wanted to get your take on something, whay do think about this belief that Texx jesuit Marrs is promoting saying that Crypto jews secretly seized the reigns of control in Rome and the cryto jews own the Vatican and that the jesuit order was really created by crypto jews and so the jeauits are Jewish etc… Texe Marrs is now promoting a book called “Solving the mysteries of babylon the great” by author Edward Hendrie. No doubt another clever jesuit deception of Rome to target the jews. Texe Marrs claims the Ignatious Loyola was a crypto Jew…but brother EJP says that Loyola was a spanish gentile….just wanted to get your thoughts.

My Responses in Red:

What do I think? I think its nonsense/poppycock. Ignatius of Loyola was no Jew! He was? a wicked White, Spanish-Basque Gentile, of the Black Nobility. Diego Laynez the second, or third Black Pope had Jewish blood in him, however since that time the Jesuits have excluded people of Jewish blood from being in the Order. The Devil you see hates the Hebrew Jewish Israelites! It makes perfect sense that he would use Papal stooges in the “alternative media” [as Co-Adjutor Texe Marrs is, whom I never really followed] to blame the Jews for the misery’s in the world when in reality it’s the Popes Jesuit White Power Structure which is responsible! Lord Bless, my friend!

My thoughts exactly…another jesuit smokescreen…this new idea that the jesuits are really crypto jews is sweeping people into eternal ruin, it is a clever deception.  I have talked to several others who know their jesuit history about this matter, and they all tell me the same thing, it is is not backed or founded by any credible historical sources.  This is just jesuit damage control that so that sneaky double agent Texe jesuit coajutor Marrs wont look like such a liar and a disinfo agent…what he dont relize is that it makes him look even more like a disinfo agent….at least to us who know the truth and wont be duped.  But? ole Texe’s cover has been blown and thats why he is scrambeling to make haste of his nakedness…Texe Marrs like his # 1 student Alex jesuit Jones is a crypto catholic….he perverts the scriptures.

Amen Brother, I love it. You see the exact same designs as I do my friend. Your exactly right Marrs and Jones are Crypto Roman Catholic’s blowing smokescreens for the Jesuits. The Jesuits love to do “damage control” by blaming you dear Jews for their wicked plots that are uncovered. For instance when they released the “Protocols of the Learned Elders Of Zion” during the Dreyfus affair trying to unleash anti-Jewish fury during their lead up to their “Second Thirty Years War” which they orchestrated by their assassin killing Franz Ferdinand in Sarejevo, and the Versailles Treaty overseen by Edmund Walsh SJ. You see the Germans treated the Jews failry in the East during the firsd? phase [WWI], but under Jesuit Hitler the Devil decimated your people by RACE not religion!!!

As you know my friend your people have a distinct Race[Yahushawah had to be of the seed of David]. Apostate Jew, Koestler is a liar. Thats why all the Nazi Nurnberg laws targeted the Jews by Race not Religion. As I mentioned the Versailles treaty above[overseen by the Jesuits] blamed all of the “first phase” [WWI] on Germany which was not correct. This made it so Jesuit rabble-rousers as Hitler could blame Germany losing the war on the “Jewish Stab in the back” plus their was tons of the Pope’s Masonic? Jewish Commies in Bavaria to help back up that claim. Of course we know it was Rome behind the whole thing through her Jesuits!!!

Shalom, feel free to post on my comment board as much as you please, your comments are? always welcome beacuse your straight on your facts and to the point….you are a goldmine of information on the workings of the jesuits. Keep it coming, your making a diffrence, cause I know that the pope(i call him the poop) himself has been on my channel and read both of our comments….

Thank you Brother, I’m humbled you think of myself that way. You really think the White? Pope, Josef Ratzinger has looked at your page? That would be crazy my friend! Were just a couple believers in “Yahushawah”, but that just shows “Yahuwah” through his beloved Son can work through us believers worldwide in the spreading of the truth. The Papacy seems to feel very threatened of late. Let’s hope and pray more “wake up”, repent, and start to speak the truth !!!

Yea, cause Joseph the? Rat zinger has his own YT page now, it’s crazy, and I went on there and commented on his board, {Revelation17} he blocked me, so I know that he has been on my page.

Now they won’t allow any comments from anybody, cause others were going on there and leaving hatefull remarks….but I am 99.99 % sure that my page has been viewed by the Papacy, cause the same day I left that comment, I got a warning in my inbox, and I didnt even say anything rude, I just quoted? Revelation 17…so who owns YT?

David

Knight of Malta James J. Angleton; Chief, CIA Counterintelligence; CIA Liaison with Soviet KGB and British MI5, 1975

Dear Andreas,

I shall post our dialogue, although I do not agree with your conclusion.  Since we agree that both the CIA and KGB worked together (as did its surrogates, the West German BND and the East German SSD) during the entire Cold War Hoax, I shall post this.  Others who read may come up with some further facts leading one of us to change our conclusion.  As you know, I welcome all correction set forth in a factual, cogent way as you have done that I may reconsider certain conclusions.

Both positions need to be reviewed.

Lord bless,

Brother Eric

______________________________________

Dear Eric:

Please don’t post it if I cannot win you over to my point of view by my below mentioned answer.

What would be the point of launching wrong information on matters like these.

I certainly don’t want to whitewash Golitysn if he was/is the man you say he is.

I took your core arguments seriously and think they are flawed.

I know you are somebody who cherishes only the better argument.  If I can’t convince you and you give me your reasons, I won’t be able to convince myself any more.  And vice-versa.

So please listen to my objections.

1.

Peter Wright: Any retired MI5 Assistant Director (!) is no truth-worthy source.

2.

You write:

“Golitsin was given the most secret files of the CIA by Angleton and the most secret files of the British MI5 by Roger Hollis according to ex-MI5 officer, Peter Wright.  This proves the collusion at the very top of the CIA, KGB and MI5/MI6”

Of course it proves the collusion at the top level. But as I have said:

Had this operation been for real, it would never have been nor needed to have been transacted in broad daylight – so sloppy, so traceable, that it was just a question of time until somebody discovered the files were missing. A long time – “maybe as long as three years” had passed by then. Don’t you think Angleton could at least retrieved them quietly long before without before?!

My conclusion continues reasonable to me: this charade was a decoy intended to frame Golitsyn for the ongoing killings and to rob the remaining loyal US and GB operatives of their confidence, making them leave Western intelligence services.

3.

Your argument:

“Golitsin’s truthful work on GP [GP = Glasnost/Perestroika ?] further confuses the seeker in seeking to substantiate Golitsin’s guilt or innocence as a Soviet spy or a real ‘defector’.”

My response:

This would only to apply to those very few of us who could judge his assertions to be “truthful” – those who knew already that the end of the Cold War was as fake as the whole Cold War in itself. A tiny group of people.

Moreover in 1995 the Golitsyn story was dead cold.

Ergo: Why would they bother to launch The Perestroika Deception to convince a bunch of people whose “conspirary knowledge” made them cases beyond any “retrieval” in the first place, and for whom this Golitsyn question was a comparatively little piece in the whole picture, one more detail only?

4.

In your quotation from his book on VAIII, p. 798, Peter Wright discredited Golitsyn making him look like a nitwit who didn’t give any information on KGB moles (see quotation VAIII, p. 798.).

But according to your argument, that’s exactly what Golitsyn’s task would have been: “Golitsin was the real deal – aided by the CIA to completely purge the KGB of real Russian patriots.”

And why would anybody have trusted him if he hadn’t given Western Intelligence anything substantial?  That would have made him suspicious right away, wouldn’t it?

5.

a. Opus Dei member of the Knights of Malta, William Colby: was he acting on his own – against Opus Dei?!  Maybe he had grown a conscience?  Yes, that’s possible, ok.

b. How do we know for sure the reasons for the murder of Eric Timm and Desmond Fitzgerald?  It seems we have to believe Anthony Cave Brown.  But even if we can trust him (I believe your judgement on his work “C”), he could have been mistaken on this one.  Nobody knows everything.  Happens all the time that we got something wrong.

But: They having been murdered at least provides both of them with some credibility. They may have opposed Angleton for having discovered one/some of the hundreds and thousands treasonous acts this demon committed, and assuming Angleton was a traitor, they wrongfully suspected  Golitsyn to be one too for the very fact that Angleton vouched for his authenticity and defended him.

6.

And finally Yuri Nosenko: is there any real prof to settle the question about where his loyalties lied.  The best argument brings up is his being tortured.  But this doesn’t prove anything if you send a strong and dedicated man.  Maybe a Coadjutor.  My point being: This whole Nosenko/Golitsyn controversy (and wasn’t there involved defector named “Fedora”?) created an embroilment of ultimately inconclusive data.

7.

There remain the “good points” in my original paper.

Sincerely yours

Andreas

P.S.: If I haven’t convinced you still, DON’T POST MY PAPER!

______________________________________

Dear Andreas,

I will post it, but I must disagree.

Anatoli M. Golitsyn was most assuredly the link between the Order’s Soviet KGB with the Order’s CIA via Knight of Malta James Angelton and Jesuit Fordham University-trained Knight of Malta Raymond Rocca.  Golitsyn was given the most secret files of the CIA by Angleton and the most secret files of the British MI5 by Roger Hollis according to ex-MI5 officer, Peter Wright.  This proves the collusion at the very top of the CIA, KGB and MI5/MI6—all subject to the Jesuit Papacy.  Golitsyn’s truthful work on “Glasnost Perestroika” further confuses the seeker in attempting to substantiate Golitsin’s guilt as a Soviet spy or innocence as a real “defector.”

CIA officers Eric Timm and Desmond Fitzgerald were both murdered for openly opposing Angleton’s collusion with Golitsyn.  See page 797 of VAIII quoting Treason in the Blood by Anthony Cave Brown.

Golitsyn lied about Yuri Nosenko stating he was a plant into the CIA, when in fact, Nosenko was a real “defector.”  Yuri in his own mind believed there was a real Cold War between the US and USSR, they supposedly being mortal enemies—a bold-faced lie!  After being tortured for three and one-half years by Angleton, Nosenko was found to be a real defector and went to work for the CIA.  Golitsin was protected by JFK assassin, brother Knight of Malta William F. Buckley, Jr., he claiming that Golitsin was not the “mole” within the CIA, Buckley knowing full-well it was Angleton who was the liaison between CIA and KGB by way of his absolute control of CIA Counterintelligence.

CIA Director William Colby later fired Angleton for which Colby was later “killed in a hunting accident.” All opposing Angleton were either driven from power in the CIA or were killed.

Golitsyn was the real deal—aided by the CIA to completely purge the KGB of real Russian patriots seeking to overthrow the Order’s Soviet Government born and built by the Pope’s International White Power Structure centered in London and Washington subject to Rome!

Let us always remember the Order has an open-but-false policy and a secret-but-true policy.  Concerning Golitsyn, the open policy was to treat him as a real defector when in fact he was not.  He was used to purge the KGB of CIA Russian patriots as well as to drive American patriots out of the CIA!  Wonderful!  Though several of Golitsyn’s warnings were true in his epic work, as you stated, the CIA never acted upon them—and Golitsyn secretly concurred in this action.  This is why he was paid by the CIA to write GP in the first place!  OPENLY publish facts that are true giving credence to his claim of being a real KGB “defector;” yet the understanding from the outset was that CIA would never act upon those warnings, the Soviets and Red Chinese perfecting their alliance for America’s coming Sino-Soviet-Muslim Invasion—to the delight of Roman Catholic Knight of Malta Golitsyn, protected by brother Knights Angleton, Rocca, Dulles, McCone and William F. Buckley, Jr.

No, Gloitsyn was a real agent for Rome building the Soviet side of the Black Pope’s dialectic between “the Communist East and the Capitalist West!”  And as we perceive, the USSR was built and the US was weakened in preparation for her invasion!

Lord bless,

Brother Eric

____________________________________

Dear Eric:

In VAIII (p. 796-798) you rendered a rather harsh verdict on Soviet defector Anatoli Golitsin.

However, I am convinced that the Jesuits’ Western intelligence services did everything to discredit and neutralize him right from the beginning. Golitsyn was framed and wrongfully accused in a most cynical fashion.

To prove my point of view, I would like to submit my following arguments to your attention.

Let me begin by quoting the decisive passages from your VAIII:

“Angleton . . . demonstrated his confidence in [Knight of Malta] Golitsin by making available to him the CIA files on the personnel of the main operating section of the CIA in the Cold War with Russia, the thousand-odd men and women of the Soviet Division. He settled in an apartment in New York City, where he was permitted to receive and read the files. During this period—perhaps three years—many of the personal and operational files were delivered to him . . . We’re talking about careers ruined, about mass resignations of counterintelligence people convinced that the CIA has been irrevocably penetrated by KGB pawns, about men we thought were our moles in Moscow—arrested and shot . . .” [...] „Golitsin was evacuated suddenly to a farm in upstate New York. The files were sent to him there but he never returned them. . . . When this was discovered, an operation was undertaken to retrieve them and, according to a CIA officer involved, ‘two vans were required to return them to the Agency—two van loads of our most secret files in the possession of a Russian in the boonies somewhere north of Albany! You can imagine what the FBI thought when they were told about what had happened to some of the most secret files!’ ” (see VAIII, pages as mentioned above)

Now first of all, the value of a defector generally lies in the intelligence he is bringing in, in this case from the Soviet Union.  If the CIA wanted to pass on the above-mentioned information, there is no point in doing so through a Soviet defector sitting in NY.  The whole argument is quite ludicrous.

Likewise, if traitor Angleton & Co. wanted to pass on this sensitive information to Golitsyn, they needn’t do so by handing him out loads of operational files in the above mentioned most conspicuous way, right in the limelight.  They seemed rather eager to draw everybody‘s attention to this monstrous procedure.

And that’s exactly what happened.  Everybody was made to believe that Golitsyn was the traitor responsible for the execution of American moles.  Another side effect were those “mass resignations of counterintelligence people convinced that the CIA has been irrevocably penetrated by KGB pawns”. Thus the Jesuits’ “operation Golitsyn“ elegantly purged the CIA of its last remaining upright agents, thereby killing two birds with one stone.

The Jesuits themselves put the very truth in the mouth of one of their contemporary “Jesuit theatre” players, the moment Knight of Malta Tom Cruise recognizes: “Golitsyn was a decoy. He was just a decoy!” (in Mission Impossible.  Everybody interested in this matter should view again this whole affair embedded in the main plot.)

At some point we can’t expect to understand the true nature of the Golitsyn case without studying The Perestroika Deception, written and published in his name in 1995.

There he complains that although having provided the Americans, British and French Secret Services with highly sensitive intelligence, being rewarded with the United States Government Medal for Distinguished Service and made Honorary Commander of the British Empire, and although those intelligence services appeared to be highly interested in his disclosures, he had to witness his warnings going completely unheeded through the 30-year period he provided the CIA with his Memoranda.  He then decided to present his Memoranda to the public in his second book, The Perestroika Deception.

Before we advance, let’s consider the possibility that his book is a forgery intended to influence public opinion in some way. The CIA could be behind it.  Or maybe the Vatican [which we know would amount to the same]?

But more importantly we shouldn’t forget that a forgery has to be credible in order to manipulate the reader.  Now, the author argues that not only did the CIA authorize the publication of his memoranda [ibid. p. XIX], but also didn’t heed his warnings.  This either puts the whole CIA’s assessment against his own or – if allowing for the possibility that the CIA had in fact taken counter-measures – would testify to the author’s ignorance.

In addition, employing Golitsyn in 1995 would have been tantamount to beating a dead horse, for then he had already been scared long ago by endless debates on his credibility, with a variety of conflicting theories leading nowhere but to confusion.

Therefore it appears reasonable to assume Golitsyn’s authorship of The Perestroika Deception.

Nevertheless he could still be wrong or just delirious. Therefore we have to take a closer look at his statements.

First, Golitsyn ironically opens with the following epigraph dedicated to James Angleton:

“In memory of Jim Angleton, founder and outstanding chief of the Central Intelligence Agency’s Counter-intelligence, a man of vision and courage, a warrior and comrade-in-arms, who recognized the dangers of the Soviets’ new strategic challenge.”

I say “ironical” because his relationship with Angleton is very much identical to Charles Manning’s relationship to Allen W. Dulles.  Manning, right at the beginning of his highly recommendable Martin Bormann – Nazi in Exile (1981) heartily thanks “Allen W. Dulles [!], for his encouragement and assurance that I was ‘on the right track, and should keep going’’’.

Dear Eric, in one of your posts (title: “Knight of Malta Raymond Rocca: CIA Traitor to Americans and Builder of KGB”) you wrote:

‘James Angleton, Soviet KGB ‘defector’ Anatoli Golitsin and Raymond Rocca had secretly worked together for several years in purging all CIA operatives in Russia which totaled over 1000, while destroying true Soviet defectors such as Yuri Nosenko.  Indeed, Golitsin refused to speak with any CIA officers save Angleton and Rocca! (Anthony Cave Brown’s Treason in the Blood (1994) makes this collusion quite clear, although Brown, like English Knight of Malta Avro Manhattan, refused to admit the obvious connection between CIA and KGB, he promoting Rome’s false dialectic of ‘the Cold War.’)”

On the other hand, in The Perestroika Deception, page XVII, Golitsyn writes that “on arrival in Washington, I asked to be received by President Kennedy.  I was assured by General Taylor, the President’s security adviser, that the President would see my appropriate contributions.  Mr. Robert Kennedy, the Attorney General, told me that in due time a meeting with the President would be arranged.  General Taylor wrote to me in the following terms: […] I wish to assure you that the officials with whom you are now in contact have the full authority and responsibility for handling matters of this nature, and I therefore request that you give them your complete cooperation. […] You may be confident that information concerning your contribution will be brought to the attention of the President if and when appropriate. ”

If true, this would signify they made sure Golitsyn didn’t meet JFK.

