USS Maine: Blown up by Jesuit agents in Havana Harbor; Begins Spanish-American War, 1898; Subsequent Treaty protects every piece of Roman Catholic Church property in American Empire

Dear Brother William,

Thank you for your most excellent missive below.

Personally, I believe war will be declared on Shia Iran AFTER Prince Hall Rite Freemason Barry Davis Obama is returned to office, AFTER Republican candidate Knight of Malta Newt Gingrich is defeated (further angering all Whites in general due to election fraud), and then AFTER the USS Enterprise is sunk in the Persian Gulf.  (The formula for igniting war on a targeted enemy includes two components: a Democratic US president and a planned naval incident.)  The sinking of the USS Enterprise will be blamed on Iran (when the real culprit is the pope’s Office of Naval Intelligence having planted a few bombs on the carrier as was done to the USS Arizona and the USS Indianapolis) due to Iranian fighter flyovers dropping a few bombs and strafing the deck with machine gun fire.

Thus, Satan’s Jesuit Order, controlling the International Vatican Empire with all attendant knightly orders, is slowly moving its US/EU military colossus into position to begin the war on Shia Iran.  Israel cannot be blamed, as it is the pope’s “Revived Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem” intended survive this war and subsequently prosper including the building of the Third Hebrew Temple.  Thus, it appears that 2013 is the year for the attack on Iran.

Lord bless,

Brother Eric

___________________________________________________

Dear Brother Eric,

I was interested this past week when you actually mentioned troops being deployed to Kuwait, because my unit, 1st Brigade, 4th ID is going to Kuwait in February 2013, makes me think that they are planning to start the war with Iran at the end of 2012 perhaps?  The chain of command says it’s we’re going to act as a reserve force incase anything hits up in Iraq again, but I know that’s a lie; it’s to prepare for the invasion of Iran, possibly through Iraq, some of my NCO’s even mentioned that.

I’m continuing to pray and occasionally fast (I’m going to do it more often now) for God to help me get out of the Army.  I love listening to your shows when you talk about Great Christian Military leaders like Cromwell, Stonewall Jackson, George Washington and Andrew Jackson.  It saddens me to see today that the leaders of the Military today from the highest General to the newest team leader (E-4) are mostly power hungry and sex driven and live on getting drunk every weekend.  All those great Christian leaders always had respect for the lower enlisted men who in return actually respected their leaders and prayed with them for victory and would give their lives in a heartbeat to protect them.  Today, I see NO leader that I would be willing to lay my life down for, and very few that I actually respect.  As long as this country is led by anti-Christian leaders, and anti-Christian Military leaders, this country will never win a war again, and I hate to see it, but for everything this country has done for the past 150 years, we deserve what is coming to this nation: it’s all judgement for our sins.

Also an interesting piece of information I remembered when I listened to your latest interview with the Count about why Iran is called Iran and not Persia.  I read somewhere before that during World War II, when Hitler was making allies with the Sunni Muslim Arabs in the Middle East (which were made into a Muslim SS division that were used to persecute millions of Jews and Orthodox Serbs in Eastern Europe I believe) I read Hitler actually renamed Persia “Iran” since ‘Iran” is ‘Aryan” in Arabic and the whole Nazi Aryan belief system comes from Indo-Persia.  I can’t say that it’s completely true, but it does seem likely.

Anyways keep up the great work Brother!

Brother in Christ,

William

USS Enterprise: Dispatched to Persian Gulf, January, 2012

As your Editor has stated for over two years, the Order is going to send an old aircraft carrier into the Persian Gulf.  There, it will be sunk “by the Iranians” so as to justify a presidential declaration of war against Shia Iran hosting a large Jewish population.  As US Democratic President Freemason Franklin Delano Roosevelt incited the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor (Freemasons Hirohito and FDR secretly working together), even so will US Democratic President Freemason Barry Davis Obama—the American Empire’s second FDR—will incite Iran to attack a carrier (Freemasons Davis/Obama and A-jad working together!).  That carrier, the 50-year-old USS Enterprise, will be sacrificed, the loss of an expendable, archaic old carrier serving to justify a war on Iran.  This most important move in the game of the Black Pope’s martial international chess (he controlling both sides) will set in motion a scenario the Company of Jesus has been planning for over 100 years!

Knight of Malta Leon Panetta, Secretary of Defense, 2011

And who is to dispatch this carrier?  Jesuit-educated at Santa Clara University, Italian-American Roman Catholic Secretary of Defense (i.e., “Secretary of War”) Knight of Malta Leon Panetta!  No doubt Knight of Malta General Martin E. Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, will lead the charge of Rome’s American-led Crusade!  As you so stated President George W. Bush, this is indeed a CRUSADE!

Knight of Malta Army General Martin E. Dempsey, Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, 2011

There will then be an Iranian missile attack into Israel—Rome’s “Revived Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem.”  Then Israel will attack Iran so as not to be blamed for initiating the war-crusade of the Vatican.  America must be blamed for inciting the war so that the plotted destruction of the Temple Mount Mosques in Jerusalem can be entirely blamed on America.  Once the Shia Muslims, hated by the Sunni Muslims financing this Anglo-American crusade against the Shia, are exterminated then the entire Sunni Muslim world can be united against America—“the Great Satan.”

For more information, see the article announcing the carrier’s deployment here.

Communist Chinese Army in Green as Pictured at Denver Airport: Persecutor of Bible-Beliving Christians

This proves your Editor’s claim made in VAIII: the Jesuits perfected and control anti-Reformation, world communism.  The Order was the font of the Russian Revolution of 1917 and the Communist Revolution in 1949.  Both Stalin and Mao were Masonic Jesuit Temporal Coadjutors put in power by the Black Pope’s Anglo-American White Power Structure centered in London and Washington.  Now the game is obvious to all:  the Communist Chinese government persecutes true, Bible-believing Chinese Christians as a matter of present policy.  Conversely, that same damnable government extols Roman Catholicism evidenced by the video below.  This is why Jesuitical Communism always takes the Reformation Bible out of the hands of true believers in Christ, and then persecutes those believers unto despair and death!

See the BBC video here!

Mario Draghi, Governor of Bank of Italy, 2006-Present

The following is a brief note from Brother Hans of Germany on the Order’s naked and open control of European Finance.

_________________________________

Dear Eric Jon Phelps,

The Jesuits are finally revealing that they are in control of European finance.

It is now very likely that Mario Draghi will be appointed as the ECB’s new head.  He now has the support of Germany’s minister of financial affairs Wolfgang Schäuble.

He was educated by the Jesuits at Istituto Massimo in Rome, a private Catholic school.  This change comes at a crucial time as Europe is about to suffer financially.

What are they planning?

In any case the change does not really matter as Herman van Rompuy as well as Jose Barroso [current president of the European Commission---EJP], are also popish stooges, Barroso having attended Jesuit Georgetown University.

My best wishes.

Hans

Lev Navrozov of Newsmax warns of Chinese Invasion of US, 2009

The video above depicts a portion of the truth concerning the future of the condemned “Holy Roman” Fourteenth Amendment, Socialist-Communist, Cartel-Corporate Fascist American Empire (1868-Present).  The introduction accurately portrays the unification of Korea, its Army becoming the second largest in the Far East.  Japan surrenders and unites with Korea.  What is omitted is the Red Chinese connection, she to be the real impetus behind the unification of the Far East including Taiwan, Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia as well as Australia.

The introduction also portrays Korea/Japan attacking Hawaii, it to serve as the staging base for an attack on the California West Coast.  Sodomite San Francisco will be conquered as well as Los Angeles after its CIA-implemented nuclear demolition.  Meanwhile, Communist Korea (and Red China) will take over the American Mid-West while the country is divided by a radiated Mississippi River.  This is in agreement with your Editor’s forecast, the US to be divided at the Mississippi River, China and its Mongolian hordes controlling all land west of the Mississippi River to the Pacific Coast.  The occupation begins, mass-murder of the American population unfolds, buses taking civilians to concentration camps.

Your Editor believes this scenario will transpire after US forces are betrayed and defeated on foreign soil, in both the Far East and in the Middle East during the Iraq-Iran-Saudi Arabian papal crusade.  It is time for all White Bible-believing Christians to begin migrating to the Northeast above highway 80.  During the occupation of foreign troops, your Editor has strong reasons to believe this predominantly White Roman Catholic region will be occupied by a White Roman Catholic European force while the amalgamated, Old Protestant/Baptist South, Protestant and Baptist Mid-West and Alien-Invaded Hispanic Roman Catholic West will be under the merciless rule of the Black Pope’s Sino-Soviet-Muslim invaders.  The unified Mongolians, absolutely hating all American Blacks (both Majority Savage and Minority Civil) do to past robbery, rape and murder of Asians as a result of US forces occupying Far Eastern nations during the pope’s  Cold War Hoax, will delight in their complete annihilation.  Payback time will have arrived to the extent that no Blacks will be permitted to live in North America, the continent to be depopulated in accordance with “Agenda 21,” and returned to the racial descendants of Shem.

_______________________________________

The following is a word from Adviser Chris Strunk:

My son says the game is not as good as others; but as for the scenario folks this is so righton that it fits exactly into the reason the USURPER BHO was placed in office by the Jesuits and SMOM!!!!

Take note that the father to William J. Zylka controlled William Casey as a SMOM higher-up and as such used his son as the behind the scenes CIA operative inside North Korea.  Zylka greased the skids for the scenario which is described in the above YOUTUBE presentation facilitated to happen in the near future when the Red Chinese have finished the widdening of the Panama Canal by 2015.

Added to the capability of putting a Chinese carrier strike force into the Gulf of Mexico, is the FACT that the BUSHES I, II, III and now IV facilitated the NAU treason that created the basis for the many Enterprise zones throughout the USA (found on the DOC website) along with the SMOM-controlled CIA/FBI-controlled 62 Muslim training camps around the country that are combined with Chinese-controlled foreign troops vis-a-vis Blackwater / SMOM therein – thanks to the traitor Hillary Clinton..

Hang on for your life folks and support local Sovereign Home Rule the so-called Government has left us for different pastures!.  YOU ALLL are on your own get a grip and become self-sufficient in food energy and defensible space!

Chris Strunk

Elizabeth I, Protestant Queen of England, Enemy of the Jesuits, 1588

Craig Oxley, “the greatest living patriotic English incendinary,” has put together another masterpiece.  All is clear and to the point.  The poor people of Japan have suffered an attack from united American and British powers subject to the Pope of Rome. Yes, the Anglo-American International White Power Structure is the hammer of the Jesuit Papacy reducing all nations to the Temporal Power of the Pope of Rome.  This horrible crime was committed so as to drive the Japanese people into the arms of the Red Chinese—our coming invaders!

See another of Craig’s videos on the Japan massacre here!

See another terrible video of Japanese fleeing from the tsunami here.

Vice President Joe Biden with Russian Jesuit, Janez Sever, in Moscow, March, 2011

Please view Maximiliano Aquaisol’s post on Jesuit-trained and honored, Irish Roman Catholic, American Vice President Joe Biden in Moscow with a Russian Jesuit.  The post is on Craig Oxley’s site, The Unihived Mind.  Well done!

Red Chinese Military on Parade with Flags, 2010

Once again the Jesuit Order, in full control of Red China since 1949 (thanks to the US State Department ruled by CFR agents loyal to JFK assassin Francis Cardinal Spellman), imposed a policy during the 1960s and 1970s of aborting or killing baby girls.  This was done deliberately so as to create approximately 30 million Chinamen with no women.  In musing on this reality, the only practical use of these men is most military!  The attached audio throws much light on this harbinger of disaster for White Apostate Protestant and Baptist America.  The narrators are Bible-believing Christian men and are most articulate dealing with this and other topics.

Please listen to the sermon audio here.

Also please read a most important Newsweek article of March 6, 2011 here.

Red Chinese Naval Frigate Off the Coast of Libya, March 21, 2011

As repeated by your Editor for the last ten years, America is to suffer a future Sino-Soviet-Muslim Invasion, North America to be partitioned between the victors.  Therefore, we are not surprised that China has been given a huge economy to surpass the US economy in a mere ten to twelve years.  In order to build a massive military capable of waging war on several international fronts, a nation must have a vibrant and growing commercial economy manufacturing a host of goods.  And what better way to build that infrastructure than to sell its goods to its future martial enemy–the USA!  Yes, the Black Pope’s CFR-controlled government of Rome’s 14th Amendment American Empire has built the Black Pope’s Red Chinese army and navy thanks to the gift of American technology—both commercial and military!

Red Chinese Naval Frigate in Port, Libya, March 21, 2011

For the first time in history, Red China has established a presence in the Mediterranean Sea—as has Iran.  It will continue.  The stage of this unfolding war in the Middle East is being carefully set.  A host of possibilities in realizing the Jesuit Order’s desires for its unfolding mass-murder and reorganization of nations have presented themselves.

May we Americans be reminded that our nation is under judgment primarily for our rejection of the AV1611 Reformation English Bible. WE have banned “The BOOK” from our domestic and foreign policies as well as from our 14th Amendment American government in Washington, it for over a century, spiritually fornicating with that “Mother of Harlots and Abominations of the Earth”—that great city of Rome (Revelation 17:18)

Map of Japan, Earthquake and Tsunami, March, 2011

Caution must always be exercised when considering the reasons for what appears to be “natural disasters.” The present domestic plight of Japan is no exception to the rule.  Before we begin, be it known that your Editor has always been fond of the Japanese people.  He had a lovely Japanese girlfriend in High School for a while and has been acquainted with the late Brother Daniel Fuji, one of the greatest Japanese missionaries of the 20th Century.  Your Editor has charted the dismal history of Japan after the Devil’s Jesuit Order was formally readmitted into the island nation in 1865.  Yet, secretly the Company had been readmitted immediately after that American rogue—Commodore Matthew Perry—opened up Japan to White “Christian” (especially White Roman Catholic) men in 1854, we White men, to the exclusion of the Protestant Dutch, having been banned from the country for centuries due to one thing—the Jesuit quest of  reducing Japan and her Emperor to the Pope’s Temporal Power, Japan then to be used for the submitting of Buddhist China to the Pope of Rome.

Emperor Komei: Poisoned by Jesuits, 1867

The events following the invasion of Commodore Perry were catastrophic to the sovereignty of old Japan.  The Order’s British Crown under Jesuitess and Apostate Protestant Queen Victoria was used in the attempted submission of Emperor Komei.  In 1863 the Emperor issued his “Order to Expel Barbarians,” but to no avail: the Shogun refused to enforce the order, the Emperor’s Protector now in the hands of the Jesuits.  In 1865 the Sons of Loyola were formally readmitted over the objection of Emperor Komei, the Order having many friends among the Japanese lords called “Daimyo.” For this relentless resistance, the Emperor was poisoned in January, 1867, with smallpox, at the virile age of only 36.  (Within three days, Crown Prince Meiji ascended the throne at the age of 14, he to reign for over 45 years.)  The following year the Emperor’s great protector turned traitor to Rome, Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Shogun Yoshinobu was “forced” to resign thus ending the Tokugawa Shogunate (1603-1868)—once the foremost enemy of the Society of Jesus in the Far East. Indeed, that same year “the Meiji Restoration” occurred, Komei’s adolescent son Meiji, only 14 years of age, began his formal reign under the argus-eyed oversight of Japanese agents serving the Jesuit General. 

Emperor Meiji receiving the British Order of the Garter, 1906

“The Meiji Restoration” began the Order’s Japanese Imperial Empire (1868-1945), the same year the Black Pope would create his “Holy Roman” Fourteenth Amendment American Empire on the ruins of George Washington’s Protestant Federal Republic of “These United States of America,” 1868.  The Jesuits then centralized all political power in Tokyo to be overseen by Jesuit Sophia University later established in 1913 with the blessing of Emperor Meiji.  (The Jesuits would do the same in their new American Empire, centralizing all power in Washington, D.C., 1871, this “Rome on the Potomac” to be directed by Jesuit Georgetown University!)  In 1877 the last Samurai resistance to the “New Order” within Imperial Japan was annihilated thanks to American machine-guns given to Meiji’s new Japanese Army.  (In this selfsame year Roman Catholic Army General Philip Sheridan, building the Black Pope’s “New Order” in Imperial America “from sea to shining sea,” defeated the Sioux and Cheyenne Indians during the Great Sioux War.)  The Order’s Hollywood movie titled “The Last Samurai” illustrates the event, Knight of Malta Tom Cruise playing the leading role.

Freemasons General MacArthur and Emperor Hirohito, 1945

In time, Meiji’s grandson, ascended the throne in Japan.  Fascist Emperor Hirohito would be used by the Jesuit Order in using Rome’s Japanese Imperial Army to wage war in the Far East, its primary purpose being to totally destroy the Protestant Reformation and the reading of the Protestant Bible among the Chinese, Korean and Filipino peoples.  This is how we understand the Japanese Army’s “Rape of Nanking;” this is how we understand Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor American Army General Douglas MacArthur’s abandonment of the Philippines resulting in the “Death March of Bataan” sacrificing tens of thousands of White Anglo-Saxon American Protestants and Baptists of the Old Protestant South no matter how many Roman Catholics perished!  “Kill em all; let God sort them out” is an old Jesuit maxim of war.

To ignite a world war between the Jesuit Empires of Imperial Japan (1868-1945) and Imperial America (1868-Present), an “Event” was needed.  Enter Pearl Harbor.  As proven by Robert B. Stinnett’s masterpiece, Day of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor (2000), Masonic FDR and Masonic Hirohito worked together, via the Japanese High Command and the American Office of Naval Intelligence, for the successful attack on America’s foremost Naval Base in the Pacific.  The Order would then use the military colossus of its largely White Anglo-Saxon Protestant American Empire to destroy Japan and its patriotic manhood as the prelude to converting the nation into an economic powerhouse later to be united with the Order’s Communist China in preparation for the Black Pope’s Sino-Soviet-Muslim invasion of America.

This brings us to our current crisis.  We must ask, “Why were the recent earthquakes and subsequent tsunamis imposed upon Japan?”  For those of us who do not believe in “coincidence,” but rather in a Satanic International Conspiracy for World Government under the Pope of Jesuit-making as well as the Providential Sovereign Hand of the Risen Lord Jesus Christ over the Affairs of Nations, the answer is twofold.  The first involves the Devil’s Jesuit Papacy; the second involves the judgment of the Son of God put upon a nation in open violation of his infallible written Word concerning the Nation of Israel.

Hiroshima: On-Ground Detonation of Atomic Device by Jesuits, 1945

As to the FIRST REASON, your Editor shall repeat his response given to one of his advisers who posed our question above.

“As stated above, Japan has been a most obedient tool of the Pope’s “Holy Roman” Fourteenth Amendment American Empire since 1945.  With its historic, anti-Jesuit culture totally destroyed by B-29 bombers of the Order’s Army Air Force commanded by Masonic General Curtis Lemay, it was rebuilt into a commercial slave-state by the U.S. Congress, it receiving credit to pay for that “urban renewal” from the Pope’s Federal Reserve Bank, the labor and person of the U.S. “taxpayer” serving as collateral further ensuring a future U.S. financial collapse and enslavement of the people under Cartel-Corporate Jesuit fascism.  Japan also has one of the world’s largest navies.  Thus, the Jesuits have rebuilt the commercial infrastructure of Japan for a reason, the same reason Communist China’s infrastructure is presently being built.  I believe both have been created so as to unite them both in the building of a massive Asian naval flotilla and military for the planned attack of North America in the future as foretold by Bible-believing ex-priest Jeremiah Crowley in his Romanism: A Menace to the Nation (1912).  This is the present Counter-Reformation endgame within the next, say, 20 years.  And when the apostate Protestant, Fourteenth Amendment American Empire falls, that will be the formal end of the Lord’s Grand and Glorious Protestant Reformation.  The White Protestant German Empire and White Protestant British Empire disappeared during the 20^th Century via the Black Pope’s Second Thirty Years’ War (1914-1945); the Protestant American Empire will end during the 21^st Century—if Satan’s Jesuit Generals have their way.

“So why the did the Order use its HAARP and underwater thermonuclear weapons in tandem to create these series of massive earthquakes and subsequent tsunamis in their Japan, a mere commercial colony of the American Empire?  Indeed, this is the $64,000 question.

Chinese and Japanese Politicians, Beijing

“I believe the purpose is primarily to ultimately drive Japan—the Japanese people—into the arms of the rulers of Red China (as the Japanese and Chinese rulers both work together for Jesuit ends).  China will probably extend relief aid to Japan endearing the Japanese people to the Chinese people (two ancient enemies), thereby creating a willingness among the Japanese to abandon the camp of the U.S. and enter into the developing Asian Union headed by Red China.  As you know, the Prime Minister of Japan was appointed by the Emperor who is a mere tool of the Jesuits, the Sons of Loyola working from their military fortress of Sophia University in Tokyo.  (Notice this ‘disaster’) transpired north of Tokyo with the plan of the radiation to be blown east over the Pacific and not south over Tokyo—the Jesuits of Tokyo escaping calculated harm.)  The relations between Japan and China are not good at present and must be “mended.”

Toyota Recall, 2009

“Other events seem to validate this conclusion of Japan’s future union with Red China.  The Order’s conspiracy to use its CFR-controlled government of the American Empire to push Toyota into the “Gas Pedal Recall” of 2009 was uncalled for.  There was no problem with all those hundreds of thousands of Toyotas.  The real purpose behind this injustice was to financially attack the auto giant so as to provide a justification (in the eyes of the Japanese people) for Toyota (also run by Japanese Jesuit Temporal Coadjutors) to move out of the U.S. and into the arms of Red China, then to set up shop inside the Communist giant.  China is to be the 21^st Century’s military “superpower,” so why not move the world’s largest auto manufacturer to Red China with the cheapest labor and largest workforce on earth?

New Panama Canal: Completion Date, 2015

“As events play out, there is going to be a horrible, unforgettable mass-death and destruction in Japan.  The Japanese Emperor and Jesuit Joe Biden are parties to the plot (Barry Davis Obama is an idiot “out of the loop” merely to play the role of “president.”)  When top Japanese Samurai nobles are informed of the U.S. government’s hand in this greatest of Japan’s desolations since WWII, moved with that internal Japanese rage they will deceptively drive the Japanese people into the arms of the Pope’s Red Chinese dictators ruled by the Jesuits in Beijing.  When this alliance if finalized, the New Panama Canal will have been completed (2015-16) enabling the Chinese and Japanese navies to move their huge carriers through the canal so as to attack the apostate Protestant South via the Gulf of Mexico.  And no wonder! For the “Gulf oil disaster” (orchestrated by certain Knights of Malta such as Peter Sutherland) has softened up the U.S. Southern coast enabling a successful beachhead to be established after the attack.

Dome of the Rock, "Palestinians" Worship, Jerusalem, 2010

The SECOND REASON concerns a judgment of the Risen Son of God upon Japan for violating Genesis 12:1-3.  Pronouncing both a “blessing” and a “curse” with regard to both individual and national treatment of the racial sons of Abraham through Jacob/Israel and their ABSOLUTE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT to the land of promise (Genesis 15:18-21), Japan is now experiencing “the curse.” Japan has sided with the Arab Muslims in their false claim to the land of Israel, a land solely the possession of the racial Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites.  Yes, Japan, ruled by the Jesuit Order, has promised to aid the savage Arab Muslims to rebuild the Jordan Valley “once the Jews are removed.”  Indeed, Japan, ruled by the Black Pope, has donated ONE BILLION Dollars to the savage Arab Muslim “Palestinians” to this end of driving the Jews off of their land and into the sea pursuant to the Palestinian Covenant of 1968.  For further information, see Israel Truth Times here!

Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans, 2005

God usually uses “Second Causes” in His enforcement of this “blessing and curse” of Genesis 12:1-3.  With regard to the weather, He can command storms, hurricanes, tsunamis, earthquakes, forest fires, floods, mudslides, urban destruction, etc.  But He can also use the means of evil men—men in command of the White Power Structure subservient to the Jesuit Papacy now ruling the world—to bring about these same “natural disasters.”  America is, to a lesser degree, under this “curse,” its effects having been repeated over and over again for the last 20 years or so.  The floods in the breadbasket of the Mid-West, the forest fires in the West, the floods in the South and the snowstorms in the North-East are evidences of “the curse” due to the American Empire’s facilitation of the theft of Israel’s promised land having been taken away from Jehovah’s “holy seed” (Isaiah 6:13) also called “the holy people” (Daniel 12:7)—the Hebrew/Jewish/Israelitic racial people of the everlasting Abrahamic Covenant.

Earthquake and Tsunami, Japan, 2011

Japan is now experiencing this national “curse” via the hand of the Risen Son of God using Satan, “the god of this world” (II Corinthians 4:4).  Satan’s Jesuit Papacy has been permitted to impose the earthquakes and tsunamis on Japan via high technology, this mass-destruction fulfilling the plans of both Satan and the Risen Lord Jesus Christ.  As to Satan’s plan, he is driving Japan into the hands of his Red Chinese government ruled by his high Jesuits (Jesuit Superior General Adolfo Nicolas being one of them), Satan assembling his “kings of the east” for a future attack into Israel (Revelation 16:12). Meanwhile, God will use this crisis to save His Elect Japanese saints made willing to believe the blessed gospel of Jesus Christ unto eternal salvation!

