<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Vatican Assassins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vaticanassassins.org</link>
	<description>Eric Jon Phelps, Author &#38; Talk Radio Host</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:56:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Douglas Brehm to EJP: Jesuit Papacy; Font of Every Form of Murderous Socialism by polycentrism</title>
		<link>http://www.vaticanassassins.org/2011/04/douglas-brehm-to-ejp-jesuit-papacy-font-of-every-form-of-murderous-socialism/comment-page-1/#comment-2616</link>
		<dc:creator>polycentrism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=11521#comment-2616</guid>
		<description>As you know the Jesuit connection to the Dulles family should especially include uncle Robert Lansing who played a central role in the Paris Versailles treaty arrangement as the sour grapes creation of the NY CFR to forward the NWO despite the Senate having rejected the treaty proposed b y Lansing. Senators Borah, Lodge and Warren Harding negotiated their own Treaty with Germany, Austria and Hungary to the chagrin of Lansing, the Jesuits and the Dulles family. Harding was murdered in 1923 for his efforts.

Lansing was born in Watertown, New York, the son of John Lansing (1832–1907) and Maria Lay (Dodge) Lansing. He graduated from Amherst College in 1886 and was admitted to the bar in 1889. From then until 1907 he was a member of the law firm of Lansing &amp; Lansing at Watertown. An authority on international law, he served as associate counsel for the United States, in the Bering Sea Arbitration in 1892-93, as counsel for the United States Bering Sea Claims Commission in 1896-97, as solicitor for the government before the Alaskan Boundary Tribunal in 1903, as counsel for the North Atlantic Fisheries in the Arbitration at The Hague in 1909-10, and as agent of the United States in the American and British Arbitration in 1912-14. In 1914 Lansing was appointed by President Wilson counselor to the State Department.

Since Alaska had been purchased from Russia in 1867 by the United States government all Russian territorial rights in Alaska and the adjacent islands went with the purchase. The boundary between the two countries was a line drawn from the middle of Bering Strait south-west to a point midway between the Aleutian and Komandorski Islands dividing the Bering Sea into two parts, the larger being on the American side. This portion included the Pribilof Islands, the principal breeding-grounds of the seals in those seas.Between 1887 and 1890, negotiations were carried out between Russia, Great Britain and the United States with a view to a joint convention but the parties were unable to agree on basis for regulating sealing in the open seas, the pelagic zone. America had seal nurseries on the Pribiloff Islands and Russia on the Komandorski group. Neither Britain, nor the dominion of Canada, had land access to the Bering Sea or seal breeding grounds. Thus, to prohibit pelagic sealing would have been to exclude Britain from the industry.

The Russians sought a warm water port on the Pacific Ocean, for their navy as well as for maritime trade. Vladivostok was only operational during the summer season, but Port Arthur would be operational all year. From the end of the First Sino-Japanese War and 1903, negotiations between Russia and Japan had proved impractical. Japan chose war to maintain dominance in Korea.

Lansing involvement in the Bering Sea Arbitration placed him is a very important position to effect the Russo-Japanese War (8 February 1904 – 5 September 1905) as &quot;the first great war of the 20th century.&quot; that grew out of rival imperial ambitions of the Russian Empire and Japanese Empire over Manchuria and Korea. The major theatres of operations were Southern Manchuria, specifically the area around the Liaodong Peninsula and Mukden, the seas around Korea, Japan, and the Yellow Sea.

I suspect Lansing as the originator of the the DOS Intelligence service was an essential player through the scenario that played out with Rasputin against Nicolas since there had been an extensive diplomatic collaboration with Russia from the Lincoln administration forward. A quick cross referenced on wikipedia got me this:

On June 26, 1912, John Foster Dulles married Janet Avery, with whom he had two sons and a daughter. One of their sons, Avery Dulles (1918–2008), converted to Roman Catholicism, entered the Jesuit order and became the first American priest to be directly appointed a Cardinal.
 
Younger brother, Allen Welsh Dulles graduated from Princeton University, and entered the diplomatic service in 1916. When Dulles was serving in Switzerland in the US DOS, he was responsible for reviewing and rejecting Vladimir Lenin&#039;s application for a visa to the United States. Was to direct the CIA with John F. Dulles and Fr. Edmund Walsh SJ
 
In 1918, Woodrow Wilson appointed John Foster Dulles as legal counsel to the United States delegation to the Versailles Peace Conference where he served under his uncle, Robert Lansing, then Secretary of State. In 1916, using funds discretionary to himself, Robert Lansing hired a handful of men who became the State Department&#039;s first special agents in the new Bureau of Secret Intelligence that would include Jesuit networks. These agents were initially used to observe the activities of the Central Powers in America, and later to watch over interned German diplomats. The small group of agents hired by Lansing would eventually become the U.S. Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) many years later using members of  the Military Intelligence Division (MID) that was a military intelligence branch of the United States Army, established in 1885.
 
John Foster Dulles made an early impression as a junior diplomat by clearly and forcefully arguing against imposing crushing reparations on Germany. Afterwards, he served as a member of the War Reparations Committee at the request of President Wilson. Dulles, a deeply religious man, attended numerous international conferences of churchmen during the 1920s and 1930s.

Fr. Edmund Aloysius Walsh, S.J. (October 10, 1885 – October 31, 1956) was an American Jesuit Catholic priest, professor of geopolitics and founder of the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service, which he founded in 1919–six years before the U.S. Foreign Service itself existed–and served as its first regent.

The Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service (commonly abbreviated SFS) is a school within Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., United States. Jesuit priest Edmund A. Walsh founded the School of Foreign Service in 1919, recognizing the need for a school that would prepare Americans for roles as diplomats and business professionals in the wake of the U.S.&#039; expanding involvement in the world after World War I. The school predates the U.S. Foreign Service by six years.

He directed the Papal Famine Relief Mission to Russia in 1922, which also succeeded in securing for the Vatican the Holy Relics of St. Andrew Bobola (they were actually transported to Rome by the Walsh&#039;s Assistant Director, Louis J. Gallagher, who later wrote books both about Walsh and about Bobola).