I suggest that Golitsyn was quarantined right from the beginning with Angleton and Rocca acting as his “guardian angels”.

As I said, it is impossible to discuss the case without having studied attentively The Perestroika Deception.

One of Golitsyn’s assignments was to serve as senior analyst in the NATO section of the Information Department of the Soviet intelligence service from 1959 to 1960, precisely at the time when Soviet long-range strategy was being designed over a period of one generation with the KGB being reorganized to play its part in it.  Below you find some of his statements (there is much more “meat”!).  What is really interesting now is to see how astoundingly Golitsyn’s information coincides with what we know about the Jesuits’ machinations:

• Perestroika was no genuine people’s revolution but conceived by the Soviet leadership between 1958 and 1960, introduced from above as a Party-controlled democratization movement, “conducted by the Communist Parties, their apparatus, their security services and their armed forces.” (ibid, p. 102)  […];

• The Prague Spring in 1968 and the founding of the polish trade-union movement “Solidarity” in 1980 were planned soviet exercises in social engineering; rehearsals for launching the real thing later, the Perestroika;

• The “natural aging and death of Stalin’s former victims resulted in the disappearance of active anti-Communists and the general acceptance of the régime by the Soviet population.  By the 1980s, there were no social democrats or politically active nationalists left alive in the USSR. By then, the KGB and the Party apparatus had succeeded in creating conditions in which only they could form strong grass roots organizations. ” (ibid, p. 15) “A generation’s delay was needed for Stalin’s victims and their jailers to pass away before the final phase of the strategy could be introduced.” (ibid, p. 102);

• “Gorbachev was selected, coached and prepared for this appointment by the late Suslov and Andropov and by Ponomarev and Gromyko” (ibid, p. 188);

• Perestroika did not lead to the disintegration of the Soviet Union, for is it the Communist Party which continues to exercise full control of foreign policy, defense and security as well as key industries of the new “independent” countries.  In this context Golitsyn points out that “the leverage which continues to be exerted by the provision of oil, gas and electricity via networks established by the ‘former’ USSR, constructed prior to ‘perestroika’, remains as powerful as under the overt Soviet Bloc system.” (ibid, p. 102)  “The fact that there have been no significant disclosures by the new ‘democratic’ governments about the important secret agents of the security services operating among their respective leading ‘dissidents’, intellectuals, scientists, cultural and religious leaders or cultural defectors, confirms that continuing use will be made of the political, intelligence and security potential of these countries to further the strategy of convergence.” (ibid, p. 99-100) (the meaning of “convergence” will become clear further below)

• The split between Communist China and the Soviet Union never happened but was a “common strategic disinformation operation to secure the successful preparation of their common strategy of ‘restructuring’. […] Gorbachev’s ‘perestroika’ and Deng’s ‘Four Modernizations’ are two similar elements in the final phase of the common strategy.” (ibid, p. 35);

• “It should be remembered, too, that the emergence of ‘perestroika’ in Russia was accompanied by the tightening of military and political control in China, starting with the Tienanmen Square episode.  Far from being coincidental, this was the result of a joint Sino-Soviet decision – confirmed during Gorbachev’s visit immediately ahead of the Tienanmen Square provocation – that, while one main pillar of the Leninist world was engaged in ‘perestroika’, the other should be held under firm control.  Similarly, the introduction of a Chinese version of ‘perestroika’, which may be expected in China after the death of Deng, would be a probable reason for a tightening of control in Russia⁹⁵.” (ibid, p. 229);

• Both the 1991 coup against Gorbachev and its failure through Yeltsin’s “heroic” stand at the White House of Russia were calculated Soviet operations.  “The real participants both in the ‘coup’ and in the ‘failure’ were some 20,000 or more chosen Komsomol and Party members in Moscow with two or three tank divisions guided by their political commissars and a handful of dedicated Party officials and generals who sacrificed their prestige in the interest of the Party’s strategy and under the guidance of its strategists” and “the main external objective of the display was to demonstrate to the West that Soviet democratization is genuine, that is has the support of the people and that it is working.”

(ibid, p. 141) [in bold by Golitsyn] Moreover, “the ‘White House’ provocation⁵⁹ has provided the strategists with a pretext for reasserting control from the centre” (ibid, p. 163);

? There never was any genuine Chechnyan independence movement.  Instead, it was artificially engineered and carried out by what is known as a “counter gang”, that is, units or groups run by their own government, usually through double agents.  In the Chechnyan case this was done for various reasons: a) “Contrived and televised Russian military bungling during the Chechnyan campaign has sent a strong message to the West that Russian military leaders are divided amongst themselves and that there is widespread incompetence and low morale in the army – factors which demonstrate that it can be discounted as a serious military adversary for the foreseeable future.” (ibid, p. 227); b): “The televised spectacle of Russian barbarity in Chechnya has aroused apprehension in neighboring states of comparable Russian military operations against themselves, thereby strengthening the argument that former members of the Warsaw Pact should be admitted to membership of NATO⁹³” (ibid, p. 228).  According to Golitsyn, one major idea underlying Perestroika was what of Sun Tzu who wrote, in his The Art of War:  “When you are weak, make the enemy believe you are strong.  When you are strong, make the enemy believe you are weak.”

• “China is destined to become a primary Soviet partner in the future World Government towards which Moscow and Peking are jointly proceeding.” (ibid., p. 36)

• “The final period of ‘restructuring’ in the United States and Western Europe would be accompanied, not only by the physical extermination of active anti-Communists, but also by the extermination of the political, military, financial and religious élites.  Blood would be spilled and political re-education camps would be introduced.  The Communists would not hesitate to repeat the mass repressions of their revolution in 1917, of the Soviet occupation of Eastern Europe in the Second World War or of the Chinese Communist victory of 1949.48  This time, they would resort to mass repressions in order to prevent any possibility of revolt by the defeated, and to make their victory final.” (ibid., p. 34)

• “Their [the perestroikan Communist's] vision includes the extermination of the American and European capitalist and élites.” (ibid., p. 38)

• “The pragmatic ground for a new American response to ‘perestroika’ is the need to protect and preserve the American system from ‘restructuring’ and convergence with the Soviet system and to save the American people from the blood baths and re-education camps which such convergence will ultimately bring.” (ibid., p. 42)

• “Behind the mask of diplomatic and political cooperation and partnership with the Unites States and Europe, the current Russian leaders are following the strategy of their predecessors and working towards a ‘New World Order’.  When the right moment comes the mask will be dropped and the Russians, with Chinese help, will seek to impose their system on the West on their own terms as the culmination of a ‘Second October Socialist Revolution’.” (ibid., p. 158) [in bold by Golitsyn]

• “The final goal of Soviet strategy [is] the convergence of the capitalist West with the Communist East on Soviet terms and the creation of a World Government as a solution to the arms race and nuclear confrontation⁹.” (ibid., p. 10)

But Golitsyn was wrong on two major points:

First, as you state in VAIII, Golitsyn came from a catholic family and later was made Knight of Malta.  He defected, believing he could trust the West.  After all, the West was the enemy of his enemies, the Soviets.  Golitsyn had no idea that the power-wielding elite in the U.S. and the Soviets were ultimately playing for the same club: the Jesuits!

That’s why he never came to terms with the U.S.’s refusal to heed his warnings.  America’s secret establishment and their Jesuit masters knew all too well what Golitsyn was talking about, he was “carrying coals to Newcastle”.

Secondly, the information he was allowed to receive as a Soviet KGB officer, was wrapped up in Cold War terms and concepts.  Golitsyn naturally assumed the Soviets would continue to seek Soviet world control and hence try to infiltrate and finally take over the West.  There he overestimated the Soviet’s might, understandable as it was for a Soviet citizen.

True, Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania and Slovakia were allowed membership both in NATO and the European Union.  By letting them in, NATO and the European Union let in as many Trojan horses which are currently commanding some significant 97 of the European Council’s total of 345 votes.

The current European Union’s staggering velocity in imposing a pure breed Fabian-socialist government on all EU member states seems to confirm his prediction.

But both the former Soviet Republics joining NATO and the EU and the Fabian-socialists taking over the EU isn’t due to “ex-“Soviet or Russian activities.  Instead, it has been made possible only because “the West” – the Jesuits! – let it happen. (Let’s bear in mind here that the Jesuits’ “West” built communist Russia right from its inception in 1917, making it one more of their “reductions”.)

Dear Eric, I would be honored if you posted this article on your website, provided you agree with its content.

I had to write this article in a little hurry. Please excuse any lapses.

Andreas

Jesuit Nicholas Roerich, Bolshevik Adviser to Cheka Inquisitor Felix Dzersinski, 1920; Creator of the Great Seal of the United States on US One Dollar Bill, 1934

Dear Brother Douglas,

Indeed, Rome is the font of all socialism regardless of its name—as you state below.  Bismarck, the Protestant Lutheran Iron Chancellor of the Protestant Second German Reich (1871-1918) called these left-wing socialists “Red Socialists” and the right-wing socialists “Black Socialists.”

Agreed: “One race, one Nation” is the biblical policy set forth in the Old Testament and is clearly the policy for the Nation of Israel.  Race-mixing/amalgamation leads to the loss of racial identity, cultural identity, national origin/history and in the end the complete dissolution of the country as Jesuit Edmund A. Walsh stated this being the main cause for the the Russian Revolution—controlled by the Jesuits.  I address this topic on in my 2008 Conspiracy Conference Power Point in detail.

Jesuit Edmund A. Walsh was at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 looking after the interests of the Black Pope.  In 1922 Walsh would be in the Order’s new “USSR” negotiating as “the mediator” between the Vatican and the Bolsheviks!  (See Descent Into Darkness by James Zatko (1965).  In truth, he was there to place Jesuit Coadjutor Joseph Stalin as head of the Communist Party, Stalin to later eliminate every leading Jew in the revolution save Lazar Kaganovitch—his token Papal Court Jew!

“Democracy” as we know it today is, in fact, “Radical Democracy,” the same beast employed by the Jesuit-ruled Jacobins in France during the French Revolution; the same beast employed by the Jesuit-ruled Radical Red/Black Republicans during the American War Between the States (1861-65).  And Illuminized Masonic Jew Karl Marx, Horace Greeley’s overseas correspondent for the New York Tribune, called the American “Civil War” a “Communist Revolution.” Indeed it was!

Later, World War I (the opening act of the Black Pope’s Second Thirty Years’ War, 1914-1945), was fought by President Woodrow Wilson (guided by his Secretary, Knight of Columbus Joseph P. Tumulty he in turn being under orders from “American Pope” James Cardinal Gibbons of Baltimore) as the war to end all wars “making the world safe for democracy.”  That democracy was socialist-communism, “from each according to his ability, and to each according to his need” fully perfected by the Jesuit Order on its South American Reductions (1609-1759).  Professor Walter Veith has done an excellent job in proving the Vatican origin of socialist-communism.

Yes, our beloved Oliver Cromwell hated communism (identified in his day as “the Levelers”) as well as cartel-capitalism (the monopolists stealing the wealth of the Protestant and Baptist English/Scottish/Irish people).

Keep up your most important work. Chris Strunk can give you insights to the Jesuit origin “Social Justice” being based on socialist-communist doctrine in addition to the Order’s Fabian Socialist propaganda known as “the White Man’s Burdon,” i.e., that all White men—especially White Protestant and Baptist nations—have the responsibility to bring the Black nations up to the par of White nations.  Thus, we have the cleverly manufactured “moral justification” to tax Middle Class Whites and give to the Lower Class Blacks to, in fact, destroy the historic White Anglo-Saxon Protestant/Baptist Middle Class peoples from America to England to South Africa in accordance with the Counter-Reformation Council of Trent (1545-1563).

Lord bless,

Brother Eric

_____________________________________________

Catholic socialism (1895)

http://www.archive.org/details/catholicsocialis00nittiala

http://www.archive.org/details/catholicsocialis00nittiala

http://www.archive.org/details/catholicsocialis00nittiala

Dear Brother Eric

If you are still researching Vatican Socialism this will be a good source for you.

The Vatican replaced a strong cultural nationalism with Racial Socialism.

Good examples are La Raza / leftist – Chicano Socialism or Aryanism combined with the Nazi NSDAP.

You see, what the Vatican did was tie together a populist solution with a false sense of culture or nationalism.

A great example is the “Aztlan” myth used to spur the Mexicans into violent invasion of the USA.

Aztlán and MECHA are un-factual and not historical.

I have a book I could loan you on the subject detailing the complete mythology. (Aztlán: Essays on the Chicano Homeland)

As you have exposed — and what the people on Craig’s UHM can find; most ALL of the socialist movements since the concept started (being either leftist or fascist) were all run by the Vatican.

My hypothesis is they needed this system to “borg” nations who would not ultimately bend to their open religion.

The Maryknoll Jesuits are all into publishing this socialist crud including the “Black Theology” of James Hal Cone.

You see again how a false sense of cultural nationalism is combined with Socialism with the RCC pulling the strings?

A while back I promised to expose Social Justice and its use in America after going over Liberation Theology in South and Central America.

It has proven to be more difficult than I anticipated because both the right and left Socialists take great care to cover the Vatican’s tracks as the authors.

Instead they put some figurehead up front like Obama or Stalin or Hitler.

I recently discovered this strange twisted concept after some time thinking.

This is why I think your work is so important because in order for the Pope to take over all the nations he had to devise (or his Jesuits did) a control system that did not make the general public feel as if they were abandoning their cultural identity.

The Jewish man Natan Sharansky gives speeches on strong cultural nationalism because he was a victim of Soviet prison’s and Refusenik.

Look these up they are very interesting.

The only solution to break this takeover methodology is a “one race one nation” policy.

If a nation is under multi-cultural chaos it cannot and will not resist Jesuit takeover and domination.

Thomas Hobbes I feel identified this concept in his Leviathan.

What could be more greater than a cultural absolute figurehead to guide and protect a nation?

Was this not the position Cromwell assumed?

“1919 World Democracy” as it could be called is a illusion.

Whoever was behind the Paris Peace Conference must have had Catholic sympathies.

Democracy has been used to usurp public control into the hands of a few unanimous Masonic US Congress with no public allegiance.

Very interesting concepts.

I’ve been accumulating a lot of books on these subjects for a eventual study.

Doug

Mehmed II Conquered Apostate Orthodox Constantinople, 1453

Dear Brother Marco,

Here is my following critique.

As you know, the Mahdi/12^th Imam is the Islamic version of the biblical Antichrist/Man-Beast.

The false “Jesus the Prophet” of Islam is the Islamic version of the biblical False Prophet—who will, in fact, be a Jew in charge of the Third Hebrew Temple yet to be built for the Pope of Rome.

The other Jesus of Islam who is called “a false prophet and Son of God” to be killed by the Mahdi is, in fact, the true Lord Jesus Christ.

Rome created Islam via Muhammad (violently driving away Arabs from believing on the true Son of God) and thus has sought to redirect attention away from the real Antichrist who shall be Roman into a mythological Islamic Antichrist that is “Syrian.”

The Antichrist is described as “the King of Tyre” who is indwelt by Satan (Ezekiel 28:1-19).  The Antichrist will rule over Tyre in his future kingdom, but his origin is not Tyre (Lebanese of Syrian): He is a Roman (Daniel 9:26).

The Antichrist is described as “the King of Babylon” and will rule over a rebuilt City of Babylon, but his origin is not from Syria or Iraq/Babylon: He is a Roman as were the six previous Roman Caesars (Revelation 17:10) of the Fourth World Empire that is Roman.

The Antichrist is described as “the Assyrian” and will rule over the region of Assyria that will be governed by the Antichrist’s capital city of Babylon, but his origin is not from Assyria.  He is a Roman that arises from the Roman Empire, later Revived with active Ten Horns/Ten Kings (Revelation 13:1-2) unlike the Roman Empire in its previous form whose Ten horns/Ten Kings were inactive from 31 BC to 476 AD.

The Antichrist is not Syrian or a Muslim as Dyer, Hagee, MacArthur, Robertson and others state.  This rhetoric is creating a hatred for all Muslims in the west so as to fuel Protestant and Baptist Bible-believers to fight the pope’s present Crusade against Islam.

We know that the Antichrist/Man-Beast will be a Roman Caesar just as much as were the six Roman Caesars that preceded him.  We know, after the Lord’s destruction of the Russian Gog and his Islamic armies at about mid-70th week (as Israel is enjoying the false peace and safety of her covenant with death of Isaiah 28:15), the Roman Papal Caesar will be killed, revived, and take control of the entire Middle East region, he to sit on his throne in his new capital in Babylon City.  Therefore he, as the Eighth Roman Caesar Antichrist living his same body when he was the Seventh Roman Caesar Pope, will take on a new identity, a new name, worship a new god and be identified by the regions he governs (Assyria, Babylon, Tyre).  He is not “the king of the north” of Daniel 11:40; this is another Russia king having regathered his forces after having five sixths destroyed just prior to mid-70th week of Daniel (Ezekiel 38).

The Restrainer of II Thessalonians 2:6 is not Michael the Archangel.  Michael has not the power to restrain Satan at this time in human history.  In the future, Michael will cast Satan out of heaven at mid-70^th week (Revelation 12:9), and he shall protect the Jews in the wilderness from Satan’s armies (Daniel 12:1).  Only the Person of the Holy Spirit, now resident in the Church as the Comforter and not resident in heaven as the Person of the Holy Spirit, can restrain Satan’s quest of manifesting that man of sin.  The Third Person of the Biblical Triune God is resident in the earth, He is not in heaven at this time just as the Second Person of Triune God was on earth as a Man during his ministry as the Lord Jesus Christ.  During those three and one half years, the Person of God the Son was not in heaven.