Future Second Coming of Jesus the Messiah to Jerusalem, Daniel 7:13-14

As to the plan of God the Father through His beloved Son presently at His Right Hand to Whom the Father has given all power in heaven and in earth (Matthew 28:18-20; Psalm 110:1), High Priest Jesus Christ is enforcing the “curse” He pronounced in Genesis 12:1-3 before the days of His flesh.  In so doing, the LORD is preserving a Jewish presence in the promised land, a presence that is ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY if all prophecies concerning the Second Coming of Messiah are to be fulfilled.  With no regathered Nation of Israel and with no Jews living in Jerusalem, there can be no Second Coming of Messiah (Zechariah 12:10; 14:1-4; Joel 3:1).

So let the intense suffering of Japan be a warning to all persons (natural and artificial) and nations, especially those of us in America.  “Do not persecute the Jews within your nations!  Do not persecute the Jews living in Israel!  Do not take the land from the Jews living in Israel!” For in so refraining ourselves from such persecution and theft, we shall escape the “curse” and be brought into the “blessing” of the Abrahamic promise we White Gentile peoples and nations of Protestant Western Civilization so desperately need.  And in adding the frosting to the cake, we must expel the Jesuit Order from our shores—FOREVER, that diabolical creation of Satan, whose agents in governments—acting in our names—are bringing the catastrophe of national destruction to all of our nations, which destruction of National Sovereignty and Individual Manhood is so necessary for the Pope’s Vatican-led, New World Order.

Word of God: AV1611 Bible for English-Speaking Peoples

God help us to legislate the maxims of His Holy Word, the Reformation Bible in the languages of all nations, into our domestic and foreign policies that we might be “blessed” with the peaceable fruit of righteousness including domestic tranquility, plenteous food harvests and economic prosperity.  America once experienced this “blessing,” and we can so again—if we repent!

Red Chinese Army: America's Future Invaders

As your Editor has stated for the last ten years, North America will be invaded by a Sino-Soviet-Muslim Coalition once our military is betrayed by the CFR-controlled Joint Chiefs of Staff and defeated during its two or even three-front war.  The Black Pope’s Federal Reserve Bank, deliberately headed by a Masonic Jew, Ben Bernanke, has indebted the American people to our enemies, the Communist Red Chinese, “Papal Court Jew” Ben Bernanke continuing this policy of massive indebtedness (as did his brother “Papal Court Jew” Alan Greenspan) on orders of his White Gentile Jesuit masters at Georgetown University.

Since the Jesuit Order’s Peoples Republic of China holds the bulk of US Treasury Bills, just how are these bills going to be exchanged for real wealth (land and labor)?  The answer: military invasion, removal of the American squatters on Chinese land via mass executions, enslavement of physically fit workers, imposed prostitution of White American women, and then the possession of at least two thirds of North America.  The land “tents” of Shem (Genesis 9:27), criminally occupied by the White sons of Japheth for the last 100 years (due to the Black Pope’s evil 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the murderous, thieving Indian Wars of the West (led by Roman Catholic General Philip Sheridan—the bosom friend of Jesuit Pierre De Smet!) from 1865 to 1890, is to be returned to the sons of Shem.  But the sons of Shem about to possess the land are not descendants of the Shemitic American Indians; they are the Shemitic Red Chinese all of which enjoy a common race, a common language, a common culture—and a common hatred for Americans.  The Japanese and Koreans will be with their Chinese masters, they too to exact vengeance for the theft, rape and murder perpetrated upon their wives and daughters by primarily Black American servicemen for the last 60 years.  And they will enjoy every moment of that payback!

The time is now, my White Brothers in Christ Jesus, to begin to plan the founding of our new White Protestant and Baptist nation within seceded Pennsylvania.  We must first migrate into Pennsylvania, and when the Empire imposes Jesuit fascism through its planned terrorist event (covertly directed by the CIA/NSA/FBI), Pennsylvania will secede.   Then we can then secede from Pennsylvania to form our new nation of ProBaptiCal, with the blessing of the God and Father of the Risen Lord Jesus Christ in accordance with his Word, the AV1611 Reformation Bible for English-speaking peoples.

King George V and Tzar Nicholas II, Cousins and Knights of Malta, 1915

Dear Brother Thomas,

This is only part of the story.

The Jesuits, via the Knights of Malta (as well as by Illuminized Scottish-Rite/Grand Orient Freemasonry), controlled Great Britain, Germany, Russia, France, Italy, Japan and America.  All the leaders of those nations worked together to realize World War II—the second act of the Black Pope’s Second Thirty Years’ War (1914-1945).  The Jesuits, in control of the Anglo-American empires via Washington and London, created the Axis Powers as well as the Allied Powers, which Powers worked together at the top for the entire duration of this 11^th Papal Crusade. During that horrible thirty years the Protestant British Empire was nearly destroyed; the Protestant German Second Reich was destroyed; the Lutherans of Germany were decimated; the Russian Orthodox Church and Romanov dynasty was conquered and submitted to Rome; over 50 million Russian Orthodox “heretic” Christians were murdered (from the Bolshevik Revolution, to Stalin’s Purges, to Hitler’s Operation Barbarossa, to Stalin’s reckless and insane invasion of Germany; historic Protestant Churches in Germany and the Netherlands were bombed and destroyed; the Eurasian Jews of the historic “Pale of Settlement” were “terminated” by Jesuit Temporal Coadjutors Hitler and Stalin—Rome’s Twin Pincers—working together (Stalin never opposing Hitler when the Jews of Belarus were rounded up, shot and buried in mass graves by the SS), etc.  If you read my Chapter 37 in VAIII, all of this is detailed—-in about 150 pages.

Russian Knight of Malta, Major General Count Cherep Spiridovich, 1914

As to Orthodox Russia and her Russian Orthodox Knights of Malta—the same Military Order of which Len Horowitz is now a member—, here is the truth.  The Jesuits, using their Russian “Tongue” of the Knights of Malta, persecuted the Jews in Russia via SMOM Alexander III as well as SMOM Nicholas II.  The Pogroms incited anti-Czarist fury among the Russian Jews because of their terrible suffering.  The mold is now set: it is the Jews—many of them (playing into the trap) becoming Communist Bolsheviks—versus the Czar and Orthodox Patriarch of Moscow, head of the Orthodox Church who also secretly directed the pogroms.  (This is why Tikhon the Patriarch was never killed by Stalin and his Bolsheviks!  He was a party to the plot!)  These pogroms began by blaming the Jews for the Jesuit/Anarchist assassination of the beloved, anti-Jesuit, “heretic and liberal” Czar Alexander II in 1881 (of which only one insignificant Jew was involved).  Persecutions continued to the pogrom of 1905 (the bloodiest pogrom in Russian history) overseen by Nicholas II.

With the building of the Bolsheviks, via London’s Fabian Socialists (ruled by the Jesuits), the propaganda began to be spread asserting there was an “International Jewish Conspiracy” to overthrow the Czar then to consummate in a world government under “Judah.”  The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion were written by Jesuits in France (just prior to the Dreyfus Affair in 1890) and served as the backdrop of the Order’s Mein Kampf later to be attributed to Hitler—who only read newspapers and never wrote any book!  Count Spiridovich would also contribute to the furor with his The Secret World Government Or “The Hidden Hand” published in 1926 seemingly validating Mein Kampf.

Jesuit/Knight of Malta Edmund A. Walsh (L) with Jewish Bolshevik Grigori Zinoviev, USSR, 1922

When the Jesuits brought the 300 Jews of New York City over to Russia who then openly led the Revolution in 1917 via Jews Trotsky and Lenin, the Czar and his Knights ruling the Russian secret police (Okhrana) secretly aided the Bolsheviks in their overthrow of the government.  Secret Police members joined the inquisitional Cheka, later the Soviet NKVD, which, during WWII was given training and technology by Knight of Malta Wild Bill Donovan’s OSS—to further enslave the “heretic” Russian Orthodox people with the KGB.  Nicholas was secreted out of the country, his death faked (see The File on the Tzar), and the Knights were formally expelled in 1917, the Grand Master “fleeing” to Paris.  Without the aid of the Jesuit Order’s Russian Knights of Malta protected by the Czar, there could have been no successful Bolshevik Revolution!  Knight of Malta King George V and Knight of Malta Czar Nicholas II were cousins! working together to the end of a successful communist revolution overseen by the Jesuits.  In 1922 Shriner Freemason President Warren G. Harding gave 60 million dollars in aid to the Bolsheviks, and that same year Jesuit Edmund A. Walsh from Washington’s Georgetown University arrived in Moscow, he to “negotiate” with the Bolsheviks on behalf of the Vatican for two years.  What a cover story! In that “negotiation” Walsh appointed Stalin to be the Secretary of the Communist Party and “Koba” remained so until the day he was poisoned in March of 1953.  Indeed, both monarchs of Britain and Russia worked together to ensure a successful Bolshevik Revolution—which, in the words of Walsh, was the single most important event since the fall of the Roman Empire in 476.  Why? Because the Order used its Communist Bolshevik Jews to conquer “the Third Rome”—Moscow!  At the same time, the Order ignited anti-Jewish fury across Europe which let to Hitler’s ultimate reign of terror.

Jesuit Superior General Wladimir Ledochowski, 1915-1942; Master of the Second Thirty Years' War (1914-1945)

Now the Jesuit Papacy had it all: Rome, Constantinople, Moscow, London, Tokyo, Washington, Paris and Berlin.  Remember, this Bolshevik Revolution occurred during the Black Pope’s Second Thirty Years’ War (1914-1945), the Jesuit “Knights of the Virgin Mary” conquering and to conquer.  The Order would also destroy the Islamic Ottoman Empire via England (the Sultan and King secretly working together as not a shot was fired when Freemasonic Crusader General Allenby entered Jerusalem in 1917) conquer Arabia, take control of the Mosques of Mecca and Medina, and create its “oil bonanza” for the purpose of financing the rebuilding of Babylon via the American Knights of Malta running Standard Oil of California via Knight John McCone.   (McCone was later the Director of the CIA and participated in the JFK assassination and cover-up).  This was the real purpose for enthroning the Order’s fanatical, Wahhabi-Islamic Saudi dynasty in 1932 (King Ibn Saud advised by English Knight of Malta Sir John Philby), the dynasty to be removed in the near future.

Knight of Malta DCI Leon Panetta and President Barry Davis Obama, 2010

It is this same unified Jesuit Power over national rulers of today that will oversee and direct the presidents, kings and dictators of the world to work in tandem for the military defeat, invasion and partition of apostate Protestant/apostate Baptist, Roman Catholic-dominated North America within the next 50 years.  The Black Pope’s Unified International Intelligence Community will direct the decisions of the American politicians and military generals to this horrible end.  And no one will know how it happened unless they have first acquired this understanding of 20^th century, Jesuit-directed history.

Lord bless,

Brother Eric

__________________________________________________

Click here: The Nazi Roots of the House of Windsor

So I read in the above article url, “One of the biggest public relations hoaxes ever perpetrated by the British Crown, is that King Edward VIII, who abdicated the throne in 1938, due to his support for the Nazis, was a “black sheep,” an aberration in an otherwise unblemished Windsor line. Nothing could be further from the truth. The British monarchy, and the City of London’s leading Crown bankers, enthusiastically backed Hitler and the Nazis, bankrolled the Führer’s election, and did everything possible to build the Nazi war machine, for Britain’s planned geopolitical war between Germany and Russia.”

So was this to overthrow the Byzantine knights that were in Russia? I’m trying to find out why Russia was such a target and have been a target of Catholic and worldwide propaganda for all these years.

brother Eric, have you covered this? i believe I remember you mentioning that Russians were also betrayed by the leader of Russia at that time. Stalin I think it was.

Craig, do you have a comment? I’m trying to sort this all out here and looking for some input.

Thomas

American Jesuit Walter Ciszek: KGB Grand Inquisitor of the Gulag, USSR

This video is self-explanatory.  More and more people are waking up to the plenary power of the Jesuits over America and thus the world.  The Society of Jesus/Horus is Satan’s great second cause in realizing the consummation of the Prince of Darkness’ Mystery of Iniquity.  That end game of the fallen cherub is the final pope of Rome, murdered and risen from the dead to be the Antichrist/Man-Beast ruling the world from his religious capital in Jerusalem and his political/commercial capital in rebuilt Babylon.

Federal Reserve Bank, New York City

As shown in previous posts, the Federal Reserve Bank is a creation and thus a tentacle of the Jesuit Papacy. Even the physical building of the New York Fed is designed after a Vatican-owned edifice in Italy!  J. P. Morgan, the leading conspirator in the Order’s plot to impose Rome’s Socialist-Communist, Cartel-Capitalist, Marxian central bank upon the historic White Anglo-Saxon Protestant and Baptist American peoples, was a member of the Pope’s Military Order of Saints Maurice and Lazarus and died in Rome, the city of his master, in a hotel room for which he paid 500 dollars a day!

J. Pierpont Morgan, Papal Knight and Leading Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor behind the Creation of Rome's Federal Reserve Bank, 1910

With this understanding, we further know that the Jesuit Papacy’s Federal Reserve Bank has used its monopolistic, credit-issuing power to enable the Black Pope’s CFR/CIA-controlled American Government to build a monstrous, Pentagon-directed, Military Industrial Complex of the imperial United States of America.  This “Frankenstein Monster”—Rome’s “Holy Roman” Fourteenth Amendment, Cartel-Capitalist, Socialist-Communist American Empire (1868-Present)—has been used to wage war around the globe in restoring the Pope’s Temporal Power over all nations, which 20th Century quest is now complete!  The American Century has come to an end, and it is time to destroy the primacy of the American Empire by morphing it into the Pope’s North American Union.  Simultaneously, it is time to build and enrich the Pope’s European Union, the forerunner of the Revived Roman Empire to be ruled by ten Roman kings as foretold by Daniel the Prophet and the Apostle John.

Knight of Malta Amadeo Peter Giannini, Founder of the Jesuit Order's Bank of America, 1930s

Now here is where the Fed comes into play.  According to the article and videos below, this traitorous Central Bank has not only extended “bailout money” (3.3 trillion “dollars”) to American financial institutions, but also to foreign banks—all of which are overseen by the Pope’s Knights of Malta and Knights of the Equestrian Order under the command of the White Pope directed by the Black Pope who in turn is orchestrating his ubiquitous Military Society of Jesus.

Bank of America Tower, NYC, February, 2010

As to the foreign commercial banks we shall now review.  These banks include Barclay’s Bank in England, Bank of America (which is, in fact, the Bank of Italy), the Royal Bank of Scotland, French bank Societe Generale, and the Deutsche Bank of Germany.  Thus, trillions were given to the most powerful European commercial banks within the most powerful commercial nations within Europe—England, Scotland, France, Germany and Italy.  Why? to build the Pope’s European Union, to bolster the gold-backed Euro (secretly, the strongest currency in the world!), the Jesuit Papacy intending to build the greatest commercial and military empire in world history, that empire to be fully completed by the mid-21st century.  For Rome’s Roman Catholic European Union is to be the heart and base of the coming Ten Roman Kings whose international political and commercial power will be given to the final Pope, murdered and risen from the dead to be the Antichrist/Man-Beast.

To review the December 2, 2010, article and videos referred to above, see this link.

Russian Communist Vladimir Putin and Chinese Communist Wen Jaibao Abandoning the Dollar, 23 November, 2010

Rome’s Counter Reformation plot continues to unfold.  The dollar has been deliberately wrecked by the Jesuit-directed Council on Foreign Relations and its Trilateral Commission controlling the government and Wall Street of the White Pope’s American Empire (1868-Present).  Now, the Order’s Communist Red Russian and Communist Red Chinese governments can dump the dollar, further manifesting the worthlessness of that fiat money.

Further, this continues the cementing of the alliance between Russia, China (including Japan, Taiwan and Korea) and the Muslim nations in preparation for the Black Pope’s future Sino-Soviet-Muslim invasion of North America.  China and Russia never were enemies in the first place, both having been armed during the Pope’s Cold War Hoax to use their military hardware against us Americans!  Moscow, Washington and Beijing all work together via Rome’s International Intelligence Community directed by the Knights of Malta.  The leaders of these capitals work against their own peoples while promoting the secret-but-true policy of “that man of sin” in Rome—Pope Benedict XVI!

To read the entire article, see this!

IHS Logo for MI5 Jane's Media Room, England

Your Editor received an email from Mark, an Australian contact, who related information foretelling of a future Red Chinese Communist invasion of apostate White Protestant Australia.  He also mentioned the new movie titled “Red Dawn,” it portraying a future Red Chinese Communist invasion of the United States in contradistinction to the first “Red Dawn” depicting a Cuban/Russian invasion of America.  Connor Cruise, the mulatto adopted son of Knight of Malta Tom Cruise, plays a leading part in the new release slated for November, 2010.   Mark’s post is as follows:

Dimitri Khalezov Interview, 2010

The following report is a result of Craig Oxley, owner of The Unhived Mind website, putting your Editor in contact with Dimitri Khalezov, the personal friend of Viktor Bout.  Both men are native Russians now in Bangkok, Thailand; both are former Soviet military officers specializing in the area of nuclear weapons; and both men seem to be enemies of the Black Pope’s Unified International Intelligence Community which includes the Russian FSB/SVR and the American Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) as well as the FBI, CIA and NSA as well as its creation and surrogate, the Israeli Mossad.  In speaking with Dimtri, he was courteous and well-studied, fluent in English with an obvious Russian accent.  In contacting him via Skype, he is most assuredly in Bangkok and his story merits international attention to which end this article is devoted.  For a complete review of Dimitri’s interviews and facts relating to this article, see Craig Oxley’s Unhived Mind post here.

According to documents provided by Dimitri Khalezov, the U.S. State Department is seeking the extradition of Viktor Bout from the Kingdom of Thailand.  We must remember the U.S. State Department—having built both Communist Red China and the “the former U.S.S.R.”—is ruled by the Jesuit Papacy through its New York City-based Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).  The Archbishop of New York City is the master of the CFR, now the Irish-American Roman Catholic Timothy Dolan.  Thus, it is the Company of Jesus ruling America now seeking the extradition of Viktor Bout via its handmaid, the State Department, overseen by Jesuit Georgetown University, Washington, DC.  Knowing the Jesuit Order always operates on the maxim of the two-headed Janus deception, openly promoting an open-but-false policy while secretly pursuing a secret-but-true policy, we shall review the reasons why the Obama/Biden State Department is seeking Viktor’s extradition.  It is alleged that Viktor Bout:

1. Attempted to kill United States nationals;

2. Conspired to kill officers and employers of the United States;

3. Conspired to acquire and use anti-aircraft missiles;

4. Conspired to supply material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization.

Knight of Malta King Juan Carlos and Skull and Bonesman George W. Bush, Texas, 2004

According to Dmitri, these charges are outright lies fabricated by U.S. officials intending to blame Bout as a supplier of anti-aircraft weapons to an anti-Columbian rebel group tied to a drug cartel.  (We cannot forget that the Columbian Cocaine Drug Cartel is ruled by the Jesuit Papacy through King Juan Carlos, both a Knight of Malta and Knight of the Equestrian Order.)  The following is a succinct statement from a document prepared by Khalezov intended to have been submitted to the Royal Court of Thailand requesting the release of Bout, but, do to Russian FSB and American DEA influence acting in concert, was never put before the judges.

“What is the basis of all of these accusations?   The basis is that some agent-provocateurs being at the pay of the American Drug Enforcement Administration (which from now on will be called in the present document “DEA” for short) claim that they allegedly lured Mr. Bout into some shady deal of supplying (to be exact “into promising to supply”) some military-grade weapons, namely anti-aircraft missiles, to the anti-governmental rebel group in Colombia.”

As a result of Viktor Bout trusting his Russian government via the Pope’s Russian FSB promising his release, the FSB asserting that the document need not be filed with the court (how clever!), Victor lost his case and is now facing extradition to Washington.  Calling upon our six friends of “Who, What, Where, How, When, and Why,” we must ask “Why” all this effort is being put forth to frame, extradite and subsequently convict—before the entire American public—a former Soviet thermonuclear weapons military officer of “conspiring to kill Americans?”

King Juan Carlos, Order of the Garter, Custodian of the Two Jerusalem Mosques, "King of Jerusalem," One of the Pope's Masters of the Mossad, 2000

According to Dimitri Khalezov, the 911 event is the basis for this sinister design against Viktor Bout.  According to several interviews of Khalezov, 911 involved pre-placed, underground nuclear devices detonated beneath the Twin Towers, Buildings 1 and 2, of the World Trade Center as well as Building 7, the command center for the demolition.  With this your Editor is in full agreement (due to the irrefutable testimony of two other eye witnesses) in addition to the combined use of thermite, energy weapons and conventional weapons!  He asserts that the U.S. was “the victim,” not the perpetrator of the 911 demolition which your Editor finds most striking and odd—to say the least! With this conclusion your Editor does not agree in the strongest of language and thereby drives him to question the honesty of Dimitri!  But then again Dimitri asserts the culprits behind the “attack” were “the Freemasons and the Mossad,” thus further alerting your Editor of a possible plot to blame Israel—the Pope’s Revived Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem administered by Rome’s Masonic Jewish Labor Zionists—for the entire 911 event.  (The “blame Israel” game is a favorite of the Jesuit Order and its Temporal Coadjutors such as Texe Marrs and a host of others.  It is my prayer that Dimitri is not a willing contributor to such a deception!  Indeed, treasonous, CFR-connected Jews were involved as well as the Israeli Mossad (openly dancing on the roof of a van drawing attention to themselves as plotted), but they all were playing a subordinate role as ordered by the White Gentiles running the “black-op” for Rome!)

Russian Granit Missile

Dimitri also asserts that a Russian missile hit the Pentagon on 911.  That missile was a “7-ton, P-700  Granit Missile” launched from a ship in the Atlantic Ocean.  The weapon was heavily armored, “like a flying tank,” and armed with a 500 megaton nuclear warhead which, of course,  did not detonate due to a failed triggering device.  As to a missile hitting the Pentagon opposed to an aircraft, your Editor is in full agreement.  (As an aside, your Editor also believes the eyewitness testimony of a lady in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, who stated on video camera that it was a missile having crashed into a field near the town—not an aircraft!)  Dimitri also believes it was missiles that hit both WTC Towers 1 and 2, not large commercial aircraft, which aircraft would have fallen to the ground upon impact.  Again, with this statement your Editor is in full agreement.

Atomic Ground Detonation, Hiroshima, Picture Taken from Enola Gay, 1945

To deviate for a moment, it is your Editor’s provable claim, asserted in his VAIII, that there is no such thing as “thermonuclear war.” There is no such thing as “mutual assured destruction” between the “superpowers.”  There is no such thing as nuclear devices detonating in motion as “airbursts,” such a phenomena having never occurred in history.  Both actual “bombs” dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were magnesium flash bombs, a uranium slug having been inserted into “Little Boy” while B-29 “Enola Gay” approached Hiroshima, and a plutonium slug having been inserted into “Fat Man” while B-29 “Bock’s Car” approached Nagasaki.  The Jesuits on-site, overseen by future Jesuit Superior General Pedro Arrupe, detonated their electromagnetic pulse “atomic” devices having been assembled on the ground by several German Jesuit physicists and readied for triggering once the air-bursting flash bombs had captured the attention of the subsequent blinded Japanese.  American General Curtis LeMay never ordered the bombing of Hiroshima or Nagasaki—both military targets—while firebombing the rest of Japan.  Why? well, the triggers would have been damaged and thus no detonations would have followed, detonations most necessary in perpetrating the Pope’s Airborne Nuclear War Hoax.  This Airborne Nuclear War Hoax was the imperative foundation critically necessary for the justification of the Pope’s Cold War Hoax (1945-1990) during which Rome’s International Intelligence Community (the revived “Holy Office of the Inquisition”) would be perfected—while preparing America for a “New Right” Fascist Military Dictatorship!  Therefore, it is no surprise that the Soviet Granit Missile never detonated!

Russian Submarine "Kursk," 2001

Since this Soviet-Cold War era missile was in the possession of the Pope’s CFR-controlled American government and military, that missile had to have been launched by an American Naval vessel—exactly as was the case with the Office of Naval Intelligence-directed American Navy shooting down Flight 800 in 1996!  (Some believe it was a vessel controlled by French Intelligence—also ruled by the Knights of Malta—but your Editor maintains the entire “black-op” was orchestrated exclusively by the American Intelligence Community directed by the agents of Knight of Malta Edward Cardinal Egan whose Knights of Malta and high-level Freemasons directed the National Security Council and its CIA/NSA/ONI/DIA.)  The question arises however as to “How” the U.S. government obtained possession of this weapon.  According to Dimitri, a Soviet Northern Fleet submarine known as the “K-141 Kursk,” Oscar II class, sunk in international waters while tracking the US Sixth Fleet (during the “Holy Roman” American Empire’s 77-day war on the “heretic” Orthodox Serbs of Kosovo) on August 12, 2000, about one year prior to 911.  The submarine sunk in approximately 350 feet of water, all 118 souls lost on board.  Shortly thereafter, the vessel was raised by a Dutch consortium controlled by intelligence agents for that Witch of the Netherlands, Bilderberger and Dame of Malta Queen Beatrix.  According to Dimitri, the Kursk was carrying 24 thermonuclear missiles, 22 of which were “stolen,” a fact which Vladimir Putin and his Jesuit-ruled FSB/SVR associates have stoutly denied.

