This is indeed a wonderful, insightful quote that only a Man of God (the sole phrase written on his tombstone) having walked-the-walk could have written.

Brother Eric

___________________________________

Christian and Missionary Alliance Preacher, Author and Man of God, A. W. Tozer

“That Incredible Christian”

“The Christian believes that in Christ he has died, yet he is more alive than before and he fully expects to live forever. He walks on earth while seated in heaven and though born on earth he finds that after his conversion he is not at home here. Like the nighthawk, which in the air is the essence of grace and beauty but on the ground is awkward and ugly, so the Christian appears at his best in the heavenly places but does not fit well into the ways of the very society into which he was born.

“The Christian soon learns that if he would be victorious as a son of heaven among men on earth he must not follow the common pattern of mankind, but rather the contrary. That he may be safe he puts himself in jeopardy; he loses his life to save it and is in danger of losing it if he attempts to preserve it. He goes down to get up. If he refuses to go down he is already down, but when he starts down he is on his way up.

“He is strongest when he is weakest and weakest when he is strong. Though poor he has the power to make others rich, but when he becomes rich his ability to enrich others vanishes. He has most after he has given most away and has least when he possesses most.

“He may be and often is highest when he feels lowest and most sinless when he is most conscious of sin. He is wisest when he knows that he knows not and knows least when he has acquired the greatest amount of knowledge. He sometimes does most by doing nothing and goes furthest when standing still. In heaviness he manages to rejoice and keeps his heart glad even in sorrow.

“The paradoxical character of the Christian is revealed constantly. For instance, he believes that he is saved now, nevertheless he expects to be saved later and looks forward joyfully to future salvation. He fears God but is not afraid of Him. In God’s presence he feels overwhelmed and undone, yet there is nowhere he would rather be than in that presence. He knows that he has been cleansed from his sin, yet he is painfully conscious that in his flesh dwells no good thing.

“He loves supremely One whom he has never seen, and though himself poor and lowly he talks familiarly with One who is King of all kings and Lord of all lords, and is aware of no incongruity in so doing. He feels that he is in his own right altogether less than nothing, yet he believes without question that he is the apple of God’s eye and that for him the Eternal Son became flesh and died on the cross of shame.

“The Christian is a citizen of heaven and to that sacred citizenship he acknowledges first allegiance; yet he may love his earthly country with that intensity of devotion that caused John Knox to pray:

‘O God, give me Scotland or I die.’

“He cheerfully expects before long to enter that bright world above, but he is in no hurry to leave this world and is quite willing to await the summons of his Heavenly Father. And he is unable to understand why the critical unbeliever should condemn him for this; it all seems so natural and right in the circumstances that he sees nothing inconsistent about it.

“The cross-carrying Christian, furthermore, is both a confirmed pessimist and an optimist the like of which is to be found nowhere else on earth.

“When he looks at the cross he is a pessimist, for he knows that the same judgment that fell on the Lord of glory condemns in that one act all nature and all the world of men. He rejects every human hope out of Christ because he knows that man’s noblest effort is only dust building on dust.
“Yet he is calmly, restfully optimistic. If the cross condemns the world the resurrection of Christ guarantees the ultimate triumph of good throughout the universe. Through Christ all will be well at last and the Christian waits the consummation.

“Incredible Christian!”

Baptist Chaplain John Gano Baptizing George Washington, Hudson River, 1781

The following article came from this webpage:

http://drjamesgalyon.wordpress.com/2008/06/16/john-gano-evangelist-calvinist-baptist/

John Gano: Evangelist, Calvinist, Baptist

John Gano, a contemporary of Isaac Backus, served both as a pastor and as an itinerant evangelist in New England, the Middle Colonies and the South.  David Benedict comments that as an itinerant evangelist, Gano was “inferior to none… unless it were the renowned Whitefield.”  Gano had extensive evangelistic experience both as an itinerant and as a pastor.  His initial ministry experience came when he accompanied Benjamin Miller and John Thomas, who were responding to a request made for assistance by a pair of Virginia churches to the Philadelphia Association.  On this journey the young evangelist had the opportunity to preach.  Taking Romans 10:3 as his text, he preached with power and several people were converted.  This embarkment led to several preaching invitations for the novitiate.

In 1755 the Charleston Association authorized Oliver Hart, pastor of the First Baptist Church of Charleston, to secure the services of a missionary.  This missionary was to be sent to the destitute parts of that colony and to its neighboring provinces.  Gano received the appointment and began his career as an evangelist.  The resulting missionary tour at the Jersey Settlement on the banks of the Yadkin River was very successful.  Henry C. Vedder notes this “was the beginning of that work of evangelization to which the subsequent rapid progress of Baptists was made.”

Gano’s subsequent pastoral ministry included stops in New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Kentucky, but the bulk of it was spent serving the First Baptist Church of New York City.   First Baptist was constituted in 1762 with 27 members.  Under Gano’s leadership and evangelistic zeal, the membership grew to 132 in five years.  The War of Independence suspended the ministry of the church, as it did many other congregations.  Disbanded in 1777, the congregation did not reconvene until 1784.  When the church reopened its doors, the members who made their way in—noticeably smaller in number than seven years earlier—found that their facilities had been damaged by the British troops who had used them as a stable.  [The Union troops of the North would do the same to Southern Churches in the South!]  The ravages of war had not only wreaked havoc to the structure of the church building but had also depleted the congregation of well over half of its members. Nevertheless, Gano penned the circular letter on behalf of the Philadelphia Association with a hopeful tone.  He wrote to the affiliate churches:

We trust, you will unite your efforts with ours, to the same good purpose; and that our thanksgivings for the present peace, harmony, and increase of our churches, our prayers for their further growth, with a more powerful effusion of the Divine Spirit and grace upon them, will be mutually offered up.  May the consideration of our effectual calling prove an incentive thereunto!  Which is the subject now to be considered, as in the tenth chapter of our Confession of faith…. This is an act of sovereign grace, which flows from the everlasting love of God, and is such an irresistible impression made by the Holy Spirit upon a human soul, as to effect a blessed change….

We are to consider who are the called.  They are such as God hath chosen and predestinated both to grace and glory, elected and set apart in Christ, as redeemed by his blood….

The changes produced are from darkness to light, from bondage to liberty, from alienation and estrangedness to Christ to a state of nearness and fellowship with him and his saints….

This is an holy calling, and is effectual to produce the exercise of holiness in the heart, even as the saints are created in Christ Jesus unto good works.

Samuel Waldo, moderator for the association, and William Verndon, its clerk, signed the letter by order of the association.  Gano remained with the New York congregation only four more years; yet in that brief span he baptized 125 individuals and the total membership of the church grew to 192.

Richard Furman, who served as the pastor of the First Baptist Church of Charleston, and as the first president of the Triennial Convention, stated the doctrines Gano “embraced were those which are contained in the Baptist Confession of Faith, and are commonly styled Calvinistick [sic].”  Furman described the evangelistic preaching of Gano, observing, “The careless and irreverent were suddenly arrested, and stood in awe before him; and the insensible were made to feel, when he asserted and maintained the honour of his God.”  It was under such searching preaching by Gano and others that A.H. Newman says a “large proportion” of General Baptists in Virginia “felt… for the very first time they understood what conversion meant.”  Leon McBeth declares Gano “must be ranked as one of the most outstanding Baptist leaders in early America” because his preaching abilities, his evangelistic zeal, and his appointment as an associational missionary helped “turn scattered Baptist churches of America into a denomination.”

_______________________________________________

Here is what J. T. Headley wrote of Gano in The Chaplains and Clergy of the Revolution (1864) on page 264-265; 271-272:

“On another occasion he was standing near some soldiers who were disputing respecting whose duty it was to cut wood for one of the came fires.  At length one exclaimed in an angry manner, ‘I’ll be d—–d if I will do it.’  Soon after finding he must, he took up the axe to perform it.  Gano immediately stepped forward, and reaching out his hand, said, ‘Give me the axe.’  ‘Oh no,’ replied the soldier, ‘the chaplain shan’t cut the wood.’  ‘Yes, but I must.’  ‘Why?’ said the soldier in surprise.  ‘Because I just heard you say you would be d—–d if you would cut it, and I had rather do it for you than that you should be made imserable forever.’  The longest homily on the guilt of profanity would not have produced half the effect on the soldiers that this indirect rebuke did. . . .”

“Mr. Gano returned to New bury, where the army erected huts to live in during the winter, andone lafger than the reast for a place of public worship on the Sabbath.  Here three services a day were held, the chaplains from each brigade preaching in rotation.

“Thus passed the winter, while rumors of peace filled the land with hope and delight.  In the spring the British evacuated New York, and Gano returned to the city, to find his house dilapidated and plundered.  His scattered congregation, such as were living, soon returned, and he settled down once more to his pastoral labors.  He continued here for some time, but attracted by representations made to him of the growing state of Kentucky, and hoping to relieve himself from debt which he saw no way of canceling in his present position, he removed thither in 1781 [just after Gano had baptized George Washington by immersion in the Hudson River while encamped at Newburgh], much to the disappointment and regret of his church.  He settled near Frankfort, where he died in 1804, in the seventy-fifth year of his hag.  A fall from his horse in 1798, followed by a paralytic chock, rendered him a cripple the last six years of his life, but he never ceased his labors—sometimes preaching while lying on his back.  Calm and resigned, he saw death approach without a terror, and to a friend who asked him if he wanted to go home and be with Christ, he faintly, sweetly answered, ‘Yes.’ This was the last utterance of his lips on earth, and the Christian and patriot passed to that better land reserved for the people of God.

“True to his country, true to his high office, true to his God, he went through the trying scenes of the Revolution, and through life honored, respected and loved by all who knew him, and now sleeps with those whose names are inscribed in the hearts of their countrymen.”

_______________________________________________

Of Gano baptizing George Washington we read from Dr. William P. Grady’s tome How Satan Turned America Against God (2005) on pages 150-153:

“Citing The Baptism of George Washington, as recorded in the archives of the First Baptist Church of New York, Dr. E. Wayne Thompson writes:

‘Daniel Gano, one of Gano’s sons and a captain of the artillery, was present and said that he, with about forty officers and men, accompanied the chaplain down to the Hudson River where the Reverend John Gano baptized George Washington.’

“Dr. James Norwood, a former associate pastor of Dr. J. Frank Norris, cites from A History of the First Baptist Church in the City of New York by I. M. Haldemann:

‘While in camp at Newburgh [near the Hudson River, 1781], General Washington requested Patsor Gano to baptize him according to the Scriptures.  He did so immersing him in believer’s baptism, in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost.’

“With the onset of the Washington Bicentennial, a number of secular historians began to question the well-established tradition, citing an absence of ‘official’ documentation.  In an attempt to ‘convince the gainsayers,’ Dr Lemuel Call Barnes, a respected Baptist historian, devoted thirty-five years to the question, ‘Was General George Washington baptized by Chaplain John Gano?’  He notes:

‘Washington said that many things about his life could be known only by tradition.  He took costly pains for the preservation of his personal writings [his letters subsequently burned by Tobias Lear V after he murdered the General via the poison cup!], leaving us “over 400″ manuscript volumes. . . . Yet he said to a correspondent:

“Notwithstanding that most of the papers, which perhaps may be deemed official, are preserved; yet the knowledge of innumerable things of a more delicate and secret nature is confined to the perishable remembrance of some few of the present generation.”

“Dr. Barnes writes (with regard to what I believe to be the crowning achievement of his unpublished, 180-page manuscript),

‘At my request, grandchildren of the chaplain put the certainty of their childhood teaching into affidavits.’

“After contacting several Gano descendants, I discovered that the priceless documents had been lost to the family for decades.  My own investigation turned up nothing.  Then, in May of 2002, my friend and colleague, Pastor James Beller, informed me that he had found the missing affidavits in the archives of the Samuel Colgate Historical Library, Rochester, New York!  Two months later, I had the priviledge of personally reviewing these amazing handwritten papers.  Two notarized testimonies read as follows:

‘I am the grandson of Rev. John Gano, now in my eighty-third year, and the brother of Mrs. Margaret Ewing.  I was raised from my fifth year to manhood by Mrs. Margaret Hubbell (nee Gano).  I have heard her say that her father baptized (immersed) George Washington.

‘S. F. Gano, M.D.

‘Subscribed and sworn to in my presence this 16th day of August, 1889.

‘Stephen Gano Long, Notary Public, State of Kentucky

‘To whom it may concern: I, Margaret Ewing (nee Gano) aged 90 years last May, being of sound mind and memory, make this statement:  I have often heard my aunt Margaret Hubbell (nee Gano), the elderdaughter of Rev. John Gano, say that her father told her that he baptized General George Washington, at Valley Forge, to the best of my recollection.  She, Mrs. Hubbell, also said that General Washington, for prudent reasons did not desire that his baptism should be made public.  Rev. John Gano was a Chaplain in the Revolutionary War and an intimate personal friend of General Washington.

‘Margaret Ewing

‘Subscribed and sworn to in my presence this 16th day of August, 1889.

‘Stephen G. Long, Notary Public, State of Kentucky’

“That a ninety-year-old Christian widow would employ the innocent qualifier ‘to the best of my recollection’ when suggesting Valley Forge as the baptismal site (as opposed to Newburg) is refreshingly disarming of suspicion.

“In 1908, Rev. E. T. Sanford of Manhattan’s North Church commissioned a painting of Gano baptizing Washington.  The historical masterpiece was originally placed in the Baptist church at Asbury, New Jersey, where it hung until Mrs. Elizabeth Johnston, John Gano’s great-granddaughter, presented it to William Jewell College, Liberty, Missouri, in 1926.  (Time magazine named the former Baptist school as its choice for Liberal Arts College in the year in 2001.) . . .

“In the lobby of the John Gano Chapel (underneath the painting of Washington’s baptism), an encased sword is prominently featured.  A commemorative plaque reads:

‘The Sword’

‘In 1996, Margaret Gano Redpath, the great, great, great, great granddaughter of John Gano offered William Jewell College the family sword.  George Washington had received it from the Marquis de Lafayette; in turn, he bestowed it on John Gano, the first chaplain of the Continental Army.  History records George Washington gave the sword to John Gano after he baptized Washington in the Potomac [in fact, the Hudson River].’ . . .

“Pastor Beller renders the following profound observation in his book, America in Crimson Red:

‘George Washington presented that battle sword, given to him by Lafayette to his Baptist chaplain, John Gano.  Let us not take this gesture of kindness too lightly, for a commanding officer knows exactly the ramifications of surrendering his sword. . . . The author will leave the reader to ponder the full thrust of its meaning.  However, “a word fitly spoken” is in order at this juncture of our narrative.