The apostasy of II Thessalonians 2:4 is literally “the departure.” The question is who has departed, or what has been departed from?  Is this a specific departure of the Church/Body of Christ from the biblical faith in Christ? If so, what is that specific event known to all believers?  Or is it the specific departure of the Church (to whom Paul is speaking in Greece) from this world via the indwelling Person of the Holy Spirit?  It can only be the last choice.  After that specific “departure” known to all believers in Christ, only then can that man of sin be manifested.  Thus, the Church/Body of Christ will not spend one day on earth within the 70^th week of Daniel.  The gospel of Christ could never compete with the miracles of the two prophets to be in the streets of Jerusalem (Revelation 11:3-12) the day that “covenant with death” is confirmed.

The Jesuits never authored “the blessed hope” of the Christian that the Apostle Paul had so declared in Titus 2:13.  He said “WE which are alive and remain shall be caught up” (I Thess. 4:17).  Paul did not expect to die; he expected to be alive at the time he would depart this world to be with Christ.  The Jesuits created a counterfeit hope so as redirect attention of believers away from the papacy and its final pope to be the Antichrist while using that heresy to justify a non-resistance to papal political intrigue.

Our story today is this:

Notable Bible teachers are seeking to incite a unified Catholic/Protestant/Evangelical/Baptist people of the West to fight a papal crusade against the Islamic nations in the Middle East.  In so doing, all attention is being directed away from the Jesuit Papacy and its infallible Pope, to the Middle East and Islam as the source for the coming Antichrist/Man-Beast—who is indisputably a Roman.

Lord bless,

Brother Eric

_____________________________________________

Email brethren,

Let’s put our head together on how the islamic end times will contrast with biblical end times… because both have a Jesus coming back, one false, one true.

Here are some helpful clips speaking on the similarities between Christian and Islamic eschatology for those new to muslim eschatology…

John MacArthur on Islam and Chrisitan end times: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4JR-H6PQjY#t=35m00s
Muslim on Mahdi (truly the biblical antichrist): http://www.5min.com/Video/The-End-Times-and-The-Mahdi-246739695
More on biblical comparison by a nkjv reader but good insight on islam: http://vimeo.com/12996480

This islamic revolution virus is a sign of the coming mahdi aka 12th imam… Now we need to see how the final pope will come into play. Think ecumenism and the next to announce the next pope is in direct dialogue with muslims and we know of Rome’s control of modern-day Islam using the likes of Fethullah Gulen, Yahya Pallavicini and SMOM Felice Abdul Wahid Pallavicini. Let’s not forget Peter-Hans Kolvenbach SJ controlling the Roman Middle East command point in Lebanon.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSmVaUiHoQM << Next to announce new pope is in talks with muslim world… HINT HINT!

Brother Marco

Daniel in the Lions' Den, 6th Century BC

Dear Doreen,

I don’t know if I quite understand your missive below, but I will attempt to reply.  You have not hurt me but motivated me to respond that I might correct some misapprehensions and beliefs on your part.

First, I enjoyed portions of your video, especially as to the Jesuit penetration and present control of Judaism, both Reformed and Orthodox.  This is not surprising as the Jesuit is to become all things to all men by means of deception to bring all men under the Temporal Power of the Pope of Rome.  The same has been done within every Protestant denomination and many Baptist denominations.

Now to your points:

Mark 7:27 and Matthew 7:6 and 15:26 concern Yeshua’s mission to ONLY the lost sheep of the house of Israel.  None of these passages state that Yeshua commanded that the Torah not be taught to Gentiles.  He is merely stating that the children to whom he was sent were the Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites, not to non-racial Jews.  These children of the lost sheep of Israel were the heirs of the Abrahamic and Davidic Covenants.  This is summarized by the Apostle Paul in Romans 15:8 when he stated that Messiah came to confirm the promises made to the fathers—Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, the 12 sons and David.

Secondly, I am a White Euro-Gentile, that is correct.  I have never thought that I am smarter than the man I think is God, and I never “interpret” his admonitions to suit my purposes.  I read what is recorded of Him in the Holy Scriptures in a literal fashion, holding to the natural and obvious meaning of words, phrases, paragraphs and entire contexts.  So when it states that Adonai Messiah ben David would be “the Mighty God,” I believe it (Isaiah 9:6).  When it states that the shepherd of Jehovah would be the fellow or equal (“amithi”) of Jehovah, I believe it (Zechariah 13:7).  When it states that Messiah is the Son of God, I believe it (Psalm 2:2, 7, 12).  When it states that the One to be born in Bethlehem to ultimately rule the people of Israel is in fact from everlasting as is only Jehovah, I believe it (Micah 5:2).  When the LORD Jehovah states that the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem shall literally look upon “me whom they have pierced,” I believe it (Zechariah 12:10).   When God refers to Himself  as “us,” indicating a plurality within the One God, I believe it (Genesis 1:26; 11:7; Isaiah 6:8).  When it states that the One God is a plurality via “the LORD our God (Elohim”—plural translated “gods” in Genesis 3:5) is one LORD, ” (Deuteronomy 6:4) indicating a plurality within the One True God, I believe it.

My White Gentile people having believed the gospel of the risen Yeshua Messiah, have not twisted his words.  We realize the he was sent, not to establish the Church (to the exclusion of Romanism), later called the Body of Christ; rather, he was sent only to Israel to call the nation to national repentance that he in turn would establish the Davidic Kingdom, its world capital being in Jerusalem as foretold by the prophets (Isaiah 2:1-4).  But in his rejection by the Nation of Israel (thank God!) salvation has been extended us Gentiles for the last nearly 2000 years.  (We do not hate the Jews for this and call them “Christ-killers” as do the Romanists; rather we thank God and do not persecute the Jews for this that was foretold in the first place!)  When that “fullness of the Gentiles” is completed, God will again deal with the Nation of Israel (Romans 11:25). After her “time of Jacob’s trouble,” (Jeremiah 30:7) the nation will be repent and be born in a day (Isaiah 66:8).  Then shall Adonai Yeshua ha Maschiach ben David sit on the throne of his father David and rule the re-gathered Nation of Israel in the land of promise forever (II Samuel 7:16).  With the understanding of Genesis 12:1-3, we White Protestant and Baptist peoples—when our leaders and majority of our people within historic Protestant and Baptist nations truly believed the Bible—NEVER persecuted the racial Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites who we permitted to dwell in our midst.  Therefore, pursuant to the blessing of Genesis 12:3, we were Blessed by the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.  The White Roman Catholics never believed the Bible and therefore always persecuted you Jews.  This is why the Pope’s Eurasian Jewish Holocaust was successful: White Catholic peoples carried it out within the Pope’s Jesuit-modeled SS and Gestapo, with the aid of a few apostate White Protestants—like Martin Bormann whose son became a Jesuit Priest!  The Protestant Second German Reich never persecuted Jews as a matter of Luther’s Bible Doctrine (Luther Never wrote On the Jews and their Lies as I prove in VAIII); the Roman Catholic Third Reich killed Jews by the millions—as a matter of Jesuit papal doctrine.

I do not try to do anything as far as living life for the Glory of God is concerned.  I yield to the Holy Spirit of God residing within me (due to my gifted salvation in Messiah Yeshua—Ephesians 4:30), that same Spirit of God Who was involved in the creation of the world (Genesis 1:2).  I am yielding to the Sprit of God and He then bears his fruit through me (Galatians 5:22-24).

As to your “Sages,” if they reject that Yeshua is the Messiah, the Son of the living God (Psalm 2), then they are of that spirit of Antichrist (I John 4:3); and their synagogues are synagogues of Satan (Revelation 3:9).  These Sages have no circumcised hearts (Deut. 10:16; 30:6).  Their religion is merely a body of works salvation, of self-reformation apart from being indwelt by the Spirit of the LORD (Ezekiel 36:23-27) and apart from being under the New Covenant (Jeremiah 31:31-34).  True, we Gentiles knew nothing of the One True God of Israel, until certain of us Gentiles believed the gospel of Messiah unto salvation (Romans 1:15-17; I Corinthians 15:1-4).  We were without Messiah, aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, strangers from the covenants of promise (Abrahamic and Davidic), having no hope, and we were without God in the world (Ephesians 2:11-12).

As to Satan, the god of this world (II Corinthians 4:4), I never sought to grab him by the horns.  First, he has no horns; secondly he is the most powerful spiritual being in the universe save the risen Son of God and God His Father.  I resist Satan by the power of the Holy Spirit through the sword of the Spirit, the Word of God (Ephesians 6:17).  When resisted like this, he flees; when resisted with man’s wisdom and strength, he conquers.

As to Ignatian Spirituality, this is nothing more than the “doctrines of devils”  that result in demon possession.  Ignatius Loyola has nothing to do with the One True God, His Son, the Holy Spirit of God or the Word of God.  Ignatius has nothing to do with the true Messiah foretold in the Old Testament and revealed in the New Testament; as the Sons of Loyola destroy or counterfeit every Bible they can find.  They ran the Holy Office of the Inquisition and conducted both Hitler’s Third Reich and Stalin’s Communist USSR in destroying the Jews of the old Pale of Settlement.  So please do not identify me or my people with anything to do with Ignatius LIEola, that Spanish Knight Templar seeking to conquer the world for the Pope of Rome!

As to the Church fathers, I repudiate all of them including Augustine who was one of four of the foremost Roman Catholic “theologians,” a hater of Jews and whose Order of Augustinians created Islam tutoring Muhammad.  The Church fathers, as I have read many of them, disagree with each other on most points of doctrine and Rome loves to occupy her enemies in reading these masters of confusion.  This is how the Order conquered the Protestant ministers during the 19^th century—preoccupying them with the reading of the Church Fathers instead of the Holy Bible born out of the Protestant Reformation.

Yes, historic, Reformation Bible-based Protestantism is as different from past and present Reformation Bible-rejecting Roman Catholicism as is day from night, as is heaven from hell!  And after the resurrection of Messiah as foretold by the prophets Isaiah and David, he commanded his disciples to preach the gospel to the Gentile nations (Matthew 28:18-20).  After the gospel of the Davidic Kingdom was rejected by Israel, the gospel of the grace of God in the risen Messiah Yeshua was then preached to the Jew first and then to the Gentiles (Romans 1:16).  Upon belief of the gospel of Messiah, both Jews and Gentiles are baptized by the Spirit of God into the same Body of Christ (Ephesians 3:6).  Further, by preaching the gospel and the whole counsel of God to Gentiles, we White Gentile races became benevolent to the Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites, as Satan is no longer our spiritual father (Ephesians 2:2).  The history of White Protestant nations proves this point.

Concerning Yeshua ben Pandera of the Talmud (Oral Law of the Orthodox Jews which they put on par with the Written Law), his man is not Yeshua of Nazareth and is a figment of the imaginations of the writers of the Talmud, the very Talmud that states that Jesus of Nazareth was a bastard and his mother a Whore.  Does this not embarrass you Doreen, especially when we White Gentiles who believe the Bible of the Protestant Reformation have given you permission to live among us unmolested—despite that wicked Babylonian Talmud?  Have you forgotten the benevolence of Protestant William of Orange I, or Independent Puritan Oliver Cromwell or Baptist George Washington?  Why do you equate us with the Romanists who constantly persecute you in obedience to Canon Law?  This is unfair and dishonest; a clever design to bias Jews never to read the New Testament with an open mind or heart.  We Protestants and Baptists never conducted a Crusade against you Jews and we never operated an Inquisition against Jews or anyone else, yet you continue to equate us with that damnable Jesuit-ruled Roman Papacy, calling both of us “Christians.”  Shame on you!

Now I know you do not love the Jew who is very God and very Man (Romans 1:3-4)—as your inspired and preserved Hebrew Tenach so describes him to be as proven above!  That is a good place to start.  You see Doreen, if you honor not the Son even as you honor the Father, then you are lost and need to be saved by the grace of God!  You are in sin and destined to an eternity separated from the One true God of Israel—as are all Gentiles until they too repent of their sins and believe the gospel!  We are all condemned and all need to be saved by the same Son of God, Messiah ben David, Jesus of Nazareth (John 3:16-18).

Indeed, the rejection of Messiah Yeshua ben David by his beloved elect nation of Israel did break his heart.  Oh, he wept when he rode into Jerusalem on Palm Sunday, the first day of the week when he fulfilled Psalm 118:24; Daniel 9:25 and Zechariah 9:9!  Read Matthew 23:37-39 and Luke 19:41-44.  Indeed, that Prophet (Deut. 18:18) was a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief (Isaiah 53:3), stricken for “my people” Israel (Isaiah 53:8).

One more thing.  Your Messiah had to declare himself such within the Fourth Decade of the First Century AD during the reign of Tiberius Caesar.  This is according to the prophecy of Daniel’s 70 Weeks of Years (Daniel 9:24-27).  For, from the commandment to rebuild the City of Jerusalem given to Nehemiah in 445 BC (Nehemiah 6:1-6) to the national declaration of “Messiah the Prince” according to Zechariah 9:9, that completion of 483 Hebrew Years fell in 32 AD, within the Fourth Decade of the First Century.  And after that national declaration, that same Messiah had to be “cut off”—to die, according to Daniel 9:26.  Now, if you can find another person who fits the description of Daniel 9:25-26, then let me know.  Joseph Ben-Matthias, alias “Flavius Josephus,” declares that indeed Jesus of Nazareth was the Messiah (The Life and Works of Flavius Josephus, William Whiston, Philadelphia: The John C. Whiston Company, 1957; first printed in 1737, p. 535).  Otherwise, know that your leaders and people have continued to reject that very Messiah promised to Israel (Deuteronomy 18:18), that very Messiah who died for the sins of the Nation of Israel (Isaiah 53:8), that very Messiah who shall return to be looked upon by Israel as the One whom they pierced (Zechariah 12:10), that very Messiah who shall save his beloved racial Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites from complete annihilation by the coming Gentile beast (Daniel 7:11) who shall be broken by the Prince of princes (Daniel 8:25)—Adonai Yeshua ha Maschiah ben David.

May Adonai Hashem bless you as you seek Him within His Word,

Brother Eric

________________________________________________

Eric,

I’m going to say something that may be hurtful, but it must be said, accepted and acted upon, if the suffering of the world is ever going to end.

Yeshua ben Pandera told his students not to teach Torah to the gentiles.
See: Mark 7:27, Matthew 7:6 and 15:26.
He said it simply, clearly and at least three recorded times.

But the Euro-gentiles thought they’d be smarter than the man they think is God and “interpreted” his admonitions to suit their purposes.

Everything in this video are horrific results the gentiles twisting his simple words.

By trying to arrogate a sacred Text that was not meant for you and trying to live on a vastly higher moral/spiritual level than you are suited for, you unleashed the worst that is in you.

Jews know how to increase the level of observance and understanding gradually so that a person does not experience moral/spiritual backlash as he or she ascends.

We know that every advance of the Soul causes a stirring of higher levels of both the good and evil within us and our Sages have taught us how to handle this inevitable occurrence as one proceeds in closely with the God of Yisrael.

You gentiles never learned these techniques and, in trying to “grab Satan by the horns”, the dark side of you was unleashed in fury because it felt itself attacked, rather than slowly being brought into the *service* of God as we know how to do.

Not only were the “church fathers” aware this was happening, they found ways to increase the effects of it – the worst of which is “Ignatian spirituality”.

Do not deceive yourselves into believing that “Protestanism” is somehow more real than Catholicism. It too goes against Yeshua’s unequivocal insistence not to teach Torah to the gentiles, the reasons for which he explained in no uncertain or politically correct terms.

As a result of this happening to you generation after generation, you have incurred considerable epigentic damage, which you then pass on to your offspring.

The most loving thing that you and other “Christians” can do is stop trying to understand that which you cannot and stop telling the terrible lies that you do about who Yeshua ben Pandera really was, about the Pharisees, about the Talmud and all the rest of the atrocious lies you tell because you are attempting to understand (and judge!) that which is vastly beyond your moral and spiritual ken, that keep my People from bringing Yeshua ben Pandera back into the fold, redeem his reputation and reunite with him.

Trust me when I tell you that I love the Jew I *know* to be my Cousin infinitely more than you love the Jew whom you believe to be God.

And trust me when I tell you, the fact that he is rejected by his People causes him pain far greater than the devotion of a billion some odd deluded gentiles can salve – and the Vatican knows that too.

Doreen Ellen Bell-(Pander)Dotan, Tzfat, Israel

Luther's Papal Whore of Rome Riding the Beast Roman Empire Revived with Seven Heads and Ten Horns, Revelation 17

Dear Brother Eric,

You might find this documentary entitled “Deliver Us From Evil” very

interesting. I found it posted on Facebook and the link led to webpage

below. I want to preface this review with a disclaimer. The film is

graphic in detail as far as the accounts of sexual abuse are concerned

and there are about three instances or so in which profanity is used

as one of  the victims now an adult recounts his abuse by priest

Oliver O’Grady.

http://www.snagfilms.com/films/title/deliver_us_from_evil/

This film released by Lionsgate made by the courageous filmmaker Amy Berg is

a most telling expose. It is a detailed analysis and chronicling of the

inner workings of the Roman Catholic Institution cult of pedophilia,

pederasty, and victimization of the young and defenseless children across

this empire.  The documentary focuses on a Romanist priest named Oliver

O’Grady an unrepentant, manipulative, and deceitful man whose sexual

perversion knows no bounds.  Then Bishop Roger Mahony of Stockton, California

who would become the current Archbishop of Los Angeles and Cardinal clearly

aided and abetted this criminal by moving him from Stockton to the San

Andreas parish and appointed him “Pastor” of the area.  Mahony cared more

about maintaining a “bella figura” (see times-tamp 38:14) a good appearance or

impression so he would be promoted and the safety and well-being of the

children was not a concern in the slightest (See 29:57). Mahony did this to

further his own career and please his Jesuit masters who reward the

concealment of sexual abuse of children case in point is the Jesuit

Conference President Thomas Smolich SJ former Provincial of the California

Province of the Society of Jesus and at one time Cardinal Mahony’s immediate

master.