Admiral Michael Mullen, Head, Joint Chief's of Staff, 2007-Present

And no wonder, for it is your Editor’s hunch that all of the missiles were salvaged by trusted third parties who then turned the weapons over to the Pentagon for its plotted “terrorist attack” on 911.  It is also most striking to recall that the area in which the missile hit the Pentagon was under an internal renovation: thus, the entity that launched the missile and the heads of the Pentagon Worked Together!  Therefore, it is believed by your Editor that the Kursk was deliberately sunk with the full knowledge of Vladimir Putin (as well as Jesuit Georgetown University-trained Bill Clinton) while the Russian president was conveniently on vacation in a presidential resort house on the Black Sea!  This enabled the secret transfer of Russian/Soviet nuclear missiles into the hands of Rome’s American Military establishment centered in the Pope’s Pentagon.  Further, your Editor maintains that Roman Catholic Admiral Michael Mullen knows the entire treasonous story!

Pentagon Wall: C-Ring Penetrated with Missile, 2001

So here is the scenario.  On September 11, 2001, the Pope’s American Military Industrial Establishment overseen by the Pope’s International Intelligence Community centered in the National Security Agency, the Central Intelligence Agency and its muscle, the Pentagon, attacked the World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2 using missiles, possibly Cruise missiles with wings and tails, thus leaving the imprint of aircraft in the burning buildings.  The Pope’s CFR-controlled media—centered in Rockefeller Center, just across the street from St. Patrick’s Cathedral—created the illusion that it was two hijacked commercial airliners that hit and ultimately demolished the towers.  (To view a most telling video as to the Pope’s Press facilitating the deception that actual Boeing 757 airliners hit the twin towers as a cover-up for missiles impacting the towers, see this link.)  If airliners did impact the WTC towers, they were carrying missiles that were launched milliseconds prior to impact, but this your Editor denies.  Shortly thereafter, the Pentagon was hit by a Soviet/Russian Granit Missile penetrating three massive walls of the structure while leaving no debris of an aircraft.  The Pope’s CFR-controlled media (Fox, CNN, MSNBC, etc.) created the illusion that another commercial aircraft (a massive Boeing 757 no less!) hit the Pentagon.  About this time, a missile crashed into a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, the Pope’s CFR-controlled media touting the lie that it was another commercial aircraft, yet the crash-site evidencing no debris justifying said conclusion.  And then the grand finale, WTC Building 7 free-falls to the ground, the Pope’s 911 Commission never addressing the reason why such a phenomena—first of its sort in modern history—could have possibly transpired.

Knight of Malta George J. Tenet & Bonesman George W. Bush, Presidential Medal of Freedom, 2004

This brings us back to Viktor Bout as to “Why” he is being framed as an arms dealer by both the Russian and American governments—both criminal brotherhoods ruled by the Jesuit Papacy.  The answer is clear: Viktor, as a contract agent for the Russian FSB, is to be blamed for the attack on the Pentagon overseen by Knight of Malta and CFR-member, DCI George J. Tenet.  Viktor is to shoulder the responsibility of the Granit missile “falling into the hands of America’s terrorist enemies!”

Bavarian Jesuit Augustin Cardinal Bea: Promoter of the Eurasian Jewish Holocaust, Pro-Nazi Vatican Ratlines, and Vatican II, 1959

This propaganda, in turn, will serve as a reason for an impending Fascist American Military Dictator to go to war with Russia at a later date, the Jesuits solidifying their Sino-Soviet-Muslim alliance when it finally invades North America as outlined in your Editor’s VAIII.  Meanwhile, American Jews, thanks to the Jesuit Order’s AIPAC and ADL (giving out its Jesuit “Augustin Cardinal Bea Award” on worthy recipients!) and CFR (loaded with over 300 Jews) in conjunction with Rome’s anti-Jew Israeli government, will be blamed for the attack, thereby to serve as another reason to roundup all American Jews then to be sent to the American Empire’s concentration camps—“for the greater glory of God,” the god who sits in St. Peter’s Chair!  Where the German SS/SD Nazis left off, the American CIA/DHS Nazis will continue the quest!  Now we understand one of the real reasons for the postwar “immigration” of thousands of German Nazis into the U.S. via Pope Pius XII’s “Vatican Ratlines” then overseen by Francis Cardinal Spellman—mastermind behind the 1963 assassination of President Kennedy as proven in your Editor’s VAIII!

FIRST UPDATE: November 17, 2010

Viktor Boot has now been extradited to the Pope’s Fourteenth Amendment American Empire (1868-Present) as concluded by your Editor.  For a full video review see the following post of Craig Oxley at his The Unhived Mind:

http://z10.invisionfree.com/The_Unhived_Mind_II/index.php?showtopic=39597&st=225#entry3521904

The full motion for the Thai release of Viktor Bout that was never introduced into the Thai Royal Court is below.  It is a perfectly sensible document and would have secured Viktor’s release for which reason both the FSB and DEA—working together—prevented its presentment at trial.  Now, Viktor Boot, the patsy, is going to be sacrificed according to a plan devised by the dastardly Company of Jesus ruling America, Russia and Thailand.  May the risen Lord Jesus Christ intervene for Viktor in answer to the prayers of true, born-again Bible-believing Christians in-Christ before he becomes another prey of the Black Pope.  The 28-page statement reads as follows:

_______________________________________________________

NOTE: this was a project of Victor Bout’s defense (written objections against the extradition charges) that must have been submitted to the Court of First Instance before any witness from the prosecution side heard by the court. It was prepared by the defense team of Victor Bout that consisted of Dimitri Khalezov and Yan Dasgupta (who mysteriously died in August, 2010). If submitted to the court as intended, this document would set a very different course of the trial on the extradition case of Victor Bout. However, due to clever manipulations of the Russian secret services Victor Bout and his family were convinced by them NOT to submit this document to the court and to limit Victor’s defense to claiming the fact that the case was merely “political“. The Russian secret services promised in this case that Victor would definitely “win” this case in the Thai court as the situation would be allegedly “taken care of” by political efforts of the Russian Government. However, professional lawyers strongly advised Victor Bout NOT to believe the Russians secret services and the promises of the Russian Government officials and to conduct his defense in the Thai court by concentrating on purely logical aspects of the Americans’ provocation against him and to defend the case without touching the alleged ‘political aspect’ whatsoever. However, Victor Bout preferred to believe the false promises of the Russian officials rather than the advice of the lawyers and, instead of conducting his defense by proving to the Thai court that he had no anti-aircraft missiles and he could not have such missiles even theoretically, he attempted to defend the case by claiming that the case was allegedly “political” and therefore “not extraditable”. While the Court of First Instance agreed with this and ruled that the case was indeed political, the Court of Appeal ruled that it was the wrong approach and the case could not be considered “political” and therefore the final verdict of the Court of Appeal was to permit the extradition of Victor Bout to America. Thanks to the Russian secret services, the main point that there were NO MISSILES in Victor Bout’s possession was not discussed in the court-room whatsoever and this alleged fact was somehow “established by default” – so that it appears now that “there have been an attempt to sell these non-existent missiles to terrorists, but the terrorists were deemed to be a “political organization” rather than a “terrorist” one.” Many people mistakenly believe that the Russian Government allegedly “helped” Victor Bout to avoid being extradited to the United States in this case. These people are mistaken; very badly mistaken… It was precisely the Russian officials who did their best to convince Victor Bout to conduct his defense in the Thai Court in the most wrongful manner. Moreover, it was the very Russian officials who advised Victor Bout to hire one of his Thai lawyers who was a proven shill working for the American DEA. This particular lawyer (advised by the Russian officials) was the one who fiercely resisted submitting of the below document to the Thai Court of First Instance.

Now, if you read the below document attentively, you will understand why the Russian officials who apparently set Victor Bout up in a joined operation with their American colleagues were so much against this method of Victor Bout’s defense:

————————————–

Objections of defense team against a

request of the United States of America

to extradite Mr. Viktor Bout.

1. Presently, the Criminal Court tries the case (Black Case No. O P 3 / 2551) concerning an extradition of Russian citizen Mr. Viktor Anatolievich Bout (correct spelling of the Accused’s surname according to his present passport and according to the official Russian transcription is “But”, not “Bout” as claimed). The case was instituted based on an extradition request by the United States of America No.1514 (which is an internal United States Embassy’s document number) dated May 1^st, 2008.

2. Defense believes that the above mentioned extradition request is groundless, since it does not meet all necessary requirements of  the Act on Extradition between The Kingdom of Thailand and The United States of America B.E. 2533 (1990). Therefore, the defense is of opinion that such a request shall not be granted by the Honorable Royal Thai Court based on the following considerations:

2.1. Contrary to the basic requirements of the Act on Extradition between The Kingdom of Thailand and The United States of America B.E. 2533 (1990) – as stipulated in its Article 9, Section 3 (b), the current extradition request No.1514  submitted by the US Embassy in this case, does not contain any evidence whatsoever that would be sufficient to convict the Accused should he undergo a trial in any Thai Court for such an offence.

2.1.1. In accordance with the provisions of the above mentioned Section 3 (b), Article 9 it is an absolute necessity that some evidence shall be provided by the Requesting State that would “justify that person’s arrest and committal for trial according to the law of the Requested State”. That means that such an evidence must be sufficient enough to justify committal for trial of Mr. Viktor Bout should such a case undergo a trial in the Kingdom of Thailand. This particular stipulation in the text of the Act of Extradition between The Kingdom of Thailand and The United States of America B.E. 2533 (1990) is apparently of imperative character, which implies that such evidence as mentioned above must be submitted together with an actual extradition request in an obligatory manner.

2.1.2. However, in this particular case we do not see any such evidence at all. If we take a close look at the materials submitted by the Requesting State, all what we could see is a set of other obligatory documents, which are mentioned in other Sections of the Act of Extradition between The Kingdom of Thailand and The United States of America B.E. 2533 (1990), other than Section 3 (b). Namely, all existing documents pertaining to the actual extradition request are mentioned in Sections 2 (a), 2 (b), 2 (c), 2 (d), 2 (e) and 3 (a), while evidence that suppose to fall under the particular provisions of Section 3 (b) is apparently missing. There is no any required evidence at all in this case and this is pretty obvious.

2.1.3. What the Requesting State offers the Honorable Court instead of the abovementioned evidence? Let’s take a closer look. The prosecution in the United States claims that Mr. Viktor Bout:

1)      attempted to kill United States nationals;

2)      conspired to kill officers and employers of the United States;

3)      conspired to acquire and use anti-aircraft missiles;

4)      conspired to provide material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization.

What is the basis of all of these accusations? The basis is that some agent-provocateurs being at the pay of the American Drug Enforcement Administration (which from now on will be called in the present document “DEA” for short) claim that they allegedly lured Mr. Bout into some shady deal of supplying (to be exact “into promising to supply”) some military-grade weapons, namely anti-aircraft missiles, to the anti-governmental rebel group in Colombia.

Leaving aside a question of whether such a claim by agent-provocateurs is true or not, let’s take a closer look at validity of the 4 abovementioned accusations alone. What we can see and conclude? We can see the following:

2.1.4. Mr. Bout allegedly attempted to sell (to be more exact he did not “attempt to sell”, but he “promised to sell”) to others portable anti-aircraft missiles (otherwise called “surface-to-air missiles” or “SAMs”) that could be carried by hand and launched from one’s shoulder. (Please, see for your reference Exhibits No.1 and No.2). These missiles could practically bring down a small single-engine aircraft flying in a lower altitude or a helicopter, since these missiles are heat-seeking and could guide themselves automatically to a source of the heat (such as a nozzle of a plane’s engine). One missile could effectively destroy only one engine and not more than this due to its being too small (an amount of explosives in its warhead does not exceed 450 gram which is comparable to a single hand-grenade in a sense of its destructive power). Therefore these missiles are primarily intended to be used against only military targets – usually against helicopters and jet-fighters flying at lower altitudes (since majority of modern jet-fighters are single-engined and could be technically put out of order by a single portable missile).

Let’s consider whether such portable missiles are really so effective when used by so-called “terrorists” against purely civilian targets since such a notion is widely believed – thanks to the intense anti-terrorist hysteria unleashed by mass media over the last few years with apparent blessings of certain governments.

Theoretically, it is possible to use such a small missile against some large civilian airliner, of course, but it is not so easy to do so practically. The 1^st problem is that a usual cruise altitude of civilian airliner differs very much from that of a military jet-fighter delivering a strike against some front-line ground target from low altitude. The maximum altitude at which a portable missile could still reach its target is about 3, maximum three and a half kilometers, while civilian airliners fly at something 8-10 kilometers high, being simply out of reach by any portable anti-aircraft missiles. The 2^nd problem is that modern large civilian airliners usually have 4 engines, at least 2 engines, while small portable missile could destroy maximum of one engine at a time. So even if some evil person would waylay with his or her “Stinger”, “Strela” or “Igla” missile near an airport and shoot such a small missile at a civilian airliner being still at lower altitude shortly after take-off or shortly before landing, the maximum effect he or she could expect – is that one of the four (or one of the two) available engines of the airliner would be put out of order. That kind of situation could still be effectively handled by modern pilots who could relatively easily fly their aircraft on remaining engines and still land to the airport to their safety. So while those portable anti-aircraft missiles officially represent serious danger even to large civilian airliners, honestly speaking, they are not truly effective against these large aircrafts, because these missiles were designed with very different reason in mind. They were designed to be used exclusively against helicopters and small military planes that are single-engined and fly at lower altitudes. Primary targets of these portable missiles, according to their design, are attack helicopters and low-flying battle planes. Based on all of these considerations, it shall be presumed that such a small portable anti-aircraft missile that could be launched from one’s shoulder is by no means a kind of weapon of terror and could be scarcely converted into such. It is a pure weapon of war with no other use. There shall not be a slightest doubt about it. Even a common machine-gun is more dangerous in a sense of terror than a portable anti-aircraft missile, because with a machine-gun it is possible to shoot directly into a fuselage of an airliner and to kill a few passengers (or even pilots), while it is impossible to do so with such a heat-seeking small missile that could only target the plane’s engine and does so automatically. Still, contrary to the common sense, the United States of America and many other modern countries officially established the ridiculous notion that such portable anti-aircraft missiles are allegedly the most dangerous weapons of terror. From this false belief, luckily to our defense, arises the next logical consideration to our favor, which is below:

2.1.5. Mr. Bout allegedly attempted to acquire from “somewhere” extremely heavily guarded kind of military weapons. Could it be true? Let’s implement some elementary logic in order to answer this question. It shall be known that those small tactical hand-held anti-aircraft missiles that are intended to be used by infantry units on the front-line only are indeed the most heavily-guarded kind of weapons in the modern world. They are guarded almost as seriously as nuclear weapons in any country that produces or possess them. Unlike huge long-range anti-aircraft missiles (those of a size of a lamppost), which routinely stay on duty as a part of an anti-aircraft defense system of some countries – such as well-known “NORAD” in the United States and Canada, those portable missiles are NEVER being issued to the end-users in case of peace and are ALWAYS being kept under a very heavy guard in some governmental arsenals. Those portable anti-aircraft missiles could only be unsealed and issued to the military units in case of real full-scale war and under no other circumstances. All governments in the modern world prefer to consider these small anti-aircraft missiles being weapons of extreme public danger (due to their being quite small and allegedly extremely deadly if used by terrorists or other insane individuals against civilian airplanes) and, considering this alleged “extreme danger”, all governments always undertake corresponding measures to safeguard such things. Therefore a normal security regime of producing, transporting, counting, maintaining, safe-keeping, training with, disposal of etc. of these portable anti-aircraft missiles is almost as tough as that of nuclear weapons. The same security regime applies to all government-to-government deals concerning selling of such portable anti-aircraft missiles from one country to another. When making such a deal, all responsible governments always undertake adequate preventive measures to ensure that subject of the deal (i.e. the actual missiles) would never end up in the hands of terrorists or in the hands of any third country that might be governed by some irresponsible government.

Just to illustrate how serious is modern attitude towards this kind of weapons, we would like to provide the following example.

One of the well known case of mass usage of small anti-aircraft missiles that could be launched from one’s shoulder and that was out of any governmental control was a mass usage of “Stinger” missiles in Afghanistan from 1980 and till 1989 by a so-called “mujaheddin” movement against the then Soviet occupational forces. (Please, see for your reference Exhibits No.2 and No.3) The semi-illegal supplier of these “Stinger” missiles to the Afghani “freedom fighters” was The United States’ CIA, of course, which is the fact well-known to everybody. Since the supply of American “Stinger” missiles was truly abundant (thousands of units were given to Afghanis by Americans for free), even after withdrawal of the Soviet Army from Afghanistan in 1989, hundreds of “Stinger” missiles were still remained in possession of former rebels inside the so-called “Tribal Area” of Pakistan. Since traditionally people leaving in Tribal Area of Pakistan are entitled to have any kind of weapons in private possession without any permission whatsoever from the Pakistani Government (these people could legally possess any kind of weapons including RPGs, mortars, heavy machine-guns, artillery pieces and even tanks), these people sincerely believed that they could continue to possess those “Stinger” missiles too, since in the mentality of the people in the Tribal Area those “Stingers” were just another kind of small weapons and nothing more than that – they simply did not see any legal difference between an “RPG” and a “Stinger”. The Pakistani Government has never been able to legally confiscate those “Stinger” missiles from these people, since it would be a violation of the long existing tradition. However, these missiles in private possession of the people in Tribal Area constituted an alleged danger to a normal civil air-traffic over Northern Pakistan (at least so it was believed then). Many airlines simply refused to fly and were obliged to make unreasonable “hooks” in order to avoid flying directly over allegedly dangerous areas (such was, for example with flights by “Aeroflot” Tashkent – Bangkok and Tashkent – Kuala Lumpur that were then obliged to take much longer routs than necessary, and many other airlines have had similar problems too). Therefore the United States Government decided to undertake an unprecedented measure to get these American-made (and American-supplied) “Stinger” missiles back from these people. While the official commercial cost of a “Stinger” has never exceeded 38.000 (thirty eight thousand) US dollars per piece (even on Afghani and Pakistani black markets they cost much cheaper), the United States administration has then offered not more not less but 180.000 (one hundred and eighty thousand) US dollars per piece in order to redeem these weapons from the people in Tribal Area of Pakistan. (Please, see for you reference Exhibit No. 3). According to some people who lived in Tribal Area of Pakistan, at a later stage of this redeeming operation the US officials decided to increase the redemption price even further, making it 400.000 (four hundred thousand) US dollars per piece, paying over 10 times as much as an official commercial cost of a “Stinger” missile was. Due to such an unprecedented policy many private possessors of these “Stingers” simply sold them back to the authorities, so it is now believed that no person in sound mind would prefer to continue to possess even a single “Stinger” in that area rather than to receive such a fabulous amount of cash.

That is just to illustrate how serious is a modern attitude of responsible governments towards the acclaimed dangers that could erase from these small hand-held anti-aircraft missiles. It should be known also that the Russian Government (as well as Ukrainian, Belorussian, Armenian, or any other government of any of the former Soviet Republics) is responsible enough not to allow this kind of portable anti-aircraft missiles out of their control. They always keep this kind of weapons very securely and whenever they sell such portable anti-aircraft missiles to any foreign state such a deal is always truly official and truly secure.

So it is simply unbelievable that a private individual in the modern world would ever be able to acquire a big number of such heavily-guarded things as portable anti-aircraft missiles in order to be able to sell them illegally on a commercial scale. Where would Mr. Bout get these missiles from? It is not possible to acquire them in a big numbers in this world anymore. The last places to obtain such things were Afghanistan and Pakistan in the beginning of the 90s and even there the US Government had offered such an unbelievable price to redeem these dangerous things that it would be much more profitable to sell them to the US authorities than to any “terrorist organization”.

Considering all of the abovementioned, we can look at the current accusation with our eyes wide open: what the accusers are talking about? Do they laugh at us? Would the US Justice imply that Mr. Bout was merely a shady figure representing official Russian weapon-traders who actually got their supply from governmental arsenals? Why then The United States do not proceed to sue the Russian Government instead of Mr. Bout?  It is pretty obvious that Mr. Bout would never be able to obtain any commercial quantity of these anti-aircraft missiles unless he had a blessing from official Russian weapons traders (and a supply line too). So, if The United States’ accusers are so vigilant and sharp-sited that they managed to see in Mr. Bout’s person a dangerous illegal weapons supplier, why didn’t they look little bit farther – behind his back – and didn’t establish where could he practically get his alleged supply of these so heavily guarded weapons? Actually, the current claim of the Americans indeed represents an insult not only to Mr. Bout as a private individual, but to the current Russian Government in whole and to the official Russian weapons-traders, because would this story be true, Mr. Bout could not get such missiles other than from official governmental arsenals and even after getting them he would still need a permission from the governmental customs office to export them out of the Russian territory. Do the US accusers also imply that Mr. Bout has had some accomplices in Russian customs office too? The accusers actually claim Mr. Bout allegedly told the agent-provocateurs that his alleged stock of missiles was already somewhere in Bulgaria. That probably means that Mr. Bout has either already sent his alleged stock of missiles from Russia, illegally imported them into Bulgaria and stockpile there, or, either, obtained them from the Bulgarian authorities. Is that believable? In his next logical step, Mr. Bout supposed to export these missiles clandestinely from Bulgarian territory in order to deliver them to the alleged “rebels” in Latin America. It shall be known also, that Bulgaria is a member of the European Union. Does anybody seriously believe that it is possible to illegally stockpile such a huge number of strictly prohibited items in a sovereign territory of a civilized country, which is, besides of all, a member of the European Union? The defense believes it was simply impossible and if it was possible, then The United States supposes not to sue Mr. Viktor Bout, but the European Union instead, since Bulgaria is a member of the EU.

2.1.6. The defense team is of opinion, that, considering the two abovementioned Clauses, it was technically impossible for Mr. Bout either to obtain such anti-aircraft missiles whatsoever, or to export them from Russian territory (or either from territory of any other former Soviet State, or from Bulgaria, or from any other modern civilized country). However, even if to believe unbelievable and to presume for a little while that Mr. Bout was indeed so powerful that he could get such a heavily guarded stuff illegally loaded into his planes and fly these planes out of Russian or Bulgarian territory without customs officials stopping him, we would still see that accusations against him are false. The Americans accuse Mr. Bout of nothing else than being a part of an alleged conspiracy to kill the US citizens and the US officials.

Let’s presume that someone’s business is to sells guns (either officially – while having a license to do so, or illegally – without heaving any license to do so). Suppose, some customer bought a gun from such a trader (be it official trader or a criminal one does not matter in this sense). Then this customer used his newly acquired gun to murder someone. The case of murder comes to the Court of Law. Would the Court consider that weapons trader who sold the actual weapons of the murder (the gun) being an accomplice to this murder? Of course, not. By no means would the Court of Law consider such a ridiculous thing. If that weapons trader did some kind of legally licensed business he would be entitled to continue to run his gun shop and to continue to sell other “weapons of murder” to other potential murderers without any blame whatsoever. If that were illegal weapons trader, yes, he would be blamed (and possibly punished) for illegal selling of gun(s), but he would never be blamed for being an accomplice to the murder. It is pretty clear that to sell weapons (be at a sword, a combat knife, a pistol, a rifle, a machine-gun, an RPG, an anti-tank canon, a tank, a navy ship, a jet-fighter, or a strategic bomber) would never make a seller to be an accomplice to the possible illegal use of these weapons. Exactly the same thing is applicable to a portable anti-aircraft missile – there is no technical legal difference between such a missile and an RPG, a machine-gun, or an anti-tank cannon. All of them are merely conventional weapons of war. Moreover, ironically, the anti-aircraft missiles of any size and of any range are all weapons of defense, not weapons of offense. They primarily and exclusively intended to defend against attacking aircraft of the enemy, and not to attack the enemy. Unlike cannons, mortars and machine-guns that could be effectively used in both – defense and offense, anti-aircraft missiles could only be used in someone’s defense. Actually, all this public hysteria against selling of anti-aircraft weaponry to various “rogue states” and “terrorist organizations” was very carefully designed by the United States spin-doctors who were hired to conduct such hysteria by the Pentagon officials. The real problem behind all complains by the United States to this effect is very simple. The anti-aircraft missiles (whenever they are being supplied to various poor countries) could serve as a serious deterrent against possible American aggression against such states. While the Americans could easily attack a small third-world country that lacks any anti-aircraft defense whatsoever – like it was in Somalia, Grenada or Panama, they would think twice and even trice before deciding to unleash an aggression against countries that are capable of defending themselves against the US aircraft. Apparently the Americans still suffer a moral trauma inflicted by losses of almost a thousand B-52 bombers during Vietnam War due to some anti-aircraft missiles that were given to the North Vietnam by the Soviet Union. That is probably the main cause of the current hysteria in connection this particular kind of weapons. And this is exactly the reason why these portable anti-aircraft missiles, being a kind of purely defensive weapons for a long time, were suddenly elevated to a new status that they begun to be considered by many lay people being allegedly as dangerous as nuclear weapons. But reasonable people shall never be affected by this ridiculous notion and shall always try to remain reasonable and to think independently: it is obvious that anti-aircraft missiles, whether big or small, were always weapons of defense and would always remain weapons of defense – whether the American spin-doctors like this fact or not.