‘It is the contention of this author that Washington knew the symbols he was leaving to posterity:  He was breaking the baptism of the established church-state monstrosity by submitting to believer’s baptism.  He further demonstrated, to the best of his ability, his deferment to the victor of the second state of the war, the spiritual stage.  This deferment was not to John Gano personally, but to the Bible and the belief system he so profoundly represented.  He placed the symbol of victory and the final break with England, and in essence, Rome, in the hands of a Bible believing, baptized preacher of the Gospel.

‘To the baptized believers, looking back through the leaves of history, the meaning of the baptism and the sword ought to be clear—America is not under the baptism of England, or Europe or Rome.  America’s baptism has no earthly headquarters.‘”

The End

Ezra Stiles, Congregationalist Minister and President of Yale College, 1783

AV1611 Reformation Bible-believing, Congregationalist Calvinist Ezra Stiles was in fact one of the principle men behind the Founding Fathers of the American Federal Republic sent from Connecticut and Rhode Island.  That glorious American Republic (1789-1868), born out of the White Anglo-Saxon Protestant and Baptist Calvinist American Revolution beginning at Lexington and ending with the Treaty of Paris (1775-1783), would, according to our man of God, develop a huge maritime commerce.  That commercial blessing from God would in turn be the means by which the gospel of Jesus Christ would be taken to all nations.  Stiles, the President of Yale College, spoke these several words about our great White Founding Father, George Washington, in a sermon delivered in 1783:

“And while we render our supreme honors to the Most High, the God of armies, let us recollect with affectionate honor the bold and brave sons of freedom who willingly offered themselves and bled in the defense of their country.  Our fellow citizens, the officers and soldiers of the patriot army, who, with the Manlys, the Joneses, and other gallant commanders and brave seamen of the American navy, have heroically fought the war by sea and by land, merit of their once bleeding but now triumphant country laurels, crowns, rewards, and the highest honors.  Never was the profession of arms used with more glory, or in a better cause, since the days of Joshua the son of Nun.  O Washington!  How do I love thy name!  How have I often adored and blessed thy God for creating and forming thee the great ornament of humankind!   Upheld and protected by the Omnipotent, by the Lord of hosts, thou hast been sustained and carried through one of the most arduous and most important wars in all history.  The world and posterity will with admiration contemplate thy deliberate, cool, and stable judgment, thy virtues, thy valor, and heroic achievements, as far surpassing those of a Cyrus, whom the world loved and adored.  The sound of thy fame shall go out into all the earth, and extend to distant ages.  Thou hast convinced the world of the beauty of virtue; for in thee this beauty shines with distinguished luster.   Those who would not recognize any beauty in virtue in the world beside, will yet reverence it in thee.  There is a glory in thy disinterested benevolence which the greatest characters would purchase, if possible, at the expense of worlds, and which may excite indeed their emulation, but cannot be felt by the venal great, who think everything, even virtue and true glory, may be bought and sold, and trace our every action to motives terminating in self–

“Find virtue local, all relation scorn;

See all in self, and but for self be born.”

(Dunciad, b. 4, p. 480.)

But thou, O Washington!  Forgottest thyself when thou lovedst thy bleeding country.  Not all the gold of Ophir, nor a world filled with rubies and diamonds, could effect or purchase the sublime and noble feelings of thine heart in that single self-moved act when thou renouncedst the rewards of generalship, and heroically tookest upon thyself the dangerous as well as arduous office of our generalissimo, and this at a solemn moment, when thou didst deliberately cast the die for the dubious, the very dubious alternative of a gibbet or a triumphal arch.  But, beloved, enshielded, and blessed by the great Melchisedec–the King of righteousness as well as peace–thou hast triumphed gloriously.  Such has been thy military wisdom in the struggles of this arduous conflict–such the noble rectitude, amiableness, and mansuetude of thy character–something is there so singularly glorious and venerable thrown by Heaven about thee–that not only does thy country love thee, but our very enemies stop the madness of their fire in full volley, stop the illiberality of their slander at thy name, as if rebuked from Heaven with a “Touch not mine anointed, and do my hero no harm!”   Thy fame is of sweeter perfume than Arabian spices in the gardens of Persia.   A Baron de Steuben shall waft its fragrance to the monarch of Prussia; a Marquis de Lafayette shall waft it to a far greater monarch, and diffuse thy renown throughout Europe; listening angels shall catch the odor, waft it to heaven, and perfume the universe.

And, now that our warfare is ended, do thou, O man of God, greatly beloved of the Most High, permit a humble minister of the blessed Jesus—who, though at a distance, has vigilantly accompanied thee through every stage of thy military progress, has watched thine every movement and danger with a heartfelt anxiety and solicitude, and, with the most sincere and earnest wishes for thy safety and success, has not ceased day nor night to pray for thee, and to commend thee and thy army to God—condescend to permit him to express his most cordial congratulations, and to share in the triumphs of thy bosom, on this great and joyous occasion.  We thank the Lord of Hosts that has given His servant to see His desire upon His enemies, and peace on Israel.  And when thou shalt now at length retire from the fatigues of nine laborious campaigns to the tranquil enjoyment, to the sweetness and serenity of domestic life, may you never meet the fate of that ornament of arms and of humanity, the great Belisarius, but may a crown of universal love and gratitude, of universal admiration, and of the universal reverence and honor of thy saved country, rest and flourish upon the head of its veteran general and glorious defender, until, by the divine Jesus whom thou hast loved and adored, and of whose holy religion thou art not ashamed, thou shalt be translated from a world of war to a world of peace, liberty, and eternal triumph!”

Stiles also addresses several important topics worthy of review!

To read most of the sermon preached before the General Assembly of the State of Connecticut on May 8, 1783, see this link.

Tobials Lear V: Personal Secretary and Murderer of George Washington on December 14, 1799

Tobias Lear V is undoubtedly the murderer of our dear White Father of the Republic of these Protestant United States of America (1787-1868), General and President George Washington.  Lear not only poisoned Washington with anthrax (possibly via a handkerchief), but then gave his noble relative a deadly cocktail, the final “poison cup.” Lear went on to be the personal secretary of President Thomas Jefferson, Lear destroying most of Washington’s private letters.  Since Jefferson benefited from both the death and destruction of the private papers of Washington, Thomas Jefferson also stands accused of murder!

President Thomas Jefferson, 1805: Co-Conspirator in the Murder of George Washington, 1799

This wicked sinner, Tobias Lear, later committed suicide, driven to his grave by a guilty conscience born out of his calculated murder of the greatest leader of the most prosperous and advanced Gentile nation in world history!  Your Editor must take a moment to weep over yet another “extirpation” of an “accursed liberal and heretic” leader carried out by Satan’s Jesuit Order.  For Washington, like Oliver Cromwell (also poisoned), was used by the Risen Lord Jesus Christ for the benefit of His Body, the Church of the risen Son of God captivated by the Word of God, the Holy Bible of the Protestant Reformation!

More to come!

Washington Crossing the Delaware River, Accompanied by Baptist Chaplain, Captain John Gano, December 25, 1776

“General Washington’s personal appearance was in harmony with his character; it was a model of manly strength and beauty.  He was about six feet two inches in height, and his person well proportioned,—in the earlier part of life rather spare, and never too stout for active and graceful movement.  The complexion inclined to the florid; the eyes were blue and remarkable far apart; a profusion of brown hair was drawn back from the forehead, highly powdered according to the fashion of the day, and gathered in a bag behind.  He was scrupulously neat in his dress, and while in camp, though he habitually left his tent at sunrise, he was usually dressed for the day.  His strength strength of arm, and his skill and grace as a horseman, have been already mentioned.  His power of endurance was great, and there were occasions, as at the retreat from Long Island and the battle of Princeton, when he was scarcely out of his saddle for two days.  Punctilious in his observances of the courtesies of society as practiced in his day, he was accustomed, down to the period of his inauguration as President, at the balls given in his honor, to take part in a minuet or a country-dance.  His dairy uniformly records, sometimes with amusing exactness, the precise number of ladies present at the assemblies, at which he was received at his tours through the Union.  His general manner in large societies, though eminently courteous, was marked by a certain military reserve.  In smaller companies he was easy and affable, but not talkative.  He was frequently cheered into gayety, at his fireside, by the contagious merriment of the young and happy, but also relapsed into a thoughtful mood, moving his lips, but uttering no audible sound.

Washington’s religious impressions were in harmony with the rest of his character,—deep, rational and practical.  On this topic, our remaining space admits of little more than a reference to the interesting article on this subject in the fourth section of the appendix to Mr. Sparks’s twelfth volume.  Washington was brought up in the Episcopal communion, and was a member of the vestry of two churches.  He was at all times a regular attendant on public worship, and an occasional partaker of the communion; and is believed habitually to have begun the day with the reading of the Scriptures [the AV1611 English Reformation Bible] and prayer in his closet.  His private correspondence, his general orders, and his public acts of all kinds contain devout recognitions of a divine Providence in the government of the world [as did Oliver Cromwell], and his whole life bears witness to the influence of a prevailing sense of religious responsibility.  In his last moments he breathed a truly pious spirit of resignation.  In his own affecting words, he died ‘hard,’ but he was ‘not afraid to go.’ Though prevented, by the rapid progress of his disease, and the almost total obstruction of the vocal organs [our dear George was strangling to death via a poison cup!], from expressing his feelings, he manifested to the last the submission of a sincere Christian to the will of the great Disposer. . . .

In the final contemplation of his character, we shall not hesitate to pronounce Washington, of all men that have ever lived, THE GREATEST OF GOOD MEN AND THE BEST OF GREAT MEN.”

[Emphasis added in Bold]

Edward Everett, The Life of George Washington, (New York: Sheldon and Company, 1860), pp. 258-263.

White South African with Lion

We are witnessing a White Protestant Genocide before our very eyes!  It is taking place today in South Africa.  A similar genocide as already run its course in Rhodesia (a.k.a, “Zimbabwe”) overseen by its anti-White, Jesuit-trained, hateful Black racist Robert Mugabe.  As stated in several of your Editor’s articles relating to this most heart-rending topic, since the Pope’s British-led, Socialist-Communist, Black African National Congress has come to power in 1994, over 50,000 Boers have been brutally murdered in their own country.  No international outcry has been made; no tears of pity shed for the tortured and murdered White Protestant Boers, including men, women and children.

But why should there be?  After all the Boers are White, from a combined stock of German, French and Dutch races.  Historically, they are Protestants who brought Luther’s German Reformation Bible and the gospel to the savage, tribal Blacks of the southern continent.  Many a Black Zulu was born again into the Body of Christ due to the witness of White Boer preachers.  Further, these Boers brought farming, food and prosperity to the backward and poverty-stricken Blacks whose way of life resembles the vast majority of Blacks in all other countries—serial fighting and fornication!  Yes, these White Protestant Boers, God answering their prayers, escaped the pope’s murderous, Jesuit-led, continental inquisition of Europe, arriving at Cape Town in the mid-1600s.  Over time they founded he Transvaal and Orange Free State; with God’s blessing, they pioneered diamond and gold mining which success made Johannesburg the wealthiest city in all Africa.

But the Sons of Loyola cannot permit White Protestant peoples of any land to live in peace and prosperity.  This would be a violation of their military mission, it being to destroy the “accursed” Protestant Reformation—including all its “heretics and liberals”—from off the face of the whole earth!  So, after the Jesuits—these secret worshippers of Horus—had taken over the Protestant British Crown with the Hanoverian dynasty in the person of King George III, they began to use the military of the Protestant British Empire to destroy White Protestant nations.  The first such nation to fall under Jesuit-led British attack was your Editor’s limited federal republic of these United Protestant States of America (1776-1868).  King George’s generals would burn Protestant churches to the ground and his colonial governors would decreed universal Negro liberty to the end that radically emancipated Blacks would rise up and kill their White Protestant masters!  (Thomas Jefferson warned of this very plot, intending to make it an article of the Declaration of Independence!)  A second British attempt to overthrow White Protestant America would again be attempted in 1812, but King George, though burning the capital in Washington, failed—by the grace of God in Christ!  Yes, the policy of the Order’s British Crown would be to use emancipated Blacks to destroy the White Protestant/Baptist peoples and Bible-based cultures born out of the Risen Son of God’s Grand and Glorious White Protestant Reformation.  This, the Ignatians would do in South Africa.

The beginning of Pope Pius IX’s Jesuit-led crusade against the White Protestant Boers was the arrival of British troops in Zululand.  This occurred in the 1870s, remembering prior to which time the Boers were living in a general peace, the Boers in their land, the Zulus in their land.  In fact, the Boers had served as mercenaries for the Zulus, defeating Black rival tribes at war with the Zulus.  Payment for such superb fighting was land—land in which the Boers could live, they enjoying all right, title and interest to their real property.  But the British upset this delicate balance, to the end that if the Pope’s British Crown could incite the pagan Black Zulus to fight and kill the Protestant White Boers, then a Bible-believing people would be annihilated in accordance with the purpose of the Military Company of Loyola!

The Order launched a series of wars, via its British Crown, first against the Zulus, then against the Boers.  Queen Victoria’s Red Coats, aided by the French then ruled by Jesuit-controlled Louis Napoleon III, defeated the Zulus in 1879.  The Zulu capital of Ulandi was burned to the ground, which resultant Zulu rage was cleverly directed against the Boers.  During both Boer Wars, Jesuit-controlled Freemasons Cecil Rhodes and Alfred Milner of the Roundtable Group, armed the Zulus with guns and Bibles, encouraging the Blacks to kill the White Boers who “stole your land.”  (This same lie is being imbibed into the Alien Roman Catholic Mexican Invaders illegally occupying Southwest America at this moment!)  Yes, Anglican bishops and ministers actively encouraged the Zulus to kill the Boers throughout the entire Second Boer War (1899-1902).  And what a harvest for the Order!  Over 100,000 British soldiers—the cream of White Protestant English, Scotch and Irish manhood—died in a war that killed tens of thousands of Protestant Boer men, not to mention 37,000 Boer women and children who starved to death in British Concentration Camps.  All for AMDG— a Latin acronym for “for the greater glory of God”—the war-cry of the Jesuits!

But the war on the Boers would continue.  The Jesuits never forget their defeats, forgive their enemies of forsake their quest!  This time it would be a war to forcefully amalgamate Blacks and Whites with the intent of destroying the White Protestant Boers via miscegenation and civil war.  Failing in the attempt with the successful policy racial separation via apartheid, the father of that Biblical separation of racial peoples paid with his life.  In 1966, Prime Minister Henrik Verwoerd was stabbed through the heart while the nation’s Parliament in session; stabbed by a Jesuit-sent assassin never to suffer righteous capital punishment for his crime!  Yet apartheid prevailed, and the new Republic of South Africa established in 1961 prevailed, it becoming the most prosperous nation in Africa, while South African Blacks enjoyed the highest standard of living on the continent!  Indeed, the White-ruled, Protestant Republic of South Africa was no longer part of the British Commonwealth, no longer under the control of the Pope’s British Crown, and thus targeted for destruction, in the end to be resubmitted to the Order’s British Crown.