The film succinctly reveals the following:

(1) Historian and Canon lawyer Catholic priest Tom Doyle defines temporal

power.  Speaking for the Roman Catholic hierarchy was ordained by God and the

laymen are to be docile and keep their mouths shut.  They are viewed as

cattle and they are to control them.  While openly claiming to act as an

advocate for the victims of abuse I believe he is a Jesuit Temporal

Coadjutor because while he openly condemns the actions of his Church he

speaks in apologetics legally tied to the Unholy See as if to say this

is the system so this is how it is.  If he truly rejected Roman Catholicism

and its priesthood cult of pedophilia he would reject Romanism and believe on

the Lord Jesus Christ and be saved. Unless the Spirit of the Lord draws him

and convicts him of his sin of involvement with the Romanist priesthood as a

legal representative of the most reprehensible, despicable, and abominable

corporation and organization on the earth so he will reject the traditions

of sinful men and the anti-biblical Magisterium, Council of Trent, “Moral”

Theology and dogma, he will not have the power that only comes from the God

of the Bible (AV 1611) and His Son to resist the dynasty and monarchy

that is Satan’s Black and White Papacy.  If Doyle’s opposition were truly

genuine then he would have been a victim of the poisoned cup by now and

dead-plain and simple. As history shows, Rome is a professional actor on

the world stage and has feigned and will continue to feign a desire to

reform however it never changes its secret policies only the semantics

to appease the public, i.e. Council of Trent and Vatican II.

(2) Then Bishop now Cardinal Roger Mahony had then at the time he had

O’Grady transferred and more so now has power and sway over the legal and

law enforcement of Los Angeles in that O’Grady was not arrested nor was he

brought to trial or held accountable for his molestation and rape of young

boys and girls.  You will hear Mahony say in no uncertain terms in a recorded

deposition regarding the allegations against O’Grady that a priest’s

attraction to or sexual abuse of children is no valid reason for him to be

removed from ministry.  Mahony employs the Jesuit tactic of mental

reservation during his deposition and answers the questions flippantly not

directly.

(3) Jesuit-trained Knight of Malta former governor of Oklahoma Frank Keating

was named chairman of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops Board

on sex abuse in 2002 as if that would result in any real reform or change.

This was an example of Rome keeping appearances and giving something to the

CFR-controlled press to print and broadcast for mass consumption.  Knight

Keating played his role well.  He compared his church to the Mafia which is

true, however I am convinced his words were calculated only intended for the

CFR press to publish and publicize only give the appearance of disagreement

with Rome evidenced by the fact he never left Romanism.

(4)  Family attorney for the Jyonos (Anne’s family) John Manly truthfully

stated that if the abuse of children is defended by [Roman Catholic]

doctrine then Roger Cardinal Mahony and the Archdiocese of Los Angeles is a

cult!  This attorney is a Roman Catholic however he is honest and sincere I

believe in his stance against what his own church is doing on a massive

scale.

(5) The result ultimately of these heinous crimes against children and their

families is disillusionment with what was falsely presented to them as

Christianity.  Rome is the greatest purveyor of atheism in the world as

you will see as the film closes.  A very clear example of this is

Anne’s father who felt betrayed by the Roman Catholic Church which is

the wealthiest criminal organization on earth—indeed the mother of

them all.  MYSTERY BABYLON THE GREAT THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND

ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.  (Revelation 17:5).  It’s an interesting fact

that all of secret societies controlled by the Jesuits and headed by

the Black Pope trace their origins to the “mystery schools.”  What is

the mystery?  I think it is the “mystery of iniquity” (2 Thessalonians

2) passed down through fables and occult stories which go back to

Babel and it’s Hamitic king (the first type of Antichrist in

Scripture) Nimrod descended from Cush, Semiramis and Tammuz.  You can

find them in every culture- Aztecs, Mayans, Sumerians, Phoenicians.

Read about Queztalcoatl believed by the Aztecs to be a serpentine

deity.  The characteristics of the “deity” are very telling—a white

and bearded male rising from the sea.  The Aztecs perceived the arrival

of Hernan or Hernando Cortes as the the return of their god in human

form (Rev, 13).  By the time they realized they were fatally mistaken

it was too late to defend against Cortes and his men in search of gold

and treasure brought disease and guns to plunder, pillage, and

eliminate the natives.

(6) There are several captions provided at the end of the film.  One them

shows George W. Bush granted diplomatic immunity to the Vatican and the White

Pope so Joseph Ratzinger can never be questioned nor will the files on

pedophile priests be released.

(7) Oliver O’Grady admitted he was sexually abused as a child by his own

brother.  He entered the Romanist priesthood as a result and this is par for

the course.  Satanic ritualistic pedophilia is a means of recruitment and

control over the minds, hearts, and and yes souls of men.  (See Revelation

18:13)  This is used to make certain a constant influx of Romanist Babylonian

priests who derive power and render worship to their god Lucifer/Satan

by sexual perversion.  Jesuit (Im)moral Theology namely the works of Fr.

Alphonso Liguori advocate and call for Catholic priests (who take a vow of

celibacy) to seek sexual release on a regular basis by any means as

proven in P.D. Stuart’s exposé Codeword Barbelon Vol. 1.

Behold this act of treason, this should anger every American especially we

men of God.  America has no business in the United Nations and no man who so

ingratiated himself to the Papacy by advocating the permanent observer

status of the Unholy See while he was campaigning should be allowed to be

President.  I’m of course referring to “The Decider” (imagine that) George W.

Bush that Bonesman who decided on nothing.  Freemason Richard Cheney called

the shots and Bush was the pseudo-Protestant crypto-Romanist who served

his god in St. Peter’s.

http://vatican.usembassy.gov/viewer/article.asp?idSite=1&article=/file2007_05/alia/a7051705.htm

I’m interested in your thoughts on this as well as those of your other

advisers and those on the mailing list.

In Christ Jesus our Lord,

Brother Nicholas Rivera

Freemason Louis Choiseul, Chief Minister to King Louis XV of France, Aided in Expelling Jesuits From France, 1764

Dear Andreas,

1. Yes.  Look as what Voltaire and Diderot did.  Voltaire played cards with his Jesuit masters during the Revolution.  Thompson in his The Footprints of the Jesuits mentions the Voltaire connection to the Order and he helped incite the Revolution.
2. The Rothschilds were merely the bankers for a German house that began in the mid 1700s.  Their financial power was as Nothing compared with the power of the Papacy.  Their power increased due to their working for the Jesuit Order during its Suppression.  They have intermarried with papal nobility and are part of the network.
3. The Frankists (following the wicked Jacob Frank) were nothing more than Jews loyal to the Papacy having been baptized into the RCC with the King of Poland acting as sponsor.  These are merely “Court Jews” for the pope and have always been so.  Makes perfect sense that Jesuit Coadjutor Weishaupt would bring them into his circle directed by suppressed Jesuits at the command of his former master, Jesuit General Lorenzo Ricci.
4. Cavalho (Portugal), Choiseul (France) and Aranda (Spain) were all Freemasons that expelled the Order from their countries.  Remember that there was the First Masonic Schism in 1754, the same year the first 25 degrees of the Scottish Rite was perfected by the Order in France.  This Schism produced the Suppression and Extinction of the Order with the blessing of the Roman Catholic monarchs, and later, the Pope (1773).  The Order countered with the creation of its Roman Catholic Bavarian Illuminati intended to repair the Masonic Schism and centralize all Freemasonry under its command.  This quest was begun with the Council of Wilhelmsbad in 1782.  Still, the Order did not control certain branches of Freemasonry such as American Freemasonry—including George Washington—at that time.  With the establishment of the Scottish Rite headquarters in Charleston, SC, in 1801, this began the attempted control of American Freemasonry.  The great American Freemasonry schism in the 1820s over the William Morgan murder (plotted by Jesuits) successfully broke up low-level, patriotic American Freemasonry, 50,000 Northern masons seceding from the lodge.  Then the Order began to rebuild American Freemasonry so that by 1861 the War of Northern Aggression (1861-1865) could be launched, incited by Masons on both sides (Henry Clay, John C. Calhoun and President Buchanan, etc.).  Still, that Second Masonic Schism continued throughout the 19^th century, Freemasons still resisting the Jesuit Order.  Simon Bolivar, Benito Juarez, and even ex-priest Charles Chiniquy resisted the Jesuits as Masons.  But by the beginning of the 20^th century, the Order was in full control of all Freemasonry via its OTO of which Count Mariano Rampolla was a member.  Rampolla was Cardinal Secretary of State to Pope Leo XIII, the abject slave of Black Pope Luis Martin.
5. Not all Freemasonry had been created by the Jesuits.  Remember, the Jesuits are the revived Knights Templars, the devil seeking to consolidate all secret societies under the Jesuit Superior General.  This consolidation took time, as the greatest organized enemies of the Order were Freemasons for over three centuries (1590-1900).
6. The 33^rd degree of Scottish Rite Freemasons is the beginning of the real substance of the Scottish Rite.  The murdered Jim Shaw, a former 33rd Degree Freemason converted to Christ Jesus,  makes this clear in his book, The Deadly Deception.  Certain 33^rd Degree men are selected to go deeper into the Order while others are stopped—depending to their answers to certain questions about Jesus Christ.  Not all Scottish Rite Freemasons are Islamic Shriners, this degree is conferred only invitation.  The English Freemasons were Roman Catholic lords serving the Papacy, a Papacy not yet conquered by the Jesuits.  Grand Orient was created by the Order which extends from Europe to the Middle East and into Russia.  Stalin was Grand Orient.

I will not be able to address any more questions.

I need to work a job.

Lord bless,

Brother Eric

_________________________________________________

Dear Eric:

Having studied quite assiduously the machinations envolving the French Revolution, there still remain some important gaps which I was hoping you could help solving.

1.

The whole French “age of enlightenment” –  which kicked in powerfully already during the 17th century (!) –  was a Jesuit operation, ok.

But from there it follows that the Jesuits planned to take out the French monarchy and Gallican church and clergy long before 1773, the year of their papal abolition, and even long before their expulsion by Louis XV.

Is that right?

2.

How can we be sure that Voltaire and Diderot were Jesuit Coadjutors?

3.

In VAIII you wrote (or quoted):

[After being abolished by the papal bull,]

• “The Jesuit General was in control of high-level Scottish Rite Freemasonry, Grand Orient Freemasonry, and now sought an alliance with the Masonic Baron of the House of Rothschild;
• He created an alliance between the House of Rothschild in establishing the Illuminati;
• Thereby he perfected the inner workings between themselves [the Jesuits] and high-level Freemasonry by illuminizing continental Freemasonry (which had expelled the plotting Jesuits from Portugal, France and Spain), thus submitting “Illuminized Freemasonry” to the Black Pope via the Council of Wilhelmsbad;
• He united the House of Rothschild and Grand Orient Freemasonry with the Society of Jesus;
• Weishaupt provided the conspiratorial resources of the Jesuit Order, while the Rothschilds contributed the money. What was missing was a means to spread the agenda of the Illuminati and that the Frankists added with their network of agents throughout the Christian and Islamic worlds.”

Questions:

• How were they able to subdue the mighty Rothschilds in the first place?
• From where did the “Frankists’s network of agents” appear? Had they operated within the Rothschild’s network?
• How did the Jesuits’ illuminati subdue so swiftly those freemasons from amongst whom men like the Marquês de Pombal and his “colleagues” in France and Spain (I don’t recall their names right now) had sprung forth to oppose Jesuit controlled freemasonry, bringing them down in those countries?
• How did this shism within freemasonry was possible anyway? I thought that all freemasonry at the time had been created by the Jesuits. Isn’t that so?

And finally:

What is the difference between “33rd level freemasonry” and “normal” Scottish Rite freemasonry? Are the former all Shriner freemasons?

Continental Scottish Rite freemasonry = Grand Orient Freemasonry? Right?

Before the creation of Scottish Rite freemasonry (at the Jesuit College of Clermont in 1754), there only existed the English Templars, who likewise had been created by the Jesuits?

Thanks so much for your time and dedication.

Sincerly yours

Andreas

The Shia Mahdi, 12th Shite Imam: Divine Antichrist of Islam Yet to Come

Dear Brother Oliver,

1.  Islam was never to progress into the nonviolent, tolerant, pagan religion of Bahai.  Rather, it appears Rome concocted this religion to divide the Shia as you state.

2.  No doubt that the Sunni Dajjal and the Shia Mahdi are, in fact, one and the same person, the coming Antichrist/Man-Beast having been the final pope of Rome, slain and risen from the dead possessed by Satan.

3.  By the time the Roman Antichrist assumes world power, Mecca and Medina will have already been destroyed.  The Antichrist will then destroy Rome and Vatican City mid-Daniel’s seven-year week (Daniel 9:27).

4.  Indeed, the Roman Antichrist (Mahdi of the Shia) will not follow the Koran.  He will honor a god his Roman papal fathers knew not (Daniel 11:38).

5.  Indeed, the Roman Antichrist will be a leader of the Jews in Israel/Jerusalem, for he will come in his own name and be received by the Jews (John 5:43).  This is the Antichrist Messiah of the Jews all Orthodox Jews await, merely for their political redemption.

6.  Indeed, the Roman Antichrist will be a violent and bloody man.  He is the person described as the rider of the four horses of Revelation 6:1-8 and his name is “Death.”

7.  Indeed, the Shia Mahdi and the Sunni Dajjal appear to be the same person.  Notice also when the Ten Roman Kings destroy the Vatican upon the final Roman Pope being murdered and then rising from the dead (Revelation 17:16), the Roman Antichrist/Man-Beast will first go to Jerusalem and sit in the rebuilt Hebrew Temple of God then to declare he is God (II Thessalonians 2:4).  After that, his Jewish False Prophet (possibly, the High Priest of the Temple) will place an image (“the abomination of desolation”—Matthew 24:15) of the Antichrist/Man-Beast inside the Third Hebrew Temple, which image/statue will be able talk and will appear to be alive, the Hebrew False Prophet/Second Beast requiring all to worship the Roman Gentile Risen Pope/Antichrist/First Beast (Revelation 13:11-18).

The Antichrist/Man-Beast then moves to the rebuilt City of Babylon (Revelation 18; Jeremiah 50), it becoming his new World political and commercial Capital after Rome has been destroyed.  The Antichrist/Man-Beast has a literal earthly throne in a literal earthly kingdom (Revelation 16:10), he being the King of Babylon (Isaiah 14:4) to rule the world for 42 months.  He shall also be called “the Assyrian” (Isaiah 14:25) indicating he rules the world from the East which Assyrian Empire of the past included the City of Babylon.

Thus, the creator of the Koran and Sunni Islam (the Pope of Rome) designed the Mahdi of the Shia and the Dajjal of the Sunnis (in secretly seeking to unite the Shia and the Sunnis around this one Man thereby ending the schism in Islam) after Rome’s design for her final Pope of Rome.  When the Antichrist (a blend of both the Mahdi and Dajjal) finally assumes world power, Romanism and Islam will have been destroyed with their holy sites and cities.  All former Roman Catholics and former Muslims as well as most of the Jews will worship this Man.  Other than the slain and risen Lord Jesus Christ presently at the right hand of God his Father (Psalm 110:1), this coming Satan-possessed risen Pope of Rome turned Antichrist/Man-Beast is the most important person of world history, the three major anti-Christ religions of Romanism, Islam and Judaism eagerly awaiting his arrival.

Lord bless,

Brother Eric

_____________________________________________

Dear Br. Eric,

I have a few questions on my mind if you have the time to answer them (if you are busy, it is alright, you don’t have to answer them – I’ll email you them at a better time)

1) Regarding the Bahai religion, the mainstream believe that Islam was supposed to progress into Bahaism. From looking at the country where this religion was born, Iran/Persia, it looks like Rome tried to divide the Shia religion through the introduction of Bahaism, but the religion never caught on. Interestingly, Bahai’s creator, Bahaullah(or so the mainstream says) was imprisoned in Iran, transported to Turkey, and then finally transported to the prison in Acre, Palestine, also known as Haifa, Israel. Also, Bahaullah and his disciples and the Bahai religion were introduced to most of the European monarchs, who were asked to convert of follow Bahaullah’s world unity of justice plans. The only European monarch to take Bahaullah seriously was a Romanian Queen Maria, who was taught the religion. It looks as if Rome either prtected Bahaullah by sending him to beautiful Acre, or they tried controlling and supressing him. What is your opinion on the creation of Bahaism? A creation of Rome to divide the Shia, or do you think Bahaullah was divinely inspired to propogate this religion according to the Bahai history?

2) Regarding the Sunnis and Shia belief in the Dajjal(Islamic Antichrist), both groups have a different take on Dajjal and their Mahdi. I would like to focusing on some very ineteresting similarities between Sunni’s Dajjal and Shia’s IMAM Mahdi (the Shia’s Imam is supernatural, while the Sunni’s Imam is just a regular human being):

a) Sunni’s believe that the Dajjal is strange looking a man beast that was alive since Muhammad’s time according to testimony of a Christian convert sailor in Muhammad’s band, who became shipwrecked on an island during a storm, landed on an island with a temple, entered it and spoke to the Dajjal, who was locked in chains from throat, wrists, and ankles, the Dajjal saying that he would be released in the end times according to certain signs.

b) the Dajjal would lead a band of Persians and Jews as their messiah, and the Dajjal would attempt to destroy Mecca and Madinah, and do all sorts of miracles.