So even if to presume unbelievable and to believe that Mr. Bout was indeed capable of selling portable anti-aircraft missiles abroad as claimed, still it would be illegal to accuse him of being an accomplice or a conspirator to the possible killing of US citizens and US officials by using of the goods sold through his alleged illegitimate business. Maximum of what Mr. Bout could be accused in such a case – is that of illegal weapons trade, but not of any conspiracy to kill anyone. If someone thinks that it is acceptable to directly link a weapon trader and an actual murderer into one conspiracy, then such a person should eventually come to ridiculous conclusions. In Thailand everybody knows a famous case of one medical doctor-gynecologist who murdered his wife using a golf-club. If to follow the abovementioned “logic” then an owner of a shop that sold the actual weapons of murder (the golf-club) would be punished too as being an accomplice to the murder. But this would be pretty ridiculous to accept such a thing. So, how come that in this particular case an alleged weapons trader is being accused as being an accomplice to possible illegal usage of the weapons sold? It is almost as ridiculous as in the abovementioned example with the golf-club converted to be a weapon of murder.

2.2. In accordance with the provisions of the Act on Extradition between The Kingdom of Thailand and The United States of America B.E. 2533 (1990) – as stipulated in its Article 9, Section 3 (b), evidence provided by the Requesting State must be sufficient enough as to be acceptable by the Requested State in accordance with its own law (apparently meaning the Criminal Procedure Law of Thailand in our particular case). That means that all evidence provided by the Requesting State (The United States) must be in accordance with the Thai Law – meaning that all such evidence must be acquired in a legal manner, must have direct relevance to the charges and must be sufficient enough to commit such a case for a trial in the Thai Court. What we can see in this particular case, instead of such evidence?  We can see actually nothing at all, as has been already mentioned in the above Clause 2.1.2. All documents accompanying an extradition request and purporting to be documentary evidence supporting the extradition claim, are indeed other obligatory documents that fit into requirements provided for by Sections 2 (a), 2 (b), 2 (c), 2 (d), 2 (e) and 3 (a) of the Article 9 of the Act on Extradition between The Kingdom of Thailand and The United States of America B.E. 2533 (1990). There is nothing at all amongst the set of the documents supplied by the American side that could even remotely resemble necessary evidence as mentioned in the Section 3 (b), Article 9, of the abovementioned Act.

Just to make things clear, let’s consider all documents, submitted by the American side, one-by-one. All what we could see inside the official set of the documents are these:

1)      An actual letter of The United States Embassy in Bangkok No.1514 dated May 1^st, 2008, and its official Thai translation. ——– both fit into the provisions of Section 1, Article 9 of the Act on Extradition between The Kingdom of Thailand and The United States of America B.E. 2533 (1990), due to this document being an actual extradition request.

2)      An affidavit by Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of State of The United States, dated by 30^th of April, 2008 and its Thai translation ——– both fit into the provisions of Section 2 (e), Article 9, of the same Act, or / and, possibly, to a certain extent – additionally into the provisions of Section 3 (a).

3)      An affidavit by the Director- (or Deputy Director-) General of the Office of International Affairs, Criminal Division, of the United States Department of Justice, dated by 30^th of April, 2008, and its Thai translation ——– both fit into the provisions of Section 2 (e), Article 9, of the same Act, or, possibly, into the provisions of Section 3 (a).

4)      An affidavit by David P. Warner, Associate Director, Office of the International Affairs, Criminal Division, Department of Justice of the Untied States of America, dated by 29^th of April, 2008, and its Thai translation ——– both fit into the provisions of Section 2 (e), Article 9, of the same Act, or, possibly, into the provisions of Section 3 (a).

5)      An affidavit by Brendan R. MCGUIRE, an Assistant United States Attorney in the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District Court of New York submitted to the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, Case No. 08 Cr. 365, dated by 28^th of April, 2008, and its Thai translation. ——– Since all relevant American laws are being mentioned in this particular affidavit, as well as some statements of the facts of the alleged offence, this particular document shall be presumed to fit into the provisions of Section 2 (b) and 3 (c), and, due to its nature, this document also might be considered to meet the requirements of Section 2 (d), and, possibly, 2 (e), Article 9, of the same Act.

6)      An indictment by the Grand Jury, at the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, United States of America, Case 08 CRIM. 365, date is unclear, and its Thai translation ——– both apparently fit into the provisions of Section 2 (e), and, possibly, into the provisions of Section 2 (b), Article 9, of the same Act.

7)      Warrant for arrest against Viktor Bout, ordered by Hon. Douglas F. Eaton, a judge, at the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, case 08 CRIM. 365, dated by 24^th of April, 2008, and its Thai translation ——– both fit into the provisions of Section 3 (a), Article 9, of the same Act.

8)      An affidavit by a certain Christine A. Hanley, a special agent of the DEA, submitted to the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, case No. 08 Cr. 365, dated by 28^th of April, 2008, and its Thai translation ——– both fit into the provisions of Section 2 (e) (“statements or other types of information”), Article 9, of the same Act.

9)      A photograph of Mr. Viktor Bout, apparently taken in Bangkok, Thailand, after his first arrest on 6^th of March, 2008 ——- this one obviously purports to meet the requirements of Section 2 (a), Article 9, of the same Act. (Actually, according to elementary logic, the Americans should supply the Thai side with a photograph taken PRIOR to the arrest of the Accused, not AFTER his arrest, otherwise, such a photograph would not be able to serve its only purpose – i.e. to really prove that a person being sought is indeed the same person as the one arrested. However, since the defense team does not really plan to prove to the Honorable Court that the Accused in this case is a person other than sought for Mr. Viktor Bout, the abovementioned argument is illegible. It just shows us that the accusers did not work on this case really seriously and did not really care to respect the necessary requirements of the Extradition Act between the Thailand and their country.)

That is all what we could see inside the set of documents enclosed with an extradition request against Mr. Viktor Bout. So, we shall conclude that the Requesting State (the United States) did present to the Thai side everything which more or less meets the requirements of the Act on Extradition between The Kingdom of Thailand and The United States of America B.E. 2533 (1990), Article 9, Sections 1, 2 (a), 2 (b), 2 (d), 2 (e), 3 (a). In addition, requirements of Sections 5 and 6, Article 9, were meet too, since to comply with these purely technical requirements was not so difficult. However, what was really difficult – was to find some real evidence that could support the allegations. Unfortunately to the accusers, they did not bother to submit the Honorable Court anything at all that could even remotely resemble necessary evidence mentioned in the Section 3 (b) of the same Article 9. This is understandable, indeed, because would the accusers have any real proof of the Accused’s guilt in their hand, they would not miss an opportunity to submit such evidence to the Honorable Thai Court in order to comply with the necessary requirements provided for by Section 3 (b), Article 9, of the abovementioned Act. This is just a proof that all allegations against Mr. Bout are totally groundless and, moreover, are devoid of any common sense.

2.3. After carefully studying all the documents submitted by the Americans together with an actual extradition request (i.e. all documents mentioned in the above Clause 2.2), we could also conclude that neither of these documents could serve as a sufficient proof of the Accused’s guilt for the Honorable Thai Court, would such an offense be tried by the local Court of Law in the Kingdom of Thailand.

In accordance with the Thai Criminal Procedure Code, Division V, Chapter I, there are some serious requirements in regard to evidence that could be considered by the Court to be as such. For example:

2.3.1. Section 226 of the Thai Criminal Procedure Code B.E. 2477 explicitly states that any evidence that likely to prove the guilt (or innocence) of the accused is admissible provided that it was not obtained through any inducement, promise, threat, deception or other unlawful means.

The true meaning of this provision (a.k.a. “Spirit of the Law”, as well as its “Letter”) is pretty clear. But what we could see in particular accusation against Mr. Bout (at least so claimed by the accusers themselves)? The accusers claim that they intentionally, being well aware of what they were doing, by means of deception, have lured Mr. Bout into an alleged false deal (most probably the provocateurs had shamelessly used as a prop a poor financial situation of Mr. Bout, who had lost all his business and all his saving due to an unprecedented persecution, tantamount to the witch-hunt, that was unleashed against him by the United States administration at the end of the 90s). The defense could not confirm whether the abovementioned alleged deal with the DEA agent-provocateurs was a true thing or not, as well it could not confirm whether the main subject of such a deal (if any) were indeed anti-aircraft missiles or it was agricultural equipment, but the defense team could confirm that the financial situation of Mr. Bout was not so good. Mr. Bout has indeed lost a lot of his former business, as well as he lost most of his savings, but still, he has a family that he has to take care of.  Considering all of this, it is pretty obvious that the evidence (if any) obtained by the DEA agent-provocateurs against the Accused could have only been obtained by means of deception, since all the alleged false deal (if any) between Mr. Bout and the DEA agents said to be “Colombian rebels” was nothing else than a deception of itself. Moreover, the actual deal (if any) did not look like if Mr. Bout did really have some illegally acquired stock of anti-aircraft missiles and was desperately looking for customers being ready to sell the weapons to the highest bidder. It looks very much vice-versa. It looks like such a deal (if any) was initiated by the DEA agent-provocateurs who did nothing else than deceived Mr. Bout into a certain cooperation with them. Therefore all evidence obtained in connection with such a shameful provocation shall be deemed inadmissible by the Honorable Thai Court should such an offence be tried in the Kingdom of Thailand.

In addition to the abovementioned, the DEA agent-provocateurs, who admitted to organize such a deal as being incriminated to Mr. Bout, did nothing else than committed a crime in accordance with the provisions of Section 84 of the Penal Code of Thailand B.E.2499. Section 84 explicitly states that “Whoever, whether by employment, compulsion, threat, hire, asking for favor or by instigation, or by any other means, causes another person to commit any offence said to be an instigator. If the employed person commits an offence, the instigator shall receive the punishment as principal” (and even if such an offence was not actually committed, the instigator still shall be liable to one third of the punishment provided for such offence). Based on this logic we shall conclude that the DEA agent-provocateurs themselves are criminals to a much larger extent than they claim the victim of their provocation (Mr. Bout) is. If Mr. Bout has ever committed any crime, he was without any doubt being instigated to do so by the accusers. So, following this logic, the accusers have to be arrested in the Kingdom of Thailand for committing such a heinous crime also partly in the Thai territory, and to be punished with something equal to three life-imprisonment terms each since this is exactly the amount of punishment they wish Mr. Bout to undergo in their country.

Even if to leave aside the abovementioned moral aspect of this disgusting provocation by the DEA agents partly committed in the Thai territory, and to leave only the legal points (i.e. leaving aside the “Spirit of the Law” and leaving only the “Letter of the Law” alone), we still could see that no evidence exists against Mr. Bout in connection with allegations against him laid by the American Justice that could be admissible by the Honorable Thai Court should it try this kind of alleged offence in accordance with the Thai jurisdiction.

2.3.2. First of all, as it was duly established in the abovementioned Clause 2.2., there is no evidence whatsoever from among the set of various affidavits and other documents submitted by the American side. None of the documents inside that set could be called “evidence” and none of them could meet the requirements of  Section 3 (b), Article 9, of the Act on Extradition between The Kingdom of Thailand and The United States of America B.E. 2533 (1990). The evidence which may be called “evidence” is simply missing.

2.3.3. Secondly, even if to consider any of such documents submitted by the American side as being a kind of “evidence”, still such evidence was acquired through illegal means (deception) and therefore shall be deemed inadmissible.

2.3.4. The accusers (the American side that requests the extradition) have an apparent duty to prove their allegations. However, in this particular case it was not so. From all the documents, submitted by the American side, only one document could theoretically serve as a kind of a surrogate evidence, instead of a real evidence – that is an affidavit by a certain Christine A. Hanley, a special agent of the DEA, submitted to the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, case No. 08 Cr. 365, dated by 28^th of April, 2008. Unfortunately to the American side, this document could serve this purpose only in their dream. According to the Thai law this document can not serve as evidence.

2.3.5. The abovementioned affidavit by a certain Christine A. Hanley by its nature resembles a collection of hearsays – “I knew from third persons”, “I heard from third persons”, “I believe what these third persons say”, “I believe that such and such interpretation of events is correct”, and the like. It seems that this woman gives a kind of a typical witness’ testimony; however, she did not see anything at all by her own self. It is obvious that this woman was none of the DEA agent-provocateurs who claim to directly communicate with Mr. Bout either in person or via electronic communications.

2.3.6. This woman neither communicated directly with the so-called “unnamed co-conspirator” of Mr. Bout aka “CC-1” as mentioned in her affidavit. In fact, the name of this so-called “unnamed co-conspirator” is well known. His name is Mr. Andrew Smulian – he is well known to the Thai authorities too, since arrest-warrants for the purpose of extradition were issued against both of them – against Mr. Smulian, as well as against Mr. Bout, however this certain Ms. Christine A. Hanley prefer to intentionally mislead the United States’ District Court by calling Mr. Smulian as allegedly “unnamed”. And as a continuance of her attempt her cheating statement to this effect has eventually arrived even to the Honorable Thai Court as a part of an extradition request. One could only wander now – why Mr. Smulian, whose name is figuring in all the relevant Thai cases – in a Warrant of Arrest No.893/2551, dated 4 of March, 2008, issued by the Criminal Court, in a Warrant of Arrest No.161/2551, dated 7 of March (please, see for your reference an Exhibit No.2) [enclose here the second arrest-warrant against Andrew Smulian issued on March 7, 2008], issued by the Criminal Court as a part of an extradition case Black Number Jor.6/2551, where Mr. Andrew Smulian, along with Mr. Viktor Bout, is one of the two Defendants, and in many other official Thai documents, had suddenly became relegated to a status of the so-called “unnamed” co-conspirator?

2.3.7. In the widely accepted judicial practice only testimonies of first-hand witnesses are acceptable as evidence, but never rumors of a kind that “the witness heard that another person (who did not come to testify to the court) have allegedly said so and so”. Such alleged claims by any third-party people are traditionally rejected by the Justice and it is indeed a very normal attitude. Moreover, it is normal for a witness to come to testify to the Law Court in person rather than to submit any kind of affidavit. At least, it seems to be a tradition in the local Thai jurisprudence. But what we could see in case of this affidavit by a certain Ms. Hanley? Did she come to the District Court of Southern District of New York to testify in person? Did she answer any questions by a judge or by any party in the case as it supposes to be? No. She prepared a written statement (so-called “affidavit”) and sent this statement to the judge that allowed her to avoid answering any possible questions. This is not a “testimony” in a full sense of this literal word and this is not a “testimony” in a truly judicial meaning. Such a malicious practice of submitting “affidavits” instead of oral testimony in the court room indeed undermines the very principles of the Justice which traditionally requires witnesses to testify. Just because of this reason alone her so-called “affidavit” shall be rejected, while there are quite a few more additional reasons to reject her affidavit, as were mentioned above.

2.3.8. [HERE  WE  SUGGEST TO  INSERT  A COUPLE OF EXAMPLES  FROM THAI  JUDICIAL  PRACTICE  WHERE  THAI  COURT  REJECTED TESTIMONIES  WHERE  HERESAY  BY  THIRD-PARTY  PEOPLE WAS  MENTIONED OR, MAY  BE,  SOME  OTHER  RELEVANT  EXAMPLES]

2.3.9. Even if to disregard all the negative impression that the abovementioned affidavit by Ms. Hanley gives to us, there is one more reason not to believe it. The problem is that Ms. Christine A. Hanley is not an independent witness. She is nothing else than a Special Agent working with the DEA. That means that she can not be just, independent in making her own conclusions, and otherwise impartial. She simply has no choice than to fully support corporative interests of her organization (the DEA) whose supply of money that is traditionally extracted from the pockets of the American taxpayer directly depends on how loudly this organization would cry to the public about alleged drug-dealers, terrorists and other rogue people. It would be strange to expect from a DEA agent any honest and independent testimony in such circumstances. Of course, Ms. Hanley will say anything what her bosses will order her to say, irrespectively whether this would be true or not.

2.4.10. To finish with her ridiculous affidavit, we shall conclude that this collection of various hearsays, rumors and nonsense, compiled by a certain Ms Christine A. Hanley, who did not even bother to respect the fundamental principles of the Justice and did not appear to testify in person before the Court, shall not dupe anyone into believing to what she claims. It shall be rejected.

2.5. Considering all the abovementioned, the defense is of opinion that an extradition request of the Americans shall be rejected in whole, since it did not meet the requirements provided for by the Section 226 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Thailand B.E. 2477, as well as it did not meet the requirements stipulated in the Section 3 (b), Article 9, of the Act on Extradition between The Kingdom of Thailand and The United States of America B.E. 2533 (1990).

2.6. The defense would like to repeat once more that it does not see any evidence amongst those documents submitted by the prosecution to the Honorable Court. However, the defense suspects that certain kinds of additional information might be submitted to the Honorable Court by the prosecution later. For this reason, the defense would like to anticipate any such attempts and to submit its objections in advance. The abovementioned suspicion of defense arises from some information that has been widely circulated in mass media shortly after both – Mr. Viktor Bout and Mr. Viktor Smulian – were arrested in Thailand.

2.6.1. Particularly, some of such rumors circulated by the mass media claimed that the arresters allegedly possessed a certain audio-tape with allegedly covertly recorded conversation between Mr. Bout and agents-provocateurs from the DEA. That tape alleged to support the allegations by the provocateurs. The defense would like to anticipate a possible usage of such an audio-tape as a kind of evidence in the present case.

2.6.1.1. Firstly, such an audio-tape, even if to presume that it exists in reality (as the mass-media claimed), shall never be trusted as reliable evidence, because it could be easily manipulated with or be even totally falsified. The problem is that modern technologies, and especially modern computer technologies, are so advanced that nowadays it is an extremely simple task: to capture someone’s voice as a sample, and then use a computer program to change anyone else’s voice to be the voice of the first person whose voice was captured first as a sample. This kind of manipulation is so easy, that one does not even need to be a big specialist in this job – providing that the necessary software and some cheap computer is available, such an operation could be performed even by a schoolchild. The computer programs that could be used for changing some one’s voice are widely available for either private or corporate use and could be downloaded from the Internet or bought in a shop with a couple of thousand baht (or their pirated copies could be bought even for 100 Baht only in places like Pantip Plaza in Bangkok, Pratunam, etc.). Either of the below mentioned program allows a novice computer user to effectively change a given voice on a given audio file into any other “fake” voice that sounds as being of a totally different person. These programs allow even to change a male voice to a female voice and a voice of an elder person to a voice of a child. Here are some examples of this kind of computer programs:

1)      “Fake Voice version 1.546” - Changes voice to Male/Female/Young/old/teen ; could be downloaded from: http://www.soft32.com/download_206007.html Publisher: “Web Solution Mart”, website: http://www.fakewebcam.com/ , Program’s cost 19.95 USD (~ 650 Baht). Publisher’s description: “Fake Voice is a voice changer software that helps you change your voice to male, female, old, young, teen, hard, robot, shrill, or some one totally new. It helps you transform your voice to something new.”

2)      “VoiceMask Pro” – Allows you to change your voice so you can sound more masculine or feminine; could be downloaded from: http://www.latestsoft.com/products/voice.htm Publisher: “Latesoft”, Tel: 1-888-282-5887 or FAX: 1-801-497-9456, Qwerks, Inc. 1648 Willow Dr Kaysville, UT 84037, USA. Program’s cost 19.95 USD (~ 650 Baht).

3)      “AV Voice Changer Software 6.0 Diamond Edition” – Changes voice in real-time, adds background effects, imitates other people voice, etc. Publisher: “Avnex Ltd.” Could be downloaded from: http://www.audio4fun.com/ Price: 99.95 USD (~ 3.250 Baht). Publisher’s description: “Truly cool voice recorder and voice simulator. Do almost anything with your voice. Similarity analysis, celebrity voice samples, import someone else’s voice…” [So, why don’t we presume that voice of Mr. Bout, who is also a kind of “celebrity” to a certain extent, could not have been imported using such a program?]

These are just only three examples of the most well-known computer software that could be used to falsify someone else’s voice. All of these programs are available even on a Thai black market of pirated software where all the abovementioned 3 programs could be bought with 100 Baht only. So, considering how easy it is to falsify someone’s voice, we shall always keep in mind that the agent-provocateurs from the DEA and their bosses would unlikely resist a temptation to falsify a voice of a person they try so hard to accuse. Based on this consideration, the defense states that even the accusers of Mr. Bout indeed possess any of such audio-tape and claim that the voice on such a tape is that of Mr. Bout, such an audio-tape can not be accepted as evidence.

It shall be mentioned also that traditionally the Honorable Royal Thai Court was always wise not to accept any kind of audio-tapes as evidence. Such attitude of the Honorable Royal Thai Court could be seen in a variety of criminal and other cases. So, the defense believes that such an attitude of the Honorable Court is very reasonable and would like to request that such a good tradition would be implemented in this particular case too.

2.6.1.2. Another consideration in regard to the abovementioned audio-tape an alleged existence of which was so widely publicized in mass-media is that such an audio-tape could have only been recorded with prior permission of the Thai Court. The accusers neither at the time of arrest of Mr. Viktor Bout and Mr. Andrew Smuian on 6 of March 2008, nor later have ever produced nor mentioned in the course of any legal proceedings any permission from the Thai court to conduct such a recording. So, if Honorable Court has never allowed them to conduct such a recording of conversation between Mr. Bout and agents-provocateurs from the DEA, how then they managed to obtain such an audio-tape as they claim to have? If a piece of evidence was obtained in an illegal manner it must be deemed inadmissible to the trial in accordance with the provisions of Section 226 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Thailand B.E.2477. This is just another reason why such thing as an alleged audio-tape that purports to record Mr. Bout’s voice must not be used as evidence in this case.

2.6.1.3. So the defense believes that either of the two abovementioned reasons (in the Clauses numbers 2.6.1.1. and 2.6.1.2), as well as either of them independently, are strong enough not to believe any alleged audiotapes and do not even accept them as evidence whatsoever.

2.6.2. Another possible trick that the prosecution might try to implement in this case is to submit to the current case a possible testimony of Mr. Andrew Smulian, who is claimed to be an alleged co-conspirator of Mr. Viktor Bout. (Mr. Andrew Smulian is also known to the Honorable Court as the so-called “unnamed co-conspirator” of Mr. Bout or “CC-1” – as appears from the affidavit by a certain Ms. Christine A. Hanley, which is enclosed with the current extradition request from the United States Embassy.) The defense believes that such a possible testimony of Mr. Smulian might to support the claims of the accusers to a certain extent. But, still, there are quite a few reasons to doubt any testimony that might be ascribed to Mr. Andrew Smulian. These reasons are as follows:

2.6.2.1. It appears from the overall picture of events claimed by the American accusers that Mr. Andrew Smulian was, firstly, a kind of middle-man between Mr. Bout and a group of agent-provocateurs from the DEA. It was no one else, but him, Mr. Smulian, who served as an essential link between Mr. Bout and the so-called “Colombian rebels”, and without personal participation of Mr. Smulian the alleged deal to sell weapons to the alleged “rebels” was simply impossible to organize. Secondly, it appears that the initiative to embark on such a deal belongs not to Mr. Bout, but to Mr. Smulian. Apparently, if one reads all the materials submitted by the American side carefully, he will notice that it was not Mr. Bout, who approached strangers with an offer that sounds like this: “Hey, boys, I have a hundred of portable surface-to-air missiles that could help you to kill a few gringos. Do you wish to buy some from me?” It was not so at all. Mr. Bout has never ever approached anyone with any offer of this kind, or with any other offer. He quietly lived in Russia, trying to make some small business that could enable him to recover from huge losses inflicted by the American persecution against him in the end of the 90s, and he did not even plan to do any thing else. It so happened that Mr. Andrew Smulian, his long time personal acquaintance and even a friend, has suddenly approached Mr. Bout in Moscow and began to bombard him with various offers of prospective business in Latin America and elsewhere. So it is pretty obvious that initiative to involve Mr. Bout into this disgusting DEA provocation was that of Mr. Smulian. It was indeed Mr. Smulian, who first acquainted himself with the group of agent-provocateurs from the DEA, it was Mr. Smulian, who first received an offer to frame Mr. Bout from them, and it was Mr. Smulian, who travelled to Moscow in the first step of this operation in order to convince Mr. Bout to participate in this dubious deal, and it was Mr. Smulian, who eventually convinced Mr. Bout to travel to Bangkok – right into the hands of his arresters.

Hereby the defense would like to express its opinion as to why exactly The Kingdom of Thailand has been selected by the American DEA to be a meeting place where Mr. Bout had to be apprehended. It shall be known that the Americans elected to lure Mr. Bout to Bangkok because they knew that Russian Federation normally does not extradite its citizens, so they can not demand any extradition of Mr. Bout from Russia and even if they apply for Mr. Bout’s punishment according to the existing Russian Criminal Law, they would make Russian Court to laugh at their ridiculous arguments. On the other hand, the Americans could not lure Mr. Bout to any country other than Thailand, because only in Thailand the Americans could have such a close cooperation with the local police, much of whom receive monthly salaries from the Americans in addition to their Thai salaries. Such a behavior of Americans is simply impossible in any country, other than Thailand. However, the defense believes that it was nothing but a good luck for Mr. Bout to be in the Kingdom of Thailand and to undergo trial in this country. Despite that Thai police are known to be notoriously corrupt and ready to serve American interests rather than interests of their own country – Thailand, the Royal Thai Justice is known to be the best and the most fair Justice System compare to many other countries. So, the defense believes that Mr. Bout could sincerely expect Justice in this country.