Now comes the grand finale, the beginning of the end of Protestant culture and the White-raced Protestant Boers.  Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Bill Clinton was installed into the Jesuit Andrew “White House” in 1993.  Sitting in the Vaginal “Oval Office” of the Virgin Mary in the West Wing, our wicked American president, that darling of Jesuit Georgetown University, continued the economic embargo against South Africa.  This embargo, along with the others imposed by the US and UN since 1963, was decreed for one reason: to remedy the “injustice of apartheid,” that is, the codified racial separation of White and Black peoples living within the same nation.  Mind you, the Boers would love to have their own White nation to the exclusion of all Blacks, just as Blacks have their own nation to the exclusion of all Whites carved out of the midst of South Africa, the poverty-ridden nation of Lesotho.  Indeed, Blacks can have their own nation, but Whites, especially White Protestants, can never be permitted to build their own nation—anywhere on the face of the earth!

The plot worked.  Backed by British intrigue overseen by the Vatican, White rule ended in South Africa in 1994.  The Socialist-Communist ideology of “Black Theology”—the racial from of the Jesuit Order’s “Liberation Theology”—was put upon all South Africans via the Black Pope’s Nelson Mandela and his hatefully-racist African National Congress.  The nation was brought back into the British Commonwealth and Mandela, a member of the English “tongue” of the Knights of Malta, was made an international hero given the Nobel Peace Prize, as was anti-segregation, Martin Luther (“Lucifer”) King, a Black American Socialist-Communist given an audience with Pope Paul VI in 1964 for a job well done!  Both King and Mandela did the bidding of Rome in amalgamating the White and Black peoples of America and South Africa—furthering Rome’s Counter-Reformation conspiracy against White Protestant peoples and nations.

Today, the White Protestant Boers are facing racial and cultural annihilation.  They have only two choices: separate from pro-Black, anti-White South African government and form their own White Protestant nation, or remove themselves out of Africa to return to their ancient homeland, northern Europe.  Either way, they must separate from Blacks (whose murderous leaders are controlled by the Jesuits), or they will continue to be robbed, raped, tortured and murdered by the Majority Savage Blacks while singing their favorite song, “Kill the Boer.” Therefore, your editor is posting his Complete and Unfettered Endorsement to the White South African Boer request for said remedy, remembering the words of Thomas Jefferson:

“Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people [the Blacks] are to be free; Nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live under the same government.”

Carleton Putnam, Race and Reason: A Yankee View, (Washington, D.C., Public Affairs Press, 1961) p. 62.

Your Editor endorses the following posts by South African Boers seeking to obtain relief from their genocide:

Link 1

Link 2

King of Rome: Papal Throne in the Vatican, 2010

The epic Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks of Years as given to the Prophet Daniel by the Angel Gabriel (Daniel 9:24-27) has been a bone of contention between Historicists and Futurists for centuries.  That contention devolves upon one singular question: do we read the prophecy literally or do we not read it literally.  Indeed, to be literal or not to be literal, that is the question.

Now, the great hermeneutic of Bible-reading is to understand the passage before you in its literal, natural meaning.  This is how the Lord Jesus Christ—the incarnate Word of God—understood the Scriptures (the written Word of God); so should we.  Neither the student nor the scholar are ever permitted to redefine any word or phrase thereby departing from its historical, natural meaning unless addressing figurative language, such as a parable or a vision.  Yet, such figurative language is explained or defined in the immediate text or by a parallel passage in the Word of God further preventing the Bible-reader from inventing his own “private interpretation” of the word, phrase of passage under study.  In keeping to this rule of literal reading (for what is to keep in check the minds of men if all are permitted to redefine the very words of God!), we shall address this all-important prophecy.  As to its specific importance, the Angel Gabriel’s words compose a prophecy cited by the Lord Jesus Christ (Matthew 24:15); a prophecy partially fulfilled by Himself in his open declaration as “Messiah the Prince” (Matthew 21:1-9) in accordance with Zechariah 9:9; a prophecy serving as the key foundation for understanding the literal fulfillment of Revelation 6 through 19.

The two camps (to the exclusion of the Jesuitical Preterists) attempting to explain this Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks of Years are the futurist camp and the historicist camp.  The futurist camp is the oldest dating back to the First Century Church; the historicist camp is of recent development generally championed by the Protestant Reformers during the 16th Century.  This point does not validate either position as the “oldest and therefore the best” argument is used by Satan as the foundation for his design of overthrowing the Hebrew and Greek Scriptures translated into the series of English Bibles born out of the Protestant Reformation.  For, the “oldest and therefore the best” argument is employed by the Jesuits and their agents to seduce the Child of God away from the Scriptures of the Reformation into accepting “the oldest and therefore the best Greek manuscripts,” which manuscripts are pro-Jerome’s Latin Vulgate, thereby returning the “heretics” (“separated brethren” as of Vatican II) to the fold of Rome.  Rather, we are confined to the rule of the great hermeneutic when somberly addressing this keystone of Old Testament prophecies “given by inspiration of God,” preserved down to this day, and translated into our epic English Reformation Bible, the AV1611 in its present edition of 1769.

Now to specifics: the futurist position maintains the 70th Week of Daniel—the last seven-year period of the prophecy—is yet future, yet to culminate in the Second Coming of the Lord Jesus Christ.  The historicist position claims the last seven-year period of the prophecy has been fulfilled by Christ at his First Coming.  Futurists believe there is a gap of time between the 69th and 70th Week of Years, a gap of time that began the day after Christ declared himself “Messiah the Prince” on 10 Nisan (April 6), 32 AD, which gap of time continues to this day.  Historicists believe there is no gap of time between the 69th and 70th Weeks of Years, that the prophecy has been entirely fulfilled in its six specifics given in Daniel 9:24.

It is the position of your Editor that the historicist position is untenable for one most important reason: it denies the literal reading of the prophecy!  It violates our first great hermeneutic—the literal reading of the Word of God as taught to us by the living Word of God Himself, the Lord Jesus Christ!  Our first example illustrating the departure from our paramount rule of understanding the Scriptures is the date on which historicists assign the issuing the commandment to restore and build Jerusalem as foretold in Daniel 9:25:

“Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks; the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.”

There is only one commandment given to restore and to build Jerusalem (not the commandment to rebuild the Temple as first decreed by Cyrus) subsequent to the giving of this prophecy.  That command is found in Nehemiah 2:1-6, and in no other place in the Old Testament.  That command was given on the first day of the Hebrew New Year, the first of Nisan, in the 20th year of the reign of Artaxerxes, King of Persia.  That date, as proven by Sir Robert Anderson in his epic work, The Coming Prince, was March 14, 445 BC.  But to simplify the matter for this discussion, the command to rebuild the city of Jerusalem—not the Temple—was given in 445 BC.  There is no other year any such commandment was issued according to the testimony of the Hebrew Scriptures.

On the other hand, historicists believe the commandment for the restoration of Jerusalem was given in 457 BC and cite Ezra 7:12-26.  In this lengthy decree of King Artaxerxes, given in the seventh year of his reign that began in 465 BC, only the building of “the house of God” is addressed.  See Ezra 7:16, 17, 19, 20, 23 and 24.  Ezra then praises God for this decree and concludes in verse 27:

“Blessed be the LORD God of our fathers, which hath put such a thing as this in the king’s heart, to beautify the house of the LORD which is in Jerusalem.”

No mention throughout the entire text is made of the building of the city of Jerusalem—None!  But the historicist, in his attempt to prove his preconceived notion that the prophet’s Seventy Weeks of Years—490 years—has been fulfilled, Suggests that there was a coordinate, implied command to rebuild the city.  (Satan’s doctrine of implied powers has not only destroyed the intent of the writers of the U.S. Constitution, but has also, in this instance, rendered the Word of God of none effect!)  The historicist has departed from the literal reading of the Scripture (even as the American Supreme Court has departed from the literal reading and intent of the Constitution!), especially when we have one singular, clear commandment to rebuild Jerusalem recorded in the second chapter of Nehemiah.  Without a solid date for the issuing of that all-important commandment to rebuild Jerusalem, our understanding of Daniel’s prophecy is incomprehendable! Such is the first and foremost dilemma the historicist must address, but only if he violates our first great hermeneutic—the literal reading of the Bible.  Sadly, this is exactly what the historicist has done: he has assigned a date for the rebuilding of Jerusalem that is premised upon a lie—his lie—that Ezra was given that commandment, not Nehemiah!

The second dilemma, nearly as significant as the first, in which the historicist is trapped is found in Daniel 9:27:

“And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.”

The historicist maintains that, according to English grammar, the “he” of verse 27 refers to “Messiah” and not “the prince that shall come” of verse 26 which reads:

“And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.”

In light of other coordinate Scriptures the “he” of verse 27 cannot refer to “Messiah,” the Hebrew/Jewish/Israelite seed of David.  Daniel goes on to further speak of this same “he” in Daniel 12:11-12:

“And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days.  Blessed is he that waiteth, and cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days.”

How are we to understand this time when the abomination that maketh desolate is set up in the Hebrew Temple as foretold by Daniel in two specific places, Daniel 9:27 and 12:11?  How are we to comprehend this event that precedes national blessing to the Jew who survives the subsequent 1290 plus 45 days after this event?  The Lord Jesus Christ gives us His answer.  We read in Matthew 24:15, 21-22, 29-30;

“When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, whoso readeth, let him understand: . . .

“For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no nor ever shall be.  And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect’s sake those days shall be shortened. . . .

“Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken: And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.”

According to Christ there is only one “abomination of desolation” spoken of by Daniel the Prophet.  Thus, this singular event, this “abomination of desolation” of Daniel 9:27 and Daniel 12:11, is the same event perpetrated by the same man, the “he” of Daniel 9:27 (who, by the way, is the same “he” of Daniel 11:45, the same “he” of Daniel 12:7).

Further, how can “he” of verse 27 refer to “Messiah” when Messiah has been “cut off,” killed?  There is no mention of the resurrection of Messiah in this text.  Thus, if the “he” of verse 27 is referring to the slain Messiah, how can the slain Messiah confirm a covenant for seven years?

Further, according to Christ, as He answers the question of his Jewish disciples as to the sign of his Second coming to earth and the end of the world (or rather “age” and not the physical destruction of the world), in the days of this singular “abomination of desolation” as foretold by Daniel:

1. There shall be great tribulation to the extent that there has never been such a time in the history of the world, and that if not shortened, no flesh—man, beast, bird or fowl— would survive (Matthew 24:21-22).

2. After that terrible tribulation of those days, the sun shall be darkened, the moon shall not give her light, the stars shall fall from heaven and subsequently the Son of man comes back to earth in “the clouds of heaven” in great power and glory in fulfillment of Daniel 7:13-14, Christ referring to this very verse when put under oath by the High Priest (Matthew 26:64).

Image of the Roman Papal Caesar, Similar to the Future Statue of the Slain and Risen Pope to be Placed Inside the Third Hebrew Temple by the Jewish False Prophet of the Man-Beast

If we are to read the Bible literally and examine general recorded history, NONE of these events have occurred.  And it is during the days of these events that the “abomination of desolation” is set up as stated by Daniel the Prophet.

Further, since these two events listed above are yet future, the setting up of “the abomination of desolation” is also yet future, for it is in the days of this desolation of the future Holy Place–-the Third Hebrew Temple in Jerusalem (which, if Daniel 9:27 is to be literally fulfilled, must be erected since the Second Temple has been destroyed as per Daniel 9:26)—that the Lord Jesus Christ returns at His Second Coming in answer to the questions of His Jewish Apostles (Matthew 24:3)!

Therefore, the individual, the “he” of Daniel 9:27, that sets up “the abomination of desolation” in the Third Hebrew Temple, causing the temple sacrifices to cease, is yet to come.  This same man, the “he” who confirms an existing covenant for seven years, breaks this covenant, and sets up the “abomination of desolation” in the holy place.  In all the gospel records, did Jesus Christ confirm an existing covenant with many nations, including Israel, for seven years?  Did Christ then break that covenant, and then desolate the Hebrew Temple?  Would Christ even do such things, thereby becoming a covenant-breaker and another Antiochus Epiphanes IV who erected an image of himself in the Second Temple?  Did Jesus the Christ, who openly claimed via a public event to be the Messiah of Israel according to Zechariah 9:9, ever cause the temple sacrifices to cease?  They continued for another 38 years until Titus’ Roman Legions destroyed not only the Temple but the city of Jerusalem in 70 AD!  Clearly, Jesus the Messiah never confirmed an existing covenant with Israel and the nations for seven years, nor did He break that covenant, nor did he cause the Temple sacrifices to cease, nor did he erect an idol in the Hebrew Temple, this idol being the “abomination of desolation.”

Clearly, the “he” of Daniel 9:27 is not the “Messiah” of verse 26.  Rather, the “he” (in light of the verses given above) is referring to its nearest antecedent, “the prince that shall come,” within the same verse.  The people of this prince who destroyed the city of Jerusalem and its sanctuary (the Temple) were Roman legions.  Thus, this “prince that shall come” is Roman, whom your Editor declares to be the final Papal Roman Caesar—the Pope of Rome—who confirms this preexisting, international covenant for seven years in fulfillment of Daniel 9:27. As to this ongoing controversy as to which antecedent noun the pronoun “he” is referring to—the Hebrew “Messiah” or the Roman “prince that shall come”—, a noted theologian, Dr. H. C. Thiessen writes:

“If the sixty-nine weeks take us to the Cross of Christ [actually, Christ's declaration of his Messiah-ship on Palm Sunday---EJP], then the seventieth week must come after the Cross.  But here we note first of all that there is an interval between the sixty-ninth and the seventieth weeks.  Tregelles says:

‘At the cutting off of Messiah, the recognition ends; then comes the interval, and the time is again taken up for one week at the close’ (Remarks on the Book of Daniel, p. 10).

“During this interval ‘the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and even unto the end shall be war; desolations are determined’ (Dan. 9:26).

“This points definitely to the coming of the Romans under Titus and their destruction of Jerusalem and the temple, which occurred in A.D. 70.  Concerning the words, ‘the end thereof shall be with a flood, and even unto the end shall be war; desolations are determined,’ Ironside says:

‘These words briefly describe the history of Palestine from the coming of the Roman armies under Titus to the present time.  Jerusalem, and Palestine as a whole, have been trodden down of all nations, and shall be, “until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled”‘ (Lectures on the Book of Daniel, p. 167).