Later, Walsh worked on behalf of the Vatican to resolve long-standing issues between Church and State in Mexico in 1929, and negotiated with the Iraqi government to establish an American College in Baghdad in 1931.
According to Karlheinz Deschner&#039;s book The Moloch Dulles ascribed assets of 1 billion dollars to the Nazi party in 1933 after Hitler&#039;s appointment as Chancellor, and according to Stephen Kinzer&#039;s 2006 book Overthrow, his firm benefited from doing business with the Nazi regime. Throughout 1934, Dulles was a very public supporter of Hitler. However, the junior partners, led by his brother Allen, were appalled by Nazi activities and threatened to revolt if Dulles did not end the firm&#039;s association with Hitler et al. In 1935, Dulles closed Sullivan &amp; Cromwell&#039;s Berlin office; later he would cite the closing date as 1934, no doubt in an effort to clear his reputation by shortening his involvement with Nazi Germany.

After the Allies&#039; victory in World War II, Walsh served as Consultant to the U.S. Chief of Counsel at the Nuremberg Trials. During that task, he interrogated the German geopolitician General Karl Haushofer to determine whether or not he should stand trial for war crimes, eventually finding that Gen. Haushofer ought not stand trial.

Will this material ever be put together as one movie?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you know the Jesuit connection to the Dulles family should especially include uncle Robert Lansing who played a central role in the Paris Versailles treaty arrangement as the sour grapes creation of the NY CFR to forward the NWO despite the Senate having rejected the treaty proposed b y Lansing. Senators Borah, Lodge and Warren Harding negotiated their own Treaty with Germany, Austria and Hungary to the chagrin of Lansing, the Jesuits and the Dulles family. Harding was murdered in 1923 for his efforts.</p>
<p>Lansing was born in Watertown, New York, the son of John Lansing (1832–1907) and Maria Lay (Dodge) Lansing. He graduated from Amherst College in 1886 and was admitted to the bar in 1889. From then until 1907 he was a member of the law firm of Lansing &amp; Lansing at Watertown. An authority on international law, he served as associate counsel for the United States, in the Bering Sea Arbitration in 1892-93, as counsel for the United States Bering Sea Claims Commission in 1896-97, as solicitor for the government before the Alaskan Boundary Tribunal in 1903, as counsel for the North Atlantic Fisheries in the Arbitration at The Hague in 1909-10, and as agent of the United States in the American and British Arbitration in 1912-14. In 1914 Lansing was appointed by President Wilson counselor to the State Department.</p>
<p>Since Alaska had been purchased from Russia in 1867 by the United States government all Russian territorial rights in Alaska and the adjacent islands went with the purchase. The boundary between the two countries was a line drawn from the middle of Bering Strait south-west to a point midway between the Aleutian and Komandorski Islands dividing the Bering Sea into two parts, the larger being on the American side. This portion included the Pribilof Islands, the principal breeding-grounds of the seals in those seas.Between 1887 and 1890, negotiations were carried out between Russia, Great Britain and the United States with a view to a joint convention but the parties were unable to agree on basis for regulating sealing in the open seas, the pelagic zone. America had seal nurseries on the Pribiloff Islands and Russia on the Komandorski group. Neither Britain, nor the dominion of Canada, had land access to the Bering Sea or seal breeding grounds. Thus, to prohibit pelagic sealing would have been to exclude Britain from the industry.</p>
<p>The Russians sought a warm water port on the Pacific Ocean, for their navy as well as for maritime trade. Vladivostok was only operational during the summer season, but Port Arthur would be operational all year. From the end of the First Sino-Japanese War and 1903, negotiations between Russia and Japan had proved impractical. Japan chose war to maintain dominance in Korea.</p>
<p>Lansing involvement in the Bering Sea Arbitration placed him is a very important position to effect the Russo-Japanese War (8 February 1904 – 5 September 1905) as &#8220;the first great war of the 20th century.&#8221; that grew out of rival imperial ambitions of the Russian Empire and Japanese Empire over Manchuria and Korea. The major theatres of operations were Southern Manchuria, specifically the area around the Liaodong Peninsula and Mukden, the seas around Korea, Japan, and the Yellow Sea.</p>
<p>I suspect Lansing as the originator of the the DOS Intelligence service was an essential player through the scenario that played out with Rasputin against Nicolas since there had been an extensive diplomatic collaboration with Russia from the Lincoln administration forward. A quick cross referenced on wikipedia got me this:</p>
<p>On June 26, 1912, John Foster Dulles married Janet Avery, with whom he had two sons and a daughter. One of their sons, Avery Dulles (1918–2008), converted to Roman Catholicism, entered the Jesuit order and became the first American priest to be directly appointed a Cardinal.</p>
<p>Younger brother, Allen Welsh Dulles graduated from Princeton University, and entered the diplomatic service in 1916. When Dulles was serving in Switzerland in the US DOS, he was responsible for reviewing and rejecting Vladimir Lenin&#8217;s application for a visa to the United States. Was to direct the CIA with John F. Dulles and Fr. Edmund Walsh SJ</p>
<p>In 1918, Woodrow Wilson appointed John Foster Dulles as legal counsel to the United States delegation to the Versailles Peace Conference where he served under his uncle, Robert Lansing, then Secretary of State. In 1916, using funds discretionary to himself, Robert Lansing hired a handful of men who became the State Department&#8217;s first special agents in the new Bureau of Secret Intelligence that would include Jesuit networks. These agents were initially used to observe the activities of the Central Powers in America, and later to watch over interned German diplomats. The small group of agents hired by Lansing would eventually become the U.S. Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) many years later using members of  the Military Intelligence Division (MID) that was a military intelligence branch of the United States Army, established in 1885.</p>
<p>John Foster Dulles made an early impression as a junior diplomat by clearly and forcefully arguing against imposing crushing reparations on Germany. Afterwards, he served as a member of the War Reparations Committee at the request of President Wilson. Dulles, a deeply religious man, attended numerous international conferences of churchmen during the 1920s and 1930s.</p>
<p>Fr. Edmund Aloysius Walsh, S.J. (October 10, 1885 – October 31, 1956) was an American Jesuit Catholic priest, professor of geopolitics and founder of the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service, which he founded in 1919–six years before the U.S. Foreign Service itself existed–and served as its first regent.</p>
<p>The Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service (commonly abbreviated SFS) is a school within Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., United States. Jesuit priest Edmund A. Walsh founded the School of Foreign Service in 1919, recognizing the need for a school that would prepare Americans for roles as diplomats and business professionals in the wake of the U.S.&#8217; expanding involvement in the world after World War I. The school predates the U.S. Foreign Service by six years.</p>
<p>He directed the Papal Famine Relief Mission to Russia in 1922, which also succeeded in securing for the Vatican the Holy Relics of St. Andrew Bobola (they were actually transported to Rome by the Walsh&#8217;s Assistant Director, Louis J. Gallagher, who later wrote books both about Walsh and about Bobola).</p>
<p>Later, Walsh worked on behalf of the Vatican to resolve long-standing issues between Church and State in Mexico in 1929, and negotiated with the Iraqi government to establish an American College in Baghdad in 1931.<br />
According to Karlheinz Deschner&#8217;s book The Moloch Dulles ascribed assets of 1 billion dollars to the Nazi party in 1933 after Hitler&#8217;s appointment as Chancellor, and according to Stephen Kinzer&#8217;s 2006 book Overthrow, his firm benefited from doing business with the Nazi regime. Throughout 1934, Dulles was a very public supporter of Hitler. However, the junior partners, led by his brother Allen, were appalled by Nazi activities and threatened to revolt if Dulles did not end the firm&#8217;s association with Hitler et al. In 1935, Dulles closed Sullivan &amp; Cromwell&#8217;s Berlin office; later he would cite the closing date as 1934, no doubt in an effort to clear his reputation by shortening his involvement with Nazi Germany.</p>
<p>After the Allies&#8217; victory in World War II, Walsh served as Consultant to the U.S. Chief of Counsel at the Nuremberg Trials. During that task, he interrogated the German geopolitician General Karl Haushofer to determine whether or not he should stand trial for war crimes, eventually finding that Gen. Haushofer ought not stand trial.</p>
<p>Will this material ever be put together as one movie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Ex-Jesuit&#8221; Greg Galluzzo: Chicago Mentor of Jesuit Coadjutor Barry Davis Obama by polycentrism</title>
		<link>http://www.vaticanassassins.org/2012/01/ex-jesuit-greg-galluzzo-chicago-mentor-of-jesuit-coadjutor-barry-davis-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2615</link>
		<dc:creator>polycentrism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=12331#comment-2615</guid>
		<description>As Barry Soetoro IS an agent of Greg Galluzzo, Saul Alinsky before him was agent of Jesuits too, as are the Mormon leadership today!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maritain