Coming back to the personal role of Mr. Andrew Smulian. If to call a spade a spade, we could say that Mr. Andrew Smulian was nothing else than the main agent-provocateur. He was an unalienable part of the group of the agent-provocateurs from the DEA that created all this trouble for Mr. Bout, who is otherwise totally innocent. It is quite clear that Mr. Smulian:

a)      got into a criminal conspiracy with the group of agent-provocateurs from the DEA with an intention to act as instigators and to instigate Mr. Victor Bout into committing some kind of what they believe the American Justice will believe is a “crime”;

b)      we can be pretty sure that Mr. Smulian got some substantial financial reward from the DEA that is known to pay handsome sums of cash to their informers and to other good collaborators, since nobody works for free, especially on such a dangerous enterprise – Mr. Smulian has even travelled to Russia to convince Mr. Bout, while Russia is known to be a dangerous place (we could guess that Mr. Smulian has been paid anything like ranging from 300 thousand US dollars to 3 million US dollars – because this is about to be a reasonable amount to be paid for this kind of job);

c)      Mr. Smulian did everything he was ordered by his DEA masters – he contacted Mr. Bout, he offered Mr. Bout some prospective business (obviously using their long-lasting personal acquaintance as a kind of guarantee of an honest deal, and a poor financial situation of Mr. Bout as an additional convincing factor);

d)     Mr. Smulian did everything he was ordered by his DEA masters to implicate Mr. Bout – he intentionally used mobile phones, the Internet e-mail addresses, and other means of electronic communications especially created by the DEA, so that later it would be easy to prove that it was indeed Mr. Bout who was involved in this allegedly “criminal” deal;

e)      and, at last, Mr. Andrew Smulian did the most important part of the DEA project – he managed to convince Mr. Bout to come to Bangkok, so that Mr. Bout could be arrested here.

So that we could say that, without any doubt, Mr. Andrew Smulian was the main tool of the DEA to lure Mr. Bout into this alleged deal in general; and he was the main tool of the DEA to lure Mr. Bout to Bangkok in particular. Logically, Mr. Andrew Smulian can not end his role at this point. He has to go a little bit further, to the final step – he must become a main witness of the prosecution against Mr. Bout. Apparently, the prosecution in the United States plans to use Mr. Smulian in this role: he will testify in the United States’ Court of Law that it was indeed him, who was a co-conspirator of Mr. Bout, thus confirming that the alleged conspiracy indeed took place, and he will say everything that his DEA masters will instruct him to say in the court room. After that Mr. Smulian will pick up his cash, change his name and surname, and be re-settled under the notorious United States witness protection program. There must not be any slightest doubt in this regard. The United States prosecution is well-known for this kind of arrangements.

2.6.2.2. If one still doubts that Mr. Smulian was indeed a part of this disgusting DEA’s provocation game from the very beginning, let him not doubt anymore: it shall be known that Mr. Andrew Smuilan was arrested together with Mr. Bout in Bangkok on 6^th of March, 2008.

His arrest was based on a preliminary request by the United States Embassy (please, see for your reference Exhibit 4) [enclose here the very first letter from the US Embassy dated by 29^th of February] and in accordance with an earlier arrest-warrant No. 893/2551 issued on 4^th of March 2008. Moreover, on 7^th of March, the public prosecutor has applied to the Criminal Court for the second arrest-warrant against Mr. Smulian and it was granted by the Court who issued an Arrest-Warrant No.161/2551 in a Criminal Case Jor.6/2551 (please, see for your reference Exhibit No.5). [Enclose here the Arrest-Warrant against Andrew Smulian No.2 issued on 7^th of March, 2008] ”Strangely” enough, after his arrest in Bangkok, Mr. Andrew Smulian suddenly “disappeared” from the Thai police’s custody and in the next two days suddenly “appeared” in New York where he was arrested and allegedly “detained” by the District Court of  the Southern District of New York. So, a few reasonable questions rise at this point:

Mr. Andrew Smulian was arrested together with Mr. Viktor Bout – by the same arresting team, in the same locality, and based on the same legal grounds. So, how come that today we could still see Mr. Viktor Bout in Thailand, fighting his extradition in the Thai Law Court, while Mr. Andrew Smulian is already in the United States? How did he manage to get there? After being under the Thai Criminal Suppression Division’s custody? May be he agreed to be extradited voluntarily? And so to relieve the Honorable Royal Thai Court from considering an extradition request against him? It might appear so at the first glance… However, it is not as simple as it might appear.

It would be a very strange decision for a person, who is facing something like 3 (three) terms of life-imprisonment, and the 4^th term of 25 years of imprisonment, in addition, not to try to protect himself using a formal extradition proceeding in the Requested State (i.e. in the Kingdom of Thailand). Apparently, Mr. Smulian, exactly as Mr. Bout, has had some good grounds to successfully challenge the extradition request of Americans in the Thai Court. Why should he forgo his legal rights in Thailand so easily and agree to go to The United States, where he could likely remain behind bars for the rest of his life?

The answer to this difficult question is indeed very simple: Mr. Andrew Smulian has never feared the American Justice, and he has never feared any punishment from it. He was simply a part of the DEA team of agent-provocateurs and he knew very well that the DEA would never sue him. So, the initial US request for provisional arrest of Mr. Smulian in Thailand, was nothing else than a part of the game. By doing so, the US authorities simply cheated Mr. Bout (and the Thai authorities in addition) into believing that the abovementioned provocation game was a “genuine thing”. In reality it was not so, of course. After that farce with his alleged “arrest” in Thailand on 6^th of March, 2008, Mr. Andrew Smulian formally signed some documents (possibly in order to observe some formalities as provided for by the provisions of Article 15 of the Act on Extradition between The Kingdom of Thailand and The United States of America B.E.2533) so that it appears from such documents that he voluntarily forgo his legal rights in Thailand and voluntarily agreed to be extradited to the United States in a simplified manner. After this he was placed under protection by his DEA masters in The Untied States and in the same time he signed any and every paper that might incriminate Viktor Bout that was given to him to sign by his DEA masters. Everything is as simply as this.

Of course, the DEA was somehow obliged to arrange this farce legally – to make it if not believable, at least looking formal to the eyes of the United States Justice. This was not so difficult task in that country. It is well-known to everybody that in The United States there is some long existing disgusting practice of “buying” former accused in a trial and converting them into witnesses of prosecution in exchange for some reduction of their punishment, or even in exchange for a non-prosecution order. Without any doubt, Mr. Andrew Smulian will go this path. The only difference between a genuine implementation of the abovementioned practice and that in the Smulian’s case is this: Mr. Smulian from the very beginning has never been planned by the prosecution to stand a trial as an accused. He was an unalienable part of the DEA provocation team long before his arrest and he was well protected by his DEA masters from any possible prosecution.

So, Mr. Smulian did not make any deal with the prosecution upon his arrival to the Untied States on 7 of March 2008 as it might appear at the first glance. He made that deal with the prosecution through his DEA masters several months before that time. That is exactly why when he was arrested in Thailand on 6^th of March 2008, he immediately agreed to go to the United States “voluntarily”. His financial reward from the DEA and a new passport with a new name under the notorious US witness protection system were awaiting him there. He must be completely crazy to sit in the Thai jail pretending to continue the game, rather than to end his part of the game immediately and to get all the DEA promised him right away. If someone still doubts that Mr. Smulian will undergo an American witness protection program instead of standing a trial as an accused, let him not doubt it anymore. Just read again the abovementioned affidavit by a certain Ms. Ms. Christine A. Hanley (mentioned above in the Clauses 2.2. (8) and 2.3.6) where she refers to Mr. Andrew Smulian as the “unnamed co-conspirator” of Mr. Bout a.k.a “CC-1”. This is pretty clear that when the DEA has embarked on cheating even the United States own Court (not to say about the Thai side in extradition proceedings) by referring to Mr. Smulian as “unnamed”, its plans were very serious, and very obvious too. It has been decided already that Mr. Andrew Smulian will testify being under witness protection system against Mr. Viktor Bout, his alleged “co-conspirator” and former friend, and then Mr. Smulian will cease being “Mr. Andrew Smulian”. He will obtain a new identity and will be re-settled by his protectors under a new name.

2.6.2.3. To summarize all the abovementioned:

- Mr. Smulian was undoubtedly one of the DEA agents-provocateurs to instigate Mr. Bout into an alleged crime; he was the most important member of the provocation team from the very beginning;

- his arrest staged in the Kingdom of Thailand and his staged “voluntarily extradition” were designed in advance as a part of the whole game;

- the seemingly “genuine” preliminary request by the United States to arrest Mr. Smulian in Thailand was a part of the game too (this part is bordering on insulting the Thai authorities, besides of all, who apparently mistook that play of Americans for a genuine thing and sent the Thai police team to arrest Mr. Smulian in a genuine manner);

- his alleged “arrest” upon arrival to the United States was just another part of the same play staged by the DEA in collaboration with local prosecution authority;

- the alleged “collaboration” of Mr. Smulian with the prosecution in order to be converted from an accused into a witness of the prosecution was yet another part of the game designed long in advance; Mr. Smulian did not decided to cooperate with the prosecution because of his old age and fear of life imprisonment, such a turn of the game was designed several months back by his DEA masters.

2.6.2.4. Should the Requesting State (The United States) obtain some testimony of Mr. Smulian and to submit it to the current trial to the Honorable Thai Court, in an opinion of the defense, such testimony shall not be admissible as evidence. Mr. Smulian, being part of the same DEA team of provocateurs, is not an independent person – he will say whatever his DEA masters will order him to say, and he will sign everything what they will order him to sign. So in case of the American side attempts to submit such a testimony, a wise decision not to believe it is kindly expected from the Honorable Court.

2.6.2.5. An additional reason to reject such a possible testimony by Mr. Andrew Smulian, is the fact that Mr. Smulian shall have to answer questions of defense during his testimony, rather than submitting a kind of the so-called “affidavit” as his other DEA colleagues did. The other reason to demand that his testimony shall be given in person is probably the same reason as mentioned in the above Clause 2.3.7 (at the second half of this Clause). In the judicial tradition it is normal – to testify in person before the Court, and it is NOT normal – to submit a written document in its stead. It is not so easy to lie in the court-room facing the Court and facing cross-examination from either side. However, it is so easy to lie to the Court in written and it seems that the American liars use this loophole in the American Justice System quite efficiently by submitting to it their lies in written. In the defense’s opinion it shall not be permitted to bring this wicked practice of Americans to the Thai soil and implement it with the Royal Thai Justice. If Mr. Andrew Smulian is indeed so “honest” man that wishes to testify against his alleged “co-conspirator” and former friend Mr. Viktor But, let him come back to the Kingdom of Thailand and do so in the court-room. The defense sincerely requests the Honorable Court not to accept any kind of written testimonies of either Mr. Smulian or other cheaters that could be sent to Thailand from the United States.

2.7. The same considerations as mentioned above are also applicable in order to reject all possible testimonies of other member of the DEA team of the agent-provocateurs who might be order by their DEA masters to testify against Mr. Viktor Bout. It shall be known that members of such a DEA team could only be either DEA cadre, or, as a variety, they could also evolve from renegade criminals, formerly involved with some illicit drug-trade, who then betrayed their former comrades, and changed sides to began to serve the DEA – their new masters (not to serve them by persuasion, but only in order to escape the due punishment). The DEA could only have this kind of stuff in such a provocation team – either from among their own cops or from among some former turncoats, or a mixture of the two. Who can believe to what this kind of folk will say? Nobody can trust the policemen, because they would say anything that is profitable to their organization. They have to maintain their corporative interests first of all, and they do not care about any Justice, especially if it is the Thai Justice. And, of course, nobody can trust those members of the provocation team who are from among former drug-criminals and who simply changed sides with the DEA in order to escape a punishment. In addition to all the abovementioned, it shall be understood, that the DEA was obsessed with getting Mr. Bout arrested at any cost, so that it decided to embark even on such a disgusting provocation bordering on a crime of itself. First of all, the DEA employed some criminals in order to successfully conduct their clandestine operations, such at the current provocation against Mr. Bout. Secondly, the DEA did not shrink from instigating Mr. Bout (who was otherwise totally innocent) into agreeing to discuss some dubious deal with them (as it has been mentioned already, an instigation is a crime of itself in accordance with Section 84 of the Penal Code of Thailand). Thirdly, the DEA did not shrink from taping illegally of the alleged conversation between the agent-provocateurs and Mr. Bout in the sovereign Thai territory, without any Thai Court’s permission, thus committing nothing, but a crime in The Kingdom of Thailand. Fourthly, the DEA did not shrink from deceiving the Thai authorities by requesting them to extradite not only Mr. Bout, but also a Mr. Smulian, who was nothing but their agent from the very beginning. And fifthly, the DEA went so far that it advised the local Thai police to accuse Mr. Viktor Bout of some offence in accordance with the Thai jurisdiction (please, see for your reference an Exhibit No.6, words highlighted with red) [enclose here the very first request for a remand where the Thai police requests the court to detain Victor Bout for 12 days based on the criminal charges in accordance with the Thai Penal Code in which highlight with red highlighter the words of the police inquirer who states that it was the Americans from the Embassy who requested the Thai Police to indict Victor Bout in Thailand according to the Thai criminal jurisdiction]. It shall be understood that the DEA people has decided to request their Thai colleagues to accuse Mr. Bout in accordance with the Thai law not because they sincerely wanted him to be punished in The Kingdom of Thailand. They did so with a totally different reason in mind. They only wanted to cheat the Thai Justice in order to win more time than two months (legally allotted for the preparation of a formal extradition request) since the arrest of Mr. Bout on 6^th of March 2008, so that they could have more time to prepare their formal extradition request. An attempt to accuse Mr. Bout in a Criminal Case Black No. P.585/2551 was a crime of itself (in accordance with either Section 200 (2) and 201 of the Penal Code of Thailand B.E. 2499). This is because the DEA agents and their cronies from the Thai police did nothing else than attempted to accuse a knowingly innocent person to be punished (or at least maliciously detained for an alleged “preliminary inquiry” that is known never to take place in reality) for the crime he has known never to commit. So, considering all of this, it shall be concluded that the DEA team of the abovementioned agent-provocateurs and all those who ordered them to make such a performance are nothing but a bunch of criminals, who have shown no respect whatsoever either to sovereignty of The Kingdom of Thailand in general, or to the Honorable Royal Thai Court in particular. Based on the abovementioned grounds, it shall be concluded that should any of such DEA agent-provocateurs or their immediate DEA superiors only try to testify against Mr. Viktor Bout, their testimonies could not be believed even to a slightest extent and shall be deemed as inadmissible evidence.

2.8. Political motivations of the Requesting State. The defense believes that the current extradition request of The United States shall be rejected by an additional reason: it is obviously politically motivated matter. In accordance with the letter and the spirit of Section 1 (b), Article 3, of the Act on Extradition between The Kingdom of Thailand and The United States of America B.E. 2533, an extradition shall not be granted when it is established that the extradition is requested for political purposes. So, we will try to establish it here. It is pretty obvious that The United States now try to obtain an extradition of Mr. Viktor Bout from the Kingdom of Thailand not because Mr. Bout has ever committed any crime against The United States (or has ever attempted to commit such a crime), but merely to satisfy some political ambitions which has nothing in common with the principles of the Justice.

2.8.1. It shall be known, that Mr. Viktor Bout long time ago became a victim of an intense persecution, tantamount to a witch-hunt that was unleashed against him by the United States of America and its satellite countries in the 90s. The problem was that Mr. Bout, being quite a brave and adventurous person, managed to create a successful airfreight company that was not afraid to operate in the so-called “hot” spots of Africa and Asia – i.e. near zones of some ethnic or military conflicts and even within actual zones of such conflicts. It is known that in the beginning of 90s many places in Africa and Asia were severely ravaged by various military conflicts. Many of these places were ungoverned or governed by different war-lords rather than by elected and officially recognized governments. In such circumstances many known airlines like Lufthansa, Air France, SAS, etc. not to say about the United States airline companies, were simply afraid to operate in such areas of conflict. This is understandable. All modern businessmen are quite cowardly. They wanted to risk neither their precious lives nor their money by operating businesses which outcome is unpredictable. Still, even conflict areas are populated by ordinary human beings, who all have their traditional basic human needs – they need food, drinking water, medicine, clothes, soap, washing powder and other necessities, postal services, means of transportation etc. etc. etc. It would be very unfair to deprive such people in conflict areas from any airlines services whatsoever just because the airlines owners and their stuff are all cowards. On the other hand it would be very stupid from an adventurous person not to use an opportunity to earn some money while seeing such a huge demand for airlines services and no offer at all to satisfy this demand. That is exactly why Mr. Viktor Bout organized his famous air company that was the only available company on the most of the African continent and in many “hot” places in Asia for several years from the beginning of the 90s and till the end of the 90s – when the American persecution against him has began. Why the Americans actually decided to unleash such a witch-hunt against Mr. Bout and to destroy all his business? Partly it was due to the fact that after being operable in Africa for many years, Mr. Bout’s company established itself as highly reliable in the eyes of potential customers. When majority of armed conflicts in Africa began to subside, many famous airlines companies from Europe and America began to think of coming back to the African continent, since its market is quite lucrative to leave it to others. However, they noticed that a lion share of the local market was already occupied by Mr. Bout and his airline businesses. It is not so easy to enter the market and to win it back in these circumstances. Of course, it was decided to push Mr. Bout and his business away from this market by using means that had nothing to do with normal business competition. Leading role in this persecution belonged to the CIA, of course, while some of their cronies (such as Belgium) has participated in Mr. Bout persecution too. The United States unleashed intimidation campaign against Mr. Bout trying to prove that he was allegedly involved in illicit weapons trade. The American spin-doctors have even ordered from their Hollywood colleagues a movie to this effect – this famous movie named “The Lord of War” with Nicolas Cage in the main role – purported to allegedly show illicit activities of Viktor Bout (at least so it is being claimed). The Americans were never able to prove even a single of these allegations against Mr. Bout, otherwise today the Honorable Court could see some of the in the present case-file. All these allegations were totally groundless, taken out of the blue, but, nevertheless, the damage was done. Mr. Bout was obliged to defend himself against these allegations; some times he was obliged to even hide himself and members of his family from possible hostile actions. In result his previously flourishing business was crippled and eventually he lost the African market to the other airline companies. Does all of this persecution of Mr. Bout look like politically motivated? Undoubtedly, yes.

2.8.2. It shall be mentioned, for the sake of fairness, that airlines belonging to Mr. Bout, in fact often transported different weapons while operating in conflict zones in Africa and Asia. But the problem is that it was not a personal business of Mr. Bout to sell these weapons. His business was to operate his airline company and to transport whatever he is being paid for by his customers. A taxi driver can not be held responsible if some armed criminal jumps in his taxi, orders him to go to another place and pays the fee in accordance with the taxi meter. For such a taxi driver his passenger whether he is armed or not is just another customer who pays for his transportation accordingly. It is not a duty of a taxi driver to check whether the gun of his passenger is licensed or not. May be this is a duty of a local police, but not that of a taxi driver. Coming back to the matter of alleged illicit weapons trade ascribed to Mr. Bout by his accusers even up to the present day. As it has been mentioned already, there is no existing proof that Mr. Bout has been involved even into a single count of an illicit weapons trade. Because if such a proof existed, then the DEA team did not need to bother to make such a disgusting provocation as they attempted to do to implicated Mr. Bout into at least something looking a bit “criminal”. Would they have such a proof in their hand, the Americans would apply for Mr. Bout’s extradition based on the existing proof that some when in the 90s he was allegedly involved into such and such counts of illicit weapons trade in Africa or in Asia. But the problem is that there is no such proof. It exists only in the movie “Lord of War”, and in sick imaginations of various journalists who has been handsomely paid to denigrate Mr. Bout in their hysterical writings. Unfortunately to the Americans, there is no any proof of the above-mentioned illicit weapons-trade accusations against Mr. Bout that could be admissible in any legal proceedings. It shall be mentioned too that all those weapons-carrying customers of Mr. Bout’s airlines in Africa and Asia were nothing but official organizations that have their legal right to transport weapons. For example, Mr. Bout airlines were hired to transport weapons on behalf of the Americans to the newly created Iraqi army (because all other cowardly airlines refused to fly to Iraq and Americans had no choice than to employ Mr. Bout to carry their weapons, despite his being their alleged “enemy”).  In another example, Mr. Bout’s airlines on several instances transported across Africa armed military personnel of United Nations’ peace-keeping forces and also transported weapons and other military supplies to the UN’ peacekeepers. In some other instances Mr. Bout’s airlines transported some military units belonging to the officially elected governments of African countries. So, who can accuse him of transporting weapons in such circumstances? That is exactly why all accusations against Mr. Bout to this effect are nothing but nonsense. They are suitable only for cheap Hollywood productions and for hysterical statements by unconscious scribblers in tabloid newspapers that are primarily intended to impress gullible plebs. These accusations are not suitable at all to any criminal case that could be considered in the court-room. And that is exactly why all of these allegations are missing in today’s case file that is being considered by the Honorable Court.

2.8.3. It shall be also understood, that while primarily reason to unleash that well-known persecution against Mr. Bout in the 90s was to push his airlines from the lucrative African market, the true reason behind today’s persecution against him is totally different. The spin-doctors from the United States have already done much of the difficult job of presenting Mr. Bout’s figure to the gullible public as a kind of a “monster”. The spin-doctors have already shot the much popular Hollywood movie “The Lord of War”, they have already inspired several publications in mass-media to denounce Mr. Bout as a high-profile criminal, and they have shown him in several popular TV productions; in addition to all of it, some pompous book with corresponding accusations alleged to be about Mr. Bout has been published and it became a kind of a best-seller (please, see for your reference Exhibit No.7). [enclose here the book about Victor Bout written by Douglas Farah].

So, due to all of their efforts, Mr. Bout became quite a popular figure in the world since the end of the 90s. Almost everybody has ever heard that such and such rascal indeed exists in this world. So, it would be unwise for the current American Administration not to use an opportunity to employ this so well-publicized figure once more to serve the current American interests. The Americans did so much in the past to make Mr. Bout well-known to the public that it would be very reasonable to expect that today they will try their best to reap some additional political dividends that are so much needed by the embattled Administration of President George W. Bush. It is very easy to see if to look at contemporary politics that the Bush Administration suffers today a very serious setback which borders on a total political bankruptcy. Due to all unwise policies conducted by the US Administration, the United States managed to bog down in a new war in Iraq, which is much disliked by the public, military expenditure and expenditures for the US law enforcement agencies were all greatly exaggerated, the US currencies’ rate sharply fell compare to Euro (the US dollar lost something like 50% of its former value if not more), this, in turn, caused serious inflation, prices for property, for gasoline, and many goods skyrocketed, that caused extremely strong sentiment of disapproval of the current US Administration. Of course, the US Administration needs to do something to divert negative public sentiment away from itself and re-direct it to somewhere else. For a few years the US Administration more or less successfully employed figures such Osama bin Laden and other so-called “terrorists” to scare the American public into believing that all failures in the US politics were justified by the alleged “terrorist threat” emanating from Osama bin Laden and Co. However, the American officials can not exploit their spectacle with all these “Al-Qaedas”, “Jemmaah Islamiahs” and other bogus terrorist organizations for unrestrictedly long time. It seems that their time is really over. More and more people in the United States and elsewhere begin to wake up and to analyze the reality on their own. Less and less people believe today that Mr. Osama bin Laden and his alleged “Al-Qaeda” are real things and more and more people arrive to a reasonable conclusion that Osama bin Laden lives not in Afghani mountains, but in Hollywood, while his so-called “Al-Qaeda” does not exist at all. It seems that the former comic play with Mr. Osama bin Laden in leading role is really over. This topic is apparently exhausted by today. Now some new enemy is much needed for the United States, because its politicians and military brass could not simply afford to live without any enemy.

So, now the United States Administration logically shall be in a desperate search for the new enemy that could replace Osama bin Laden to continue to scare the public and to allow the DEA, CIA and FBI guys to continue to extract unreasonably huge sums of money from the pockets of an American taxpayer on their alleged “anti-terrorist” needs.

What the Bush Administration does to this effect? To see it is pretty easy. The Unite States Administration by no means tries to present Mr. Viktor Bout as a petty criminal whose only guilt is an attempt to earn some couple of million of US dollars on some dubious deal. The Bush Administration went much further. It tries hard to portray Mr. Bout as an enemy of the United States and nothing less than that. Here is, for example, a document published by the US officials after arrest of Mr. Bout in Thailand on 6^th of March, 2008, and two more – after an indictment of Mr. Bout in the US court on 6^th of May, 2008 (please, see for your reference Exhibits No.8, No.9 and No.10). [Insert here three documents named “FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 6, 2008, United States Attorney Southern District Court of New York”, “Indictment_ Arms dealer offered weapons to kill Americans - CNN” ? ??? ???? – “U.S. Announces Indictment”]

2.8.4. The defense would like to ?ite here some of the US officials’ statements that reveal their true position in regard to the accusations against Mr. Viktor Bout. Here are some examples:

“DEA and our partners now have this terrorist supporter in custody where he can no longer

ply his deadly trade,” said DEA Acting Administrator MICHELE M. LEONHART. (in

Exhibit No.8, highlighted with red).