According to the Shia, the Dajjal was barely written about in their Hadiths, which focused on the Sufyani tribe as the main enemy of the Shia. What is inetersting is that the Shia’s IMAM Mahdi fits the Sunni’s discription on Dajjal:

a) The Shia believe that their IMAM Mahdi was hidden in a cave in occulatation for a thousand or so years and will appear at end times (similar to the Sunni’s Dajjal that is hidden in a temple and promised to appear at the end times).

b) The Shia believe that once their Imam Mahdi emerged from hiding, he will not follow the Quran but will follow a special book written by Hebrews that contains the hidden teaches and wisdom of the Hebrews. The Imam Mahdi will follow the Law of David and Solomon and Imam Mahdi will address God’s name in Hebrew, and he will be the leader of the Jews and Shia (this sounds like the Sunni’s Dajjal, who will lead Jews and Persians from Isfahan, which is located in southern Iran).

c) Accoridng to the Shia, the Shia’s Imam Mahdi will be a violent and bloody man, who will kill all non-Muslims, except the Jews and Shia, and he will destroy Kaaba, Mecca, and Madina, and will revive the bodies of Muhammad’s original Ummah, as well as Fatima, and execute them according to Shia Sharia Law for being liars and sinners.

Although the Shia’s religion was free from Roman creative control, their Imam Mahid resembles the bloody Dajjal the Sunnis are waiting for. I believe that one of the influencers of the Shia religion, Hasan Ibn Sabah, a Rabbinical Jew from Yemen and creator of the ninja-eqse masonic Hashashin/assassin killers, was hired by Rome to map out a disasterous future for the Shia by fooling the Shia to believe that the Muslim Antichrist will be their Mahdi. What do you think about this issue of the Shia Imam Mahdi resembling the Sunni’s Dajjal?

I thank you for your time and knowledge! You are always a pleasure to listen and learn from! Even though I have trouble accepting the Jews are the true Judahites(I still firmly believe True Israel and Israelites are America and it’s Celtic peoples), I feel like everything you write is TRUE and I am willing to learn.

Peace be with you!

Br. Oliver

____________________________________________

Dear Br. Eric,

I just wanted to emphasize one last point regarding the comparison between Sunni’s Dajjal and Shia’s Imam Mahdi:

As stated in my last email, the Shia hadiths say that Imam Mahdi will destroy mecca and Madina, and Imam Mahdi will kill any non Shia Arabs.

Here is what finally identifies the Shia Imam Mahdi with the Suni Dajjal: according to Sunni hadiths, Dajjal will try to enter Mecca and Madinah with his Jewish and Persian army in order to destroy them, but the angels will prevent non Muslims from entering these places.

Regarding Hasan Ibn Saba, the Jewish agent of Rome, or Rome’s original plan for Sunni prophecies, Rome wanted a Muslim Antichrist to fool the Shia and jews(as well as western pro Zionist forces backng up the Jews and Iranians) into follwing him, towards a final battle with the Sunni’s Mahdi.  In other words, the climax of WW3.

What are your views on this comparison and hypothesis of this issue?

Peace!

Br. Oliver

Apostate Protestant Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor, General Robert E. Lee, 1865

Dear Marco,

Thank you for contacting me.

In VAIII I cover the Jesuit Order’s control of both the North and the South during the “Civil War,” or rather “the War Between the States,” or better yet, “the War of Northern Aggression.”  The Jesuits controlled Jefferson Davis, Judah Benjamin and Robert E. Lee (with their conscious assent).  The Order also controlled Abraham Lincoln and the “Radical Red/Black” Republican Party (although Lincoln underwent a true conversion to Jesus Christ after Gettysburg and then began to oppose his Jesuit masters).  Both ex-priest Charles Chiniquy and General Thomas Harris (a Baptist-Calvinist) missed the Jesuit connection to the North.

To begin with, Rome ALWAYS has an Open-but-False policy for world consumption, and a Secret-but-True policy known only to the high Jesuits and the Pope himself.  For example, the Papacy openly opposes homosexuality and pedophilia, yet both crimes are institutionalized throughout the entire Roman Catholic Institution.  Another example is the present War in Afghanistan and Iraq.  Openly, the pope is against it; Secretly, he plotted it for years and ignited it on 911 via his Knight of Malta/CFR-member and DCI, George J. Tenet.

Now before we can examine the War of Northern Aggression, we must go back about 100 years to the time just prior to the White Anglo-Saxon-Celtic Protestant and Baptist American Revolution (1775-1783).  King George III came to power in 1760 and would reign for 60 years, dying in 1820.  From the very day he donned the British Crown, he was a Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor, serving his Jesuit masters within his court.  What does he do?  He declares Roman Catholicism to be the religion of Quebec after the French-Indian War—when there are no more French in the region.  This was an Outrage to every British Protestant!  George also steps up the London-based African slave trade, its major English masters being White Roman Catholic and pro-Catholic Anglican lords.  The Royal African Company that had a monopoly on that wicked “trade” for many years was owned by the House of Stuart.  And though the Stuarts were legally outlawed from ever becoming British sovereigns again with the Act of Settlement in 1702, the Jesuit-ruled Stuarts intermarried with the German Hanoverian dynasty that would occupy the monarchy for the following 200 years.  Nothing really changed.  So the slave trade continued, that criminal selling of African Blacks by African Blacks to White slavers, then to be brought to the Western Hemisphere and sold on the docks, with regard to this narration, sold to the White Protestant North American/British colonies.

The question is “Why?” Why would the Jesuits use their British Crown to import hundreds of thousands of Black slaves into the 13 Protestant colonies.  (Remember, at the time of the American Revolution, there were 2.5 million White Protestants and Baptists; 500,000 Black Slaves; 30,000 White Roman Catholics; and 24 Roman Catholic priests in the entire 13 colonies.)  The reason for this criminal slave trade, a veritable mass-kidnapping in the spirit of things, was to bring Blacks into the “heretic and liberal” American Protestant colonies, then to incite them to a huge race war.  This race war was to kill off the White Protestants and Baptists with aid from the American Indians.  This plot is so stated by Thomas Jefferson, as I quote it in one of my Power Points, the quote taken from W. O. Blake’s The History of Slavery and the Slave Trade (1860).  Yes, Jefferson stated that the Blacks were to be incited to kill off all the Whites of the colonies.  And if 500,000 Blacks would rise up and kill the Whites, this would be in complete harmony with the Jesuit Order’s Council of Trent and her “Moral Theologians” such as Suarez, Molina, Escobar, etc.  This Black-on-White race war (at this time in 2011, still in the making) would further the Black Pope’s Counter Reformation aided and abetted by the secretly-ruled British Crown.

But the plot failed.  Yet, it remained a major design against the White Protestant and Baptist United States of America with its “Baptist First Amendment.”

About thirty years after the creation of America, in 1819, the Order used its British Crown to agitate for the “freeing of the slaves.”  (Since the Order failed in its use of the British Crown to destroy America in the War of 1812, it would seek to incite domestic insurrection!)  That freeing was to be a radical emancipation, Rome’s Secret-but-True policy being to ruin the White Protestant South by driving the freed slaves to desperation, starvation, then to anarchy and then to mass-rapine and race war—as had been done in White Roman Catholic French Santo Domingo in 1791.  (That race war in Santo Domingo—“Hispanola”—was incited by Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Napoleon Bonaparte with the Jesuit-ruled French Directory.  The Directory, led by Jesuit Abbe Sieyes, preached the socialist-communist doctrine of “universal equality” as perfected by the Jesuit Order on its Paraguayan Reductions from 1609-1759, for 150 years!  This socialist-communist doctrine served to ignite the race war, the Blacks drawing first blood.)  All other nations conducted a policy of gradual emancipation with monetary compensation paid to the owners.  This was done by England as well as Mexico.  But the Order’s policy for the White Protestant South was universal, radical emancipation and no compensation paid to the owners of the Black slaves, at which time there were both White and Black owners of Black slaves.  Yes, this policy was to destroy the Protestant South using uneducated, illiterate, irresponsible, unskilled, emancipated Blacks, who, after the plotted destruction of the Whites, would then be destroyed by White European invaders to included the French, Spanish and the British—the very forces who later landed in Mexico to overthrow the great anti-Jesuit Benito Juarez and to invade the US during the War of Northern Aggression.

This “anti-slavery agitation” began in the northern cities under Jesuit control.  They were New York, Boston and Philadelphia.  The limited federal government at the time had no Constitutional jurisdiction over the domestic policies of the individual sovereign states, including the domestic institution of slavery.  The continuation or abolition of slavery was an issue of states’ rights, not federal legislation.  The federal government could no more take the property of guns any more than it could take the property of labor in slaves from the owners.  Yet, this anti-slavery agitation, later denounced by President James Buchanan as the foremost cause for the war, persisted for over 30 years until it culminated in the creation of the “Republican Party,” the revived old Federalist Party seeking centralization of power in Washington.  During this time, the Missouri Compromise had been enacted, a total violation of the Constitutional protection of slave property owned by citizens of the states, which wicked Compromise (led by Masonic Jesuit Coadjutor Henry Clay) geographically separated the nation via the Mason-Dixon Line into “North and South.”  Hence, the warnings of George Washington in his Farewell Address—America’s greatest state paper—went unheeded!

By 1860 the nation was divided over the “burning question of slavery.”  Forget that the federal government had already begun to repatriate freed American Blacks to the Black African colony of Liberia, for which its first governor, Thomas Buchanan—the brother of President James Buchanan—gave his life to found.  Forget that American Black Bible-believing Joseph Roberts was the President of Liberia and called for honest American Blacks who believed the Bible to come to beautiful Liberia—founded, financed and built by American White Anglo-Saxon Protestants!  No, the Jesuits could never allow a Black Protestant nation to exist in Africa, so all migration back to Africa had to be stopped “by any means necessary,” including inciting a huge uncivil war in America that was intended to morph into a Black-on-White race war once the South had been defeated.

With Lincoln’s election to the presidency, South Carolina seceded.  As an aside, for a Republican to be elected, the Democratic Party had to be divided—which was done in 1860!  This rupture of the Democratic Party led by Jesuits secured a win for the Order’s Radical Red Republican Party.  Maryland was about to secede when it was put under martial law, Lincoln signing the nation’s first “executive order.” If Maryland had seceded, then Washington would have been in the hands of the Confederates.  Thus, the Marylanders fled into Virginia and manned the Army of Northern Virginia under Lee.  The last State to secede was Virginia, the home of America’s greatest statesmen including our beloved President George Washington—the Baptist, having been baptized by his Baptist Chaplain John Gano in the Hudson River in 1783.  The War was on, having been ignited by President James Buchanan when he sought to reinforce Fort Sumter in Charleston Harbor, South Carolina, with his ship, “Star of the West.”  Yes, the war was started by the North, South Carolina having the right to secede as did all other states.

Rome was delighted!  Her open policy was to support the South—only after the South had lost Gettysburg in July of 1863.  Indeed, the nation that had been founded on July 4, 1776, via the Declaration of Independence, ended on July 4, 1863 with the South’s loss of the Battle of Gettysburg.  Rome, knowing it was only a matter of time until the South was defeated, openly sided with Jefferson Davis with Pope Pius IX’s letter of support to Davis in 1864.  The truth is, Lee was a traitor, deliberately sacrificing nearly one half of his army that day, aided by another traitor, General James Longstreet.  Had General Stonewall Jackson been in the saddle at Gettysburg instead of Longstreet, Roman Catholic General Meade would have been routed.  But Lee prevented such a possibility: Lee and General A. P. Hill—Jackson’s old enemy—carried out the conspiracy to murder Jackson at Chancellorsville, Jackson given “the poison cup” by Lee’s trusted Masonic doctor, Major Hunter McGuire!  All of this is in VAIII.

With the loss of Gettysburg, the “War to Preserve the Old Union” became a crusade “to Free the Slaves.”  Bevin Alexander, America’s foremost military historian, makes this clear in his masterpiece, Lost Victories.  The Radical Red Republican-led Yankees will conduct a war of annihilation against the White Protestant Southern people, stealing their tobacco, cotton and labor in slaves—as a matter of federal policy thanks to the wicked Thaddeus Stevens (baptized into the Roman Catholic Church on his deathbed!)—while stealing every other valuable they can find via the Irish Roman Catholic drunken “bummers.” Meanwhile, Roman Catholic General Meade is ordered by a Jesuit in camp not to pursue Lee, which pursuit would have ended the war.  NO, “Dagger John” Archbishop Hughes will cause the New York City riots that will justify Meade sending a portion of his army to quell the anarchy.  This gives Lee his exit back to Richmond, to then draw out the war for another nearly two years.  Thus, Rome’s “Open-but-False” policy is to back the South but her “Secret-but-True” policy is to defeat and destroy the White Protestant South and on its ruins, erect an empire “from sea to shining sea.”  That Empire is what I call in VAIII, the Black Pope’s “Holy Roman” Fourteenth Amendment, Socialist-Communist, Cartel-Corporate-Fascist, American Empire (1868-Present).  That empire was created with the declared ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment on July 28, 1868, also covered in VAIII.

________________________________________

Now, to your question of “White Supremacy.” Since this term conjures up the ideas of the White KKK and the White Nazis, I do not use this term.  I use the term “White Predominance,” a predominance in intellectual capacities as reflected in culture, the arts, sciences and nations.  There is no question of “White Predominance,” as our genius and persistence is used both for good and for evil.  The greatest men in history for the last 500 years have been White Protestants and Baptists (Luther, Knox, Calvin, Cromwell, Washington, etc.)   To the contrary, the most wicked men in history for the last 500 years have been White Roman Catholics (Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin, and every Pope of Rome).  This the war is a war between Whites—Bible-believing, righteous Whites versus Bible-rejecting, wicked Whites.  All other races, with their obviously lower cultures, are merely siding with either faction of this ceaseless war.  It takes a Righteous White man to resist a Wicked White man.  The Pope’s evil White Power Structure incited the Slave trade; the Risen Son of God’s righteous White men, such as William Wilberforce, ended that damnable traffic.  Presently, the world is ruled by evil, Bible-rejecting White men—White men serving the White Jesuit Papacy!  Those chief in the forefront in resisting these White Devils, are Bible-believing White men—White men who know the Lord!

Therefore, it is Rome’s quest to destroy every White Protestant population on earth.  This was the real purpose for the Jesuit-led, Black Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s.  This is the real purpose for putting the Black ANC in power in South Africa—now mass-murdering the White Protestant Boers without restraint.  Since 1994 over 30,000 Whites have been murdered by Socialist-Communist, Majority Black Savages tied to the Pope’s ANC.  This is why the Whites have been killed out of once White Protestant Rhodesia (Zimbabwe) now ruled by Black Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor, Robert Mugabe.  And with no Protestant Whites, the Blacks of Zimbabwe are financially broken and starving!  This is why the Pope’s White Power Structure has been destroying the White race and White Protestant culture within America for the last 60 years.  It is clearly a war between White adversaries—Righteous, Bible-reading White populations versus the Pope’s anti-Bible, White Power structure using the Blacks and now Hispanic Roman Catholics—alien Hispanic Roman Catholic invaders—against us.  To successfully resist Rome’s White Power Structure, White raced-peoples must be preserved.  Thus, we must observe racial separation as mandated by the Word of God when the Lord created the races to keep mankind separate.  His creation of the three major races was done in order to prevent mankind from uniting against the Lord as was done prior to the Great Flood when there was one race, one language and one land mass of earth.

Hopefully Marco (and I remember that you are Italian), you, being a White man, will side with us Bible-believing, Righteous White men against the designs of the Pope’s Wicked White Power Structure.  For once we White Protestants and Baptists are destroyed as a race and nation of people in North America, the Blacks and Hispanics will not stand a chance to resist this damnable White Power Structure having destroyed every Latin American Nation’s cultural advancement for the last 100 years.  We will be nothing more than a race-mixed, Roman Catholic Brazil or Cuba.  This end is Rome’s Secret-but-True policy here in North America.

I trust this is helpful.

Lord bless,

Brother Eric

___________________________________________

Hello Eric,

Been a listener for a while, born Italian so I have a lot of knowledge on the Whole Roman Papacy.  I Just wondered I have studied endless sources before the 19th Century… And i’ve not heard one author who has said the North is the Popes army?  This is everyone I could find speaking against the Vatican.  But I see you were claiming this was the case and I just wondered what information you could show me in this or any sources or references before the 19th century in Books.  This is a part of my history and i know it pretty well… So i was a bit surprised you were supporting this.

Also whats the Racial division about through superiority in the White Race?

Regards,

Marco

King David in Old Age: His Seed Joshua the Christ yet to sit on David's Earthly Throne Forever, II Samuel 7:16

Dear Brother Craig,

So good of you to share your thoughts on the paramount topic of the Risen Lord Jesus Christ to Whom has been given all power “in heaven and in earth” (Matthew 28:18).

Agreed, there are many parallels between David and Jesus the Messiah; for David (whose name means “beloved”) was a type of the “beloved Son” of God the Father (Matthew 3:17).  They are most wonderful.  We see the same many parallels between Joseph and Christ—over 100 of them.  Again, most wonderful.

Now indeed, Christ before Pilate said “My kingdom is not of this world: . . .” (John 18:36), but you, along with all amillennialists (a papal eschatology promoting Rome’s false “Replacement Theology”—that the Roman Catholic Church has replaced the Nation of Israel), understand this sentence to mean Christ never came to establish a literal, physical international kingdom on earth.  I would remind you, in your insisting there can be no earthly kingdom of Christ in the future, you stand on the literal reading of the passage above.  You stand upon this passage literally, yet refuse to consider parallel passages pertaining to this topic, reading them also in a literal fashion.  As to the literal reading of the scripture, which is indeed how we should read the Word of God to arrive at truth when it comes to all doctrines, let us review the words of William Tyndale, the father of the English Reformation Bible:

“Thou shalt understand, therefore, that the Scripture hath but one sense, which is the literal sense.  And that literal sense is the root and ground of all, and the anchor that never faileth, whereunto if thou cleave, thou canst never err or go out of the way.  And if thou leave the literal sense, thou canst not but go out of the way.  Neverthelater, the Scripture useth proverbs, similitudes, riddles, or allegories, as all other speeches do; but that which the proverb, similitude, riddle, or allegory signifieth, is over the literal sense, which thou must seek out diligently. . . .”* [Emphasis in bold]

*J. Dwight Pentecost, Things to Come: A Study in Biblical Eschatology,  (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1972; first printed in 1958) p. 27; Pentecost quoting Charles Augustus Briggs, he quoting William Tyndale.