In 1959 the Thomist philosopher Étienne Gilson reported Fr. Carlo Balić&#039;s criticism of Maritain&#039;s &quot;Integral Humanism,&quot; who said:

    Jacques Maritain is considered a heretic. He would have already been condemned—on the twofold ground of progressismus [progressivism] and laicismus [laicism]—were it not that he had been French ambassador to the Holy See.... He will not be condemned ... never! Still progressivism and laicism are heretical. Integral Humanism is a dangerous book.

The 20th century&#039;s great Thomist theologian Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange, doctoral thesis advisor of the future Pope John Paul II, &quot;advised him [Maritain] to stay away from political philosophy and to dedicate his time to his metaphysical epistemological issues.&quot; Maritain also corresponded with the revolutionary community organizer Saul Alinsky and French Prime Minister Robert Schuman, which has caused some to doubt his committal to the kingship of Christ as advocated most prominently in Pope Pius XI&#039;s 1925 encyclical Quas Primas.

http://catholicforum.fisheaters.com/index.php?topic=3426020.0;wap2


Paul VI Learned from a Meeting with the Atheist/Anarchist Alinsky
How to Introduce Revolution into the Catholic Church to Turn It into the Modernist Newchurch
From: Jacob
Dear Fathers:

I came up this interesting bit of information about archbishop Giovanni Montini, later to become Paul VI, and his association with Saul Alinski, the mentor of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton:

One summer [Jacques] Maritain brought to Montini&#039;s house an American who he considered to be &quot;one of only three revolutionaries worthy of the name, indeed, one of the few really great men of this century.&quot; It was Saul David Alinsky. The self styled &quot;professional radical&quot; was to spend a week with Archbishop Montini discussing the Church&#039;s relationship with the powerful communist trade union. &quot;There I was&quot;, Alinsky told his biographer S.K. Sanders, &quot;sitting between the Archbishop and the beautiful blonde union official discussing the common interests bridging communism and capitalism. 

Alinsky&#039;s disparagement of religion was well known. He dedicated his book, Rules for Radicals, to &quot;the first radical, Lucifer.&quot; As for the destruction of the Catholic Church, Saul Alinsky explained his position to Playboy a few years later. He had left his strict Jewish family to join the International Brigade in the Spanish Civil War. Going on to develop his theory of &quot;people power,&quot; he said that it was after meeting Jacques Maritain that he began to see how the revolution could become part of the Catholic Church.