“Then we note that the city and the sanctuary shall be destroyed by the people of the prince that shall come, not by the prince himself.  As we have seen, these people are the Romans, who fulfilled this prophecy in A.D. 70.  The prince comes to the fore in v. 27.  The verse reads as follows:

‘And he shall make a firm covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease; and upon the wing of abominations shall come one that maketh desolate; and even unto the full end and that determined, shall wrath be poured out upon the desolate.’

Throne of the Pope as the King of Rome, 2010

“There is, however, considerable difference of opinion as to what is the antecedent of the pronoun ‘he.’ Most commentators think it is ‘the Anointed One,’ in the first part of v. 26; some, taking the pronoun as a neuter, ‘it,’ think it is the ‘week,’ as if the ‘week’ would confirm the covenant with the many.  But how, we would ask, can the reference be to Christ when we have just been introduced to the Roman prince? It seems necessary to make the pronoun refer to him [which conclusion sustains the established rule of English grammar, a pronoun referring to its nearest antecedent---EJP].

“Furthermore, when did Christ make a firm covenant with many Jews for one week; and how can it be said of Him that ‘in the midst of the week’ He caused ‘the sacrifices and oblations to cease,’ when the temple sacrifices continued for about forty years after Christ’s death on the Cross?  It would seem absurd to refer the pronoun to the ‘week.’  How can a ‘week’ make firm a covenant and then break it in the midst of itself?  It is more natural to refer the pronoun ‘he’ to the prince mentioned in the last part of v. 26, namely, the Roman prince; however not to Vespasian, Roman emperor from A.D. 69-79, nor to his son and successor, Titus, who ruled from A.D. 79-81.  Neither of these made and broke such a covenant with the Jews; and Titus lived only two years after his accession to the throne.  The reference is to a Roman prince who shall come after the long interval of the last half of verse 26, which has already lasted 1,900 years; and the last week is still future.  Tregelles takes the pronoun ‘he’ of v. 27 to refer to the ‘prince that shall come’ of v. 26, and says:

‘The prince who shall come is the last head of the Roman power, the person concerning whom Daniel had received so much previous instruction’ (op. cit., 105).—Bibliotheca Sacra, 1935, XCII, 48-50* [Emphasis added]

*Lewis Sperry Chafer, Systematic Theology, (Dallas, Texas: Dallas Seminary Press, 1948), Vol. IV of VIII, pp. 348-349.

___________________________________________________

Daniel in the Lions' Den, 580 BC

In conclusion, the pronoun “he” of Daniel 9:27 is none other than “the prince that shall come” of verse 26. This coming prince, during whose reign the Lord Jesus Christ will physically return to Jerusalem, is Roman.  For his Roman legions (though composed of foreigners, specifically the 10th Legion) destroyed both Jerusalem and the Second Temple in A.D. 70.  This coming Roman prince will be as much of a Roman Caesar as were his predecessors.  And since the title of “Pontifex Maximus”–that name of blasphemy—was transferred from Roman Emperor Gratian to Bishop of Rome Damasus I, EVERY POPE OF ROME has been a Roman Emperor, a Roman Caesar, the King of Rome and foremost Prince of the Roman Papacy ruling an international, geopolitical empire since no later than A.D. 606.

Therefore, according to this wonderful prophecy, there is a coming Roman Papal Caesar who will be the last and final Pope of Rome.  He will confirm a preexisting, international covenant that will bring a temporary peace to Israel.  This peace will protect the Third Hebrew temple and its priests, they offering sacrifices and oblations according to the law of Moses.  This final King of Rome will be slain and rise from the dead to be the Man-Beast of Revelation 13:1-10, 18.  Upon rising from the dead, the risen Pope, possessed by Satan to be the Antichrist/Man-Beast, will go to Jerusalem, break the covenant he previously confirmed, and there demand to be worshipped as God, his Jewish False Prophet erecting an image of the risen, Roman Man-Beast inside the Hebrew Temple.  At this time he ends all Hebrew worship and service at the Third Hebrew Temple, the erecting of the image of himself being “the abomination of desolation” as warned by the Lord Jesus Christ, He referring to the same abomination of desolation as spoken of by Daniel the Prophet.  At this time, mid-week of the seven-year period, the risen Roman Pope turned Satan-possessed, Antichrist/ Man-Beast will rule the world for 42 literal months.  Indeed, the “he” of Daniel 9:27 is “the prince that shall come,” the final Roman Papal Caesar turned Antichrist/Man-Beast, to be cast alive into the Lake of Fire by the risen and returning Lord Jesus Christ at his glorious Second Coming (Revelation 19:20)!

Praise God!

Kingdom of Christ, Stone Cut out Without Hands Smashes Final Roman Empire of Antichrist

Masonic Monument in Elat; Israel Established by Rome's Masonic Jewish Labor Zionists, 1948

Your Editor’s favorite Hebrew Christian commentators are Alfred Edersheim, Arno Gaebelein, Adolph Saphir and David Baron.  All were premillennial believers as they were acquainted with the Hope of Israel having been racial and religious Jews reared in Jewish homes.  During your Editor’s morning reading of the Prophet Zechariah, in reviewing David Baron’s The Visions and Prophecies of Zechariah, he discovered a most moving historical narration concerning the prophesied rebirth of the Nation of Israel.  This is important, for without the secular re-establishment of the Nation in a condition of unbelief and dominated by Gentile rule, the Second Coming of Messiah Jesus as described in Zechariah, chapters 12 and 14, cannot be literally fulfilled as the prophet foretold!  We must remember that Baron’s epic work, considered to be the best commentary on Zechariah ever written, was first published in 1918!

In commenting on Zechariah 14, Baron writes:

“But it is necessary briefly to summarise the probable events which lead up to the supreme crisis into the midst of which we are introduced in this last chapter of Zechariah.

“First of all we have to suppose a restoration of the Jews in a condition of unbelief—not a complete restoration of the whole nation, which will not take place till after their conversion, but of a representative and influential remnant.

“It seems from Scripture that in relation to Israel and the land there will be a restoration, before the Second Advent of our Lord, of very much the same state of things as existed at the time of His First Advent, when the threads of God’s dealing with them nationally were finally dropped, not to be taken up again ‘until the times of the Gentiles shall be fulfilled.’  [Luke 21:24---EJP]

“There was at that time a number of Jews in Palestine representative of the nation; but compared with the number of their brethren, who were already a diaspora among the nations, they were a mere minority, and not in a politically independent condition.

[As in the days of the First Coming of Christ, the Jews had no king but Caesar (John 19:15); even so will it be at the time of the Second Coming of Christ.  The Jews will have no king but the Papal Roman Caesar, murdered and risen from the dead to be the Roman Antichrist/Man-Beast.]

Supreme Court Building, Jerusalem, Israel

“So it will be again.  There will be at first, as compared with the whole nation, only a representative minority in Palestine, and a Jewish state will be probably formed, either under the suzeranity of one of the Great Powers, or under international protection.

“The nucleus of this politically independent Jewish state is already to be seen in the 120,000 Jews who have wandered back from all regions of the earth to the land of their fathers.

“Already Jerusalem before the war [World War I] was almost a Jewish city, while the thirty and more Jewish colonies which dotted the land were described by a prominent English Jew as ‘so many milestones marking the advance which Israel is making towards national rehabilitation.’ And in no other country in the world do the Jews, to the same extent, represent the nation.  In Jerusalem and in the other Jewish settlements in Palestine I have personally, in the course of my seven different visits to the land since 1890, met Jews form all parts—from the east and the west; from India and the burning plains of Southern Arabia, and from the extreme north of Siberia and the Caucasus; and have heard them speaking in nearly all languages under heaven.

“Around this nucleus a large number more from all parts of the world will in all probability soon be gathered; but we shall only be able to speak of a restoration of the Jews as an accomplished fact when Palestine becomes by international consent (to quote from the Zionist programme) the ‘openly recognised and legally assured home’ of the Jews, i.e., when the Jews are once more acknowledged as a nation with a land of their own to which they might go.*

Freemasonic Third Hebrew Temple

“But what follows?  After a brief interval of prosperity there comes a night of anguish.  What occasions the darkest hour in the night of Israel’s sad history since their rejection of Christ is the gathering of the natons and the siege predicted in this chapter. . . .

“And it will be no other than Jehovah-Jesus, the El Gibbor, ‘God the Mighty Man’ [Isaiah 9:6-7], who will thus suddenly appear as Israel’s deliverer in the hour of their sorest need:

“‘And his feet,’ we read, ‘shall stand in that day upon the Mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east.’”

*How rapidly things have developed on the lines here forecast since the above was originally written four or five years ago.  The ‘Declaration’ of the British Government [Masonic Balfour Declaration of 1917] recognises the Jews as once more a nation, and promises to facilitate their re-establishment in Palestine; while Jerusalem has been captured by the victorious British Army!  [Indeed, Masonic British General Allenby peaceably marched into Jerusalem without firing a shot, taking the city from Ottoman Turkish domination in 1917.]

[Emphasis in bold]

In conclusion, these kinds of forecasts are the result of reading the Bible literally.  As literally prophesied, all events come to pass!

Jesuit Spiritual Coadjutor Alphonse Louis Constant, alias Eliphas Levi, 1848

Here is yet another example of the Jesuit Order using one of its own White Gentile Temporal Coadjutors to masquerade as a Jew.  Purpose? to blame the Jews in general for the contemptible crimes of the Company of Jesus—as is being done at this very moment throughout the American Empire.  “Eliphas Levi” was the surname of Alphonse Louis Constant (1810-1875), a French Gentile who, in 1825, entered a seminary in Paris, Saint-Nicolas-du-Chardonnet, led by Abbot Frere-Colonna, a member of the immensely powerful Roman Colonna Royal Bloodline family and instructor of young Alphonse in the art of Magic and the Hebrew Kabbalah!  For more evidence that Constant/Levi was trained by Jesuit institutions and instructors, see this link!

IHS Jesuit Monogram: Seminary of Saint-Nicolas-du-Chardonnet, Paris

Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor “Eliphas Levi” became a priest but was “thrown out” for failure to keep his “vow of chastity.”   More valuable as a “Jesuit of the Short Robe,” Constant/Levi went on to provide a most productive life of evil for the Company of Jesus.  Becoming the Order’s most renowned Magician and Occultist of the 19th Century, Constant/Levi wrote The History of Magic and was well known to the “Pontifex Maximus” of Jesuit/Illuminatized Scottish-Rite Freemasonry in America, Albert Pike.  Indeed, both Constant/Levi and Pike were contemporaries, both connected to the Jesuit Order!

Jesuit Alphonse Louis Constant alias Eliphas Levi, 1860s

Constant/Levi understood there was an unchanging essence of the occult, Satan’s religion of Mystery Babylon (Revelation 17), Mystery Babylon being the city of Rome seated on seven hills ruling over the kings of the earth (17:18).  Of that essence, Constant/Levi wrote in the opening lines of his Transcendental Magic: Its Doctrines and Ritual:

“Behind the veil of all the hieratic and mystical allegories of ancient doctrines, behind the darkness and strange ordeals of all initiations, under the seal of all sacred writings, in the ruins of Nineveh or Thebes, on the crumbling stones of old temples and on the blackened visage of the Assyrian or Egyptian sphinx, in the monstrous or marvelous paintings which interpret to the faithful of India the inspired pages of the Vedas, in the cryptic emblems of our old books on alchemy, in the ceremonies practised at reception by all secret societies, there are found indications of a doctrine which is everywhere the same and everywhere carefully concealed.”

Of this very same universal doctrine common to all secret societies of all pagan nations throughout the ages, the wicked theosophist Madame Blavatsky agreed.  She expressed this belief in both of her works considered classics among occultists, The Secret Doctrine and Isis Unveiled.  Bible-believing Protestant Englishman of the 19th Century Alexander Hislop stated the same when he declared in his epic masterpiece, The Two Babylons; Or The Papal Worship: Proved to be the Worship of Nimrod and His Wife (1916), page 120:

“. . . the Babylonian Messiah whose tragic death, and subsequent restoration to life and glory, formed the cornerstone of ancient paganism.”

Baphomet, Goat of Mendes, Symbol of the Babylonian Messiah of the Knights Templars, 1800s

And where is the headquarters of world paganism today?  Again, Hislop tells us on pages 2-3:

“It has been known all along that Popery was baptized Paganism; but God is now making it manifest, that the Paganism which Rome has baptized is, in all its essential elements, the very Paganism which prevailed in the ancient literal Babylon, . . . Rome is in very deed the Babylon of the Apocalypse; . . . her priesthood and their orders, have all been derived from ancient Babylon; and, finally, that the Pope himself is truly and properly the lineal representative of Belshazzar.”

Thus, the Jesuit Alphonse Louis Constant, disguised as a Jew— “Eliphas Levi,” furthered the ancient mystery religion of Babylon, the essential religion of the Jesuit Papacy.  (On his deathbed, he expired a Roman Catholic, receiving “Last Rites” from a priest—most likely a Jesuit priest!)  The end of that Roman pagan system is to be the final pope of Rome, murdered and reborn from the dead to be “Tammuz,” or “Horus,” or “Jupiter,” or “Mithras,” or just plainly, the Antichrist/Man Beast of Revelation 13! The Antichrist, a god-man (murdered and risen from the dead to be possessed by Satan as was the risen Horus possessed by Set) will be pagan man’s “Desire of All the Ages,” the culmination of Satan’s “Mystery of Iniquity” (II Thessalonians 2:7).

Pastor David Manning, Harlam, New York, 2009

We should be thankful that there is at least one Black Man, claiming to believe on the Risen Lord Jesus Christ of the Reformation English Bible, who has enough courage tell the truth about the lower-cultured Black African races and nations.  If a White was to say such things, he would be tarred and feathered as a “racist and a bigot”—even as your White Editor has indeed experienced over the last several years!  But what Manning declares in the video above, purposely expressing himself with typical Black American “Ebonic English” colloquialisms, not only is the naked and obvious truth, but is based upon verifiable scientific observation as reflected in writings of 19th century students of Natural and World History.  To view the suppressed video of Pastor Manning, that video removed by Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Paul S. Otellini controlling Google,  see Craig Oxley’s Unhived Mind website here!