But let us read a few other passages literally.

1.  Isaiah 9:6-7. We agree that this is speaking of the Messiah of Israel, Jesus Christ.  We agree he is the mighty God and Prince of Peace of verse six.  This is the literal reading of the verse.  Why cannot we agree he is to sit on the literal throne of David on earth, to have a kingdom on earth?  Was not this the very promise given to David by the Prophet Nathan (II Samuel 7:12-17), the present fulfillment of the prophecy being in Solomon, yet the future “Seed” of David  being Christ as per verse 14?  Does not the Holy Spirit in Hebrews 1:5 attribute II Samuel 7:14 to Christ himself?  Does not Hebrews 1:5 also attribute Psalm 2:7 to Christ?  And if so, does not all of Psalm 2 refer exclusively to Christ, especially verse 6, the LORD’s king to be placed on the LORD’s “holy hill of Zion”—the earthly Zion of earthly Jerusalem? We know there is a heavenly Zion—a heavenly Jerusalem (“the mother of us all”—Galatians 4:26) in which Jesus the Christ, the Son of God, sits at the right hand of his Father (Hebrews 12:22; Galatians 4:26; Hebrews 1:3).  But the Jerusalem in which the throne of David is to be re-established in her midst is presently “in bondage” (Galatians 4:25) during this “times of the Gentiles” ruling Jerusalem (Luke 21:24), Jerusalem having been without a king to sit upon the throne of David for “many days” (now nearly 2600 years) as foretold in Hosea 3:4-5.

2.  Luke 1:31-32. We agree that this is speaking of Jesus, that he was born of Mary/Miriam in verse 31.  Why cannot we agree that he is to be given the literal throne of David upon which to sit and rule over the literal nation of Israel in his earthly kingdom.  Christ is not presently sitting on his throne of David; he is sitting on his Father’s throne in heaven (Revelation 3:21).  Christ is yet to sit upon his throne of David—if the Scriptures are to be literally fulfilled— that rule to begin when he judges the surviving Gentile sheep and the goats after his Second Coming to earth (Matthew 25:31-32).

3.  Daniel 7:13-14. Christ Himself attributes verse 13 to himself (Matthew 26:64).  He is to return physically to earth.  Why cannot we agree that he will then be given a literal kingdom on earth in which all peoples of every language and nation shall serve him?  If verse 13 is literally fulfilled at the Second Coming, why not verse 14?

This brings us back to John 18:36, the clarion call for all amillennialists.  With all these aforementioned promises given to Israel; that the nation would be ruled forever by a physical descendant of David to sit on David’s earthly throne in a revived Kingdom of David, to rule the nation forever, why would Christ say “my kingdom is not of this world?”  (As you know, there is no such thing as a heavenly “throne of David.”)

Before we can answer this question, we must look to the context of this conversation between Pilate and Christ.  Jesus has been delivered to Pilate, Christ having been charged with “blasphemy” by the High Priest, and that Jesus of Nazareth should be killed for that blasphemy (Matthew 26:65-66).  In attributing Daniel 7:14 and Psalm 110:1 to himself, Christ has been given a death sentence.  Both of these passages of Holy Writ describe the earthly rule of Messiah over all the world.  This claim by Christ, that he is to personally and literally fulfill both passages quoted to the High Priest, is a direct challenge and threat to the rule of the High Priest over Israel occupied by Rome.  It is also a threat to Caesar, for Caesar controls the High Priest ruling Israel on Rome’s behalf—just as the Masonic Jewish Labor Zionist leaders of Israel rule Jerusalem today on behalf of the Papal Caesar in Rome sitting in “Caesar’s Palace”—the Vatican.

Christ is then brought before Pilate, the Praetor administering the government of Rome over Jerusalem.  Jesus is has been charged with blasphemy for claiming, via the weight of Scripture, that he is an EARTHLY king.  For Christ’s confession before the High Priest is that he is, in truth, an EARTHLY king, as Israel’s Messiah must be.  The “Hope of Israel” has always been in her coming Messiah delivering the persecuted Nation from her bondage to sin and merciless affliction at the hand of Gentile nations.  The Jews in Christ’s day who lived this hope are the ones who looked for that physical deliverance and consolation (comfort) of Israel, two of them being Simon and Anna (Luke 2:25-38).  That “comfort” to Israel would be the fulfilling of Isaiah 40:1-2, that earthly Jerusalem would have no more war and no more sin after having undergone a terrible punishment from the LORD called in Jeremiah 30:7 “the time of Jacob’s trouble.”

Pilate understands the charge for which reason Jesus now stands before him.  Pilate puts to him the question in John 18:33:

“Art thou the King of the Jews?”

Pilate is asking “Are you the earthly King of the Jews?”  Nothing about a spiritual kingdom is being questioned.  Jesus has been delivered to Pilate by the High Priest for this every claim of being the earthy king of the Jews which Messiah must be.  This was the same understanding of the wicked Herod the Great, when the wise men from the east came to Jerusalem asking “where is he that is born Long of the Jews” (Matthew 2:1-2)?  The reason Herod sought to find in the prophets (Micah 5:2) where the King of the Jews was to be born involved his secret plot to kill that king of the Jews (Matthew 2:16-18).  Why would Herod the Great, that earthly tyrant, kill all those little babies and children in Bethlehem if this “king of the Jews” was not an earthly threat to Herod’s earthly throne?

After Christ’s response with a question (18:34) and then Pilate’s immediate response with an arrogant, rhetorical question (“Am I a Jew?,” 18:35), Pilate then asks “What has thou done?”

Christ replies”  MY KINGDOM IS NOT OF THIS WORLD: if my KINGDOM were of this world, then would my servants would fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews; but now is my kingdom not from hence.”  (John 18:36)

As I have told you before, if Christ is in fact declaring in this singular verse of the New Testament that he never came to establish an earthly kingdom and to sit upon the earthly throne of David, then we have a host of contradictions evidenced by the above Scriptures.  As we literally compare scripture with scripture (as did the Lord Jesus Christ when he quoted Psalm 110:1 in Luke 20:39-44), we must look to the underlying Greek language for our answer.  That answer is found in the Greek preposition “ek” which means “out of.” Hence, “my kingdom is not out of (‘ek’) this world.”  We know his kingdom which he is to establish on earth over all nations (in light of the literal reading of the Hebrew prophets as per above) comes “out of” heaven to the earth (Daniel 7:14).  If his earthly kingdom was to come “out of” the earth (via a political movement of his followers), it would be established with fighting and bloodshed—just as the Jesuits have been doing for the last 500 years—and as were the four previous Gentile world kingdoms on earth (Daniel 2 and Daniel 7).  The fifth kingdom of the “stone” coming to earth smiting the image on its feet is just as much a literal earthly kingdom as were the four previous world kingdoms of Babylon (gold), Medo-Persia (silver), Greece (brass/bronze) and Rome (iron).

And this is precisely what shall happen as we read the Scripture literally—as also recommended by our beloved William Tyndale, our great White father of the English Reformation Bible.  The risen Lord Jesus Christ (“the stone” of Daniel 2:35) will return with the clouds of heaven (Daniel 7:14; Acts 1:9-11), his feet to stand on the Mount of Olives, from which mount he departed when he ascended into heaven 40 days after his literal resurrection (Acts 1:12; Zechariah 14:4).  At the time of his Second Coming to earth, the sun shall be literally darkened (Joel 2:31; Matt. 24:29; Rev. 6:12), and Christ shall then judge the surviving nations, save his elect nation of Israel (born again in day—Isaiah 66:8), establish his literal Kingdom on earth and sit on the literal throne of his fleshly father David (through Mary/Miriam, his literal natural mother through Nathan, son of David—Luke 3:31).  Revelation 20, literally read, confirms this conclusion, while it literally fulfills all the Law and the Prophets.  Ought not Christ to first literally suffer—on earth in Israel—and then literally enter his glory—on earth in Israel, he having “redeemed” Israel from the hand of her literal earthy Roman enemies according to the “Hope of Israel”?  (Luke 2:38; 24:21).

As to your belief of Harold Camping’s several false doctrines including the denial of the existence of a literal, eternal lake of fire; the end of the “Church Age” as of 1988 as well as his timeline prophecies which include the end of the world in 2011, these are topics of another post.

I trust this is helpful.

Lord bless,

Your brother in the flesh and Body of Christ,

Eric

_________________________________________

Hi Eric,

David’s likeness to Christ is astounding.  David’s throne represented Christ’s throne. David undoubtedly was the greatest of the Kings in the nation of Israel ruling over the twelve tribes.  Christ’s KINGDOM OF GOD is a past, present and future everlasting KINGDOM. King David ruled over Israel as born in Bethlehem,  slayed a lion and bear, presented himself humbly before King Saul, with an ass, bread and a lamb, an ass is redeemed by a lamb: Ex. 13:13 ( an ass refers to the unsaved and the lamb (Christ) redeems the sinner, the bread refers to the body of CHRIST) David was a shepherd of the sheepcote , David destroys his enemies just as Christ will destroy His enemies (the non-elect)

David wept at the death of Abner, Jesus wept before raising Lazarus, David pleased all the people, Christ pleases those he saves, the house of David waxed stronger and stronger, just as Christ’s Kingdom as JESUS saves his elect, David slays the champion Goliath just as Christ will slay Satan in Rev. 20:10, David was prudent in all manners, Christ dwells in Prudence.  Christ said, my kingdom is not of this world. The worldly representation of the Kingdom of God manifested by King David which glorified Christ’s Spiritual Kingdom is ended now.  The only representation of the Kingdom of God at this present time is outside of the churches which strayed from Truth just as national Israel, and God’s Holy Spirit of Christ JESUS no longer dwells there ( Thank God) but God is using the Spirit of God to save sinners outside of the congregations/churches through the hearing of HIS WORD in TRUTH.

I hope this is helpful.

JESUS IS LORD,

Craig

Saladin taking Jerusalem, 1187

Dear Sheik Omar,

The Jesuit Papacy has one really great fear.  That is, the fear Islamic peoples will finally wake up to the fact that their Masonic leaders are completely in the lap of Rome.  Thus, my purpose in working with Prince Yasser and you is to wake up the Muslim world to the fact that Rome has hired American and European guns (financed by the corrupt Masonic Sunni leaders of Saudi Arabia, UAE and Kuwait) to wage this present Crusade in order to secure and expand the Pope’s Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem (Masonic Jewish Labor Zionist Israel) as well as to rebuild the Kingdom of Babylon (from Dubai to Baghdad) under the guise of a “New Sunni Caliphate.” To accomplish this, Mecca and Medina must be destroyed during this American-led, Papal Crusade.  All Arab attention must be redirected by Rome to the rebuilt City of Babylon once Mecca and Medina are in ashes.

Once honest Muslim leaders begin to attack the Jesuit Papacy and its Anglo-American (RIIA-CFR) governments enforcing the Pope’s damnable “Temporal Power,” I will host them on the broadcast to tell their story.   Part of my plan is to fully acquaint the Muslims that they had absolutely NOTHING to do with 911, save the Saudis and Muslim Brotherhood—totally in the arms of the Mother of Harlots in Rome via the Black Pope’s CIA!  Muslims must immediately STOP feeling guilty and STOP being intimated for Knight of Malta Edward Cardinal Egan’s 911 “Pearl Harbor” wickedly blamed on them!  They must stand up and denounce this 911 black-op as a design of Rome to incite Western hatred for all Muslims.  This must be done openly and boldly in a public forum.  If they are called upon to prove their claim, then I will humbly come to their aid at which time the Pope’s CFR press will be unable to logically respond and thus back off and shut its lying, loud mouth.  The O’Reillys, Hannitys, Peter Kings, Laura Ingrams, Ann Coulters and all those papal slaves licking “the slippered toe of the Pope” (as do all Skull and Bonesmen during their initiation in “the Tomb”) cannot refute my information and thus will be put to silence.  Then, the Muslims, once they realize they have been victims of a cruel hoax,  can go on the attack demanding answers to their honest claims while denouncing the papal rule of America.  With the Pope’s CFR/RIIA-controlled press totally unable to give a truthful retort, the Muslims will be further convinced they are right and Rome will begin to shudder.  The Jesuit Papacy is terrified at the possibility that she could lose control of Islam as did the Roman Papacy in 750 AD, which loss of control continued for over 1000 years—until the Order began to regain that control with its Great Avenger, Napoleon Bonaparte I.

Cromwell at Dunbar with His Undefeated Puritan Ironsides, 1650

May the Lord bless our work and may He set back the powers of Satan’s Jesuit Papacy in our lifetime.  He has done it before and He can do it again as He is omnipotent.  Saladin, the forerunner of His anti-Jesuit Highness Oliver Cromwell, killed 230 Knights Templars and Knights of Malta when he took Jerusalem from the Knight Templars in 1187 AD.  Hence, the Risen Son of God used Islam to restrain the power of Satan’s Roman Papacy in the Middle East.

Oh, haste the day when a White Protestant and Baptist Army/Navy/Air Force will valiantly fight alongside avenging Muslim Warriors in attacking the strongholds of Rome.  For our common enemy has murdered tens of millions of us over the centuries via the Crusades and accursed “Holy Office of the Inquisition.”  I truly pray we may behold such a sight in our lifetime.

“The wicked flee when no man pursueth, but the righteous are bold as a lion.”

Proverbs 28:1

Lord bless dear Sheik,

Brother Eric

____________________________________________

Dear Brother Eric,

Thank you so much for your friendship and information.

I must be brief. I am always praying for you and I hope that you are praying for me. I will a always be eagerly listening to your broadcast.

The information that you have provided to me is astounding, and very thorough, therefore I know it to be True.  My greatest contribution to your work would be to document the inter-relations between the Islamic hierarchy (an abomination in the name of the Prophet) and those of Western Europe and the Papists.  My family were actually Islamic converts going back over ten centuries, so we have much insight into the inner workings of the Faith.

I have extensive information regarding this, and I will get the information to you a soon as possible. Your broadcasts are excellent, and focusing on the nobility and their acts of demonology is important in understanding our enemy.

I feel that we will win in the end, we are already on our way!

Lord Bless Brother Eric.

Wa-salaam-a-leikum,
Sheik Omar

Savage Black Cafeteria Brawl: Alabama State University, February, 2011

Dear  Brother Joseph,

I find it most telling that you utterly refuse to agree with me on one point of my general analysis by merely stating “you are entitled to your opinion.” This is not mere subjective opinion, but facts—objective, irrefutable, evidential facts you refuse to acknowledge.   Indeed, I have a right to be angry over all the epidemic Black crime in every major city of this country.  And I have a right to be angry at YOU, my Black brother in Christ, YOU who refuse to openly and verbally resist it.  You could have written that this brawl is despicable and that you hate and stand against this wickedness, but  no, that cannot be done, can it?  You have united with your Black race, right or wrong—which is most typical of most Minority Civil Blacks, and this is Sin on your part.

I shall pray for your repentance before it is too late and the White rage I am seeking to redirect against the Jesuits does not consume you in the approaching “Civil War II” as warned of by Mulatto Tony Brown in his Empower the People which social destruction the Order has planned for all of us.

Thank you for this conversation.

Lord bless,

Brother Eric

___________________________________________

Mr. Phelps,

As I said previously you are entitled to your opinion. You are right that MANY who are privileged to attend accredited Colleges and Universities do not appreciate it. Same goes for many whites as well! At my school I have seen activity similar to this but not as violent with White students as well. I think your anger should be more so directed to my generation. I really truly believe that the root of all of this is Parenting and the Media/Entertainment Industry. I pray that when you say White rage is growing, you are referring only to the People in general and not YOU included!

Peace and Blessings,

Joseph Oden

____________________________________________

Dear Brother Joseph,

I apologize for my previous email of a few minutes ago.  I did not see your response below.

As you know, 70% of all Blacks are illegitimate (the biblical term is “bastard”).  No nation can be built on a bastard population.  Whose fault is that, the White Protestant and Baptists’?  The school system is lacking in funding.  Whose fault is that, the White Protestant and Baptists?  Since when is funding the primary necessity for an education?  The White Protestants and Baptists of this country up to about the 1950 received their education on ONE ROOM SCHOOLHOUSES.  An older White lady who worked for me for years had to make dresses out of burlap bags or feed bags (dyed, of course) to have clothes for school.  Her parents could not afford to buy meat so she was raised on potatoes and other carbohydrates.  This led to her diabetes.  Poverty and lack of educational funding did not prevent Lois from being an intelligent and well-spoken Christian lady.

You speak of funding.  The socialist-communist property tax on this property that I live on is over 3,000 Federal Reserve Notes a year.  And what does this fund?  It funds the public schools that teach a host of lies; public schools that have banned the AV1611 Bible, and public schools that practice, as a matter of policy, reverse discrimination against Whites.  I get to pay for this!  I cannot send my White children to these public schools because they will be assaulted by Blacks and Mexican/Puerto Ricans/Hispanics.  So we home-school—at great cost and time expense to us—so our White children will not be beat up or even killed by the Black and Hispanic children whose parents pay no socialist-communist property tax.  We White Protestants and Baptists (I care not for the White Roman Catholics who hate us and have destroyed this once Protestant, Bible-based culture) are trapped.  We are in the exact same predicament the Blacks were in the day of Malcolm X—who I defend in my book and on my website.