Attorney General Michael Mukasey last month singled out Bout as a leading example of a new breed of organized crime leaders who operate across international boundaries to amass wealth without regard to political ideology. (in Exhibit No.9, highlighted with red)

“Viktor Bout has long been considered by the international community as one of the world’s most prolific arms traffickers,” U.S. Attorney Michael Garcia said in the news release Tuesday. (in Exhibit No.9, highlighted with red)

“Viktor Bout no doubt faces some of the most extraordinarily serious conspiracy charges possible for his crimes against Americans,” said DEA Acting Administrator Michele M. Leonhart. “With the unsealing of this indictment, we are one step closer to ensuring Bout has delivered his last load of high-powered weaponry and armed his final terrorist.” (in Exhibit No.10, highlighted with red)

The Americans were never able to officially accuse Mr. Bout of any count of alleged “illicit weapons trade” as they claim he was so deeply involved in during the 90s, yet they still talk about this his alleged offences in such a manner as if it were a prove fact. Strangely enough, the abovementioned statements belong not to hired scribblers who are totally devoid of any shame, and not to any semi-unconscious anchors of popular TV-talk-shows. All these irresponsible statements indeed belong to the US Judicial officials – those who today pursue Mr. Bout’s extradition from Thailand and those who tomorrow might sue him in the US Court in case of their extradition request would be granted. Actually, only these irresponsible claims by the US judicial officials alone shall preclude an extradition of Mr. Bout to this country, because it seems that The United States would not be able to protect legal rights of Mr. Bout in a duly manner. It shall be sincerely expected that any possible legal proceedings against him in that country will indeed resemble a summary trial in some totalitarian state where a convicting sentence is already decided and known well in advance. It seems that a common misconception that The United States is allegedly a “jural state” shall be rejected after reading carefully such irresponsible statements by its judicial officials as quoted above.

2.8.5. In addition to the above said, it is quite clear to perceive from these bombastic statements that the American spin-doctors claimed to be judicial officials will never be satisfied with a low profile crime of Mr. Bout as it expected to be taking into consideration the actual accusations against him (a couple of millions of US dollars is nothing, but a petty amount of money considering today’s standards – this would be scarcely enough to buy two middle-class houses of three-room each in the outskirts of Moscow). So, the American prosecutors apparently plan to exaggerate an importance of his person and to inflate Mr. Bout’s figure to such an extent as to make him to be comparable in value to Osama bin Laden or something of this kind. The above mentioned turns of speech such as “new breed of” and “his crimes against Americans” are quite frank, indeed. They show us that the Americans clearly plan some new round of public hysteria to replace that former one connected to “Al-Qaeda”. Terms such as “new breed” do nothing, but reveal to us their true intentions. From now on we could expect a “new breed” of public hysteria too – this time not in connection with Osama bin Laden, but in connection with alleged “politically neutral shameless illicit weapon traders”. Yes, it is probably true to a certain extent that Mr. Bout himself is “politically neutral”, since the US officials accuse him of acting in “disregard to any political ideology”, as appears from the above statements. However, the US officials themselves, who demand his extradition from Thailand are absolutely not “politically neutral”. They are politically motivated and this is pretty obvious and evident of itself.

The American side claims that Mr. Bout was allegedly so “dangerous” that he, being simply a private person (and not so rich private person we should add), managed to allegedly successfully threaten the entire United States, that boasts population of over 400 million people, and boast one of the most efficient armed forces, navy, air force, and intelligence apparatus in the modern world. Firstly, such a claim of Americans is nothing but ridiculous. Secondly, such a claim, however ridiculous it is, has nothing to do with jurisprudence. To declare someone an enemy of the state is obviously something to do with high politics. So, to summarize all the above mentioned we could say that the much publicized personality of Mr. Bout does not even look like that of an ordinary petty criminal, whose case must be heard in a normal criminal court. This figure is nothing but inflated over any measurements imaginary bugaboo clearly designed by the American spin-doctor to scare general public – in the same manner as the figure of Osama bin Laden does. If this kind of attitude by the American side towards Mr. Bout is not a political matter, what then is a political one? The defense therefore sincerely believes that the entire current attempt of the Americans to implicate Mr. Bout into this imaginary so-called “crime” (which was from its beginning and to its end conceived and performed by the DEA alone) was nothing but a politically motivated theatrical production. In order to justify its obvious failures, the US Administration much needed at least some imaginary victories to justify its existence and its exaggerated expenditures before the public. So it shall be considered that this provocation against Mr. Bout and his arrest in Bangkok were nothing but one of these much needed imaginary victories to calm down the American public. Of course, this is a politically motivated case. There shall not be even a slightest doubt in this regard. Due to this reason, the defense believes that provisions of Section 1 (b), Article 3, of the Act on Extradition between The Kingdom of Thailand and The United States of America B.E. 2533 shall be applied to the current case of his extradition and the request of the Americans shall be rejected based on these grounds alone.

2.9. Questions on whether alleged offences being incriminated to Mr. Viktor Bout are indeed extraditable offences in accordance with the Act on Extradition between The Kingdom of Thailand and The United States of America B.E. 2533. A basic principle to distinguish an offence as being an extraditable offence in accordance with this Act is that such an offence must be considered being an offence punishable by imprisonment for more than one year not only in one state, but in both states. So, if some particular offense is a crime in The United States, but is not considered being a crime in The Kingdom of Thailand, then this is not an extraditable offence, subject to the abovementioned Act, and an extradition request for such an offence shall not be granted.

2.9.1. There could be, actually, two different approaches to consideration of this matter. One – is very formal (in a sense “superficial”), and the other one – truly considerate and attentive. Let’s say that someone is being accused of committing a murder in the Requesting State. The murder, of course, is nothing but a crime in the Requested State too. So, it appears that in this case a wanted person must necessarily be extradited, since he is accused of an extraditable offense. This is an example of a typically formal and superficial approach. However, a truly attentive approach that aims to consider not only the nature of the actual accusation, but some factual circumstances of the alleged offense might likely reveal some additional details of an alleged murder that might lead to total reconsideration of whether it was a murder at all or not. The current case of Mr. Bout’s extradition is by no means an ordinary case (even the American attorneys honestly admit that this is nothing but the “most extraordinarily serious” case, as was quoted in the above Clause 2.8.4.). Since this case exhibits many characteristics that reveal its truly extraordinary nature, it would be very unfair to implement a formal superficial approach in its consideration. So, it appears for the defense, that a deep, truly considerate and attentive approach to this particular case is required. Based on this premise, let’s look at some factual circumstances of this case with our eyes wide open.

2.9.2. If we imagine that the some claims of the American accusers in regard to the existing conspiracy between Mr. Bout and agent-provocateurs from the DEA to sell the alleged anti-aircraft missiles and other weapons of war to the Colombian rebels are true, it does not mean that Mr. Bout could be accused of conspiring to kill anyone, as it have been considered in the above Clause 2.1.6 in a precise detail.

2.9.3. In addition to the abovementioned, there is another important circumstance to consider. The problem is that from its very beginning to end the entire provocation was conceived and performed by the DEA provocateurs alone, not by any true anti-governmental rebels. So, based on this fact, it shall be clearly understood that no harmful consequences of commission of this alleged offense might occur in either involved countries (Thailand, Columbia, The United States). This alleged offence was doomed to be unsuccessful in any case. So there is actually nothing for Mr. Bout to be punished for. If someone really deserves any punishment in connection with this offense is not Mr. Bout, but his instigators from the DEA.

2.9.4. There is yet another circumstance to be considered. Let’s presume that the American DEA sincerely believed that Mr. Bout had indeed have in his private possession those 100 alleged portable anti-aircraft missiles (that were alleged to be stockpiled somewhere in Bulgaria as they claim in their affidavits). Let’s presume that based on this false, but sincere belief, the American DEA agents sincerely ventured into this unprecedented provocation in order to provoke Mr. Bout to surface with his dangerous goods so that it would be possible not only to arrest him, but also to confiscate his so much feared anti-aircraft missiles. Let’s presume that almost all this provocational operation was successful – Mr. Bout, the main and the only culprit, at last, surfaced, arrived to Bangkok and began negotiating in person with the DEA agents concerning that long-wanted final delivery of his missiles. Would it be then reasonable for an honest policeman to apprehend such a culprit thus depriving him from any opportunity to reveal to the law enforcement the true place where his alleged missiles were being kept? Of course, not. Would not it be much better to pay to Mr. Bout the two million US dollars he allegedly requested as a preliminary payment to begin the missiles delivery? It shall be understood that two million US dollars is not an unaffordable amount of money for the Americans. Indeed, this is what they could afford with ease – they have paid 10 million dollars to Thai police as a bonus for the famous capture of Hambali in 2003, and they officially promised another 25 million for any information leading to the capture of Osama bin Laden, so one shall not doubt that a laughable amount of 2 million US dollars is nothing to them. They could easily pay this money to Mr. Bout if they really wanted to get missiles from him. It is good to remember also that when the US Administration attempted to redeem their own “Stinger” missiles from Pakistani people in the mid-90s that remained there since the time of the first Afghani war, they did not bother to offer as much as 400 thousand US dollars per unit, while an official commercial cost of a “Stinger” was something like 10 times lower. Based on all of these presumptions and observations, one must sincerely expect that when the American law enforcement officials have learned that Mr. Bout allegedly has as much as 100 “Igla” missiles in his possession somewhere in Bulgaria and he was ready to sell them all at once to a highest bidder, “disregarding any political ideology”, they must be willing to get this missiles from him at any cost. What is 2 million US dollars compare to alleged dangers represented by 100 anti-aircraft missiles that are capable of bringing down as many as 100 (!) aircraft if properly used? So, why the DEA provocateurs did not pay to Mr. Bout the 2 million US dollars he allegedly demanded as a pre-payment to begin the missiles delivery? Was it because the Americans suddenly became greedy? Why they paid then 400 thousand per “Stinger” missile in Pakistan just 15 years ago? Were they not greedy then?

So, how come that the Americans today are totally satisfied with the apprehension of only Mr. Bout alone, without seizing of his missiles? They have apparently reconciled themselves with the alleged fact that somewhere in Bulgaria (inside the European Union, by the way) there are still stockpiled some 100 extremely dangerous anti-aircraft missiles that could be easily brought to near any European Union airport (because there is no custom checking anymore when one travels within the entire European Union)? Does the Honorable Court sincerely believe that it was an adequate behavior of those DEA agent-provocateurs and their bosses? To arrest Mr. Bout and to leave his alleged missiles unattended and waiting for just another buyer?  Please, do not believe those liars from the DEA. They knew pretty sure that Mr. Bout has never had any single missile and he was never ever capable of conducting such a business as being ascribed to him. Would it be otherwise, and the DEA really believed that Mr. Bout has these missiles somewhere in Bulgaria, Russia, Armenia, or even in Papua New Guinea, they would never miss such an opportunity to apprehend these 100 missiles too.

2.9.5. Just to logically illustrate how ridiculous is the current accusation of the Americans against Mr. Bout, the defense would like to present to the Honorable Court the following example. Let’s presume that a certain unit of Thai police got some tip from their police informers that such and such person allegedly sells heroin and that person has in his possession somewhere hundreds of kilograms of heroin. Then, upon receiving such a tip, the chief of this police unit decided to check whether it is true or not and if true, then to arrest the heroin seller. Then the police devise a certain provocation operation in order to lure such an alleged drug dealer into a trap. They decide to call him by the phone (and to tape conversation for some future use) and they call him. They ask him: we heard that you sell heroin, is not it? Could we buy some heroin from you? The alleged drug dealer supposedly answers them: yes, I can sell it for you; 25 thousand US dollars per kilogram. Is that price is OK for you? The police say: OK, agreed. Let’s meet tomorrow to discuss the deal in such and such cafeteria.

Tomorrow the undercover policemen took some voice recorder with them to tape a future conversation and they meet the alleged drug dealer in the cafeteria. They greet and ask the alleged drug dealer – is that true that you have a few hundreds of kilogram of heroin in your possession? The drug dealer answers: yes, of course, I have. Do you wish to see some photographs? Here are some photos: you can see all my heroin on these photos. Here is my laptop computer too – you see I have many incoming e-mails where many customers wish to buy heroin from me. I am indeed a big guy and my business is indeed a big business. The undercover policemen ask him: so, if we buy from you to begin with a hundred gram of heroin, to test the quality, and we pay you 75 thousand Baht, is that OK for you? We are planning to retail your heroin in some Thai schools, because we believe that those young children are the best customers. The alleged drug dealer allegedly says, yes, it is OK for me. But, please, give me first 10 thousand Baht as advance payment and we will meet here (or elsewhere) again tomorrow, I will bring you your heroin and you will give me the remaining 65 thousand Baht. At that moment the undercover police reveal themselves as the police, show their police ID-cards and arrest the alleged drug dealer. They did not even bother to try to discover whether he has any heroin in reality, and they did not wish to wait for tomorrow when the drug dealer might bring to them 200 grams of it. They do not wish also to trace the alleged drug dealer in order to discover where he would go after the meeting (it is very likely that he will go to some place where he keeps his hundreds of kilograms of heroin in order to take the 200 grams that he promised to sell to the undercover police).

All the police team did – they promptly apprehended the alleged drug dealer and brought him straight to a press-conference where they invited all available TV-channels, all newspaper reporters, and all international news agencies representatives. In that press-conference the police show the alleged drug dealer in handcuffs and solemnly declare to the journalists that today, at last, the police managed to catch one of the most dangerous drug-dealer, who deals in hundreds of kilograms of heroin and, moreover, he sells his heroin mostly to innocent school children. His arrest was a result of some well-planed, successful sting-operation. So, the arresters would say: today the air in The Kingdom of Thailand has became much cleaner, because such a notorious drug-dealer was at last put out of his disgusting business.

After such a press conference the police deliver the drug dealer to the Criminal Court, ask for 12 days warrant of detention and they repeat so another 6 times (7 times by 12 days) for alleged preliminary inquiry. At the end of 84 days some public prosecutor submits a criminal charge against that person to the Criminal Court. The charge would read: “This man is being indicted not only on the actual possession of several hundreds kilograms of heroin with an intention to sell it, but also on an attempted murder of Thai school children, because the prosecution believes that the heroin he attempted to sell to the undercover police agents was indeed intended to be sold in Thai schools. So many Thai children would die from overdose of it or die from AIDS which they would contract by sharing syringes that would be used to inject heroin that was sold to them by this man”.

Would the Thai Court believe such an accusation? Of course, not. Where is evidence that this person indeed possessed any heroin as claimed? Where is an official report of a drug expertise that such and such white powder was indeed a heroin? Many more questions will be asked and none of them will be properly answered by the prosecution witnesses. The only “evidence” the prosecution witnesses would probably offer to the Court would be that taped telephone conversation and another taped conversation in cafeteria where the alleged drug dealer boasted that he allegedly had hundreds of kilograms of heroin. But would be that “evidence” enough to convict him for being high-scale illicit drug-dealer? Of course, not. This person would be found not guilty in such a ridiculous accusation and totally acquitted.

2.9.6. Based on the above example, we should presume that the police would never behave like it was mentioned above in similar circumstances. They would either: pay the 10 thousand Baht to the alleged drug dealer and so try to provoke him further – into a real delivery of alleged heroin. Or, as a variety, the police would try to trace this person in order to find out where he keeps his alleged heroin. Or, they will try to find out who is this alleged drug dealer, where he resides, who are his relatives, friends, business partners and other acquaintances, so that the police would have chance to conduct some undercover surveillance for a while with the same reason in mind – trying to discover where this alleged drug dealer keeps his alleged “hundred kilograms of heroin”. The Thai police would never behave as stupidly as described in the above example. Because the police actually need to confiscate the heroin, this is their primary target. The person of alleged drug dealer is their secondary target, because hundreds of kilograms of heroin would be apparently more important for them (especially considering that the police would never be able to win the criminal case in any Court of Law against such an alleged drug-dealer anyways without having confiscated his heroin as evidence).

2.9.7. Another consideration shall be applied to this particular explanation. Even in the eyes of the Thai Justice the 2 million US dollars might appear a “big” sum of money, in reality it is not so big amount. Many years have passed since a “million” US dollars was really a “million”. Nowadays a million US dollars is nothing but a cost of a not very expensive house in a big city, a cost of two four-room apartments in a middle of big city, or a cost of two prestigious sport cars. A million US dollars is not big money anymore and a person who today posses even a few million US dollars could not be considered being a “millionaire” in a former sense of this word. It is just a middle-class man, who is not too rich. On the other hand, it shall be understood, that the 2 million US dollars allegedly demanded by Mr. Bout as an advance payment for the missiles delivery is not a big money for the DEA. The DEA, as well as any other US enforcement agencies, enjoys virtually unlimited supply of cash from the pockets of an American taxpayer, so that the 2 million US dollars for the DEA is about as petty amount as 10 thousand Baht for the Thai police in the above sample. If it would be stupid for the Thai police not to pay 10 thousand Baht in order to have an opportunity to seize a few hundred kilograms of heroin, it would be about the same stupid for the DEA not to pay petty 2 millions US dollars in order to have an opportunity to seize 100 of the alleged anti-aircraft missiles.

2.9.8. The defense believes that this explanation is clear enough. Of course, the above-mentioned example is rather extreme, but the problem is that it is totally comparable with the extremely ridiculous accusations against Mr. Bout. There is no much difference in behavior of such an imaginary police team in an exemplary case of a Thai drug-dealer, and that of the real DEA team which lured Mr. Bout into similar circumstances and managed to apprehend him, rather than to seize his alleged missiles.

This just an example why the Honorable Thai Court shall not believe the American accusers even to a slightest extent. They are all liars and they would never be able to win such a ridiculous accusation would such a criminal case undergo trial in the Thai Court. Moreover, this example successfully proves that Mr. Bout has never had even a single anti-aircraft missile and the American DEA agents were pretty sure of this fact. The DEA agents did not even attempt to trace and seize the alleged missiles, because they knew in advance that there was nothing to seize anyways. Their accusations in their entirety are totally false and were false from their very beginning.

2.9.9. In addition to the abovementioned, the defense would like to refer to some real and well-known case of attempted selling of a portable “Igla” missile to alleged terrorists. This case was briefly mentioned at the end of Exhibit No.1 in a Chapter named “Use in alleged plot against Air Force One”.  This was a famous case of a certain Mr. Hemant Lakhani, a British national of Indian origin, who was intercepted attempting to bring what he had thought was an older-generation “Igla” missile into the USA. It was reported that, after the Federalnaya Sluzhba Bezopasnosti (FSB) – Russian Secret Service – detected him in Russia seeking to obtain such a missile from its manufacturing factory, he was approached by US undercover agents posing as Somalia terrorists wanting to shoot down a commercial plane. He was then provided with a non-working “Igla” by undercover Russian agents, and arrested in Newark, New Jersey, when making the delivery of a real, but non-operable “Igla” missile to the undercover US agent. This person was consequently punished by the New Jersey District Court, the United States of America, by 47 years of imprisonment. Please, see for your reference also Exhibits No.12 and No.13).  [enclose here two BBC articles that describe the case of Hemant Lakhani]. As the Honorable Court may see from this case, even though this case was also a pure provocation by various secret services from its beginning to its end, this case of Mr. Lakhani has some very different features if compare it to the Mr. Bout’s case. The first difference is that the secret services, who successfully managed to entrap Mr. Lakhani, decided to do so not because they hate Indians in general and not because the hate Mr. Lakhani in particular. The problem was that Mr. Lakhani was the one who has initiated the would be deal and has so attracted attention from Russian secret services at the first instance. He was roaming around Russia and trying to make contacts with some people who work in a factory that actually manufactures these “Igla” missiles. Of course, his behavior was considered extremely dangerous and the secret services of Russia and the United States have decided to provoke him further and so to be able to arrest him and to put him out of his dangerous enterprise. It is notable, that neither Russian, nor US secret services, believed that they could arrest this man simply because he approached the missile-making factory and not even because of his verbal or written in e-mail preliminary arrangements with prospective buyers of the missiles. If compare this case with the case of Mr. Bout we could expect the secret services to arrest Mr. Lakhani straight away, without letting him any chance to touch any missile whatsoever. Strangely enough, the secret services in this case decided to go much further, because they probably realized that they would not be able to win such an accusation in the US Court if they would not provoke some factual delivery attempt with an existing “Igla” missile (even a non-working one, but real). For this reason, the secret services went so far that they allowed Mr. Lakhani to have a REAL missile in his hands, travel with it to the United States and, instead of arresting him right at the customs checkpoint, they allowed him to proceed further and to bring the REAL missile to a meeting with alleged terrorists. Why did they prefer to undergo all of these difficulties rather than arresting Mr. Lahani at the first instance – when he only revealed his true intentions approaching the missile-making factory? It is pretty easy to answer this reasonable question. This happened because the secret services personnel involved in this case were apparently responsible people. They wanted it to make sure that Mr. Lakhani was not a joker and he would indeed to go that far as to pick up a real missile into his hands, deliver it to the United States, and that he will indeed sell it not to the weapons collectors, not to any museum and not to the American Military Intelligence Office as a sample of some foreign weaponry. The secret services in this case wanted to be 100% sure that Mr. Lakhani brought this missile to the United States with an intention to sell it to real terrorists, not to the weapons collectors.

2.9.10. Still, it shall be noted from the attached Exhibit No.14 [enclose here BBC article named  «What is a legal sting?»] that in the United States and elsewhere there was a heated discussion in the wake of Mr. Lakhani arrest on whether the secret services agents behaved appropriately in this particular sting operation against Mr. Lakhani or not. Many people have indeed raised a question of whether such a sting operation was legal, or the secret services have overdone with entrapment in their zeal to enforce the law. Considering that even in the abovementioned sting-operation question of legality was raised quite sharply, what could we say in regard to a disgusting provocation against Mr. Bout? Where he was virtually forced into an alleged crime which he otherwise have never even dream to commit? In this regard, the defense believes, would be very appropriate to mention here words of Hon. Justice Byron White, as was quoted in the abovementioned Exhibit No.14 (highlighted with red). Here is the full quotation:

“In the majority Supreme Court ruling in that case in 1992, Justice Byron White wrote: “In their zeal to enforce the law, however, government agents may not originate a criminal design, implant in an innocent person’s mind the disposition to commit a criminal act, and then induce commission of the crime so that the government may prosecute.”

Justice White also wrote: “When the government’s quest for convictions leads to the apprehension of an otherwise law-abiding citizen who, if left to his own devices, likely would have never run afoul of the law, the courts should intervene.””

Unfortunately, it seems that much water has flowed under the bridges in America since 1992 and the Americans began to forget their own former principles just 15 years later… Anyhow, the defense believes that written words of Hon. Justice Byron White still could be used as a guidance in the Thai proceedings, even if the Americans themselves do not wish to use them anymore: when a person is entrapped by government agents, who, otherwise, if left to his own devices, would likely never violate any law, the court should interfere [on behalf of such an entrapped person]. Hereby the Honorable court is kindly requested to interfere as said and at last to establish the justice which is deserved by the victim of this disgusting provocation.

2.9.11. So, considering the above two samples – one with an imaginary sting-operation by the Thai police unit against an alleged heroin dealer, and one with a real 2003 sting-operation where a real “Igla” missile was involved – we could, at last, understood that Mr. Bout case was nothing but an utterly fake, an utterly malicious, and an absolutely disgusting frame-up, which has nothing to do either with the so-called “terrorism”, or with Jurisprudence. It was based on nothing, but on a hatred of the Americans towards Russia and Russians in general and towards Mr. Viktor Bout in particular. This case is just some kind of continuation of the Cold War. This entire accusation is nothing, but a political game. The Americans just needed some small “victory” in order to impress the public opinion, and they thought that Mr. Viktor Bout was a suitable target of such a “victory”. Unfortunately to the American provocateurs, their supposed “small victory” should turn out to become a total disaster for them. They truly deserve this kind of outcome. So, the Honorable Court is kindly requested to this effect.

Based on the reasons explained above, the defense kindly requests the Honorable Court not to believe the accusers and to reject the ridiculous extradition request by the United States.

2.10. Defamation matters. Considering all abovementioned, we shall presume that the current DEA move against Mr. Bout was not just only politically motivated, it was apparently ordered by some high-ranking US officials. There shall not be even a slightest doubt that it was not a local chief of the DEA who decided to conduct such an unprecedented frame-up against an innocent person. The DEA chief could only venture into such a reckless scheme if he had a distinct order to do so from the very top of the US political establishment. It shall be understood, that a mere cop, however high-ranking, would never dare to conduct such a dubious operation at his own risk. He would be afraid to end up in the jail. So such a cop must necessarily feel protected from the very top of the hierarchy, which means that this particular performance was without any doubt ordered by high-ranking politicians, possibly by people such Condoleezza Rice or George W. Bush personally. In these circumstances it is not surprising that Mr. Viktor Bout was so severely defamed and otherwise treated unfairly.