One of those accomplished historians was White American Protestant John Clark Ridpath, LL.D, author of his 17-volume Ridpath’s Universal History, (New York: Merrill & Baker, 1901), first published in 1894.  Concerning the Hamite Black race he writes in Volume II, page 555-556:

“If we turn to the Black races of mankind, it will be perfectly reasonable to assert that they have effected, in the countries to which they were distributed, no perceptible changes in the conditions of their environment.  The Negro races inhabiting the great central belt of Africa have never shown a disposition to struggle with the forces of the natural world and to subordinate them to the purposes of life.”

[If Blacks do not struggle with the forces of the natural world in seeking to subordinate those forces, we can assume Blacks will not seriously resist the natural tendency to political tyranny, imposed by Rome's International White Power Structure, as is the case here in America today?  There is no substantial Black outrage (in antithesis to the 80 million Whites within the "Tea Party Movement") against the Jesuitical, socialist-communist, thieving, tyrannical policies of the Obama/Biden administration.]

“The same is true of the Hottentots.  Along the great African rivers the forests stand as they were from the beginning.  The towns are built in the forests by the river banks and nature is unchanged.  Though the country is peopled and occupied, it is in no sense possessed to the extent of mastery and dominion.  The same is true in Australia and Melanesia.  We speak, of course, of the influence of the native races in these countries.  It is a mere truism to assert that barbarians so low in the scale as the Australian and Papuan races neither would nor could modify the surface of the earth by their industries and enterprises.  The great difference, indeed, between the barbarian and the civilized states is that in the one the man is the master and in the other, the slave of the natural world.

Mastery Over the Black Man by Nature: Ridpath's Universal History, Vol. II, Page 560

“On the whole, we see that the great modifying influence of man on his physical environment has been exerted most largely by the [White] Ruddy races, in their progress to the West [White Protestant Western Civilization].  The Brown races in Southern Asia have effected certain changes of the kind in the aspect and conditions of the outer world; but these results have been rather incidental to the massing of vast populations within small areas of territory than from any direct and energetic assault of man on the natural world.  In other regions, the Brown races have in no wise modified the nature of the earth or directed the forces and conditions of their environment.  The nomadic Turanians and the Polynesian islanders have submitted themselves to the laws of the material world, and turned their whole activities to other fields of exertion.  The Black races, as we have seen, have in a still less degree influenced the physical surroundings where they have held their career.  They have simply yielded to the blind elements of the natural world, and have resisted the swirl of the forces to which they were exposed only so far as to cling to the surface of the earth and maintain thereon a precarious existence.”

Now remember, there were no Nazis at the time of the writing of this history.  The science of Eugenics was being developed (i.e., noting obvious physical differences between the races as well as the cultures produced therefrom), remembering, that like all sciences, Eugenics could be used for good or for evil.  The concept of the Black and Brown races being culturally lower, in general, than the cultures of White races, in general, was a foregone conclusion after irrefutable facts of racial national existence were fully considered.  Clearly, we have the historically verifiable conclusion of cultural White Supremacy and cultural Negro Inferiority, which worldwide phenomenon necessitates the conclusion said cultural differences must be traced to genetic differences between the races.  The Jesuits know this and use these unchangeable natural laws governing race and culture for the benefit of their Counter-Reformation purposes in destroying White Protestant nations born out of the “heretic and liberal” White Protestant Reformation.

To the contrary, Ridpath now describes the Ruddy White or “Aryan” races, on page 556 and page 558.  But let us not fall into the pit of equating the term “Aryan” with the hatefully-racist, White Nazi ideology imposed on White Protestant and Jewish peoples of Europe via the Jesuit-ruled Nazi SS during Pope Pius XII’s Crusade in Europe, as Knight of Malta Dwight D. Eisenhower titled his book:

Master Over Nature by the White Man: Ridpath's Universal History, Vol. II, Page 561

“There are also certain subjective reasons for the preeminence of the Aryan race as a modifying force on the surface of the earth.  These peoples have an instinctive curiosity to scrutinize and manage the elements of nature.  The Aryan, from our first acquaintance with him in the shadows of prehistoric ages, has been curious to know, to theorize, to experiment with the phenomena and laws of the material world.  In the most primitive epoch of his activity he created a mythology in explanation of the aspects and conditions around him.  From the time of the awakening of his tribal consciousness he was on the alert to note, and even to record, the movements and caprices of physical nature.  He was quick to discover the identities and antagonisms of natural facts, and thus were laid the foundations of these classifications which, in the riper ages of the world, have become science.

“In this respect the Aryans have been strongly discriminated from the peoples of Brown descent, and still more strongly from the Black races of the tropics.  It is doubtful if any such thing as natural science has ever suggested itself to the inquiry of thinkers among the Brown peoples of mankind.  Doubtless the highest degree of knowledge possessed by any branch of this family is that to which the Chinese have attained, and it is certain that among them the natural sciences are either wanting or else in so crude a condition as to merit no attention from the Western nations.  [All technological development of Far Eastern nations is derived from scientific advances pioneered in the West, the West enjoying "freedom of conscience" as applied to science, a freedom born of the White Protestant Reformation.]  Even from the Hamitic and Semitic families of men, the Aryan race is almost equally distinguished by its scientific tendency and attainments.  The disposition of the Semitic peoples, and of the Hamites in their best estate, as among the Egyptians, has been, from the first, to look at nature as a caused phenomenon, and pass immediately to reflection on the nature and character of the Cause; while the Aryan mind has had almost a passion for scrutinizing the phenomena themselves, for determining the relations of physical facts, and discovering the laws by which they are governed.

“This subjective difference , as will readily be seen, has led to the scientific ascendency of the Aryan races and to their domination over the earth.  That is, the Aryan peoples have mastered the laws of phenomena and subordinated the forces of nature so successfully as to turn them upon their environment, and to compel nature to operate against herself for the benefit of her most intelligent creature.  The modification which these peoples have effected in the general aspect of those parts of the world where they have held their career has been resultant from their instinctive curiosity to know and handle the forces of the natural world.  If for a moment we contemplate the hydraulic miners at their gigantic task among the gorges of the Sierras, with the uplifted brazen nozzle of their hose throwing a volume of more than a hundred square inches of water, compressed into the destroying impact of a solid column, against the granite mountain side, hurling and hurting the boulders and debris as mere sand flying before the blast, we shall see the Aryan mind displayed at its topmost bent and in its most characteristic activity.  This intellect delights in attacking the environment and crushing it into subjection.  And in this respect it is totally unlike the quiescent and adjustable intellect of the Brown or the Black races. . . .

Concluding on pages 560-561 and 566 as to the cultural supremacy of the Ruddy White races, Ridpath declares:

Avro Arrow CF-105: Designed and Manufactured in White Protestant Toronto, Canada, 1958

“It would be trite to enlarge upon the advantages which the highest races of men have derived from their knowledge of physical nature and the laws by which it is governed.  As between this knowledge and the general fact called civilization, defined as it is in our modern languages, it were hard to determine which of the two more powerfully stimulates the other.  A certain kind of civilization may exist without the prevalence of scientific knowledge, and a certain kind of scientific knowledge may prevail without inducing a high grade of civilization.  But, on the whole, the two are concomitant.  The more the man knows, the more does he develop and direct the civilizing forces.  The more he uses the forces of civilization, the more he knows of the principles by which universal nature is controlled and directed.

“As compared with the other races, the Aryan stock has been preeminent in these respects.  The distinction between them and the Hamitic and Semitic families of men on the line of scientific achievement is sufficiently broad, and when we look at the Brown races of Asia and Polynesia and at the Black races of Africa and Melanesia, we can but be struck with the strong contrast between the indifference of the latter to natural law, their inability to control and direct for benefit the forces of the material world on the one hand, and the breadth and profundity of scientific knowledge and astonishing benefits derived therefrom by the Aryan, or Indo-European, families of mankind on the other.

“It is believed that the differences in the intellectual habits and achievements of the several races as viewed from a general point of observation are most distinct and striking with respect to this great fact of natural law and the connection of man with the material world. . . .

“In these respects, we find again that the [White] Ruddy races have been superior to the correlated branches of the human family. . . . On the whole, the superiority of the Ruddy races over the other varieties of mankind, in their masterful relations with the physical world, in their concept of natural phenomena and the laws by which they are governed, in adaption of means to ends in gaining and maintaining a dominion over the earth, and in the exercise of an adventurous and rational spirit, giving them preeminence and leadership, is undeniable and sufficiently striking.”

But Why do the White Ruddy races dominate the earth?  Ridpath suggests that cranial capacity (Ah, the forbidden topic never to be considered or even discussed in any academic arena lest the student or professor be accused of “hateful racism!”) plays a noted part in providing an explanation.  He writes on pages 571-572:

Table of Cranial Capacities, 1901 Ridpath's Universal History, Vol. II, Page 571

“From the  foregoing schedule it will be seen that the native Australians are the lowest type of men in cranial capacity, being inferior in this respect to the Negroes by an average of eighty-four cubic centimeters.  The table does not include the Hottentots as a separate study.  These people, as a matter of fact, have a cranial development intermediate between the Australians and the Negroes.  Again, it will be noted that the Mongoloids have an average capacity of eighty-two cubic centimeters in excess of the Negroes, while the average capacity of the Aryans is forty-four cubic centimeters above the measure of the Mongoloids.  It will also be observed that the preceding table does not exhibit the relative size of the brain of the Papuans, but from other sources this has been found to be above that of the Australians, and nearly identical with that of the Hottentots.

“It may well be confessed that this physical index discovered in the capacity of the brain for the several races points distinctly to a certain grade of rational activity and progressive power in each people.  Here, then, is the fundamental fact of a certain quantity of brain forces expended in the administration of life among the various peoples of the earth.  The same is correlated with other peculiarities of the anatomical structure [i.e., genitalia size difference among the races, Black males, in general, having the largest].  It is found that the cranial cavity is very variable in its shape, conforming in its proportions and relative distribution of parts to the general configuration of the skull.  And this is typical in each of the primary races.  It is not the place to enter into any elaborate illustration of the definite angles and peculiarities of the human skull, or to describe by comparisons its various approximations to the crania of other animals.  Such discussion belongs to special scientific treatises, and the results derivable therefrom could play but a small part in the ethnic history of mankind.”

This is why, Dr. Manning, the Black man has never built a boat that is seaworthy—as you have observed.  He is incapable of the task if left to himself, untrained by Aryans or Mongolians.  This is why there is no Black African nation with the ability to engage in mining, oil drilling, weapons production,  air-conditioning manufacturing and even diamond cutting using its own Black population.  They, left to themselves, simply do not have the intellectual abilities to create such a culture in competition with White Aryan or Asian Mongolian Nations, they also left to themselves.

And in destroying the Bible-based, White Protestant nations born out of the White Protestant Reformation, the Counter Reformation Society of Jesus has enforced a practical Black Supremacy (via a Jesuit-directed tyranny in Washington, D. C., imposing forced integration).  This wicked policy of forced racial integration has led to racial amalgamation now converting America into a mulatto nation.  This diabolical crime, as foretold by White Southern Presbyterian Robert L. Dabney in his Defense of Virginia and the South (1867), has been committed by select agents of the Order imposing the religious belief of Roman Catholic Sir Thomas More’s Utopian, socialist-communist doctrine of “universal equality” during the last 60 years.

Flag of ProBaptiCal, New White Protestant and Baptist Nation withn Seceded Pennsylvania, 2025

This is why your Editor calls for White Protestant and Baptist believers to obey the Bible’s maxim of racial separation to the end that White Bible-believing Protestants and Baptists might establish a new nation here in North America.  Our purpose is that we might serve the one true God our Father in preaching and living the Gospel of Jesus Christ (as formerly intended by Oliver Cromwell’s White Puritan Commonwealth).  This obedience will further tend to preserve our blessed White race enjoying all the attentive benefits derived therefrom.  And the Pope’s International White Power Structure, aided by certain of the Pope’s Court Jews within the RIIA and CFR, can once again tremble at the reality of a White nation armed with the Word of God (“the Sword of the Spirit”) and high-tech Weapons (“the Sword of Just Defense” so termed by John Knox!) wielded by White Men of Faith, real men driven by an unfeigned refusal to submit to the Pope’s ludicrous Temporal Power without a righteous war unto the death in resisting unbridled, Jesuitical, anti-Christian tyranny!

Oliver Cromwell Between "Beauty and Bands:" Protector of the Commonwealth of England, Defender of the Protestant Faith, 1657

This epic speech of his Highness, Lord Protector Oliver Cromwell, is another testimony to his Bible-based purity of purpose revealing a knowledge of God’s blessing to men and nations when they conform to the maxims of His Word, the Reformation Bible—in the vulgar tongue!

Cromwell had survived another assassination attempt while the Three Nations had been delivered from Rome’s conspiracy of overthrowing the Protectorate via a domestic Roman Catholic Royalist Insurrection and a foreign Roman Catholic Spanish Invasion.  Our dear Cromwell’s speech was given to the Second Protectorate Parliament on Friday, the 23rd of January, 1657, all of which is quoted below.  The Parliament, in deep sympathy over Cromwell’s providential escape from death, had, to the man, walked over to the Banqueting House at Whitehall where Oliver was resting.  The Defender would have a mere 20 months to live, until he became another victim of the Black Pope’s “poison cup,” to be murdered by his trusted Dr. George Bate on September 3, 1658—the day of his greatest signal victories over the Scots at Dunbar and Worcester.  May we all learn from the erudite words calmly spoken by the Protector as he, in portions of this extemporaneous message, quoted the greatest of England’s Reformation English Bibles, The King James Authorized Version of 1611:

“Mr. Speaker,

“I confess with much respect, that you have put this trouble on yourselves upon this occasion.—but I perceive there be two things that fill me full of sense.  One is, The mercy on a poor unworthy creature; the second is, This great and, as I said, unexpected kindness of Parliament, in manifesting such a sense thereof as this is which you have now expressed.  I speak not this with compliment!  That which detracts from the thing, in some sense, is the inconsiderableness and unworthiness of the person that hath been the object and subject of this deliverance, to wit, myself.  I confess ingenuously to you, I do lie under the daily sense of my unworthiness and unprofitableness, as I have expressed to you:  and if there be, as I most readily acknowledge there is, a mercy in it to me, I wish I may never reckon it on any other account than this, That the life that is lengthened may be spent and improved to His honour who hath vouchsafed the mercy, and to the service of you, and those you represent.

“I do not know, nor did I think it would be very seasonable for me, to say much to you upon this occasion; being a thing that ariseth from yourselves.  Yet, methinks, the kindness you bear should kindle a little desire in me; even at this present, to make a short return.  And, as you have been disposed hither by the Providence of God, to congratulate my mercy; so give me leave, in a very word or two, to congratulate with you.