Thank you for admitting there is no justification for these actions.  But what is the solution?  For us White Protestants and Baptists, our only solution is racial separation.  When we discipline a Black student or laborer for his misbehavior or laziness or non-performance, why we are called “racists.” It is now a matter of race, not performance.  It is a matter of the color of his skin and not a content of his character.  I witnessed this same wickedness in the USAF (1972-1977) as the White officers refused to discipline Blacks for fear of being branded “racists” and thus not being promoted.  I met only one White officer who did in fact discipline unruly Blacks and will never forget his name—USAF Col. Bobby Hughes.

You state that you object to my categorization of Blacks as the “Majority” being Savage.  I was raised among Blacks in the North Bay region of California.  I was in the county jail with Blacks.  I went to school with Blacks.  I was in the military with Blacks.  My personal experience (the best teacher) is that indeed the Majority of Blacks are Savage—about 80% Savage, 20% Civil.  They hate all Whites in general and never acknowledge that the greatest friend to the Blacks for the last 500 years have been the White Protestant and Baptist peoples.  This paramount racial hatred for Whites is the foundation for Black Savagery.  Were not all the Blacks who had to time to march over the Jena Six agitation in fact Black Savage racists?  Why did they seek to protect six Savage Blacks who, with one kick to the temple, could have killed that White young man they ganged up on like the dogs they were.  Nooses were hung from a tree which was wrong, but does that justify the attempted murder of the White?  I have condemned the White Roman Catholic Savage behavior of the Los Angeles police beating of Black serial criminal Rodney King.  (My father, who had been the Police Chief of the Richmond PD told me he would have fired every one of those cops.)  Have you condemned the criminal beating of the Savage Black Jena Six so championed by that hateful racist, Masonic Mulatto Al Sharpton?

You address the “Drug Dealing.” When are you going to attack the Pope’s CIA/Mafia collusion in bringing the drugs into the Black communities?  The answer is not more police and most definitely not surveillance cameras on every street corner!  Why would you welcome a police state in order to fight the Drug Trade?  This is exactly what the Jesuits want! The answer, dear Joseph, is bringing the Pope’s White Roman Catholic CIA and White Roman Catholic Mafia to justice as well as executing all drug dealers.  Simple solution.  Baltimore is, as I perceive it, a Majority Savage Black city.  The Middle Class Whites have fled to the suburbs—as is the case in nearly every White city in the US.  Why?  Is it because Whites are inveterate, hateful racists refusing to live around Blacks in general?  No. It is because Black crime has driven them out of their homes in the city and, in order to escape that crime, they have resettled outside the cities (which includes taking out loans to buy homes they cannot afford) away from the war zones.  This has further destroyed the White Middle Class born out of the Reformation.  The one redeeming attribute of the Roman Catholic, Jesuit-ruled city of Baltimore was “Preacher Brown,” the great Black Preacher Joseph Brown who inspired me every time I heard one of his fiery sermons.  I dearly loved the man, as I have stated many times on my broadcasts.

Finally, as to racial separation.  God created the races so as to keep mankind separate.  Before the Great Flood of Noah there was only one race (neither White nor Black), a race that was probably Brown or olive-skinned.  As you know, it was a only Ten generations from Adam to Noah, a mere 1656 years, during which Man became totally corrupted, and united against God.  So He created the races via Shem, Ham and Japheth; He instituted languages as a judgment for Babel, and He divided the earth into continents for one primary purpose (Genesis 10:25)—to keep mankind divided.  But Rome has forced integration and amalgamation upon the Whites of historic White Protestant nations.  This has been done by socialist-communist legislation and legislated equalitarianism that is both against the Word of God and against the nature that God has created.  It cannot last.  But if you wish to live under these maxims, then may you do so in your own country with others who believe likewise.  But for those of us who believe that forced miscegenation is a sin against God calculated to result in the destruction of the White Race—without which there is no political freedom on earth—, we now have no country in which to live.  This is why I advocate the creation of a new White Protestant and Baptist nation in a portion of North America, particularly in a portion of Pennsylvania.  (Racial Jews may live among us that we might receive the blessing of Genesis 12:1-3.)  This is a choice that should be facilitated by those who believe in freedom of choice, but hence, we WASPS and White Baptists have no freedom of choice—to the delight of the Jesuit Papacy.

I would agree that we should be in prayer for this sin-hardened, and heartless generation.  Meanwhile, crime should be punished when it is now condoned and people should have the legal right to live among their own race—the the exclusion of all others—as a matter of religious conviction.  When the races wisely agree to separate into their own nations and keep the Reformation Bible in their public affairs; when secret societies are outlawed and the Roman priesthood and Jesuits are expelled (Baltimore without Jesuits?!), then crime will drastically decrease as was the case in early White Anglo-Saxon Protestant and Baptist-Calvinist America (1789-1868).

Again, please delete my previous post of a few minutes ago.  I did not know you had sent such a detailed response.

Lord bless dear brother Joseph,

Brother Eric

________________________________________________

Mr. Eric,

You said a lot here so I will break it apart piece by piece.  The point in my argument was in no way intended to make any kind of excuse or justification for such actions. No, I would never walk in the way of sinners anymore, but I once did. Thankfully God delivered me from reckless partying, drinking, and fornication. It just seems to me that your statements are a bit cold-hearted. I blame parenting and the media/entertainment industry for most of the damage my generation is facing regardless of race. You are entitled to your opinion, but please consider this. Most of these young individuals have grown up without a father, in a broken household, in an environment where drug-dealers are the only successful role-models, and  where the school system is severely lacking adequate funding. Thankfully I have grown with both of my parents who instilled the importance of prayer at an early age. I believe that rather than condemning, we need to stay in prayer for this heartless generation. I consider some of these people my friends because I can see the pain in them, and how their spirit is thirsty for a way out of their situation. Many of them have tried Church, but were met with people who have the same views you do. Yes, there are some older Black (you are right, African American is not the proper term here) men and women who feel the same way you do about these people. Consider this, “A drug-addict can leave his addict friends, and attend Church. If he relapses and leaves the Church, his drug-addict friends will accept him with open arms. However, if the Believer leaves his Church-Going friends for the evil of this world and then returns to Church, he is met with stoning and out casting.” This should not be!

I laughed a bit when you said they would call me an “Uncle Tom” or “Oreo”. Maybe “Preacher” or “Reverend”, but I clearly do not fit “Uncle Tom” characteristics. My only problem with your “Majority Black Savage” comments are the fact that you coin the MAJORITY of us Blacks as SAVAGE. This is not true even in inner-cities. The drug-dealers and killers are only the select few. To be honest, “Drug Dealing” is declining because Police are doing a very good job at cracking down. In Baltimore, there are police cameras on almost every street corner in “rough” neighborhoods!

One more thing I would appreciate if you elaborate. You stated also on your website that races are best if kept separate. I would strongly disagree with you on that! Howard County/Ellicott City/Columbia MD was deemed the second BEST place to live in the country. The diversity there is amazing. There are Blacks, Whites, Asians, and Arabs all living there together and it is a beautiful living condition!

Thank you Again for Your Time and God Bless,

Joseph Oden

Dear Brother Joseph,

Thank you for contacting me.

First, I am delighted that you are a Black man in-Christ Jesus.  Your eternity is quite settled (I Peter 1:3-5).  We shall enjoy heaven together forever with Christ our Savior and God our Father (Revelation 5:9).

However, I find your response to my carefully worded articles concerning the “Majority Savage Blacks” to be highly offensive.  How can you, whom I term as a “Minority Civil Black,” have any identification with these anti-White, hatefully racist, lawless, constantly fighting-and-fornicating, Majority Savage Blacks? Have you ever been an innocent, unsuspecting victim of Majority Savage Black crime as I have been?  They make no cultural contributions; they take, take, take, and only destroy what is left of what was once a high White Protestant culture—now thoroughly Roman Catholic.  And do not blame the living conditions as the reason for the actions of these Majority Black Savages.  Nowhere in the Word of God are you permitted to employ such a justification for crime.  Criminal activity is a choice, and not the result of poverty—a poverty these Majority Savage Blacks have created for themselves via their ludicrous, fighting and fornicating lives.  I have lived in poverty and never once robbed, raped or murdered anyone.  NO, these criminals need to be PUNISHED for their savagery.  And some of these Black Savages are your friends?  Do you not believe the Holy Scripture when it commands us believers-in-Christ not “to stand in the way of sinners” (Psalm 1:1)?  Where in the Scripture are we to “UPLIFT” such hardened, violent and vicious Savage Black criminals?  Should I “UPLIFT” the members of the White KKK as well as the White Hell’s Angels, or seek punishment for their crimes?

To the contrary, the Scripture commands their punishment for doing evil (Romans 13:3-4).  Further, we are to warn them that God is not mocked: that whatsoever they sow, they shall reap (Galatians 6:7).  And what they are going to reap, unfortunately for all of us, is a huge race war.  The plundered Whites of this country are fed up with pro-Black, anti-White governmental discrimination as well as ceaseless Black-on-White crime.  And because of general White rejection of the Word of God, we (I speak as a White man) shall be as putty in the hands of the Jesuits in creating and manning the New Right Fascist Movement.  When that happens, the blood is going to flow in rivers on both sides—to the delight of the Jesuit Order!  And key to the success of this plotted race and religious war (Black/Muslim v. White/ “Christian”) will have been the despicable Majority Black Savagery that has plagued this country for the last 50 years, since the Black Pope’s wicked, Socialist-Communist, Civil Rights Movement led by serial adulterer and Bible-denier, Martin Lucifer King—the Black slave of Francis Cardinal Spellman’s master of the Civil Rights Movement, White Devil Jesuit John LaFarge.

I challenge you, my Black American brother-in-Christ, stand up to these “Majority Savage Blacks.” Tell them to stop hating, robbing, raping and murdering the White man as they shall reap what they have sown.  Tell them to stop killing White men just to steal their I-Phones—as was done just a few months ago in Black/White Roman Catholic Philadelphia.  And just watch how they will respond to you: they will call you a “honky,” “an oriel cookie (black-on-the-outside and white-on-the-inside),” “an Uncle Tom,” and threaten to do you bodily harm!  As the profane, Black comedian Chris Rock said in all seriousness, “We hate the White man!”, all the Savage Blacks in the audience giving their loud, boisterous approval.  Yes, join me in naming them for what they are (while defending the “Minority Civil Blacks” who also deplore the “Majority Savage Blacks”) when I call them “Majority Savage Blacks” evidenced by their daily works of hateful, anti-White racism.  Join me in warning them that if they will not repent and turn from their sinful, evil ways, they are going to be violently rounded up and sent to the concentration camps via the hands of merciless, Savage White Fascists addicted to the octagon gladiators—most of whom will be White Roman Catholics of Irish and Italian descent.  Do you have the courage to do so my Black brother-in-Christ?  The answer is YES if you have the faith of Christ within you (Galatians 2:20).

Lastly, I am greatly offended by that damnable term known as “African-American.” Do you not realize we Whites hate that term and are greatly aggravated by its continual use?  Do you not know this is a Jesuit design to further the division and hatred so necessary for the impending race/holy war so the Jesuits’ Department of “Romeland” Security can come and “rescue” all the Whites by carting off the Blacks to the camps?  I never use the term “European American” and would never stoop to use that wicked designation to describe my White Anglo-Saxon Protestant and Baptist people here in America.  I am a White American and you are a Black American.  So please, stop the agitation by refusing to call yourself an “African-American.”

To further understand my point as to the lawless and violent behavior of the “Majority Savage Blacks,” view the following video taken of a recent brawl at the Alabama State University.  Now do you understand why the Whites during the Uncivil Rights Era fought against forced integration?  Additionally, the majority of these brawling Blacks are on “scholarships” (while we Whites get nothing)—educational welfare—and appreciate nothing!

See the video here.

Again, thanks for your thoughts and I am humbled that my work has benefited anyone.  To God be the glory!

Lord bless,

Brother Eric

____________________________________________

Hello Mr. Phelps,

I would like to say that it has been a blessing to read some of your articles on your website. I am pretty young (22-years-old) and proudly and boldly declare that I am a spirit-filled believer in Christ. I came across your web-site in doing research on the Jesuit Order, as I recently discovered their existence. I was amazed at what I found on your site, and have relentlessly been sharing what I have found with friends and family.

However, I couldn’t help but find your “Majority Black Savage” section highly offensive.  I am African American myself, and have seen the miraculous works of God in the lives of many that you may feel fit the “savage” description.  Many of which are my friends!  I have even read some of your responses to some irate African American viewers in which you state that the “savages” DESERVE the worst.  I couldn’t help but think “He that is without sin, may cast the first stone”.  I do believe that many are “harsh” individuals, but rather than CONDEMN, we are called to UPLIFT as true Christians!  I also feel that one cannot make such harsh accusations without first considering the living conditions that such individuals endure.

I want to thank you for your time. And again, God Bless! Some of the info I have read on your site has been food for my soul!

Peace and Many Blessings,

Joseph Oden

Hexagram: Sign of Rome's Masonic Jewish Labor Zionists

Dear Bruce,

I understand your rage against the Masonic Jewish Labor Zionists, believe me.

A dear married couple who are Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites, whom I personally know, lived in Israel for 15 years.  Both are Messianic Jews in Christ Jesus.  He was a pastor.  They have two children, both formerly in the IDF.

Yet, the Masonic Jewish Labor Zionists controlled by the Talmudic Orthodox Jews working for Rome drove them out of Israel.  They now have a US ministry with the Friends of Israel.

Fred told me the fanatical Orthodox Jews beat down the walls of their little church and the police watched and did nothing.  Israel has an “anti-missionizing law” since 1977 making it a crime to tell lost Jews about the Lord Jesus Christ, Yeshua.

There is no question, dear Bruce, that the Masonic Jewish Labor Zionist government of Israel is utterly corrupt, completely in the hands of the Jesuit Papacy via Knight of the Equestrian Order/Knight of Malta King Juan Carlos and a few other SMOMs.  But then so are the governments of every nation in the Arab world including the PLO and Hamas.  You know that Peres and Arafat had a partnership in the Israeli telephone company named PALTEL according to Barry Chamish.

Here are a few maxims we must always remember when dealing with the Israel issue:

1.      The racial Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites have a God-given right to their land to the exclusion of all Arab, Black, White, Hispanic and Asian racial Gentiles (non-Jews).  The Abrahamic Covenant is a racial promise to the physical descendants of Abraham through Isaac, through Jacob, through the 13 tribes.

2.     There is a blessing and a curse pronounced upon individuals and nations in accordance with how they treat the racial Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites.  We do not want to be under that curse as we presently see Japan for its gift of ONE BILLION dollars to the “Palestinians”—a non-historic nation with no rights to the land whatsoever.

3.     The Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites are no longer under the Mosaic Law since the veil was torn in half at the death of Messiah (Matthew 27:51).  Therefore, no obedience to the Mosaic Law is required in order for the racial Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites to live in their land.  They are not under the Mosaic Law evidenced by the fact they have had no Hebrew prophet for nearly 2000 years.  National Israel has been set aside “until the fullness of the Gentiles” is completed (Romans 11:25) after which national salvation will come to Israel.

4.     There are six different kinds of “Zionists,” as I covered with Lenny Bloom on one of his broadcasts.  They are 1) the Pope’s Masonic Jewish Labor Zionists presently ruling Israel—Rome’s “Revived Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem;” 2) the anti-Pope Revisionist Zionists led by the late Vladimir Jabotinsky who sought to prevent the Nazi mass-murder of Jews in Poland but was later murdered in Hunter, New York.  His truly nationalistic Irgun was destroyed by Ben-Gurion’s Haganah, now the CIA/German BND-created Mossad; 3) the Pope’s Orthodox Jewish Zionists who claim Israel has no right to exist PRIOR TO the coming of Messiah, which is an utter denial of Joel 3:1, Ezekiel 38:8 and Zechariah 14:1-4.  Clearly there must be a re-gathered Nation of Israel living in a condition of national unbelief prior to the Coming of Messiah in Power to the earth—the Second Coming of Christ; 4) the Arminian Christian Zionists which includes the vast majority of Baptists and other men such as 33^rd Degree Freemason Billy Graham and John Hagee.  These “Christians” support both the government of Israel and the Talmudic Orthodox Jews (which are evil, clearly in the lap of Rome) as well as the right of the Hebrew/Jewish/Israelitish people to live in their land of promise (which is good, according to Genesis 15:18; 12:1-3).  I used to be one of these Arminian Christian Zionists; 5) the Calvinist Christian Zionists (which includes myself and other Christian men) who know the government of Israel is ruled by the Jesuit Papacy, the Nation now governed by the evil predecessors of Israel’s future leaders called “scornful men” (Isaiah 28:14) who will be ruling Israel during the future 70 week of years as foretold in Daniel 9:27.  Thus, we abhor the present government of Israel—Rome’s Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem—but we defend the right of the Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites to live in their land of promise; 6) the Lord Jesus Christ/Yeshua Messiah Himself, he being the foremost Zionist bringing peace and final comfort to Zion yet in the future (Isaiah 40:1-2, 9-11).

5.     The participation of Rome’s Israeli government and Mossad in the Lavon Affair, the attack on the USS Liberty and 911 were all ordered by the Jesuit Order’s International Intelligence Community leaders in Rome.  The attack on the USS Liberty was completely backed by Masonic Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor and serial adulterer President Lyndon B. Johnson who wanted that “god—–“ ship sunk to the bottom of the ocean.  The dancing Israelis on top of a van in New Jersey right after 911, and the Israeli company involved with the WTC were both controlled by Rome via Jewish Freemasons and the CFR, so as to provide a visible connection to Israel in order to justify a future nationwide rage against the Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites living in the US.  That day will surely come when the White fascists come to power.