2.10.1. It shall be mentioned also that from the very beginning legal rights of Mr. Bout were constantly violated. For example, the corrupt Thai police, being at the pay of the Americans, attempted to illegally prolong the time legally allotted for the Americans to come up with their extradition request (60 days) by pretending to conduct some alleged “preliminary inquiry” against Mr. Bout in accordance with the Thai criminal jurisdiction. To this effect, the Thai police requested the Criminal Court to detain Mr. Bout three times by 12 days each (please, see for your reference Exhibits No.6, No.15 and No.16) [enclose here remand requests to detain Victor Bout for 12 days ?2 ? ?3, since. ?1 is already the Exhibit No.6, mentioned above]. More that that, the Thai police requested the Court not to grant Mr. Bout any provisional release. While in prison, Mr. Bout was held in special conditions, that were different from conditions of the rest of prisoners which greatly violated his legal rights of a person being not yet punished, but merely accused (please, see for your reference Exhibit No.17) [enclose here either original or a copy of the “Bangkok Post” newspaper where the prison director talks about the fact that life of Victor Bout is not so sweet under his supervision and he has a much harsher treatment than the rest of the prisoners] It shall be understood, that the Thai police, who requested to detain Mr. Bout for as long as 33 days for an alleged preliminary inquiry in the Black Case No. P.585/2551 and not to grant him any provisional release, knew perfectly well that they would not sue him at the end of 48 days, because their entire attempt was nothing but “legally-looking” criminal trick to please their US masters. The defense plans to sue the police offenders in both – criminal and civil charges in connection with their attempt to fabricate the abovementioned criminal case Black Case No. P.585/2551 and to legally pursue some punishment for the offenders that they deserve. However, the defense sincerely hopes that a wise verdict of the Honorable Court in the current case would partly settle this matter, since Mr. Bout, who has really suffered a lot of undeserved damage, might feel at least some moral satisfaction that could to a certain extent compensate for all those damaged inflicted.

2.10.2. Another defamation matter with Mr. Bout is that the Thai police (those, who were directly involved in Mr. Bout’s case, of course) together with their American masters, did nothing but trumpet all over Thailand and the entire world that Mr. Bout was allegedly a a high-profile illicit weapons trader, whose activities allegedly “fuel” many regional conflicts in Africa and Asia. (please, see for your reference several articles about Mr. Bout – Exhibit No.18) [here to enclose 2-3 most hysterical articles from Thai newspapers]. It shall be understood, that neither the Americans, nor their cronies have ever been able to bring even a single piece of evidence that might confirm their claims that Mr. Bout was an illicit weapon dealer. Mr. Bout has never been found guilty by any court of being such an illicit weapons dealer and he was never been legally alleged of being such an illicit weapons dealer. It is pretty clear that Mr. Bout is just an innocent person, who suffers from some intense politically motivated persecution. Why then the Americans and their Thai accomplices have unleashed such an intense public defamation campaign against Mr. Bout in the local and international mass-media after his arrest?  It is quite easy to answer this question. The Americans, who are, indeed, good specialists in political propaganda and other related PR disciplines, have unleashed this unprecedented defamation campaign in order to influence the Thai Court and so to prejudice the Thai Court against Mr. Bout’s personality. The defense believes that all these articles in mass-media serve to the great detriment of Mr. Bout’s position in legal proceedings against him. The Americans got used to their own court system that is based on a jury. This kind of trial system makes it an extremely easy task to influence jurors by a well-organized propaganda campaign. Mr. Bout’s personality was so highly publicized, and so much was said about him, that would his case really come to the United States court, he is doomed to be found guilty, because jurors in such a court would never perceive that Mr. Bout is nothing but a small businessman from near Moscow. They will not see Mr. Bout in him. The jurors will rather see in him Nicolas Cage, because each of the jurors, without any doubt, has seen the movie “The Lord of War” and each of the jurors has known that this movie was about Mr. Bout. That was a malicious plan by the American spin-doctors. They did not make all this hysterical defamation campaign against Mr. Bout only in order to defame him. They did that with a totally different reason in mind – they wanted to create such a negative atmosphere around his personality, that he will lose his case in the court just because of the prejudice against him. However, unluckily to the American spin-doctors, this particular trick might not work in the Kingdom of Thailand. Unlike in the United States, where jurors are commoners who know nothing about jurisprudence, the court in the Kingdom of Thailand consists of professional judges, who suppose not to care at all of what was written about Mr. Bout in newspapers and suppose to stick to the facts only.

2.10.3. Additionally, the defense would like to bring a kind attention of the Honorable Court to some distinctly separate part of the defamation matter, namely to the alleged aliases of Mr. Viktor Bout that seems to be too many.

2.10.3.1. If we look at the documents of the Black Case P.585/2551 (such as Exhibit No.6, for example), we could notice that Mr. Bout is alleged to have at least two distinctly different aliases: Mr. Viktor Anatoljevich Bout, or BUTT, or BOUTOV, or SERGITOV. The inquirer simply mentioned all of these aliases, without further elaboration, while he knew perfectly well that Mr. Bout was arrested in Thailand holding his Russian passport that bore his only name and surname: “Viktor But” (without “o” in the surname as claimed). The middle name “Anatoljevich” or “Anatolievitch” – the exact spelling in Latin letters depends on a kind of transliteration – is a so-called “Patronimic” name, which is traditionally being used in Russia only, but never outside of Russian borders. This middle name in Christian Orthodox tradition means that its bearer was born of a legal wedlock and that his father’s name was “Anatoli”. Since to use patronymics is a typically Russian tradition (in Europe and America it was abolished sth. like 500-600 years ago and totally forgotten by today), the Russian documents issued for international use would never include any patronymics. Moreover, it is not even necessary to transliterate Russian patronymics from Cyrillic letters to Latin ones, because there is simply no reason to do so – they are not going to be used abroad of Russia anyways. That is exactly why Russian passports issued for travel abroad would never contain any patronymic name. The passport form does not even contain a necessary line where such a patronymic could be filled in. Such a passport form contains only lines intended for a name and a surname of a bearer. This is well-known fact to the American police. So they did not need to bother to translate Cyrillic patronymic name of Mr. Viktor Bout to English, because they knew it perfectly well that it is not going to be officially used anyways. Even Russians themselves never write any patronymic names in their passports. So, why then the Americans and their Thai cronies went so far as to discover that Mr. Bout’s father’s name was “Anatoli” and his Cyrillic patronymic supposes to be “Anatoljevich”? Why they transliterated this middle name into Latin, while they knew very well that it is not even tranliterable and could only be used in original Cyrillic?

It appears, that this particular trick was done with utterly malicious intention: the accusers of Mr. Bout would like to create a wrong impression in the Honorable Court that Mr. Bout is indeed a “bad” guy, because he could be called in many different manners that allegedly “reveals” some great cheater in him, because it might somehow appear to the Court that Mr. Bout has habit of changing his names too often.

In reality it is not so. Mr. Viktor Bout, whose name in Cyrillic looks like this: “?????? ???”, has only one manner of spelling of his personal name in Latin: “Viktor” – always through “k”, rather than through “c” – since it is an official Russian transliteration of this name from Cyrillic to Latin. And Mr. Bout has only two manners of spelling of his surname: “Bout” and “But”. Why two? The problem was that before the middle of the 90s, Russia still used the so-called “French manner of transliteration from Cyrillic to Latin” where the Cyrillic letter “?” (sounds [ouu] – equivalent of Latin “u”) must be transliterated as “ou”. Since the middle of 90s, Russia has adopted a new, the so-called “British manner of transliteration from Cyrillic to Latin” where the same Cyrillic letter “?” renders as “u”, rather than “ou”. That is why, in former Soviet and first Russian passports of Mr. Viktor Bout his family name was spelled as “Bout”, but in a new edition of Russian passport his family name spells “But”. However, both of these spellings are correct, because both were in accordance with the contemporary official transliteration rules adopted by the Soviet Union and then – by Russian Federation. Mr. Viktor Bout is not guilty even to a slightest extent that he has two names: “Bout” and “But”. It just so happened. So, to summarize it, his contemporary name is “Viktor But” and his name in former Soviet and first Russian passports was “Viktor Bout”. He has never been “Viktor Anatoljevich Bout” as claimed, because the middle name (patronymic) even though legally correct, could not be used in any other language than Russian, and could not be rendered in Latin letters, but only in Cyrillic ones. The defense would like to explain to the Honorable Court all these technicalities, because it wishes to disprove this particular dirty trick of the accusers, maliciously intended to create a wrong impression about Mr. Bout’s personality. It is well-known that only tough criminals use many aliases, but not any decent and law-abiding citizens. So, the mere fact that Mr. Bout allegedly uses so many different aliases and so many different spellings of his original name, should create such a negative impression. This dirty trick shall not be allowed.

2.10.3.2. In the abovementioned Exhibit No.6, the Thai police inquirer claims that, besides being “Viktor Anatoljevich Bout” (which is already incorrect, since the inquirer has had in his possession a contemporary passport of Viktor But, where his name is spelled differently and middle-name-patronymic is not used at all), the Accused allegedly used the following aliases:

- BUTT;

- BUTOV;

- SERGITOV.

However, the inquirer did not even bother to provide the Honorable Court with any proof of that any of the three additional alleged aliases has been ever used or suspected to be used by the Accused. He simply stated that the Accused has these three additional aliases as if it were a matter of fact. The police inquirer is nothing but a liar. The Accused would like to state that he has never in his life used names such as “BUTT”, “BUTOV” or “SERGITOV” even once and hears of all of these alleged aliases for the first time in his life.

2.10.3.2. In the document, copy of which is an Exhibit No.18, on its pages 3 and 4, [here to enclose the first letter from the US Embassy – the request for the arrest and provisional detention of Bout and Smulian of 29^th of February, 2008] the accusers claim that Mr. Bout allegedly possessed not only his Russian passport No.0006765, but also an alleged British passport No.K163077. From this ridiculous claim, a reasonable question comes: was Mr. Bout also a British citizen, in addition to being a Russian citizen? Did the American accusers elaborate whether Mr. Viktor Bout also held any British citizenship? No. Did the Americans elaborate whether the alleged “British passport” of Mr. Bout was false or original? No. Did the Americans elaborate whether the alleged “British passport” of Mr. Bout was legally issued or received through some cheating means, or stolen? No. Did the Americans elaborate whether the alleged “British passport” of Mr. Bout bore his correct name “Viktor Bout” or some other name was written into it? No. Did the Americans provide the Thai side with any photocopy of the alleged “British passport” of Mr. Bout? No.

So, how come than that the Americans claimed to be aware not only of the fact that Mr. Bout allegedly used some “British passport”, but they claimed to know even this alleged British passport’s number, but they did not elaborate neither of the abovementioned questions? Was it really difficult for the American police to contact their British colleagues with a question: “Hey, colleagues, have you really issued the British passport No.K163077 to a certain Russian, whose name is supposedly Viktor Bout? Or if not, do you have any report that a blank of a British passport No.K163077 was stolen from some of your passport offices?” No, definitely it was not difficult at all to the American accusers to investigate the alleged matter of this British passport, thanks to the fact that a serial number of this passport was allegedly known. Such an investigation would not take for them long – in only a few hours they would already have an exact answer from their British colleagues.

Why the American accusers did not make such an investigation? Why they did not obtain any explanation from the British on whether Mr. Bout possessed his alleged British passport legally or illegally? Why did not they obtain this passport’s photocopy from British? Why they did not supply the Thai side with such a photocopy when requesting the Thai side for his arrest pending an extradition request? Why until now the prosecution did not submit to the Honorable Court any documented evidence proving that a British passport No.163077 has been allegedly used by Mr. Viktor Bout for some malicious reason or for any other reason?

It is quite easy to answer all of these reasonable questions: because the Americans knew it for sure that Mr. Viktor Bout has never ever used such a British passport as they claim. This particular story is nothing, but a “beautification” of an extradition request, that is primarily intended to make a person of Mr. Bout to look a bit “more criminal” than he really is. This is just another dirty trick intended to impress the Thai official when demanding of Mr. Bout’s extradition.

2.10.3.3. As it appears from the current case of the extradition of Mr. Bout, the Americans claim that Mr. Viktor, besides being “Bout” and “But” (that is already explained above), also uses the following additional aliases:

- Boris (family name is missing);

- Viktor Budd;

- Viktor Bulakin;

- Vadim Markovich Aminov (in this particular one the Americans again used a patronymic, despite of the fact that there is no legal practice to use Latin transliteration of patronymics).

If someone carefully reviews the entire set of documents provided by the Requesting State (i.e. by the American accusers), he will never find in this set any mentioning that Mr. Bout in such and such circumstances has ever used any of the aliases such as “Budd”, “Bulakin” or “Vadim Markovich Aminov” in either commission of any alleged offence, or in any other circumstances. There is simply not even a single indication that Mr. Bout has ever used any of the additional aliases ascribed to him. Why the American accusers bother so much to do this again? The answer is very simple. They continue to implement the same dirty trick as was described in the above Clauses 10.3.1 and 10.3.2. All they want that the Honorable Thai Court would acquire a negative impression of the Accused’s personality. It is implied that Mr. Viktor Bout is allegedly a “bad” guy, because only criminals use so many aliases. It is as simple as this.

The Accused hereby would like to state: he has used only these spellings of his name and surname: “Viktor Bout” (formerly) and “Viktor But” (presently). He has never used name “Boris”; he has never used surname “Budd”; he has never used surname “Bulakin”; and he has never used set of the names: “Vadim Markovich Aminov”. All these claims by the accusers that he allegedly used so many different names are nothing but a blatant lie and a dirty trick intended to create a negative impression of his personality. The defense hereby kindly requests the Honorable Court to seriously consider this particular matter and to reject all these alleged aliases of the Accused based on the grounds that the prosecution failed to provide any evidence to support these particular allegations of having so many names.

2.11. The defense would like to additionally consider each of the four alleged offenses for which the current extradition is requested, independently of each other. The Requesting State (the United States) claims that Mr. Bout has been indicted in the United States for the four different offences, which are as follows:

1) attempted to kill United States nationals;

2) conspired to kill officers and employers of the United States;

3) conspired to acquire and use anti-aircraft missiles;

4) conspired to provide material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization.

Let’s consider each of the fore one-by-one trying to establish whether all of them are indeed extraditable offences or not.

2.11.1. The accusation No.3 (a conspiracy to acquire and use anti-aircraft missiles). This is an apparent crime under the United States that prescribes a minimum penalty of 25 years of imprisonment and a maximum penalty – the life-term imprisonment. The American side has provided a conclusive proof to this effect. But the problem is that such a conduct, however it is criminal in accordance with the American law, is not a crime in accordance with the Thai law. There is no mentioning of such a crime or another crime that even remotely resembles such a crime in the Criminal Procedure Code of Thailand, or in any other applicable Thai law.  The American side failed to provide any proof that such a conduct indeed constituted any offence that is punishable in accordance with the Thai law. This is understandable, indeed, because there is no such proof exists. This is simply not a crime in the Kingdom of Thailand. Based on this grounds, the current extradition request for an alleged offense No.3 shall be rejected. This particular offense is not an extraditable kind of offense as provided for by the Section 1, Article 2, of the Act on Extradition between the Kingdom of Thailand and The United States of America B.E.2533 (1990).

2.11.2. The accusation No.4 (a conspiracy to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization). This is indeed a crime under the penal laws of both countries – the Kingdom of Thailand (Section 135 of the Penal Code) and the United States of America. However, the problem is that this particular offense fell under a principle of dual jurisdiction in accordance with the provisions of Section 5, paragraph 1 of the Penal Code of Thailand. The alleged offense of negotiating an illicit weapons deal with alleged “terrorists” was without any doubt committed inside the Thai territorial jurisdiction, since the alleged negotiation took place in a hotel situated in the middle of Bangkok. If to compare legal rights of The United States and of The Kingdom of Thailand over who have more rights to prosecute such an offender, The Kingdom of Thailand has about 99,9% rights against 0,1% remaining to The United States.

The nature of the actual alleged offense is as follows: some foreign criminal (who is not even an American citizen) meet some other criminals (who are presumably Colombian citizens, not American) to discuss with them a matter to arm a foreign terrorist organization (not an American terrorist organization, but a Colombian one). He allegedly conspires with them to make an illegal weapons delivery to a sovereign territory of another state (this state is Colombia, not The United States). The main military aim of this allegedly “terrorist” organization is to violently overthrow the democratically elected government of Colombia (but not that of The United States). The main political aim of this allegedly “terrorist” organization is to enforce Communist rule in Colombia (and not to enforce any Communist rule in The United States). The actual places where the alleged offence occurred were: 1) Netherland Antilles (Curaçao); 2) Romania; 3) Denmark; 4) Russia; 5) supposedly Bulgaria; 5) might be Armenia; 6) would be – Colombia; 7) and definitely – Thailand (where the final negotiation over the alleged deal took place). It did not happen in The United States even in the least part. Of course, the most rights to prosecute Mr. Bout and to pursue his extradition belong to the Government of Colombia. It is probably possible, that Bulgaria is the next country to demand Mr. Bout’s extradition since it is claimed that he allegedly stored his deadly anti-aircraft missiles in this country. It is also possible that Russia is the next in a queue to seek his extradition, because his alleged 100 “Igla” missiles are Russian-made (probably stolen from Russian arsenals) and a bigger part of negotiations were conducted from Russian territory where Mr. Bout resides. The Kingdom of Thailand is probably the next – it has also a lot of legal rights to prosecute Mr. Bout, because some part of his alleged offense was definitely committed in its sovereign territory and it is within its territorial jurisdiction where Mr. Bout was eventually arrested. Since neither Colombia, nor Russia, nor Bulgaria reveals any intention to pursue an extradition of Mr. Bout, The Kingdom of Thailand is, undoubtedly, the country that is legally entitled to prosecute Mr. Bout for his alleged offence. But what this case has to do with the United States of America? Nothing, except that the team of agent-provocateurs were the United States employees who conducted their theatrical production at the expense of the American taxpayer.

Without any doubt The Kingdom of Thailand has incomparably more legal rights to prosecute Mr. Viktor Bout for this particular accusation No.4, than its only remaining competitor – The United States. So, exactly in accordance with the request of the United States (that is highlighted with blue in the Exhibit No.6), The Kingdom of Thailand has already attempted to criminally proceed against Mr. Viktor Bout for this particular alleged offence (Section 135 of its Penal Code). That was a criminal case Black No. P.585/2551 at the Criminal Court. This criminal case continued for 33 days being still at the stage of the preliminary inquiry, but has eventually resulted in a non-prosecution order. Apparently, the Thai inquirers and Public Prosecutors were unable to find any evidence solid enough to prosecute Mr. Bout. The Americans, who apparently realized that there was dual jurisdiction existed over this matter, have voluntarily forgo their legal rights to prosecute Mr. Bout for this particular offence, by requesting their Thai colleagues to do so in their stead.

This is absolutely clear matter of fact that should not allow any ambiguous interpretation. The Americans have simply forgone their rights in this regard, ceded their rights to Thailand, and they have done so irrevocably. It is clear that it were the Americans who initiated the proceedings and requested the Thai police to prosecute Mr. Bout (please, read the Exhibit No.6, highlighted with blue). Since both sides in the current extradition procedure agreed on this point – the American side requested Thai side to prosecute Bout and the Thai side has duly accepted the request and has already proceeded against Mr. Bout in the abovementioned criminal case Black No. P.585/2551, this matter shall be deemed satisfying the provisions of Article 4 of the Act on Extradition between the Kingdom of Thailand and The United States of America B.E.2533. Irrespectively of whether the actual charge has reached the court on this case or not, it shall be considered that the criminal proceedings have already taken place and they can not be repeated in connection with the same alleged offense in neither The Kingdom of Thailand, nor in The United States of America. If so happens it will be against the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code of Thailand B.E.2477, Sections 146 and 147, and against the provisions of the Article 4, and Section 2, Article 5 of the Act on Extradition between the Kingdom of Thailand and The United States of America B.E.2533.

Even though provisions of Section 3, Article 5, of the same Act stipulate that extradition shall not be precluded when the Requested State decided not to prosecute the person sought for the same acts, it shall not be applicable to this particular case. Because a non-prosecution order in the criminal case Black No. P.585/2551 was not based on the grounds of pending extradition to the United States. It was based merely on the lack of evidence to charge the Accused in the Thai court. So, this one should be exactly the ground to refuse his extradition for the same alleged offence and to implement provisions of the Section 2, Article 5, of the same Act.

2.11.3. The accusations No.1 and No.2 (conspiracy to kill US nationals and conspiracy to kill officers and employees of the US). Since these two remaining accusations are similar in nature, we could consider them together. The main count of offence being incriminated to Mr. Bout was an alleged attempt to illegally deliver anti-aircraft missiles into the hands of Colombian rebels inside Colombian territory. The rest of accusations – such as “conspiracy to kill United States nationals” and “conspiracy to kill officers and employers of the United States” – are all but derivations from the main count of accusation. If there were some missiles in reality, then these derivations could be derived from this fact. If there were no missiles, than there is nothing to derive. You can not accuse a person of attempting to murder another person with such and such weapon, if the weapon itself does not exist in reality. The defense believes that these two particular accusations could be effectively disproved by either below considerations or by both of these considerations:

1)      It is self-evident, that the American agent-provocateurs were unable to either catch Mr. Bout with some missiles in his hand, or to seize any single missile that could be traced back to belong to Mr. Bout. There were no missiles available in this theatrical production. Not even the fake ones, like in the 2003 case of Mr. Hemant Lakhani (Exhibits No.12, 13, 14). Everything was arranged by the agent-provocateurs to frame Mr. Bout, except the only the actual missiles. So you can not kill anyone with a missile if you do not have any missile to carry out your intention.

2)      As it has been already considered in the above Clause 2.1.6, when someone sells any kind of weapons (be it a knife, a golf-club, a baseball bat, a gun, a tank, or a portable anti-aircraft missile), irrespectively of whether he is licensed to conduct such a trade or not, such a weapon-trader can not be held guilty of possible illegal usage of his goods. Yes, he could be held guilty for illegal sell of his weapons, but he can not be held guilty on any accusations such a “conspiracy with his buyers with an intention to commit murder” and the like. This presumption is self-evident. So, even if Mr. Bout indeed had any missiles in his possession and he indeed attempted to sell these weapons to others, he could be held guilty on the illegal weapons trade, but not on any attempted killing.

2.11.4. To summarize all the abovementioned, we can put it as follows: from all the four counts of accusations claimed by the Americans as legal reasons to pursue Mr. Bout’s extradition:

- the third one is not an extraditable offence by definition;

- the forth one is not an extraditable offence anymore (since he has been already proceeded

against for this offence in Thailand);

- the first two are not offences, considering the actual nature of Mr. Bout’s alleged offence.

So, based on all these consideration, neither of the four mentioned counts is sustainable as

being legal grounds to request someone’s extradition from the Kingdom of Thailand. Either

of the four counts shall be rejected one-by-one and the extradition in whole shall be rejected.

3. Based on all the abovementioned considerations, matters of law and matters of fact, as well as based on existing judicial precedents, the defense kindly requests the Honorable Court to reject the extradition request of the United States in this case as being inconsistent with the Act on Extradition between the Kingdom of Thailand and The United States of America B.E.2533, and to release Mr. Viktor Bout from custody.

President Bush and Cardinal Egan, 2001

This article will not be popular but it is necessary medicine if we White American men are to turn to the God and Father of the Lord Jesus Christ, the Savior of the World.  For we must begin with a godly sorrow and truly repent of our sins, believe the gospel of the saving grace of God in Christ Jesus.  Then, by the faith of the Son of God given to us—that faith being a fruit of the Spirit—we must utterly refuse to continue mass-murdering the Shia Muslims of Iraq.  Gentlemen, we have been duped into fighting the 12th Crusade of the Pope of Rome: we must wake up before it is to late for us, our families and our country.  We have innocent blood on our hands, and we are deserving of national judgment if we repent not.

About a year ago, your editor reviewed the noted documentary film, No End In Sight.  Just yesterday he reviewed the recently released movie Green Zone.  Both movies tell the same terrible story.  The highlights of those painful films are these:

Knight of Malta George J. Tenet Receiving Presidential Medal of Freedom, 2004

1.  Upon General Tommy Franks’ invasion of Iraq, U.S. Forces discovered no Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs).  Iraq’s program intending to develop WMDs was abandoned in 1991, over ten years before the bombing of Baghdad.  This means the primary reason for the American invasion of Iraq on March 19, 2003, was premised upon a LIE!  a damnable, diabolical, depressing LIE!  To this day, no WMDs have been discovered in Iraq and President George W. Bush even joked about this bitter reality before the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, March 24, 2004.  The man who championed the 911 attack as a work of “Al Qaeda” and who later stated that the fact of Iraq having WMDs was “a slam dunk” was Jesuit Georgetown University-trained Knight of Malta and DCI George J. Tenet—the altar boy of Knight of Malta Edward Cardinal Egan.  For this great show, President Bush gave Knight Tenet the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

DCI Tenet, General Franks, President Bush and Iraqi Governor Bremer Awarded Presidential Medal of Freedom, White House, 2004

2.  After the successful “overthrow” of (Jesuit/CIA-creation) Saddam Hussein, American “Governor of Iraq” and CFR-member L. Paul Bremer III disbanded the Iraqi Army, rendering every former soldier, especially those in the Republican Guard, a criminal if he dared to wear a uniform.  This was done over the objections of several high-level American officers.  Therefore, we are forced to conclude Washington FULLY INTENDED to create chaos and the subsequent civil war in Iraq between the Sunnis, Shia and Kurds furthering the “Urban Renewal” of the country.  And why?  Green Zone character Clark Poundstone (the actor being a “spitting image” of L. Paul Bremer III) stated: “We’re doing a good thing here.  We are going to rebuild this place.” (This leads to another question of Biblical proportions:  WHY?)  For their obedience to the Pope’s dictates, crusaders Franks and Bremer were also given the Presidential Medal of Freedom.  At this moment, Rome’s Iraqi Crusade has obligated the American peoples for over 100 Billion Dollars, which are in fact 100 Billion Federal Reserve Debt Notes created out of thin air by the Pope’s Federal Reserve Bank.