“Congratulations are ever conversant about good, bestowed upon men, or possessed by them.  Truly, I shall in a word or two congratualte you with good you are in possession of, and in some respect I also with you.  God hath bestowed upon you, and you are in possession of it,—Three Nations, and all that appertains to them.  Which in either a geographical, or topical consideration, are Nations.  In which also there are places of honour and consideration, not inferior to any in the known world,—without vanity it may be spoken.  Truly God hath not made so much soil, furnished with so many blessings, in vain!  But it is a goodly sight, if a man behold it uno intuitu.  And therefore this is a possession of yours, worthy of congratulation.

“This is furnished,—give me leave to say, for I believe it is true,—with the best People in the world, possessing so much soil.  A People in civil rights,—in respect of their rights and privileges,—very ancient and honourable.  And in this People, in the midst of this People, ‘you have, what is still more precious,’ a People (I know every one will hear ‘and acknowledge’ it) that are to God ‘as the apple of His eye’ [Zechariah 2:8], —and He says so of them, be they many, or be they few!  But they are many.  A People of the blessing of God; a People under His safety and protection.  A People calling upon the Name of the Lord; which the Heathen do not.  A People knowing God; and a People (according to the ordinary expressions) fearing God.  And you have of this no parallel; no, not in all the world!  You have in the midst of you glorious things.

“Glorious things: for you have Laws and statutes, and ordinances, which, though not all of them so conformable as were to be wished to the Law of God, yet, on all hands, pretend not to be long rested-in farther than as they are conformable to the just and righteous Laws of God.  Therefore, I am persuaded, there is a heart and spirit in every good man to wish they did all of them answer the Pattern.  I cannot doubt but that which is in the heart will in due time break forth.  That endeavours will be ‘made’ that way, is another of your good things, with which in my heart ‘I think’ you are worthily to be congratulated.  And you have a Magistracy; which, in outward profession, in pretence, in endeavour, doth desire to put life into these Laws.  And I am confident that among you will rest the true desire to promote every desire in others, and very endeavour, that hath tended or shall tend to the putting of these Laws in execution.

“I do ‘also’ for this congratulate you:  You have a Gospel Ministry among you.  That have you!  Such an one as,—without vanity I shall speak it; or without caring at all for any favour or respect from them, save what I have upon an account above flattery, or good words,—such an one as hath excelled itself; and, I am persuaded,—to speak with confidence berfore the Lord,—is the most growing blessing (one of the most growing blessings) on the face of this Nation.

“You have a good Eye ‘to watch over you,’—and in that I will share with your good favours.  A good God; a God that hath watched over you and us.  A God that hath visited these Nations with a stretched-out arm; and borne His witness against the unrighteousness and ungodliness of men, against those that ‘would’ have abused such Nations,—such mercies throughout, as I have reckoned up unto you!  A God that hath not only withstood such to the face; but a God that had abundantly blessed you with the evidence of His goodness and presence.  And He ‘hath done things wonderful amongst us’ [Isaiah 25:1], ‘by terrible things in righteousness’ [Psalm 65:5].  He hath visited us by ‘wonderful things.’ In mercy and compassion hath He given us this day of freedom, and liberty to speak this, one to another; and to speak of His mercies, as He hath been pleased to put into our hearts.

“Truly, this word in conclusion.  If these things be so, give me leave to remember you but one word; which I offered to you with great love and affection the first day of meeting with you, this Parliament.  It pleased God to put into my heart then to mention a Scripture to you, which would be a good conclusion of my Speech now at this time to you.  It was, That we being met to see the good of so great an Interest, as I have mentioned, and the glory of that God who is both yours and mine, how could we better do it than by thinking of such words as these, ‘His salvation is nigh them that fear Him,’ [Psalm 85:9] ‘that glory may dwell in our land’ [Psalm 85:9]!

Protector Oliver Cromwell, Parliament, London, England

“‘Yes,’ if it be so, ‘Mercy and Truth shall meet together, Righteousness and Peace shall kiss each other’ [Cromwell's paraphrase of Psalm 85:10].  We shall know, you, and I as the father of this family, how to dispose our mercies to God’s glory; and how to dispose our severity.  How to distinguish between obedient and rebellious children;—and not as Eli did, who told his sons ‘he did not hear them well,’ when perhaps he saw ill by them.  And we know the severity of that.  And therefore let me say,—though I will not descant upon the words,—that Mercy must be joined with Truth:  Truth, in that respect, that we think it our duty to exercise a just severity, as well as to apply kindness and mercy.  And truly, Righteousness and Mercy must kiss each other.  If we will have Peace without a worm in it, lay we foundations of Justice and Righteousness.  And if it shall please God so to move you, as that you marry this redoubtable couple together, Mercy and Truth, Righteousness and Peace,—you will, if I may be free to say so, be blessed whether you will or no!  And that you and I may, for the time the Lord shall continue us together, set our hearts upon this, shall be my daily prayer.  And I heartily and humbly acknowledge my thankfulness to you.”  [Emphasis added in bold]

Thomas Carlyle, Oliver Cromwell’s Letters and Speeches: With Elucidations, (London: Chapman & Hall, Ltd., 1894), Vol. IV of V, pp. 233-237.

Jeremiah J. Crowley, Irish-American Ex-Roman Catholic Priest, Believer on the true Lord Jesus Christ of the AV1611 Reformation Bible, 1912

Brother-in-Jesus Christ Jeremiah J. Crowley was the Martin Luther of America during the early 20th Century.  Just as Ex-Priest Charles Chiniquy exposed the plots of Rome for us Americans who fought the War Between the States (1861-65) and suffered the social upheaval of the Jesuit murder of President Lincoln, even so Crowley was sent to the World War I generation (1910-1920) to expose the power of Rome over Washington, especially the power of Baltimore Archbishop, James Cardinal Gibbons—the first “American Pope.”  The presidents Crowley named as servants of the pope were 33rd Degree Freemason Theodore Roosevelt, 33rd Degree Freemason/Skull and Bonesman William Howard Taft and Woodrow Wilson, advised by his secretary, Knight of Columbus Joseph P. Tumulty.  Crowley wrote two classics: Romanism: A Menace to the Nation (1912) and The Pope: Chief of White Slavers, High Priest of Intrigue (1913) at this crucial time of America’s history and destiny.

Jeremiah J. Crowley, 1912

Enjoy the following quote of this Christian Son of Thunder written in 1913!  What the Jesuit Order was preparing Fascist Imperial Japan to accomplish, it is now using Communist Red China in preparation for America’s Sino-Soviet-Muslim Invasion, the Roman Catholic Mexican invasion—aided and abetted by Washington—serving as its present precursor.  We read:

“Americans who bow not before the idols of popery may well ask—Are our Presidents and Vice-Presidents, our Cabinet officers and the Judges of the Supreme Court, our Senators and Representatives placed in office to play part so subservient and so dastardly servile to Rome’s foulest purposes? Rome is now egging on Japan to annex Mexico, seize on the Philippines, on Hawaii and Alaska, to wipe off the United States of America from the map of the world’s great powers.  While our Presidents are attending mass the Jap and other foreign emissaries in America are busy stealing plans from the Navy Department [the Office of Naval Intelligence working with Japanese Military Intelligence later evidenced during the attack on Pearl Harbor, 1941] and studying every weak spot in our National armor, to report thereon promptly and fully to hostile governments.

“Rome, hating a free, popular government like that of America, is ready to coalesce with Jap or any other agency—pagan, atheistical, or professedly Christian—to destroy our Nation. . . .

Pope Pius X, 1912

“LETTER to POPE PIUS X”

“Subject: Papal Intrigue, Usurpation, and Episcopal Vandalism, illustrated by the case of ‘The Most Reverend’ John Baptist Purcell, Archbishop of Cincinnati, Ohio, U. S. A.

“‘Your Holiness’

“I feel free to address myself directly to you, not indeed because I acknowledge subjection in smallest measure to your authority, either in spirituals or temporals, but because I charge you—CHIEF OF WHITE SLAVERS, HIGH PRIEST OF INTRIGUE—with being the fountain-head of evils world-wide, the arch-disturber of humanity’s peace, religious and social; the relentless foe of the three basic principles of American National life and liberty—freedom of conscience, freedom of speech, freedom of the press.

“From America you draw large part of the revenues used by your System to enslave mankind.  Every one of your hundred and more bishops under the American flag is collector of ‘Peter’s Pence,’ his standing with your government depending on the amounts he is enabled to wring from an already overtaxed constituency. . . .

Martin Luther, Protestant Reformer of Germany, Father of Religious Liberty in Western Civilzation, October 31, 1517

“Political machines many has this world seen since Nebuchadnezzar to Nero; from Nero to Pope Borgia (Alexander IV); and from Pope Borgia to Pope Sarto (Pius X); but no political machine ever devised by the wicked ingenuity of man has equaled, in the deadliness of its execution, the extortionate exactions of its rapacity, the mercilessness of its unceasing demands, the papal machine doing business at Rome.  All honor to the immortal Elizabeth [I] of England for delivering her race from the thraldom of such a machine!  All honor to Luther, the bold, majestic, and magnificent apostle of conscientious reform in Germany, for delivering the Teuton and Scandinavian races forever from that vile and sanguinary curse.”

Jeremiah J. Crowley, The Pope: Chief of White Slavers, High Priest of Intrigue, (Aurora, Missouri: The Menace Publishing Company, 1913), pp. 117-118, 119, 223.

What a river of tears Brother Crowley would shed if he knew that England, Germany and America are all now under that “merciless papal machine doing business in Rome!”

Lt. General Charles Fleetwood, Cromwell's Son-in-Law, 1652

The following letter is written by Oliver to his son-in-law, Lt. General Charles Fleetwood having replaced Lt. General Henry Ireton having been given the Order’s “poison cup” while in Jesuit-infested Ireland.  Cromwell’s daughter, a widow due to the death of her husband, General Ireton, later married General Fleetwood, the present son-in-law now addressed so lovingly by his father-in-law and military commander, Oliver Cromwell.  Behold the wisdom, purity and tone of this letter, a letter your Editor suggests no American or British military general presently has the faith or the heart to compose!  May we learn from Oliver’s example as he writes in 1652:

“For the Right Honourable Lieutenant-General Fleetwood, Commander-in-Chief of the Forces in Ireland: These.

“DEAR CHARLES,

“I thank you for your loving Letter.  The same hopes and desires, upon your planting into my Family, were much the same in me that you express in yours towards me.  However, the dispensation of the Lord is, to have it otherwise for the present; and therein I desire to acquiesce;— not being out of hope that it may lie in His good pleasure, in His time, to give us the mutual comfort of our relation:  the want whereof He is able abundantly to supply by His own presence; which indeed makes-up all defects, and is the comfort of all our comforts and enjoyments.

“Salute your dear Wife from me.  Bid her beware of a bondage spirit.  Fear is the natural issue of such a spirit;— the antidote is Love.  The voice of Fear is:  If I had done this; if I had avoided that, how well it had been with me!— I know this hath been her vain reasoning: ‘poor Biddy!’

“Love argueth in this wise: What a Christ have I; what a Father in and through Him!  What a Name hath my Father:  Merciful, gracious, long-suffering, abundant in goodness and truth; forgiving iniquity, transgression and sin. What a Nature hath my Father; He is LOVE;— Free in it, unchangeable, infinite!  What a Covenant between Him and Christ,— for all the Seed, for every one:  wherein He undertakes all, and the poor Soul nothing.  The new Covenant is Grace,— to or upon the Soul; to which it, ‘the Soul,’ is passive and receptive:  I’ll do away their sins; I’ll write my Law, &c.; I’ll put it in their hearts:  they shall never depart from me, &c.

“This commends the Love of God:  it’s Christ dying for men without strength, for men whilst sinners, whilst enemies.  And shall we seek for the root of our comforts within us,— What God hath done, what He is to us in Christ, is the root of our comfort:  in this stability; in us is weakness.  Acts of obedience are not perfect, and therefore yield not perfect Grace.  Faith, as an act, yields it not; but ‘only’ as it carries us into Him, who is our perfect rest and peace; in whom we are accounted of, and received by, the Father, —even as Christ Himself.  This is our high calling.  Rest we here, and here only.

“Commend me to Harry Cromwell:  I pray for him.  That he may thrive, and improve in the knowledge and love of Christ.  Commend me to all the Officers.  My prayers indeed are daily for them.  Wish them to beware of bitterness of spirit; and of all things uncomely for the Gospel.  The Lord give you abundance of wisdom, and faith and patience.  Take heed also of your natural inclination to compliance.

“Pray for me.  I commit you to the Lord; and rest, your loving father,

“OLIVER CROMWELL.”

Thomas Carlyle, Oliver Cromwell’s Letters and Speeches: With Elucidations, (London: Chapman & Hall, Ltd., 1889), Vol. III of V, pp. 189-191.

Coat of Arms, Cromwell's Commonwealth of England, 1649-1660

In this most tender and moving letter, Oliver Cromwell bears his soul to John Cotton, a Puritan brother-in-Christ of like precious faith in Christ and pastor of the Church in Boston.  Indeed, Boston would be the cradle of Puritanism, and, in memory of the Jesuit Order’s St. Bartholomew’s Massacre in 1572, its attempted invasion of England via the Spanish Armada in 1588, its Gunpowder Plot in 1605, its assassination of French King Henry IV of France in 1610 and its Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648), the colony would pass a law imposing the death penalty upon any Jesuit that would dare to set his unclean foot within its borders, Praise God! For that Puritan colony would be the nexus of the American Revolution.  Boston would also be the place from which, on the green at Lexington, “the shot would be heard around the world,” thus beginning the Protestant and Puritan Baptist-Calvinist American revolt against absolutist, Jesuit-directed British tyranny.

Puritan Pastor John Cotton, Boston, New England, 1650

Indeed, with no Oliver Cromwell, there is no American Revolution!  This link between English Puritanism, having vanquished the Jesuit Order’s tyranny over Great Britain via Charles I and Charles II, and American Puritanism, that would ignite and fight the Order’s tyranny over the American Colonies via George III, is one of the keystones in understanding the the birth of the Protestant and Baptist, Federal Republic of these United States of America (1789-1868).  Because of this connection to Calvinist Puritanism, America would be known in Protestant Europe as “the Kingdom of Calvin.” Our beloved Oliver writes:

“WORTHY SIR, AND MY CHRISTIAN FRIEND,

“I received yours a few days since.  It was welcome to me because signed by you, whom I love and honour in the Lord: but more ‘so’ to see some of the same grounds or our Actings stirring in you that are in us, to quiet us to our work, and support us therein.  Which hath had the greatest difficulty in our engagement in Scotland; by reason we have had to do with some who were, I verily think, Godly, but, through, weakness and the subtlety of Satan, ‘were’ involved in Interests against the Lord and His People.