6.     As to the killing of Arab men, women and children who are primarily Muslims avowing the destruction of Israel, this is unfortunate, but do not the fanatical Arab Muslims mass-murder Israeli men, women and children?  As I have said, all this would stop if Rome did not continue to perpetuate the Arab Muslim presence in Israel.  Now if those Arabs in Israel (though enjoying the highest standard of living of any Arab people) seek to leave the country, they are persecuted and driven back to Israel by the very Arab Muslims claiming to be their “brothers.”  Did not the Pope’s Masonic Muslim King Hussein kill tens of thousands of Arab Muslim “Palestinians” in Jordan during the Black September Massacre of September, 1970?  Did not the Emir of Kuwait (another serial adulterer), upon his return to the country after the First Gulf War, beat and drive all “Palestinians” back to Israel to continue the Israeli-Arab agitation of Rome?   Did not Lebanon refuse to assimilate the Arab Muslim “Palestinians” but rather keeps them in “refugee camps?”  Does not Saudi Arabia utterly hate the Arab Muslim “Palestinians” never helping them to resettle in Arab countries?  Clearly both the Pope’s government of Israel and all surrounding Arab governments utterly refuse to solve the problem.  And anyone proposing the right solution, that is repatriation to Arab Muslim nations, is killed outright—men like Rabbi Kahane.  The death of Arab civilians is not just the fault of the Israeli government: every Arab Muslim government is to share the blame as all these wicked governments are ruled by the Jesuit Papacy.  And woe be to the Arab leader who seeks to be at peace with Israel: he will be killed outright by Rome’s Intelligence Community as was Anwar Sadat—murdered by Rome’s Muslim Brotherhood in control of the Egyptian military.

7.     Indeed, the Rothschilds are ruled by Rome and intermarry with the Ten Noble Roman families advising the Jesuit Council of the Black Pope.  The wealth of the Rothschilds is as nothing compared to the Farnese, Chigi, Colonna, etc.,  families now ruling all the currencies and gold hordes.

8.     Indeed, Greenspan, Chertoff, Bernanke, Geithner (?), Madoff and all these wicked “Court Jews” of Rome have robbed us blind.  But remember that Greenspan is a Knight of the British Empire subject to Rome; Chertoff is a Knight of Malta; and Geithner is also a Knight of Malta who refused to save the Jewish Lehman Brothers with a $65 million bond that would have saved the market ONE TRILLION Dollars according to Goldman Sachs guru Jim Cramer.  Also remember that “Court Jew” Richard Fuld, the CEO of Lehman was also a member of the CFR and thus a party to the plot to bring down Lehman loaded with Jewish Money.  Let us not also forget that all the six banking beneficiaries of the “bailout” were controlled by the Jesuits via Knights of Malta including Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs and Citigroup.  Do not forget the current robbery perpetrated by Kolberg, Kravis and Roberts Chairman, Henry Kravis—the controller of the corrupt First Data credit card monstrosity raping merchants every day with their hidden charges concealed on monthly statements that no merchant can read.  This racial Jew Henry Kravis is a Roman Catholic and a Knight of Malta—just like Abraham Foxman leading the wicked ADL also creating anti-Jewish fury here in the US.

Thus, there is a good Zionism (#5 above), but it is the abject enemy of the Jesuit Papacy’s Labor Zionists and will never be allowed to come to power—unless God intervenes with a righteous Gentile nation honoring His Word and everlasting promise to the racial sons of Jacob.  That is one of my goals in founding our new White Protestant and Baptist nation of “ProBaptiCal.”

I trust this helps.

Lord bless,

Brother Eric

_________________________________________________

Eric,

I couldn’t stop thinking about about the e-mail I sent you yesterday.  That Genesis 12:7 reference may or may not mean what I think it means.

I am simply sick about all the brutal killing of men, women, and children by those twisted Israelis.  THEY are evil!  And, the twisted murdering creeps all call themselves Zionists.

I get so angry just thinking about these evil Israelis role in the Lavon Affair, the USS Liberty, and 911, coupled with their constant need to murder and destroy.

Yes, I realize there are some good people in Israel who may have some form of Zionist Nationalistic Pride, perhaps in their Olympic athletic program or something else constructive, but for the most part, when I think of Zionism, I think about the Jesuit controlled Rothschilds lying, cheating, stealing, and murdering to establish that evil nation.

I think about that hideous looking Alan Greenspan, Michael Chertoff, and all those Zionist Jews on Wall Street who have robbed us blind.

So, I hope you will forgive me when I get a little upset with you for saying anything positive about Zionism.

I guess a baby born as the result of a violent rape can be regarded as positive too.  I just don’t like it.

Regardless, I do think you are fantastic 99.999% of the time.

I love you like a brother,

Bruce

__________________________________________________

Eric,

I have a problem with the Zionists in Israel abusing the Arabs in Palestine.

Genesis 12:7 reads, “And the Lord appeared unto Abram, and said, “Unto thy seed will I give this land…

Are you sure that none of the Arabs being abused, murdered, and kicked out of their homes by these evil Zionists are not the seed of Abraham too?

Yes.  The Arabs consider themselves to be the seed of Ishmael, not of Isaac.
The way I see it is the way Myron Fagan and Ben Freedman tell it.  The Satanic Rothschilds, most probably assisted by the Jesuits, lied about the SS Sussex to get the USA involved in WWI so Great Britain would have to honor their deal with the Zionists and steal the land, where Israel is today, from the folks living there, give it to the Rothschilds so they could have their state of Israel.
Both Fagan and Freedman were loyal to Rome.  Freedman was indeed a Roman Catholic Jew and traitor to his people.
It pains me when I hear you say that Zionism is somehow good.  There is nothing Biblical about murdering, stealing, and manufacturing a living Hell for these Palestinian people.
I answered this above.
Most of these people in this area of the world, label them any way you choose, have some claim to Abraham’s seed.  The land we call the state of Israel belongs to all of these folks, not just the Zionist murderers who call themselves Jews.  Remember, Hitler called himself a Christian (Roman Catholic).

Disagreed.  See above.
Jews love God and practice the religion of Judaism.  None of these Zionists love God and practice Judaism.  It is precisely the same as saying that Hitler loved God and practiced Roman Catholicism.  It’s all a load of poop!
No one loves God unless they love his Son.  This eliminates all unsaved Jews, Muslims and Roman Catholics from the list of those who “love God.”
I wish you would stop saying that Zionism is somehow good.  It is not good.  There is nothing good about it.  It is absolutely disgraceful.  You simply confuse matters when you say it is good in any way.  Henry Ford really had it right in his book The International Jew.  These folks don’t need their own separate little country in the middle east.  They rule the roost wherever they are.  They are truly independent and international people.
33rd Degree Scottish Rite Freemason Henry Ford worked for the Jesuits.  The Jesuits of Detroit wrote The International Jew, not Ford.
Another thing you said made me very uncomfortable.  You said Felix Larkin and Montagu Norman, two gentile bankers, were far wealthier than the Rothschilds.

Both Norman and Larkin were Gentile Knights of Malta.
How do you know this?  Is everyone else wrong about the Rothschilds?  Aren’t they the wealthiest family in the world?

Research and private sources.  Yes, they are wrong, as blaming the Rothschilds as the source for the money power is both unbiblical and not grounded in true history.  This blaming the Rothschilds and thus all Jews is a Papal maxim championed by Pope Innocent III.  Have you read my book?

The more I study, the more it appears that the Zionists, folks only pretending to be God loving Jews, are the folks running virtually everything.  Eric, I am still on your team, accepting the idea that the Jesuits are the Zionist puppet masters,  but it sure appears that the Zionists are calling most of the shots.

See above comments on the Pope’s Labor Zionists.

These Zionists appear to be nothing more than the Jesuits’ Mobsters.  I wish you would stop saying that Zionism was good in any way.  It simply shakes my confidence in you.

I still love you like a brother.

Bruce

Lord bless,

Brother Eric

Flag of Jamaica

To the reader:

Please remember that English is not Brother Bjorn’s native language.  Look to the spirit of his writing.

Dear Brother Bjorn,

I do believe the Jesuit Order running the re-programming mind-control in the USSR and Red China are able to so traumatize an individual so as to then be enabled to reprogram that man.  Jesuit Hollywood’s movie trilogy titled The Bourne Identity, The Bourne Supremacy and The Bourne Ultimatum make this clear.  The only bulwark against the success of the program is the Word of God memorized in the heart and mind of the victim.  This, it has been proven, the Order’s Communist inquisitors cannot overcome.

Your Editor

__________________________________________________

To Mr. Eric Jon Phelps,

With Respect to God and Jesus Christ, I write on this issue to you.

Proverbs 4 vs 7, “Wisdom is the principal thing therefore get wisdom,and with all thy getting get understanding.”

The propose of Education is to bring out understanding with oneself by reading the Bible loving God words an Accepts Jesus Christ, has our Authority on Earth by the power of Holy Spirit. The principle: We Christian men and women love and knew is the truth, for the time Reformation Christian Nations, were the Greatest educated, Scientific,Technological an Agricultural nations in the world. South America, Central America nations never achieved this.  Nor the Socialize Communist Atheist U.S.S.R, their technological 80% come form the Western nation Primary USA.  The irony is the communist Nations are thought to hate God and Christ,Christian nations, yet depend on these nations for their life hood. I read of the Murder of General George Patton, Christian man of Principle, by Joseph Stalin.  Patton wanted save 28500 American, British soldiers for being kidnapped sent to Russian Gulags.  The Kidnapped continue in Germany cold war there ,during the Korean war ,President Eisenhower is quoted has saying he will not pay for the Korean war U S p.o.w. held after the war nor risk war with USSR.  The Practice of Kidnapping continued in Vietnam war.  U S Pow where sent to USSR Gulag, Russian late president Boris Yeltsin, is refer to U S A prisoners in Russia living there today to NBC news journalist.  Nothing was done to save them or contact them, it was forgotten by the main press for these soldiers who were brainwashed, experimented on by the Communists.  My Question to you Mr. Phelps: these kidnappings look to be training practice for communist instructors to control population in brainwashing technique, to erase the person mind from where he come from.  Do you agree that there is technology out there to erase a persons mind?  I hope not, but it seems that these technology of erase minds exist.  It takes a Strong-willed men of God and Jesus Christ,to resist these Experiments.  Many Christian soldiers payed with their life in Russian Gulag, so has not to be lost their soul and body to Devil.

With thank to God and Jesus Christ will on his Earth i give thanks God Blessed.

Brother Bjorn

King George V and Tzar Nicholas II, Cousins and Knights of Malta, 1915

Dear Brother Thomas,

This is only part of the story.

The Jesuits, via the Knights of Malta (as well as by Illuminized Scottish-Rite/Grand Orient Freemasonry), controlled Great Britain, Germany, Russia, France, Italy, Japan and America.  All the leaders of those nations worked together to realize World War II—the second act of the Black Pope’s Second Thirty Years’ War (1914-1945).  The Jesuits, in control of the Anglo-American empires via Washington and London, created the Axis Powers as well as the Allied Powers, which Powers worked together at the top for the entire duration of this 11^th Papal Crusade. During that horrible thirty years the Protestant British Empire was nearly destroyed; the Protestant German Second Reich was destroyed; the Lutherans of Germany were decimated; the Russian Orthodox Church and Romanov dynasty was conquered and submitted to Rome; over 50 million Russian Orthodox “heretic” Christians were murdered (from the Bolshevik Revolution, to Stalin’s Purges, to Hitler’s Operation Barbarossa, to Stalin’s reckless and insane invasion of Germany; historic Protestant Churches in Germany and the Netherlands were bombed and destroyed; the Eurasian Jews of the historic “Pale of Settlement” were “terminated” by Jesuit Temporal Coadjutors Hitler and Stalin—Rome’s Twin Pincers—working together (Stalin never opposing Hitler when the Jews of Belarus were rounded up, shot and buried in mass graves by the SS), etc.  If you read my Chapter 37 in VAIII, all of this is detailed—-in about 150 pages.

Russian Knight of Malta, Major General Count Cherep Spiridovich, 1914

As to Orthodox Russia and her Russian Orthodox Knights of Malta—the same Military Order of which Len Horowitz is now a member—, here is the truth.  The Jesuits, using their Russian “Tongue” of the Knights of Malta, persecuted the Jews in Russia via SMOM Alexander III as well as SMOM Nicholas II.  The Pogroms incited anti-Czarist fury among the Russian Jews because of their terrible suffering.  The mold is now set: it is the Jews—many of them (playing into the trap) becoming Communist Bolsheviks—versus the Czar and Orthodox Patriarch of Moscow, head of the Orthodox Church who also secretly directed the pogroms.  (This is why Tikhon the Patriarch was never killed by Stalin and his Bolsheviks!  He was a party to the plot!)  These pogroms began by blaming the Jews for the Jesuit/Anarchist assassination of the beloved, anti-Jesuit, “heretic and liberal” Czar Alexander II in 1881 (of which only one insignificant Jew was involved).  Persecutions continued to the pogrom of 1905 (the bloodiest pogrom in Russian history) overseen by Nicholas II.

With the building of the Bolsheviks, via London’s Fabian Socialists (ruled by the Jesuits), the propaganda began to be spread asserting there was an “International Jewish Conspiracy” to overthrow the Czar then to consummate in a world government under “Judah.”  The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion were written by Jesuits in France (just prior to the Dreyfus Affair in 1890) and served as the backdrop of the Order’s Mein Kampf later to be attributed to Hitler—who only read newspapers and never wrote any book!  Count Spiridovich would also contribute to the furor with his The Secret World Government Or “The Hidden Hand” published in 1926 seemingly validating Mein Kampf.

Jesuit/Knight of Malta Edmund A. Walsh (L) with Jewish Bolshevik Grigori Zinoviev, USSR, 1922

When the Jesuits brought the 300 Jews of New York City over to Russia who then openly led the Revolution in 1917 via Jews Trotsky and Lenin, the Czar and his Knights ruling the Russian secret police (Okhrana) secretly aided the Bolsheviks in their overthrow of the government.  Secret Police members joined the inquisitional Cheka, later the Soviet NKVD, which, during WWII was given training and technology by Knight of Malta Wild Bill Donovan’s OSS—to further enslave the “heretic” Russian Orthodox people with the KGB.  Nicholas was secreted out of the country, his death faked (see The File on the Tzar), and the Knights were formally expelled in 1917, the Grand Master “fleeing” to Paris.  Without the aid of the Jesuit Order’s Russian Knights of Malta protected by the Czar, there could have been no successful Bolshevik Revolution!  Knight of Malta King George V and Knight of Malta Czar Nicholas II were cousins! working together to the end of a successful communist revolution overseen by the Jesuits.  In 1922 Shriner Freemason President Warren G. Harding gave 60 million dollars in aid to the Bolsheviks, and that same year Jesuit Edmund A. Walsh from Washington’s Georgetown University arrived in Moscow, he to “negotiate” with the Bolsheviks on behalf of the Vatican for two years.  What a cover story! In that “negotiation” Walsh appointed Stalin to be the Secretary of the Communist Party and “Koba” remained so until the day he was poisoned in March of 1953.  Indeed, both monarchs of Britain and Russia worked together to ensure a successful Bolshevik Revolution—which, in the words of Walsh, was the single most important event since the fall of the Roman Empire in 476.  Why? Because the Order used its Communist Bolshevik Jews to conquer “the Third Rome”—Moscow!  At the same time, the Order ignited anti-Jewish fury across Europe which let to Hitler’s ultimate reign of terror.

Jesuit Superior General Wladimir Ledochowski, 1915-1942; Master of the Second Thirty Years' War (1914-1945)

Now the Jesuit Papacy had it all: Rome, Constantinople, Moscow, London, Tokyo, Washington, Paris and Berlin.  Remember, this Bolshevik Revolution occurred during the Black Pope’s Second Thirty Years’ War (1914-1945), the Jesuit “Knights of the Virgin Mary” conquering and to conquer.  The Order would also destroy the Islamic Ottoman Empire via England (the Sultan and King secretly working together as not a shot was fired when Freemasonic Crusader General Allenby entered Jerusalem in 1917) conquer Arabia, take control of the Mosques of Mecca and Medina, and create its “oil bonanza” for the purpose of financing the rebuilding of Babylon via the American Knights of Malta running Standard Oil of California via Knight John McCone.   (McCone was later the Director of the CIA and participated in the JFK assassination and cover-up).  This was the real purpose for enthroning the Order’s fanatical, Wahhabi-Islamic Saudi dynasty in 1932 (King Ibn Saud advised by English Knight of Malta Sir John Philby), the dynasty to be removed in the near future.

Knight of Malta DCI Leon Panetta and President Barry Davis Obama, 2010

It is this same unified Jesuit Power over national rulers of today that will oversee and direct the presidents, kings and dictators of the world to work in tandem for the military defeat, invasion and partition of apostate Protestant/apostate Baptist, Roman Catholic-dominated North America within the next 50 years.  The Black Pope’s Unified International Intelligence Community will direct the decisions of the American politicians and military generals to this horrible end.  And no one will know how it happened unless they have first acquired this understanding of 20^th century, Jesuit-directed history.

Lord bless,

Brother Eric

__________________________________________________

Click here: The Nazi Roots of the House of Windsor

So I read in the above article url, “One of the biggest public relations hoaxes ever perpetrated by the British Crown, is that King Edward VIII, who abdicated the throne in 1938, due to his support for the Nazis, was a “black sheep,” an aberration in an otherwise unblemished Windsor line. Nothing could be further from the truth. The British monarchy, and the City of London’s leading Crown bankers, enthusiastically backed Hitler and the Nazis, bankrolled the Führer’s election, and did everything possible to build the Nazi war machine, for Britain’s planned geopolitical war between Germany and Russia.”

So was this to overthrow the Byzantine knights that were in Russia? I’m trying to find out why Russia was such a target and have been a target of Catholic and worldwide propaganda for all these years.

brother Eric, have you covered this? i believe I remember you mentioning that Russians were also betrayed by the leader of Russia at that time. Stalin I think it was.

Craig, do you have a comment? I’m trying to sort this all out here and looking for some input.

Thomas