U.S. Embassy on 104 Acres, Baghdad, Iraq, 2007

3.  The outlawing of the Iraqi Army, a force that could have brought stability to the nation and the early departure of U.S. Forces, created “The Insurgency” within one week after Bremer made his “decree.”  This criminal act of the calculating and cunning L. Paul Bremer III ignited a civil war and solidified organized military resistance to American Forces in Iraq.  Every bullet or IED that has killed or maimed every American soldier has been fired or set off by the very Iraqi soldiers outlawed by L. Paul Bremer III, that agent for Skull and Bonesman, President George W. Bush.  Further, the more resistance to U.S. Forces, the more justification is provided for Rome’s American-led, open-ended occupation of “coalition forces”—because—“We are going to rebuild this place.” Again, we ask WHY?

Since the above three facts cannot be refuted, for they are part of admitted public record, we must conclude the following:

American Soldiers Killed Because of Rome's CFR/CIA-led Crusade in Iraq

1.  Every Iraqi that has been killed since its invasion of March 19, 2003, has been MURDERED by the military forces of the Pope of Rome, which forces have been led by the U.S. Government based in Washington, “Rome on the Potomac.”

2.  Every American soldier hurt, maimed or killed since the invasion of March 19, 2003, has been MAULED or MURDERED by “The Insurgency” created by the policies of the Pope of Rome through his agent, the U.S. Government.  American soldiers are not “American heroes;” rather, they are “Roman crusaders” as was your editor when garrisoned in West Germany for nearly four years.

3.  Every dollar spent in financing this Jesuit War furthering the plan of the Pope of Rome in defending his “Revived Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem” (Israel) and his rebuilding of the “Revived Kingdom of Babylon” (Iraq) has been spent ILLEGALLY by the U.S. Congress also having consented to the CRIMINAL INVASION of Iraq.  Every American paying the income/excise/privilege tax in financing this 12th Papal Crusade is a party to the CRIMINAL INVASION of Iraq and MASS-MURDER of the Iraqi people who were never a threat to the American people.

Babylonian Empire, 606-536 BC

And WHY this invasion of powerless Iraq?  Because Rome intends to use the blood, treasure, engineering and high technology of the “accursed heretic and liberal” American peoples to rebuild the entire region into a “Revived Kingdom of Babylon” hosting a rebuilt “City of Babylon.” From Dubai to Baghdad it is to be fashioned into the commercial epicenter of the world (Revelation 18:9-14), the crossroads between the continents, North, South, East and West.  At first to be a restored Sunni Caliphate with its capital in Baghdad (after U.S. Forces have been betrayed from within and defeated from without), for which secret but true reason the massive U.S. Embassy has been built, it will be absorbed into the Revived Roman Empire (the Pope’s completed EU—Revelation 13:1-2; Daniel 7:7-8) of the Antichrist/Beast-Man in the middle of the yet future 70th Week of Years (Daniel 9:27).

Roman Empire under Emperor Trajan, Kingdom of Babylon Absorbed, 116 AD

The Seventh Roman Caesar/King (Pope of Rome) will be murdered and rise from the dead to be the Eighth Roman Caesar/King (Revelation 17:10) just days before the first three and one-half years of the coming seven-year period has elapsed.  The Ten Kings of the risen Pope turned Antichrist/Man-Beast will destroy Rome and Vatican City (Revelation 17:16-18).  Following that destruction, the risen Pope turned Antichrist/Man-Beast will move his political/commercial capital of the world to the rebuilt City of Babylon, he to be “the King of Babylon,” (Isaiah 14:4) the city to be “the throne of the kingdom” of the Man-Beast (Revelation 16:10).

Third Hebrew Temple Designed by Scottish-Rite Freemasons, 2000

His religious capital of the world will be Jerusalem in which will be situated the rebuilt Temple of Solomon (II Thessalonians 2:3-4; Matthew 24:15; Revelation 11:1-2).  In the middle of the 70th Week of Years (after the first three and one-half hears, 1260 days) the risen Pope turned Antichrist/Man-Beast will break the seven-year international peace treaty (Daniel 9:27) and go down to Jerusalem.  He will enter into the Hebrew Temple of God and demand to be worshipped as God (Thess. 2:3-4).  Subsequently on that same day, the Man-Beast’s Hebrew False Prophet will erect a statue of the Antichrist/Man-Beast inside the Third Hebrew Temple that is able to speak.  All who do not worship this “image of the beast” televised around the world will be put to death (Revelation 13:11-17).

Ishtar Gate, Rebuilt City of Babylon

Meanwhile, the Antichrist/Man-Beast will depart for his treasure city of rebuilt Babylon there to control the commerce of the world, his Jesuits assigning his name, mark or number (666) to most of the people in the world!  Hence, there will be a formidable link between Jerusalem and Babylon—the two most important cities of Satan’s revived Roman Pope turned Man-Beast ruling the world for 42 months.  Immediately after those dark days of “the Destroyer,” the risen Lord Jesus Christ will return to earth, this time as the “Lion of the Tribe of Judah.”

White men, and especially White Brothers in Christ Jesus, it is time to repent of our sins of commission—the murder of a people that had nothing to do with 911 and whose government had no WMDs!  It is time to repent of our sins of omission—the refusal to face ourselves and think, then act in righteousness in resisting the occult Masonic forces having brought this stupendous shame upon our nation and people.  For those forces involving every secret society are subject to the Society of Jesus whose Superior General rules the Pope of Rome, the American Roman Hierarchy, the secret societies in control of the CFR-directed government of 14th Amendment America and nearly every detail of our very lives.  We must repent, we must return to the reading of the AV1611 Reformation English Bible, we must realize our duty to God and man and then we may be restored to the old paths of righteousness in Christ by the intervening power of the risen Lord Jesus Christ.

Then God the Father, through the intercession of his beloved Son, the Lord Jesus Christ, will fight for us and put the Satan’s Jesuits to flight!

Deepwater Horizon Oil Rig, Burning as it Sinks, April 22, 2010

Your editor has deliberately held off in his analysis pertaining to the Gulf of Mexico oil disaster continuing to fester “out of control.”  At first, considering the explosion and resultant fire that sunk British Petroleum’s Deepwater Horizon (“Horus Rising”) Oil Rig to have been a genuine accident, time was spent listening to others who were actually on site as well as investigative journalists more adept in this field of expertise.  But after over two months of research with aid from other honest advisers, your editor has concluded the following points below.  Remembering the great maxim of the Society of Jesus, “The Ends Justify the Means,” nothing should come as a surprise to the student of the dastardly and diabolical Military Company of Jesus as it destroys the final vestige of the Risen Son of God’s Bible-based, Grand and Glorious, Protestant Reformation here in North America:

666 "Holy Door," St. Peter's Basilica, Rome

1. Jesuit Hollywood Theater foretold in its 2009 release Knowing, featuring Knight of Malta Nicholas Cage, there would be a massive fire on an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico.  The number “666″ is also on a piece of paper seen on the clip, which number is unique to the Papacy, as “666″ in three distinct symbols is on the bronze door of St. Peter’s Cathedral in Rome.  (Notice the six hexagrams on the extreme right seal.  See also your editor’s Conspiracy Conference Power Point, 2008, updated to 700 frames available under “Store” on this website.)  The brief video clip of this segment of Knowing is all over the internet and posted above.

Knight of Malta Geoffrey T. Boisi, Goldman Sachs, Adviser to the Pope

2. A short time prior to the downing of the oil rig, Goldman Sachs sold short in the stocks it held with British Petroleum.  Thus, Goldman Sachs, Wall Street pundit Jim Cramer’s former employer, made a wondrous killing of a profit, the style of which parallels the insider trading depicted in another Jesuit Hollywood release, Wall Street.  Remembering that Pope Benedict XVI had recently stated that Goldman Sachs was “doing God’s business,” and remembering that your editor had proven Rome’s Knights of Malta have been running Goldman for years (via, Knight of Malta Geoffery T. Boisi and others) in his book VAIII, this is the second detail evidencing Rome’s involvement in the fiasco.  The current manager of Goldman Sachs International is Peter Sutherland, another Papal Knight and a chief financial adviser to the Pope.

Papal Knight Peter Sutherland, Goldman-Sachs, Bilderberger

3. British Petroleum had been irresponsible in its drilling operations.  The Deepwater Horizon was not fitted with a safety mechanism that, in theory, would have prevented the accident.  Why?  Surely the cost of the safety device would have been worth the investment had it prevented such an event now “out of control.”  Futher, a dominant chairman within the BP apparatus is none other than Peter Sutherland.  Now we have complicity at the top of both Goldman and BP centered in a financial adviser to the Pope of Rome!  Sutherland’s bio is as follows given by researcher Brian David Anderson:

“Peter D. Sutherland, KCMG, serves as the Managing Director of Goldman Sachs International.  Mr. Sutherland serves as an Advisory Director of Goldman Sachs Group Inc.  He served as the Director General of GATT and Group Secretary and General Counsel of World Trade Organization from 1993 to 1995.  Mr. Sutherland served as an Attorney General of Ireland and also served as European Commissioner from 1985 to 1989 where he was responsible for competition policy. He serves as Chairman of Goldman Sachs International of Goldman Sachs Group Inc.  Mr. Sutherland has been the Non-Executive Chairman of BP Solar International, Inc., since 1997.  He serves as the Chairman of British Petroleum, BP Amoco PLC and United Kingdom.  From 1989 to 1993, he served as the Chairman of Allied Irish Bank.  He served as the Chairman of Yorktown Virginia Refinery since 1997, and BP PLC from May 1997 to October 2009.  He has been a Director of Bergesen Worldwide Limited since July, 2009.  He has been a Director of BP Trinidad & Tobago LLC since 1995, and BP Solar International, Inc., since 1995.  He serves as a Non-Executive Director of Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson.  He serves as a Director of Goldman Sachs International. He has been Member of Supervisory Board at Allianz SE since January, 2010, and serves as a Member of its International Advisory Board.  He also serves as a Member of Advisory Council of TechnoServe, Inc.  Mr. Sutherland served as a Non-Executive Director of BP PLC since July 1995. He serves as a Member of Foundation Board of World Economic Forum.  He served as an Independent Non-Executive Director of National Westminster Bank PLC since January 2001.  He served as an Independent Non-Executive Director of The Royal Bank Of Scotland PLC from January 2001 to February 6, 2009.  He served as a Non-Executive Director of Yorktown Virginia Refinery.  In addition, he serves on the board of Allianz, Koc Holding A.S. [involved in the Gaza Flotilla fiasco] and is a member of the advisory board of pharmaceutical giant, Eli Lilly.  Mr. Sutherland served as Non-Executive Director of BP PLC from 1990 to 1993.  He served as a Director of LM Ericsson Telephone Co. since 1996, Ericsson SPA since 1996 and Investor AB since 1995.  He served as a Non-Executive Director of Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC from January 2001 to February 6, 2009.  He served as a Member of International Advisory Board of CNOOC Ltd. since March 20, 2003.  He holds various board and advisory positions with several global corporations and organizations. He is Chairman of London School of Economics, and UN Special Representative for Migration and Development.  He was awarded an honorary KCMG in 2003.  Mr. Sutherland holds Bachelor of Civil Law from University College Dublin.

But most importantly Peter D. Sutherland has the title of Consultor of the Extraordinary Section of the Administration of the Patrimony of the Apostolic See which means he is “officially” the chief financial advisor to the Vatican.  But in reality his Vatican title means he is a high ranking foot-soldier for the Jesuits and the Pope.”

4. The day the oil rig exploded and caught on fire was April 20, 2010.  This is most intriguing as that day is Hitler’s birthday.  Could this have been a statement that another Hitler is coming, this time to be a fascist military dictator of the American Empire?  The Order has warned of its intent to impose fascism in the U.S. as per another Hollywood movie, JFK.  This is now our fifth piece of evidence pointing to Rome as the culprit behind what appears to be the greatest natural disaster in history—apart from the Great Flood of Noah.

Knight of Malta/DCI Leon Panetta with Davis/Obama

5. As seen in the picture above, the oil rig is sinking on April 22, 2010—two days after the initial explosion.  Notice the gaping hole in the helicopter pad at the top right of the initial photo above.  The metal surrounding the hole is convex in shape, turning down, not up.  Thus, the evidence is clear: something hit the oil rig from above, maybe a missile, a bomb or a high powered laser.  Regardless of the weapon, this means the Unified American Intelligence Community orchestrated the event.  Yes, this is another inside job as was 911.  And the present individual now overseeing the Pope’s American Intelligence Community is a darling of the Jesuits of Santa Clara University, Roman Catholic Director of Central Intelligence Knight of Malta Leon Panetta—whose daughter recently “visited” Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez.  And Chavez—the servant of Knight of Malta King Juan Carlos—is now permitting the Soviet Navy and Airforce to base in his country.  This leads us straight to Mulatto President Barry Davis Obama, the creation of Bilderberger and former National Security Director, White devil Zbigniew Brzezinski—another darling of the Jesuits of both Georgetown University and Fordham University.

Biden and Obama, 2010

6. After the sinking of the oil rig on the 22nd, the muck has been permitted to flow without ceasing.  No real effort has been made to stop the gusher.  Toxic chemicals have been dropped in the millions of pounds further polluting the Gulf, rather than employ tested, safe, biological solutions.  Foreign help was refused. Why?  These decisions lead us to the Obama White House and its secret but true master, Roman Catholic Vice President Joe Biden—the real President of the United States.  Yes, this beloved tool of the Jesuits overseeing their presidential creation is a darling of the Company running their Scranton University and St. Joseph’s University right here in Pennsylvania.  Had enough yet?  One last thing: the Republicans in the Senate are blocking the conferring of powers to launch a full investigation of the disaster as seen here. But let’s stop reciting the facts serving as circumstantial evidence leading to an easy conviction.

The questions that arise are Why Did the Vatican do this? What is the endgame of this sordid scenario? As it appears to your editor, the answer must be the Military Company of Jesus commanded by the Jesuit Superior General is now moving in for the kill, to “extirpate” all of us “heretic and liberal” peoples of the American Empire.  Our White Southern-born, Protestant Presbyterian Constitution and Baptist-Calvinist Bill of Rights are now to be scrapped in favor of a White fascist, anti-Jew, military dictatorship.  Therefore, we can expect the situation to worsen with HAARP-induced tropical hurricanes and possibly a huge explosive detonation at the well-head in the attempt to “stop the flow.”  Whatever course of action pursued will justify radical emergency powers to be wielded by Rome’s “left-wing” Council on Foreign Relations / “right-wing” Council for National Policy agents ruling Washington.  There may well be a monstrous evacuation ordered, as “Mass Evacuation” buses are visible on the highways in the South as seen here.

Most likely, the Empire’s over 800 concentration camps will be opened to receive all those having been first “relocated”—the exact same scenario the Pope’s Nazi-SS put upon the “Jews, heretics and liberals” of Europe.  Those first relocated to holding centers (possibly the Wal-marts) by bus will, in time, be sent to the camps by train.  But the end is not yet.

Red Chinese Army

The purpose of evacuating the coast of the South—from Louisiana to Florida—is to facilitate the Order’s impending Sino-Soviet-Muslim invasion.  That is the ultimate endgame.  This is why Chavez has hosted the Order’s Soviet Russian military.  This is why Jesuit-trained Fidel Castro is an old friend of the Soviets, as well as having been a most obedient slave of the Pope.  This is why the Order’s Red Chinese military is manning intelligence stations in Cuba.  This is why Red China is in control of the Order’s Panama Canal—thanks to “giveaway” Freemason Jimmy Carter and his lodge brother, Zbigniew Brzezinski.  And this is why Red China is in control of the largest container facility in the Western Hemisphere located in the Bahamas.  

We have been encircled.  This was done to the Protestant Second German Reich before Jesuit Coadjutor Kaiser Wilhelm II  attacked France beginning World War I in 1914.   History is now repeating itself since it is the same Jesuit Order being permitted to impose the same encirclement policy.  Now a massive military beachhead is being prepared for the tripartite coalition’s future attack into the last bastion of Protestant and Baptist liberty in the world—the apostate Old White Protestant South!  There can be no other explanation, considering all of the above coordinated events during the last two months, indeed during the last sixty years!

Update:  See this link.

Update:  See this link.

Update: See this link. Shattering Denial: “Gulf Oil Rig Prepares Path for Invasion of US, Part 1.”

Update: See this link. Shattering Denial: “Gulf Oil Rig Prepares Path for Invasion of US, Part 2.”

Update: See this link. Shattering Denial: “Gulf Oil Rig Prepares Path for Invasion of US, Part 3.”

Update:  View the following by Lenny Bloom and Mrs. Steele:

Companies Profiting from Gulf of Mexico Oil Disaster

FINANCIAL - first, consider the ‘coincidences’ of these financial transactions before the event:

1. BP knew about the cracks in the drill casing 2 weeks before (direct witness testimony).

2. BP sells half its own stock before the explosion (public record).

2. BP CEO Hayward sells over a million in his own personal stock a few weeks before the explosion (public record).

3. Goldman Sachs sold 44% of their BP oil holdings in the 1Q 2010, earning 266 Million on the Sale (public record).

4. Halliburton (former CEO, Dick Cheney) buys ‘Boots n Coots’ (an oil spill cleanup company!) 11 days before it happens (public record).

5. Nalco, maker of Corexit, the toxic chemical being sprayed by BP has controlling interests co-owned by Al Gore, George Soros, Barack Obama and others (public record).

SECRECY - BP sealed off the area from all outside access – and instituted a complete media blackout ((Why? - only those that have something to hide do their deeds in secret):

1. BP hires Goons, UN Troops and Gulf Police to patrol the waters and coastline, forcing a ‘lockdown’ and blackout on any public scrutiny, under threat of arrest. (Why?)

2. Reporters and anyone caught talking to reporters is threatened with immediate arrest. Coastal residents are in a state of fear, not from the oil, but from BP Goons.(Why?)

3. The entire area is decreed a ‘no-fly zone’. (Why?)

4. BP has full control of all released data. No independent scientists or other professionals are allowed access to data that is not first ‘filtered’ through BP. (Why?)

TOXICITY - not only is toxicity pouring into the gulf from the undersea volcano, but the BP is deliberately spraying the highly toxic Corexit into the air and over populated areas. Hurricane season is coming up, destined to carry the poisonous gases inland over the eastern US.

1. This is not only an oil spill, they hit a volatile volcano, emitting toxic poisons (4) benzene, methane, and others into the water and the air. The levels of these poisons are now up to 3,000 times more toxic than EPA’s ‘safe levels’.

2. BP is using toxic chemicals to ‘clean-up‘ Corexit made by Nalco to ariel spray over the oil. This poison contains mercury and arsenic. It is far more toxic and less effective than any of the other oil disperssants that could have been used. (why would they use this when there are safer and less harmful alternatives ?)

3. Gov’t tells BP to quit spraying and but they continue anyway. (Why?)

4. Cleanup workers are getting sick and dying – BP offered no protection for any of these workers cleaning and helping. Workers requests for respirators are denied by BP. (Why?)

VOLITILITY - it is not just pollution from the oil that is the greatest threat:

1. An eruption of this undersea volcano will result in a tsunami, caused by superheated steam, estimated by scientists to be up to 80-200 feet high – effectively wiping out anything in its path up to 200 miles inland – this includes most of the state Florida, the highest point of which is only 60 ft above sea level.

2. A Bubble of High Pressure Steam is emerging at the point of drilling. The pressure under this bubble is building continually. This could result in a huge erruption unless the pressure is somehow eased. “Satellite imagery withheld by the Obama administration shows that ‘under the gaping chasm spewing oil at an ever-alarming rate is a cavern estimated to be around the size of Mount Everest’. This information, he says, has been given an almost national security-level classification to keep it from the public.” (Wayne Madsen Reports)

3. The gulf stream will eventually take the oil into the ocean along the east coast over to Europe, there’s is no stopping this. (this is happening now, the oil has travelled up as far as North Carolina).

DESTRUCTION TO LIFE - Two months after the event and subsequent ‘clean-up,’ we see:

1. Birds falling dead out of the sky.

2. Animals picked up on shore dead in mass accumulation.

3. People living along the coast getting sick, vomiting, and the air smells like oil.

4. Crops are dying inland of the coast. Farmers are reporting plants covered with white and yellow spots and acres upon acres rotting vegetation.

5. It’s now raining oil on various communities along the coast.

6. Once beautiful white-sand beaches in Pensacola Florida are now covered with an ugly black toxic sludge (see photo above).

7. There is NOTHING being done that is slowing or stopping the pollution. In fact, BP has accelerated the problems by poisoning the air with chemicals.

MARTIAL LAW PREPARATION - The President seems curiously unconcerned:

1. President Obama has TURNED-DOWN several attempts by experts and professionals from other nations to help solve this problem. (Why?)

2. Obama has been down there with a bus load of his own people, (not real coastline people) and tells us everything is okay, that when they are done with their ‘cleanup’ the gulf will be better than before when they are done, and then sends down 17,000 national guard. Does anyone out there actually still beLIEve this pathological liar? (Why?)

3. 4,000 white transport vehicles are transported to an empty airfield near Jacksonville, FL, and lie waiting for the eventual evacuation. They’ve been there long before ‘the event’. It is obvious, someone’s been planning a scenareo like this for some time.

4. Federal govt is readying FEMA camps, bought up blocks of hotel rooms, will use post offices and military bases to evacuate. There are now over 800 FEMA (concentration camps) in the United States, many of them outfitted with modern guillotines and gas chambers. Don’t believe it? Its true. They’ve been systematically building them for the last 25 years.

OCCULT SYMBOLISM - The Date:

1. The event occurred on April 20th, Adolf Hitler’s Birthday - This is the same date as 3 other manipulated events within the last two decades, including: the Ruby Ridge Massacre, the Oklahoma City Bombing False Flag, and the Columbine Massacre. Does anyone out there really think this is just ‘an odd coincidence?’ It is a fact that the controlling global elite operate through black magic and dark occult practices to preserve and expand their positions of power. April 19-20 has long been identified as one of their black power dates.

CONCLUSION - This is an event of such long range devastating impact on the environment and all life on this planet that there may be no way for mankind to stop or reverse it’s consequences. We will have to wait and see, but it appears that the forces this ignited are way beyond anything man can do to mitigate it. It seems our global karma is now in our face, to the point where we cannot ignore it any longer. What makes it even most heinous is that fact that there is much to indicate it was a planned, ‘staged’ false-flag event with foreknowledge and orchestration by those who are now reaping profit and greater consolidation of power as a result of the disaster (Much like Larry Silverstein’s lucrative insurance policy taken out of the World Trade Center shortly before their demolition).

This is a manipulated event and not just an ‘accident’ – But, why would someone want to do this? There are lots of reasons, and to understand events on the global scale, one simply has to ask ‘who benefits‘?

So, when we ask that question, we get these answers:

1) Barack Obama - now has the perfect situation in which he intends to force his planned Cap and Trade tax down on the America’s people. This will further tie a weight around the neck of America’s taxpayers, who are already going under, losing their homes by the millions and forming ‘tent cities’ all over the country. Unless people ‘wake up’ to the reality of what is really happening and demand REAL CHANGE, it will mean the final death blow to the nation. Broke, demoralized, suffering ill-health and disempowered – the people of the United States will be reorganized into the emerging global totalitarian government which has long been planned and to which we have been marching towards, step by step, for several decades.

2) Corporations – there’s lot of money to be made from the destruction and death caused by wars and disasters. (Just ask Dick Cheney.)

3) Those who promote Population Control – clearly, the geographic location of this event is no accident, (as was Katrina was no accident). The communities along the Gulf of Mexico has a high percentage of people either living on welfare or social security, and are predominantly afro-american and the retired elderly. These economic and racial groups are prime targets for population reduction as has been publicly stated as the one of the highest priorities for those pushing the Globalist NWO agenda… (Kissinger’s ‘useless eaters’).

Lapel Pin: Russian and Red Chinese Flags

The immediate purpose for this, the Jesuit Order’s designed BP/Goldman Sachs/Halliburton Oil Disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, is mass-evacuation of the south coast, from Texas to Florida.  The far-reaching, future purpose of this disaster is to prepare the beachhead for the Vatican’s coming Sino-Soviet-Muslim Invasion.  As the newer and larger Panama Canal will not be finished until after 2015, the invasion is subsequent to the completion of that maritime monster.  The Communist USSR (deceptively called “The Russian Federation”) and Communist Red China have been built by the Order’s CFR in control of Rome’s “Holy Roman” Fourteenth Amendment American Empire (1868-Present) since the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917.  All is proceeding according to Vatican plan, and this travesty of treason in the Gulf is part of the Black Pope’s plot!

EJP

Update:  According to Texe Marrs (and he does post some important truths in spite of his “blame the Jew” Jesuit rhetoric) an unexploded, undersea bomb washed up on the Alabama shoreline and was discovered by BP cleanup workers.  Maybe this is one of the reasons no independent press is allowed to walk and photograph the shoreline!

Update:  The Oil flow has now been “capped.”  It was never “out of control.”  The Gulf has been isolated from independent reporters and photographers.  The attached video has several important points to consider and is worthy of serious reflection.   See this link.