“With what tenderness we have proceeded with such, and that in sincerity, our Papers (which I suppose you have seen) will in part manifest; and I give you some comfortable assurance of ‘the same.’  The Lord hath marvellously appeared even against them.  And now again when all the power was devolved into the Scottish King and the Malignant Party,— they invading England, the Lord rained upon them such snares as the Enclosed will show.  Only the Narrative in short is this, That of their whole Army, when the Narrative was framed, not five men were returned.

“Surely, Sir, the Lord is greatly to be feared and to be praised!  We need your prayers in this as much as ever.  How shall we behave ourselves after such mercies?  What is the Lord a-doing?  What Prophecies are now fulfilling?  Who is a God like ours?  To know His will, to do His will, are both of Him.

“I took this liberty from business, to salute you thus in a word.  Truly I am ready to serve you and the rest of our Brethren and the Churches with you.  I am a poor weak creature, and not worthy the name of a worm; yet accepted to serve the Lord and His People.  Indeed, my dear Friend, between you and me, you know not me,—my weaknesses, my inordinate passions, my unskillfulness, and everyway unfitness to my work.  Yet, yet the Lord, who will have mercy on whom He will, does as you see!  Pray for me.  Salute all Christian friends though unknown.  I rest, your affectionate friend to serve you,

OLIVER CROMWELL.”

Thomas Carlyle, Oliver Cromwell’s Letters and Speeches: With Elucidations, (London: Chapman & Hall, Ltd., 1889), Vol. III of V, pp. 172-173.

Cromwell Dismissing the Long "Rump" Parliament, 1653

The Presbyterian Scots, in league with traitorous King Charles Stuart II, fought their last battle against Cromwell’s Parliamentary New Model Army in the English town of Worcester, 1651.  The day of battle: September 3, exactly one year to the day on which Cromwell defeated the Scots at Dunbar in Scotland.  The king, nicknamed “The Grand Malignant,” was using his deceased father’s enemies having begun the First Civil War in 1642, the Protestant Presbyterian Scottish army.  But after a four-hour fight, Charles and his Scottish army was routed, thousands of Scots losing their lives while Cromwell lost no more than 200 men.  For this signal victory from the hand of the God and Father of the Risen Lord Jesus Christ, Cromwell gives the Lord complete credit and all praise!  We read a portion of his letter to William Lenthall, Esquire, Speaker of the Parliament of England, it having been composed and sent the day following Cromwell’s victory:

“The dimensions of this mercy are above my thoughts.  It is, for aught I know, a crowning mercy.  Surely, if it be not, such a one we shall have, if this provoke those that are concerned in it to thankfulness; and the Parliament to do the will of Him who hath done His will for it, and for the Nation;— whose good pleasure it is to establish the Nation and the Change of Government, by making the People so wiling to the defence thereof, and so signally blessing the endavours of our servants in this late great work.  I am bold humbly to beg, That all thoughts may tend to the promoting of His honour who hath wrought so great salvation; and that the fatness of these continued mercies may not occasion pride and wantonness, as formerly the like hath done to a chosen Nation [Israel]; but that the fear of the Lord, even for His mercies, may keep an Authority and a People so prospered, and blessed, and witnessed unto, humble and faithful; and that justice and righteousness, mercy and truth may flow from you, as a thankful return to our gracious God.  This shall be the prayer of, Sir, your most humble and obedient servant,

OLIVER CROMWELL.”

Thomas Carlyle, Oliver Cromwell’s Letters and Speeches: With Elucidations, (London: Chapman & Hall, Ltd., 1889), Vol. III of V, pp. 158-159.

Oliver Cromwell: Protector on Coin, 1650s

“The fall of the Monarchy in England was succeeded by a Commonwealth.  The Commonwealth soon passed into a military Dictatorship.  The nation felt that the constitutional liberty for which it had contended on the battle-field had escaped it, and that it had again fallen under that arbitrary government which many hoped had received its mortal wound when the head of Charles rolled on the scaffold.   Both England and Scotland felt the heavy weight of that strong hand which, putting away the crown, had so firmly grasped the sceptre.  Perhaps England, swarming with Royalists and Republicans, with factions and sectaries, was not yet fit for freedom, and had to return for a little while longer into bonds.  But if the forms of the rule under which she was now placed were despotic, the spirit of liberty was there; her air had been purified from the stifling fog of a foreign slavery; and her people could more freely breathe.

If Cromwell was a tyrant, he was so after a very different pattern from that of Charles I.; it was to evildoers at home and despots abroad that he was a terror.  England, under his government, suddenly bounded up out of the gulf of contempt and weakness into which the reigns of the two Stuarts had sunk her.  Rapidly mounted upward the prestige of England’s arms, and brightly blazed forth the splendour of her intellect.  She again became a power in Christendom, and was feared by all who had evil designs on hand.  The Duke of Savoy at the bidding of the Lord Protector stayed his massacres [of the Bible-believing Vaudois] in the Waldensian Valleys, Cardinal Mazarin is said to have changed countenance when he heard his name mentioned, and even the Pope trembled in the Vatican when Oliver threatened to make his fleet visit the Eternal City.  He said he should make ‘the name of an Englishman as great as ever that of a Roman had been.’ At home his severe countenance scared the persecutor back into his cell, and the streets of the capital were cleansed from the horrible sights, but too common in the days of Charles and Laud, of men standing in the pillory to have their noses slit, their ears cropped off, and their cheeks branded with red-hot irons, for no offence save that of being unable to practice the ceremonies that form the king’s and the archbishop’s religion.  His death in 1658 was followed by the Protectorate of his son Richard, who finding the burden, which even the Atlantean shoulders of his father had borne uneasily, insupportable to him, speedily resigned it, and retired into private life.”

James A. Wylie, The History of Protestantism, (London: Cassell, Petter & Galpin, 1878), Vol. III of III, pp. 556-557.

Oliver Cromwell, Battle of Dunbar, Scotland, 1650

The Battle of Dunbar is one of the most important battles in world history.  The entire English Reformation, indeed the very British Empire that was to take the Gospel of the Risen Lord Jesus Christ to the ends of the earth, hung upon its outcome: had the Scots won, King Charles II would have been immediately restored to the English throne of the Stuarts—to the delight of the Jesuit Papacy!  For the Scottish Presbyterians had aligned themselves with this most wicked king who, upon the advice of his Jesuits, would “never keep faith with heretics.”  Cromwell, leading his English Puritan Army and Ironsides (his marvelous Horse that never lost a battle), refused any carnal alliance with the king for which reason they had been blessed by God on many fields of battle in both England and Ireland.  Cromwell is now at Dunbar outnumbered two-to-one, his army numbering nearly 11,000 while General Leslie’s forces are over 23,000.  Upon the interposition of the omnipotent Risen Son of God resulting in a martial error by Scottish General Leslie, Cromwell saw the blessed mistake and attacked early the following morning.  Subsequently, Leslie’s army was routed:  3,000 Scots were put to the sword and 10,000 were taken prisoner, while only 30 Englishmen lost their lives!  As a result of this signal victory due to God’s blessing upon the arms and intent of Cromwell’s Parliamentary New Model Army, our Man of God gave a full report to William Lenthall, Speaker of the Parliament on the 4th of September, 1650, the final portion reading with your Editor’s added emphasis in bold print:

“It hath now pleased God to bestow a mercy upon you, worthy of your knowledge, and of the utmost praise and thanks of all the fear and love His name; yea, the mercy is far above all praise.  Which that you may the better perceive, I shall take the boldness to tender unto you some circumstances accompanying this great business, which will manifest the greatness and seasonableness of this mercy. . . .

“The best of the Enemy’s horse being broken through and through in less than an hour’s dispute, their whole Army being put into confusion, it became a total rout; our men having the chase and execution of them near eight miles.  We believe that upon the place and near about it were about Three-thousand slain.  Prisoners taken: of their officers you have this enclosed List; of private soldiers near Ten-thousand.  The whole baggage and train taken, wherein was good store of match, powder and bullet; all their artillery, great and small,—thirty guns.  We are confident they have left behind them not less than Fifteen-thousand arms.  I have already brought in to me near Two-hundred colours, which I herewith send you. . . .

“Thus you have the prospect of one of the most signal mercies God hath done for England and His people, this War:—and now may it please you to give me the leave of a few words.  It is easy to say, The Lord hath done this.  It would do you good to see and hear our poor foot to go up and down making their boast of God.  But, Sir, it’s in your hands, and by these eminent mercies God puts it more into your hands, To give glory to Him; to improve your power, and His blessings, to His praise.  We that serve you beg of you not to own us,—but God alone.  We pray you own His people more and more; for they are the chariots and horsemen of Israel.  Disown yourselves;—but own your Authority; and improve it to curb the proud and the insolent, such as would disturb the tranquility of England, though under what specious pretences soever.  Relieve the oppressed, hear the groans of poor prisoners in England.  Be pleased to reform the abuses of all professions:—and if there be any one that makes many poor to make a few rich, that suits not a Commonwealth.  If He that strengthens your servants to fight, please to give you hearts to set upon these things, in order to His glory, and the glory of your Commonwealth,— ‘then’ besides the benefit England shall feel thereby, you shall shine forth to other Nations, who shall emulate the glory of such a pattern, and through the power of God turn in to the like!  [Indeed Oliver, nations are turned to the gospel and good government by the successful example of a Bible-honoring nation of people, not by the sword of an empire imposing socialist "democracy" around the world!]

“These are our desires [Cromwell speaking for the Army].  And that you may have liberty and opportunity to do these things, and not be hindered, we have been and shall be (by God’s assistance) willing to venture our lives;—and ‘will’ not desire you should be precipitated by importunities, from your care of safety and preservation; but that the doing of these good things may have their place amongst those which concern well-being, and so be wrought in their time and order.

“Since we came in Scotland, it has been our desire and longing to have avoided blood in this business; by reason that God hath a people here fearing His name, though deceived [as in America today!].  And to that end have we offered much love unto such, in the bowels of Christ; and concerning the truth of our hearts therein, have we appealed unto the Lord.  The Ministers of Scotland have hindered the passage of these things to the hearts of those to whom we intended them.  And now we hear, that not only the deceived people, but some of the Ministers are also fallen in this Battle.  This is the great hand of the Lord, and worthy of the consideration of all those who take into their hands the instruments of a foolish shepherd,—to wit, meddling with worldly policies, and mixtures of earthly power, to set up that which they call the Kingdom of Christ, which is neither it, nor, if it were it, would such means be found effectual to that end,—and neglect, or trust not to, the Word of God, the sword of the Spirit; which is alone powerful and able for the setting-up of that Kingdom; and, when trusted to, will be found effectually able to that end, and will also do it!  This is humbly offered for their sakes who have lately too much turned aside:  that they might return again to preach Jesus Christ, according to the simplicity of the Gospel;—and then no doubt they will discern and find your protection and encouragement.

“Beseeching you to pardon this length, I humbly take leave; and rest, Sir, your most obedient servant,

“Oliver Cromwell”

Thomas Carlyle, Oliver Cromwell’s Letters and Speeches: With Elucidations, (London: Chapman & Hall, Ltd., 1898), Vol. III of V, pp. 39, 44, 45-47.

Oliver Cromwell, 1653

“THE Scotch People, the first beginners of this grand Puritan Revolt, which we may define as an attempt to bring the Divine Law of the Bible into actual practice in men’s affairs on the Earth, are still one and all resolute for that object; but they are getting into sad difficulties as to realising it.  Not easy to realize such a thing:  besides true will, there need heroic gifts, the highest that Heaven gives, for realising it!  Gifts which have not been vouchsafed [for] the Scotch People at present. . . .

“The faults or misfortunes of the Scotch People, in their Puritan business, are many:  but properly their grand fault is this, That they have produced for it no sufficiently heroic man among them. No man that has an eye to see beyond the letter and the rubric; to discern, across many consecrated rubrics of the Past, the inarticulate divineness too of the Present and the Future, and dare all perils in the faith of that!  With Oliver Cromwell born a Scotchman; with a Hero King and a unanimous Hero Nation at his back, it might have been far otherwise.  With Oliver born Scotch, one sees not but the whole world might have become Puritan; might have struggled, yet a long while, to fashion itself according to that divine Hebrew Gospel,—to the exclusion of other Gospels not Hebrew, which also are divine, and will have their share of fulfillment here!—But of such issue [a Scottish Oliver Cromwell] there is no danger! . . .

“The meaning of the Scotch Covenant was, That God’s divine Law of the Bible should be put in practice in these Nations:  verily it, and not the Four Surplices at Allhallowtide, or any Formula of cloth or sheepskin here or elsewhere which merely pretended to be it.  But then the Covenant says expressly, there is to be a Stuart King in the business:  we cannot do without our Stuart King! Given a divine Law of the Bible on one hand, and a Stuart King, Charles the First or Charles Second, on the other:  alas, did History ever present a more irreducible cast of equations in this world?  I pity the poor Scotch Pedant Governors; still more the poor Scotch People who had no other to follow! . . .

“Human crimes are many:  but the crime of being deaf to God’s Voice, of being blind to all but parchments and antiquarian rubrics when the Divine Handwriting is abroad on the sky,—certainly there is no crime which the Supreme Powers do more terribly avenge! . . .

“[Lieutenant General of Horse] Wooden Ludlow gives note of another very singular interview he himself had with Cromwell, ‘a little after,’ in those same days or hours [1650 AD].  Cromwell whispered him in the House; they agreed ‘to meet that afternoon in the Council of State’ in Whitehall, and there withdraw into a private room to have a little talk together.  Oliver had cast his eye on Ludlow as a fit man for Ireland, to go and second [Lieutenant General] Ireton there; he took him, as by appointment, into a private room, ‘the Queen’s Guardchamber’ to wit; and there very largely expressed himself.  He testified the great value he had for me, Ludlow; combatted my objections to Ireland; spake somewhat against Lawyers, what a tortuous ungodly jungle English Law was; spake of the good that might be done by a good and brave man;—spake of the great Providences of God now abroad on the Earth; in particular ‘talked for almost an hour upon the Hundred-and-tenth Psalm;’ which to me, in my solid wooden head, seemed extremely singular.