Alinsky, however, preferred to call the institution the &quot;Church of Today and Tomorrow.&quot; It was a Church that he felt must become quite free of dogma: &quot;I detest and fear dogma. Nobody owns truth and dogma, whatever form it takes; it is the ultimate enemy of human freedom. Alinsky, Maritain, and Montini expressed serene accord that the Church Militant must give way to the &#039;Church Loving.&#039;&quot; And that is the Church that Benedict-Ratzinger heads today, one that is, in the Modernist style, devoid of definite doctrine and &quot;liturgies&quot; detached from Tradition, which can be selected cafeteria style to suit any taste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Barry Soetoro IS an agent of Greg Galluzzo, Saul Alinsky before him was agent of Jesuits too, as are the Mormon leadership today!!</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maritain" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maritain</a></p>
<p>In 1959 the Thomist philosopher Étienne Gilson reported Fr. Carlo Balić&#8217;s criticism of Maritain&#8217;s &#8220;Integral Humanism,&#8221; who said:</p>
<p>    Jacques Maritain is considered a heretic. He would have already been condemned—on the twofold ground of progressismus [progressivism] and laicismus [laicism]—were it not that he had been French ambassador to the Holy See&#8230;. He will not be condemned &#8230; never! Still progressivism and laicism are heretical. Integral Humanism is a dangerous book.</p>
<p>The 20th century&#8217;s great Thomist theologian Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange, doctoral thesis advisor of the future Pope John Paul II, &#8220;advised him [Maritain] to stay away from political philosophy and to dedicate his time to his metaphysical epistemological issues.&#8221; Maritain also corresponded with the revolutionary community organizer Saul Alinsky and French Prime Minister Robert Schuman, which has caused some to doubt his committal to the kingship of Christ as advocated most prominently in Pope Pius XI&#8217;s 1925 encyclical Quas Primas.</p>
<p><a href="http://catholicforum.fisheaters.com/index.php?topic=3426020.0;wap2" rel="nofollow">http://catholicforum.fisheaters.com/index.php?topic=3426020.0;wap2</a></p>
<p>Paul VI Learned from a Meeting with the Atheist/Anarchist Alinsky<br />
How to Introduce Revolution into the Catholic Church to Turn It into the Modernist Newchurch<br />
From: Jacob<br />
Dear Fathers:</p>
<p>I came up this interesting bit of information about archbishop Giovanni Montini, later to become Paul VI, and his association with Saul Alinski, the mentor of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton:</p>
<p>One summer [Jacques] Maritain brought to Montini&#8217;s house an American who he considered to be &#8220;one of only three revolutionaries worthy of the name, indeed, one of the few really great men of this century.&#8221; It was Saul David Alinsky. The self styled &#8220;professional radical&#8221; was to spend a week with Archbishop Montini discussing the Church&#8217;s relationship with the powerful communist trade union. &#8220;There I was&#8221;, Alinsky told his biographer S.K. Sanders, &#8220;sitting between the Archbishop and the beautiful blonde union official discussing the common interests bridging communism and capitalism. </p>
<p>Alinsky&#8217;s disparagement of religion was well known. He dedicated his book, Rules for Radicals, to &#8220;the first radical, Lucifer.&#8221; As for the destruction of the Catholic Church, Saul Alinsky explained his position to Playboy a few years later. He had left his strict Jewish family to join the International Brigade in the Spanish Civil War. Going on to develop his theory of &#8220;people power,&#8221; he said that it was after meeting Jacques Maritain that he began to see how the revolution could become part of the Catholic Church.</p>
<p>Alinsky, however, preferred to call the institution the &#8220;Church of Today and Tomorrow.&#8221; It was a Church that he felt must become quite free of dogma: &#8220;I detest and fear dogma. Nobody owns truth and dogma, whatever form it takes; it is the ultimate enemy of human freedom. Alinsky, Maritain, and Montini expressed serene accord that the Church Militant must give way to the &#8216;Church Loving.&#8217;&#8221; And that is the Church that Benedict-Ratzinger heads today, one that is, in the Modernist style, devoid of definite doctrine and &#8220;liturgies&#8221; detached from Tradition, which can be selected cafeteria style to suit any taste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Majority Black Savagery Continues Unabated in Apostate Protestant White America by mrwhite2012</title>
		<link>http://www.vaticanassassins.org/2011/03/majority-black-savagery-continues-unabated-in-apostate-protestant-white-america/comment-page-1/#comment-2613</link>
		<dc:creator>mrwhite2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=10729#comment-2613</guid>
		<description>Typical black savage response &quot;Blame Y T&quot; I really hope that 99% of those BLACK demons are put in the GAS Chambers aka FEMA CAMPS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typical black savage response &#8220;Blame Y T&#8221; I really hope that 99% of those BLACK demons are put in the GAS Chambers aka FEMA CAMPS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Majority Savage Blacks: Incessant Black-on-White Crime in Major American Cities by mrwhite2012</title>
		<link>http://www.vaticanassassins.org/2012/01/majority-savage-blacks-incessant-black-on-white-crime-in-major-american-cities/comment-page-1/#comment-2612</link>
		<dc:creator>mrwhite2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=12380#comment-2612</guid>
		<description>Another great article! Keep up the great work and I just love it when a White man who speaks the truth about those G__ ____ Savages aka Black demons!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great article! Keep up the great work and I just love it when a White man who speaks the truth about those G__ ____ Savages aka Black demons!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Knight of Malta John F. Queeny: Founder of Monsanto by OMEN 2012: Control of Food &#38; Crops by 666 NWO SCUM « TheRR9's Report</title>
		<link>http://www.vaticanassassins.org/2009/11/knight-of-malta-john-f-queeny-founder-of-monsanto/comment-page-1/#comment-2604</link>
		<dc:creator>OMEN 2012: Control of Food &#38; Crops by 666 NWO SCUM « TheRR9's Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=2254#comment-2604</guid>
		<description>[...] to the Count in Venice, John Francis Queeny (founder of The Monsanto Company) was a Knight of Malta. Irish-American ROMAN Catholic Queeny [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the Count in Venice, John Francis Queeny (founder of The Monsanto Company) was a Knight of Malta. Irish-American ROMAN Catholic Queeny [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Majority Savage Blacks: Incessant Black-on-White Crime in Major American Cities by stealthmaster</title>
		<link>http://www.vaticanassassins.org/2012/01/majority-savage-blacks-incessant-black-on-white-crime-in-major-american-cities/comment-page-1/#comment-2594</link>
		<dc:creator>stealthmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 03:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=12380#comment-2594</guid>
		<description>Question:

EJP... Is it true that you are a practicing Freemason?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question:</p>
<p>EJP&#8230; Is it true that you are a practicing Freemason?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Majority Savage Blacks: Incessant Black-on-White Crime in Major American Cities by stealthmaster</title>
		<link>http://www.vaticanassassins.org/2012/01/majority-savage-blacks-incessant-black-on-white-crime-in-major-american-cities/comment-page-1/#comment-2593</link>
		<dc:creator>stealthmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 03:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=12380#comment-2593</guid>
		<description>EJP... Your vehement, hate-laden comments have very little baring on the much larger picture.