“Modern readers, not in the case of Ludlow, will find this fact illustrative of Oliver.  Before setting out on the Scotch Expedition, and just on the eve of doing it, we too will read that Psalm of Hebrew David’s, which had become English Oliver’s:  we will fancy in our minds, not without reflections and emotions, the largest soul in England looking at this God’s World with prophet’s earnestness through that Hebrew Word,—two Divine Phenomena accurately correspondent for Oliver; the one accurately the prophetic symbol and articulate interpretation of the other.  As if the Silences had at length found utterance, and this was their Voice from out of old Eternity:

“The LORD said unto my Lord:  Sit thou at my right hand until I make thine “enemies thy footstool.  The Lord shall send the rod of thy strength out of Zion:  “rule thou in the midst of thine enemies.  Thy people shall be willing in the day of “thy power; in the beauties of holiness, from the womb of the morning:  thou has “the dew of thy youth.  The Lord has sworn, and will not repent, Thou art a priest “forever after the order of Melchizedek.  The Lord, at thy right hand, shall strike “through Kings in the day of his wrath.  He shall judge among the Heathen; he shall “fill the places with the dead bodies; he shall wound the heads over many “countries.  He shall drink of the brook in the way:  therefore shall he lift up the “head.”  [Quoted from the King James Authorized English Version of the Bible, 1611, in its present edition of 1769]

“In such spirit goes Oliver Cromwell to the Wars.  ‘A god-intoxicated man,’ as Novalis elsewhere phrases it.  I have asked myself, If anywhere in Modern European History, or even in ancient Asiatic, there was found a man practising this mean World’s affairs with a heart more filled by the Idea of the Highest?  Bathed in the Eternal Splendours,—it is so he walks our dim Earth:  this man is one of few.  He is projected with a terrible force out of the Eternities, and in the Times and their arenas there is nothing that can withstand him.  It is great:—to us it is tragic; a thing that should strike us dumb!  My brave one, thy old noble Prophecy is divine; older than Hebrew David:  old as the Origin of Man;—and shall, though in wider ways then thou supposest, be fulfilled!—”

Thomas Carlyle, Oliver Cromwell’s Letters and Speeches: With Elucidations, (London: Chapman & Hall, 1898), Vol. III of V, pp. 1, 2, 3, 5-6.

Cromwell Gazing on the Body of Executed King Charles I, 1648

Upon Cromwell’s submission of fanatical Roman Catholic Ireland led by Jesuit Priests having incited the nation to murder over 300,000 Scots-Irish and English Protestants for eight years (1641-1649), Ireland began to enjoy domestic peace.  For ten years, from 1650 to 1660 in which year the diabolical King Charles II was restored to the throne of England, Ireland enjoyed a prosperity and peace unknown for centuries.  For it was in 1172 AD that Englishman Nicholas Breakspear, under the name of “Pope Adrian IV,” gave Ireland to English King Henry II with the order to shove the Roman Catholic religion down the throats of the once Bible-believing Irish people when Ireland was known as “Hibernia.”  Thus God, in His wonderful providence, used the same English government, now under the sway of Puritan Calvinists, to give the Irish people the opportunity to return to the faith of the Baptist preacher known today as “St. Patrick” (as he was no Roman Catholic!) and thereby embrace the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ as a matter or civil polity.

But the Jesuits, in refusing to give ground to an irrefutable historical record, invented the myth known to all brainwashed Irishmen as “the Curse of Cromwell.” This lie perpetually feeds an Irish hatred for all Englishmen while creating a false moral supremacy upon which the Irish base their “just claim” for “Home Rule.”  And as all Protestant historians know “Home Rule is Rome Rule,” the Irish people must be kept in a ceaseless state of agitation in the Jesuit Order’s war upon White Protestant and Baptist Independent English people so accursed by the Black Pope’s Counter Reformation Council of Trent.  But historian Thomas Carlyle sets the record straight as to the “Curse of Cromwell,” that it was indeed a blessing of prosperity and peace unsurpassed in review of the dismal history of a people having been kept in a degraded squalor and intellectual retardation since Henry II imposed the iron boot of Rome over “the Emerald Isle.” May all of us AV1611 Reformation Bible-believers take the following words of Carlyle to heart while we preach the gospel to Rome’s greatest defenders now under the Vatican’s tyranny of the unwanted Lisbon Treaty—the dear but duped Irish Roman Catholics!

“There goes a wild story, which owes it first place in History to Clarendon, I think, who is the author of many such:  How the Parliament at one time had decided to ‘exterminate’ all the Irish population; and then, finding this would not quite answer, had contented itself with packing them all off into the Province of Connaught, there to live upon the moorlands; and so had pacified the Sister Island.  Strange rumours no doubt were afloat in the Council of Kilkenney, in the Conventicle or Clonmacnoise, and other such quarters, and were kept up for very obvious purposes in those days; and my Lord of Clarendon at an after date, seeing Puritanism hung on the gallows and tumbled in heaps in St. Margaret’s, thought it safe to write with considerable latitude respecting its procedure.  My Lord had, in fact, the story all his own way for about a hundred-and-fifty years; and, during that time, has set afloat through vague heads a great many things.  His authority is rapidly sinking; and will now probably sink deeper than even it deserves.

“The real procedure of the Puritan Commonwealth towards Ireland is not a matter of conjecture, or of report by Lord Clarendon; the documentary basis and scheme of it still stands in black-on-white, and can be read by all persons.  In this Document the reader will find, set forth in authentic business-form, a Scheme of Settlement somewhat different from that of ‘extermination,’ which, if he be curious in that matter, he ought to consult.  First, it appears by this Document, ‘all husbandmen, ploughmen, labourers, artificers and others of the meaner sort’ of the Irish nation are to be,—not exterminated; no, but rendered exempt from punishment and question, as to these Eight Years of blood and misery now ended [having begun with the Jesuit Order's Irish Massacre totaling over 300,000 Protestant victims!---EJP]; which is a very considerable exception from the Clarendon Scheme!

“Next, as to the Ringleaders, the rebellious Landlords, and Papist Aristocracy; as to these also, there is a carefully-graduated scale of punishments established, that punishment and guilt may in some measure correspond.  All that can be proved to have been concerned in the Massacre of Forty-one [1641]; for these, and for certain other persons of the turncoat species, whose names are given, there shall be no pardon:—‘extermination,’ actual death on the gallows, or perpetual banishment and confiscation for these; but not without legal inquiry and due trial first had, for these, or for any one.  Then certain others, who have been in arms at certain dates against the Parliament, but not concerned in the Massacre:  these are declared to have forfeited their estates; but lands to the value of one-third of the same, as a modicum to live upon, shall be assigned them, where the Parliament thinks safest,—in the moorlands of Connaught, as it turned out.  Then another class, who are open Papists and have not manifested their good affection to the Parliament:  these are to forfeit one-third of their estates; and continue quiet at their peril.  Such is the Document; which was regularly acted on; fulfilled with as much exactness as the case, now in the hands of very exact men, admitted of.  The Catholic Aristocracy of Ireland have to undergo this fate, for their share in the late miseries [the Irish Massacre]; this and no other:  and as for all ‘ploughmen, husbandmen, artificers and people of the meaner sort,’ they are to live quiet where they are, and have no questions asked.

“In this way, not in the way of ‘extermination,’ was Ireland settled by the Puritans.  Five-and-forty thousand armed ‘kurisees’ [deported Irish mercenaries] are fighting, not without utility we hope, far off in foreign parts [for Roman Catholic monarchs].  Incurably turbulent ringleaders of revolt are sent to the moorlands of Connaught.  Men of the Massacre where they can be convicted, of which some instances occur, are hanged.  The mass of the Irish Nation lives quiet under a new Land Aristocracy; new, and in several particulars very much improved indeed:  under these lives now the mass of the Irish Nation; ploughing, delving, hammering; with their wages punctually paid them; with the truth spoken to them, and the truth done to them, so as they had never before seen it since they were a Nation! Clarendon himself admits that Ireland flourished, to an unexampled extent, under this arrangement.  One can very well believe it.  What is to hinder poor Ireland from flourishing, if you will do the truth to it and speak the truth, instead of doing the falsity and speaking the falsity?

“Ireland, under this arrangement, would have grown-up gradually into a sober diligent drabcoloured population; developing itself, most probably, in some form of Calvinistic Protestantism.  For there was hereby a Protestant Church of Ireland, of the most irrefragable nature, preaching daily in all its actions and procedure a real Gospel of veracity, of piety, of fair dealing and good order, to all men; and certain other ‘Protestant Churches of Ireland,’ and unblessed real-imaginary Entities, of which the human soul is getting weary [Roman Catholicism], would of a surety never have found footing there!  But the Ever-blessed Restoration came upon us [King Charles II Stuart returning from Jesuit-ruled France to England and taking the throne in 1660 then to make Presbyterian Scotland "howl" for 28 years].  All that arrangement was torn-up by the roots; and Ireland was appointed to develop itself as we have seen [into a fanatical Roman Catholic nation constantly conspiring against Protestant England via the Jesuits now ruling both Dublin and London].  Not in the drabcoloured Puritan way;—in what other way is still a terrible dubiety [doubt leading to vacillation and uncertain outcome], to itself and to us [Englishmen]!  It will be by some Gospel of Veracity, I think , when the Heavens are pleased to send such.  This ‘Curse of Cromwell,’ so-called, is the only Gospel of that kind I can yet discover to have ever been fairly afoot there.”

Thomas Carlyle, Oliver Cromwell’s Letters and Speeches: With Elucidations, (London: Chapman and Hall, Ltd. 1894), Vol. II of V, pp. 258-260.

Oliver Cromwell, Protector of Protestant Scotch and Roman Catholic Irish Citizenry

Many slanders have been uttered and libelous statements printed concerning the military policies of Oliver Cromwell—the savior of the White Protestant Reformation in England.  Our Man of God has been accused of perpetrating rape, robbery and murder as an intricate part of his campaign strategy, especially in Roman Catholic Ireland.  The Jesuit Order’s “History Channel” has even been so bold to hire Dale Dye, a Roman Catholic retired Marine Corps captain and “Jesuit Hollywood” actor (playing the role of General Edward Lansdale in Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Oliver Stone’s JFK), to unabashedly malign Cromwell.  While narrating the “History Channel’s” version of Cromwell’s invasion into Roman Catholic Ireland, an Ireland having been incited by Jesuits to massacre over 300,000 English and Irish Protestants which mass-murder commenced with The Irish Massacre in 1641 (and continued until Cromwell’s righteous invasion in 1649), Dye accused Parliament’s Lieutenant General Oliver Cromwell of inciting his highly disciplined soldiers composing his “New Model Army” to robbery and rape of the Irish.

Captain Dale Dye, Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor

This diabolical lie proclaimed by that damnable, totally-depraved, Roman Catholic sinner Dale Dye, is now fully refuted by the very words of Cromwell himself—that epic embodiment of Reformation Bible-based, Calvinistic English Puritanism—as quoted by Thomas Carlyle, one of England’s foremost historians.  (Yes, the Order’s “History Channel” cares not for record of verifiable history, for its whole purpose is to re-direct the serious seeker of historical truth into the lies and calculated deceptions concocted by those masters of deceit, the Society of Jesus!)  The following are two declarations issued by Oliver to his army during the Second Civil War (1648-1651) regarding his invasion of Protestant Presbyterian Scotland in 1648 (wickedly in alignment with the Jesuit Power behind exiled Charles II) and later, Roman Catholic Ireland in 1649 notoriously under the control of the Black Pope’s Jesuit Order.  Concerning Scotland, here is the first of Puritan Cromwell’s warnings:

“PROCLAMATION.”

“WHEREAS we are marching with the Parliament’s Army into the Kingdom of Scotland, in pursuance of the remaining part of the Enemy who lately invaded the Kingdom of England, and for the recovery of the Garrisons of Berwick and Carlisle:

“These are to declare, That if any Officer or Soldier under my command shall take or demand any money; or shall violently take any horses, goods or victual, without order; or shall abuse the people in any sort,—he shall be tried by a Council of War:  and the said person so offending shall be punished, according to the Articles of War made for the government of the Army in the Kingdom of England, which punishment is death.

“Each Colonel, or other chief Officer in every regiment, is to transcribe a copy of this; and to cause the same to be delivered to each Captain in his regiment: and every said Captain of each respective troop and company is to publish the same to his troop or company; and to take a strict course that nothing be done contrary hereunto.

“Given under my hand, this 20th September 1648.

“OLIVER CROMWELL”

The following is Cromwell’s second warning upon his invasion of Roman Catholic Ireland in 1649:

“This DECLARATION is appointed to be printed, and published throughout all Ireland; By special direction from—OLIVER CROMWELL.

“WHEREAS I am informed that, upon the marching out of the Armies heretofore, or of parties from Garrisons, a liberty hath been taken by the Soldiery to abuse, rob and pillage, and too often to execute cruelties upon the Country People:  Being resolved, by the grace of God, diligently and strictly to restrain such wickedness for the future,

“I do hereby warn and require all Officers, Soldiers, and others under my command, henceforth To forbear all such evil practices as aforesaid; and Not to do any wrong or violence toward country People, or persons whatsoever, unless they be actually in arms or office with the Enemy; and not to meddle with the goods of such, without special order.

“And I farther declare, That it shall be free and lawful to and for all manner of persons dwelling in the country, as well as gentlemen and soldiers, as farmers and other people (such as are in arms or office with or for the Enemy only excepted), to make their repair, and bring any provisions unto the Army, while in march or camp, or unto any Garrison under my command:  Hereby assuring all such, That they shall not be molested or troubled in their persons or goods; but shall have the benefit of a free market, and receive ready money for goods or commodities they shall so bring and sell:  And that they, behaving themselves peaceably and quietly; and paying such Contributions, proportionately with their neighbours, as have been, are, or shall be duly and orderly imposed upon them, for maintenance of the Parliament’s forces and other public uses,—shall have free leave and liberty to live at home with their families and goods; and shall be protected in their persons and estates by virtue Hereof, until the 1st of January next:  By or before which time, ’1st of January next,’ all such of them as are minded to reside, and plough and sow, in the ‘Army’s’ quarters, are to make their addresses, for now and farther protections, to the Attorney-General, residing in Dublin and to such other persons as shall be authorised for that purpose.

“And hereof I require all Soldiers, and others under my command, diligently to take notice and observe the same:  as they shall answer to the contrary at their utmost perils. Strictly charging and commanding all Officers and others, in their several places, carefully to see to it That no wrong or violence be done to any such person as aforesaid, contrary to the effect of the premises.  Being resolved, through the grace of God, to punish all that shall offend contrary hereunto, very severely, according to Law or Articles of War; to displace, and otherwise punish, all such Officers as shall be found negligent in their places, and not to see to the due observance hereof, or not to punish the offenders under their respective commands.  [Emphasis in bold added]

“Given at Dublin, the 24th of August 1649.

“OLIVER CROMWELL.”

Thomas Carlyle, Oliver Cromwell’s Letters and Speeches: With Elucidations, (London: Chapman and Hall, 1894), Vol. II of V, pp. 55, 139-141.