What is your point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EJP&#8230; Your vehement, hate-laden comments have very little baring on the much larger picture.</p>
<p>What is your point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brother Chris White Debunks the Lie: Ashkenazi Jews of Israel are Gentile Khazars by dnsloan</title>
		<link>http://www.vaticanassassins.org/2012/01/brother-chris-white-debunks-the-lie-ashkenazi-jews-of-israel-are-gentile-khazars/comment-page-1/#comment-2589</link>
		<dc:creator>dnsloan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=12353#comment-2589</guid>
		<description>I had recently come across Arthur Koestler&#039;s theory as presented in &quot;The 13th Tribe&quot;,and I have noticed a connection to the Brit-Am variant of British-Israelism. They claim that the Khazars were in fact descendants of the scattered 10 tribes (the Northern Kingdom), and were thus uniquely disposed to accept &quot;Judaism&quot;, therefore there may be some truth in Koestler&#039;s theories in the sense that perhaps there was a large migration of converted Khazar&#039;s to modern Israel, but if the Khazar&#039;s were descendents of the 10 lost tribes, then they are still descendants of Abraham - and still Israelites - though perhaps not Jews. 

Beyond that, I&#039;m wondering if you have an opinion on the notion of British-Israelism? There seems to be a lack of understanding in relation to Jews vs. Israelites, and visa versa, as the terms are used interchangeably - there is a reference to Scandinavian Jews, is this a reference to British-Israelism? In short, Jews are Israelites, but Israelites are not necessarily Jews - there are still 10 tribes to be accounted for. Nonetheless, excellent research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had recently come across Arthur Koestler&#8217;s theory as presented in &#8220;The 13th Tribe&#8221;,and I have noticed a connection to the Brit-Am variant of British-Israelism. They claim that the Khazars were in fact descendants of the scattered 10 tribes (the Northern Kingdom), and were thus uniquely disposed to accept &#8220;Judaism&#8221;, therefore there may be some truth in Koestler&#8217;s theories in the sense that perhaps there was a large migration of converted Khazar&#8217;s to modern Israel, but if the Khazar&#8217;s were descendents of the 10 lost tribes, then they are still descendants of Abraham &#8211; and still Israelites &#8211; though perhaps not Jews. </p>
<p>Beyond that, I&#8217;m wondering if you have an opinion on the notion of British-Israelism? There seems to be a lack of understanding in relation to Jews vs. Israelites, and visa versa, as the terms are used interchangeably &#8211; there is a reference to Scandinavian Jews, is this a reference to British-Israelism? In short, Jews are Israelites, but Israelites are not necessarily Jews &#8211; there are still 10 tribes to be accounted for. Nonetheless, excellent research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EJP to Brother Thomas: Jesuit Oversight of Second Thirty Years&#8217; War, 1914-1945 by eire</title>
		<link>http://www.vaticanassassins.org/2011/03/ejp-to-brother-thomas-jesuit-rule-of-second-thirty-yearss-war-1914-1945/comment-page-1/#comment-2588</link>
		<dc:creator>eire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=10374#comment-2588</guid>
		<description>I was in Ukraine recently in a city in central Ukraine where in the 1930&#039;s there were tens of thousands disappeared and murdered, and it was reported these disappearances were without patterns, but the locals saw a pattern, everyone of them had crossed paths with a jew in some small way or had something a jew wanted. It was only when the Germans advanced into the city in WW2 that these mass graves were uncovered after requests by locals to search, the bodies that had been reported disappeared were uncovered, all shot in the back of the head by Jews working with the NKVD, of whom were almost entirely jewish it seems. At the same time there was also a famine created by the NKVD by stealing all the food from the residents before the winter months which starved 7 million of them to death. The Germans did quite alot of work in uncovering the mass graves (which did suprise me somewhat) as much of these jewish murders of Orthodox peoples on a massive scale was being reported in Germany and throughout Europe, and the famine that was entirely manipulated by the NKVD was also known throughout Germany. It is against this backdrop that the anti-jewish sentiment rose high in Europe during the 1930&#039;s and it becomes more understandable how Hitler and the SS managed to drive through some of their most oppresive policies against jews in their own land. Now your readers will know that the Jesuits were manipulating events in Russia, but those those jews who did commit those most horrible crimes in the soviet unions brutal regime will have to answer to our Father for their actions when the time comes, plus their actions whipped up such hatred for Jews in Europe at the time that it lead to the punishment and slaughter of millions of their fellow jews in central Europe. Many thousands of Jewish peoples are in no way blameless for the shaping of events in the 1930&#039;s, in fact many would argue that they created the situation where a creature such as Hitler would actually gain much support to persecute their fellow Jews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was in Ukraine recently in a city in central Ukraine where in the 1930&#8242;s there were tens of thousands disappeared and murdered, and it was reported these disappearances were without patterns, but the locals saw a pattern, everyone of them had crossed paths with a jew in some small way or had something a jew wanted. It was only when the Germans advanced into the city in WW2 that these mass graves were uncovered after requests by locals to search, the bodies that had been reported disappeared were uncovered, all shot in the back of the head by Jews working with the NKVD, of whom were almost entirely jewish it seems. At the same time there was also a famine created by the NKVD by stealing all the food from the residents before the winter months which starved 7 million of them to death. The Germans did quite alot of work in uncovering the mass graves (which did suprise me somewhat) as much of these jewish murders of Orthodox peoples on a massive scale was being reported in Germany and throughout Europe, and the famine that was entirely manipulated by the NKVD was also known throughout Germany. It is against this backdrop that the anti-jewish sentiment rose high in Europe during the 1930&#8242;s and it becomes more understandable how Hitler and the SS managed to drive through some of their most oppresive policies against jews in their own land. Now your readers will know that the Jesuits were manipulating events in Russia, but those those jews who did commit those most horrible crimes in the soviet unions brutal regime will have to answer to our Father for their actions when the time comes, plus their actions whipped up such hatred for Jews in Europe at the time that it lead to the punishment and slaughter of millions of their fellow jews in central Europe. Many thousands of Jewish peoples are in no way blameless for the shaping of events in the 1930&#8242;s, in fact many would argue that they created the situation where a creature such as Hitler would actually gain much support to persecute their fellow Jews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EJP Replies to Jewess Doreen Concerning Adonai Yeshua ha Maschiah ben David by eire</title>
		<link>http://www.vaticanassassins.org/2011/04/ejp-replies-to-jewess-doreen-concerning-adonai-yeshua-ha-maschiah-ben-david/comment-page-1/#comment-2587</link>
		<dc:creator>eire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=11435#comment-2587</guid>
		<description>Excellent reply to a very arrogant letter. The entire tone of it is a shame to its author. And it also displays an amazingly blinkered view of events and of other peoples rights, also fails to recognise that Abrahams God created everything and everyone and loves all, he is in all through all for all, not just jews. It also shows an astonishing lack of insight that she can&#039;t see the main reason Israel was over-run was because of her &quot;Sages&quot; inventing the Talmud/Rabbinical laws which were adding to the Torah and taking away from the Torah, 2 acts strictly forbidden by the Torah itself. Nehemia Gordon, a Jew who left the orthodox teachings to become a Karaite gives a good discussion on some of the entire nonsense of much of the Talmudic laws, and to hear him talk it appears there is great similarities to what the Rabbis began teaching and the laws the Vatican passed where he decided he was infallible. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tddCNY6U77Y
I have recently started learning Hebrew myself and am in contact with a Rabbi and when discussing the Hebrew Scriptures and its implications I was somewhat surprised when he told me that the Gentiles were always welcome as a grafted in part of Israel, I thought this was only after Yahsuahs death and when Shimon Kefa and Rabbi Shaul were teaching Gentiles but he showed me that Gentiles had left Egypt with Moses, were with him when the Red Sea parted and were at Mt Sinia when the commandments and scrolls were given. I had read those books and admit had overlooked the references to it in Devarim (deutoronomy) and Shemot (Exodus). This painted a very different picture from the view I previously had and the view that Orthodox Jews wish to have. Any right-thinking person who studies the written word of Moses, the Torah, can clearly see Rabbinical Law is forbidden, and yet how these orthodox jews can so conveniently overlook this is puzzling. That Jewish woman talks about her increased level of observance, yet I would take a good guess when she sees the name of the Creator in her scriptures and where it says to proclaim his name she will substitute it with a title Adonai instead!!! If she observed the Torah she would see through the nonsense of the Talmud. The Messiah Yashua said that the jews were the first chosen to the Kingdom of God but only a remnant would make it there, this is a great shame. Orthodox jews should take a better look at themselves and their &quot;sages&quot; and ask themselves why the power given to their ancestors in Noah&#039;s time has been abandoned from them now, why was Jerusalem ever over-run, why they lost the Ark of the Covenant, why Antiochus Epiphanes was able to erect a Pagan statue to Zeus in Jersusalem, why the Romans flattened the city and why the nation was scattered and their spoken language Classical hebrew died out. If they had the righteousness of God then surely none of these events would have happened. A reassessment of how they see themselves and the unhealthy outlook many of them have would be very refreshing. It is clear to see that a karaite like Nehemia, who has turned his back on the Talmud and Rabbinical laws has love and respect for all peoples in his heart, regardless of anyones beliefs. Incidentally Nehemia is not a Messianic Jew as far as I am aware. The Rabbi I am in contact with has been so warm and kind-hearted and when people like this Ms Bell can show similar humanity then the future for Israel will be so much brighter. There are alot more Jewish people who believe Yahshua is the Messiah than most Orthodox Jews like to admit, here is one talking. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujYH6H4z6Oc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEzLxK2NItE And an amusing clip that has some truth in it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCY_1UIq6VU
He (Yashua) entered the temple and began to drive out those who sold and those who bought in the temple, and he overturned the tables of the money-changers and the seats of those who sold pigeons; and he would not allow any one to carry anything through the temple. And he taught, and said to them, &quot;Is it not written, &#039;My house shall be called a house of prayer FOR ALL THE NATIONS?&#039; But you have made it a den of robbers.&quot; (Mark 11:15-17)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent reply to a very arrogant letter. The entire tone of it is a shame to its author. And it also displays an amazingly blinkered view of events and of other peoples rights, also fails to recognise that Abrahams God created everything and everyone and loves all, he is in all through all for all, not just jews. It also shows an astonishing lack of insight that she can&#8217;t see the main reason Israel was over-run was because of her &#8220;Sages&#8221; inventing the Talmud/Rabbinical laws which were adding to the Torah and taking away from the Torah, 2 acts strictly forbidden by the Torah itself. Nehemia Gordon, a Jew who left the orthodox teachings to become a Karaite gives a good discussion on some of the entire nonsense of much of the Talmudic laws, and to hear him talk it appears there is great similarities to what the Rabbis began teaching and the laws the Vatican passed where he decided he was infallible. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tddCNY6U77Y" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tddCNY6U77Y</a><br />
I have recently started learning Hebrew myself and am in contact with a Rabbi and when discussing the Hebrew Scriptures and its implications I was somewhat surprised when he told me that the Gentiles were always welcome as a grafted in part of Israel, I thought this was only after Yahsuahs death and when Shimon Kefa and Rabbi Shaul were teaching Gentiles but he showed me that Gentiles had left Egypt with Moses, were with him when the Red Sea parted and were at Mt Sinia when the commandments and scrolls were given. I had read those books and admit had overlooked the references to it in Devarim (deutoronomy) and Shemot (Exodus). This painted a very different picture from the view I previously had and the view that Orthodox Jews wish to have. Any right-thinking person who studies the written word of Moses, the Torah, can clearly see Rabbinical Law is forbidden, and yet how these orthodox jews can so conveniently overlook this is puzzling. That Jewish woman talks about her increased level of observance, yet I would take a good guess when she sees the name of the Creator in her scriptures and where it says to proclaim his name she will substitute it with a title Adonai instead!!! If she observed the Torah she would see through the nonsense of the Talmud. The Messiah Yashua said that the jews were the first chosen to the Kingdom of God but only a remnant would make it there, this is a great shame. Orthodox jews should take a better look at themselves and their &#8220;sages&#8221; and ask themselves why the power given to their ancestors in Noah&#8217;s time has been abandoned from them now, why was Jerusalem ever over-run, why they lost the Ark of the Covenant, why Antiochus Epiphanes was able to erect a Pagan statue to Zeus in Jersusalem, why the Romans flattened the city and why the nation was scattered and their spoken language Classical hebrew died out. If they had the righteousness of God then surely none of these events would have happened. A reassessment of how they see themselves and the unhealthy outlook many of them have would be very refreshing. It is clear to see that a karaite like Nehemia, who has turned his back on the Talmud and Rabbinical laws has love and respect for all peoples in his heart, regardless of anyones beliefs. Incidentally Nehemia is not a Messianic Jew as far as I am aware. The Rabbi I am in contact with has been so warm and kind-hearted and when people like this Ms Bell can show similar humanity then the future for Israel will be so much brighter. There are alot more Jewish people who believe Yahshua is the Messiah than most Orthodox Jews like to admit, here is one talking. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujYH6H4z6Oc" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujYH6H4z6Oc</a> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEzLxK2NItE" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEzLxK2NItE</a> And an amusing clip that has some truth in it <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCY_1UIq6VU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCY_1UIq6VU</a><br />
He (Yashua) entered the temple and began to drive out those who sold and those who bought in the temple, and he overturned the tables of the money-changers and the seats of those who sold pigeons; and he would not allow any one to carry anything through the temple. And he taught, and said to them, &#8220;Is it not written, &#8216;My house shall be called a house of prayer FOR ALL THE NATIONS?&#8217; But you have made it a den of robbers.&#8221; (Mark 11:15-17)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Pope&#8217;s Playoffs: Jesuit-Connected Owners of Five Professional Football Teams by jon_owen</title>
		<link>http://www.vaticanassassins.org/2012/01/the-popes-playoffs-jesuit-connected-owners-of-five-professional-football-teams/comment-page-1/#comment-2544</link>
		<dc:creator>jon_owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=12301#comment-2544</guid>
		<description>they create culture for the masses it comes from the top and gets put down to the masses. generally sports for men and soap tv for women. they own the finest prestigious universities, they are at the cutting edge of scientific research, own the media corps etc, music industry, hollywood. american people are kept on a constant diet of junk food for thought, never any time to get a hold of true information. and when they do they cant handle it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they create culture for the masses it comes from the top and gets put down to the masses. generally sports for men and soap tv for women. they own the finest prestigious universities, they are at the cutting edge of scientific research, own the media corps etc, music industry, hollywood. american people are kept on a constant diet of junk food for thought, never any time to get a hold of true information. and when they do they cant handle it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Knight of Malta Leon Panetta Dispatches USS Enterprise to Persian Gulf&#8212;to be Sunk! by Ayelyah</title>
		<link>http://www.vaticanassassins.org/2012/01/smom-leon-panetta-dispatches-uss-enterprise-to-persian-gulf-to-be-sunk/comment-page-1/#comment-2542</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayelyah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=12289#comment-2542</guid>
		<description>&quot;state&quot;.
The jesuit/zionist alliance is well over thousand of years old. The Knights Templar/ Preury of Sion alliance split and went separate ways in the year 1188. They reformed this old alliance during Nazi regime, (Knights Templar are Jesuits and have taken the Jesuit oath which runs parallel to the Protocols of Zion). The jesuit/zionist (sionist) alliance solidified during the Nazi regime with Hitler (Rothschild zionist) and the then Pope (of the Jesuit order). This regime never really ended but went underground with the help of Brittish and US intelligence networks . The Vatican holds the wealth stolen over centuries by the protected &quot;elite&quot; in their untouchable &quot;state&quot;. Their Palestine is the centerpoint, they want it all, the zionists will hand over the Holy city to the Vatican for the anti-christ &quot;King&quot; to be enthroned in Jerusalem from a zionist bloodline with the Pope as the head for their one world religion. A counterfeit bloodline that has NOTHING to do with the REAL Jesus Christ of Nazareth, a Nazarene, not of their law and one they despised. The Vatican is the incubator of evil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;state&#8221;.<br />
The jesuit/zionist alliance is well over thousand of years old. The Knights Templar/ Preury of Sion alliance split and went separate ways in the year 1188. They reformed this old alliance during Nazi regime, (Knights Templar are Jesuits and have taken the Jesuit oath which runs parallel to the Protocols of Zion). The jesuit/zionist (sionist) alliance solidified during the Nazi regime with Hitler (Rothschild zionist) and the then Pope (of the Jesuit order). This regime never really ended but went underground with the help of Brittish and US intelligence networks . The Vatican holds the wealth stolen over centuries by the protected &#8220;elite&#8221; in their untouchable &#8220;state&#8221;. Their Palestine is the centerpoint, they want it all, the zionists will hand over the Holy city to the Vatican for the anti-christ &#8220;King&#8221; to be enthroned in Jerusalem from a zionist bloodline with the Pope as the head for their one world religion. A counterfeit bloodline that has NOTHING to do with the REAL Jesus Christ of Nazareth, a Nazarene, not of their law and one they despised. The Vatican is the incubator of evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Jesuit Owl: Common to CIA Headquarters, the Pentagon and Capitol Buliding! by eccles</title>
		<link>http://www.vaticanassassins.org/2010/11/the-jesuit-owl-common-to-cia-headquarters-the-pentagon-and-capitol-buliding/comment-page-1/#comment-2540</link>
		<dc:creator>eccles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=9545#comment-2540</guid>
		<description>I am a bedraggled refugee from the &quot;Holy&quot; Roman Catholic Church, now a Proud Atheist. I suffered 12 years of my youth at a JESUIT &quot;Concentration Camp&quot;, Xavier College, Melbourne, Australa in the 1950&#039;s. We were never  taught anything about the EVIL JESUITS. I now know why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a bedraggled refugee from the &#8220;Holy&#8221; Roman Catholic Church, now a Proud Atheist. I suffered 12 years of my youth at a JESUIT &#8220;Concentration Camp&#8221;, Xavier College, Melbourne, Australa in the 1950&#8242;s. We were never  taught anything about the EVIL JESUITS. I now know why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on History of Islam: Identical Doctrines and Deeds of Satan&#8217;s Roman Jesuit Papacy by SBV</title>
		<link>http://www.vaticanassassins.org/2011/12/history-of-islam-identical-doctrines-and-deeds-of-satans-roman-jesuit-papacy/comment-page-1/#comment-2538</link>
		<dc:creator>SBV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=12182#comment-2538</guid>
		<description>akif124, you are the stereotypical example of an ignorant person.

Your arguments should be directed at disproving the information in the link, no? Especially since you claim it is filled with lies...

To be honest, when I saw that you wrote a paragraph of text, I was prepared to read some relevant arguments from your side (since you obviously seem to be a Moslem).

It is typical for someone who is ignorant (or in denial) to just revert to claiming the information presented to him is a lie. Don&#039;t do that... If you want to set a good example, at least back your claims, as the LINK seems to do (or at least, try). For instance, if I was a neutral, impartial person happening upon this, and I had to read both your information and the information presented in the link, it would be clear that you are on the losing side of the argument. And that would be putting it lightly...

To be honest, I don&#039;t even think you read the link properly. I am going to guess your emotions boiled up and you just ignored it and posted your own opinion. I suggest you re-read that whole link word for word. This is your eternity that you&#039;re betting, and I believe something that important requires more than a passing glance...

Many of the answers to your questions can be found so simply. A couple of your questions are answered right there in the article that&#039;s linked. It would seem to me that the entire Surah is filled with doctrine that is detrimental to humanity. Your other questions could be answered by doing the following:

1) open google.com
2) search something along the lines of &quot;is allah a pagan god&quot; or &quot;how is allah a moon god&quot;

Then you can review all the information yourself, check sources, compare them to your Quran, and make a careful, calculated decision based on your findings. If you do that, you cannot go wrong..

EJP&#039;s link is quite extensive already, but if you&#039;re not satisfied, I have researched this information in the past, and this site I&#039;m about to link is irrefutable, since it&#039;s full of sources, and debates all the necessary details in a fine argumentative order. What I mean by that is that author argues by taking you through the entire thought process. Basically, if you take the time to actually read it, you won&#039;t be able to refute the information since it&#039;s fact. Here it is:

http://www.answering-islam.org/Silas/swordverse.htm

If you can seriously read the above, and still question whether or not Islam orders the killing of those who do not convert, then there is a serious problem.

I&#039;ll be honest, I feel sorry for some Muslims because they definitely mean very well - willing to do so much for their god... Some (false?) Christians could definitely learn from Muslims&#039; loyalty, commitment and dedication to Allah... Yahweh made it so easy for His children, and most take it for granted. If any Muslim could just shift their dedication from Allah to Yeshua, how blessed would they be? I believe God&#039;s heart pains when He sees such things... People are more commited to false gods than some of His children are to Him. It&#039;s quite pathetic...

So in many ways, I admire Muslims. I just pray that the LORD lift the deception and free them from bondage. You mean well, but the devil is a master deceiver, turning good people away from God. How free would they be under Christ? No required scripted prayers, no senseless rituals, no vain babblings, no forced fasts. Just a relationship with the Creator, where it all comes from the heart. The prayers, fasts - all from the heart. 

Lastly, I really have grown to dislike the fact that Muslims are the world&#039;s scapegoats, or, should I say, the Pope&#039;s scapegoats. Even evangelicals pointing fingers at Muslims, claiming a Muslim will be the anti-christ and whatnot (I refer to Perry Stone, a preacher that I respect except for his distorted views on politics etc. For example he seems to praise Pope John Paul for ending the USSR - sigh). Any true Bible believer, who is INTERESTED in finding the real Truth, would know that Jesus gave us a big clue on what race the anti-christ would spring from. If Jesus told the Jews that they didn&#039;t accept Him, but one day another would come,and they would accept him, then it is clear that a Jew would most fit that description. I can&#039;t see the Jews accepting a Muslim Messiah.

As for the false prophet - the pope is the perfect fit. No need to look elsewhere...

As for Islamic terrorists - should I lol??? We all know 9/11 was a Gentile + false Jew (Revelations&#039; synagogue of Satan) operation. The Muslims are scapegoats, and therefore I feel sorry for them. Yes there are cases where the fundamentalist Muslims assert their scriptural authority, but in the end, if you want to be completely honest, it is their right if done within their confines, on their land, to their people of their race and culture. If that&#039;s their decision, we can&#039;t force our will upon them. As long as they stay away from Yahweh&#039;s children, and other innocent peoples.

Lastly, I don&#039;t feel like arguing Jesus&#039; divinity, as that is not really what is in question here. You haven&#039;t read the Bible if you think that there is no claim to Jesus&#039; divinity there. Why do you think the Jews insisted on His crucifixion? It was because He &#039;blasphemed&#039; by saying that He and the Father are One. The Torah insists blasphemers are to be killed, and that&#039;s how they came to the conclusion that Jesus must be done away with. In the end it was a lack of wisdom of their part, because Jesus told them to search the Scriptures, and they would find evidence of Him. But then again, Jesus also said they would not believe Him, because they never belonged to Him (or the Father) in the first place.

Hope you don&#039;t find what I say offensive... I typed this in a rush so excuse any errors :)

The LORD&#039;s will be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>akif124, you are the stereotypical example of an ignorant person.</p>
<p>Your arguments should be directed at disproving the information in the link, no? Especially since you claim it is filled with lies&#8230;</p>
<p>To be honest, when I saw that you wrote a paragraph of text, I was prepared to read some relevant arguments from your side (since you obviously seem to be a Moslem).</p>
<p>It is typical for someone who is ignorant (or in denial) to just revert to claiming the information presented to him is a lie. Don&#8217;t do that&#8230; If you want to set a good example, at least back your claims, as the LINK seems to do (or at least, try). For instance, if I was a neutral, impartial person happening upon this, and I had to read both your information and the information presented in the link, it would be clear that you are on the losing side of the argument. And that would be putting it lightly&#8230;</p>
<p>To be honest, I don&#8217;t even think you read the link properly. I am going to guess your emotions boiled up and you just ignored it and posted your own opinion. I suggest you re-read that whole link word for word. This is your eternity that you&#8217;re betting, and I believe something that important requires more than a passing glance&#8230;</p>
<p>Many of the answers to your questions can be found so simply. A couple of your questions are answered right there in the article that&#8217;s linked. It would seem to me that the entire Surah is filled with doctrine that is detrimental to humanity. Your other questions could be answered by doing the following:</p>
<p>1) open google.com<br />
2) search something along the lines of &#8220;is allah a pagan god&#8221; or &#8220;how is allah a moon god&#8221;</p>
<p>Then you can review all the information yourself, check sources, compare them to your Quran, and make a careful, calculated decision based on your findings. If you do that, you cannot go wrong..</p>
<p>EJP&#8217;s link is quite extensive already, but if you&#8217;re not satisfied, I have researched this information in the past, and this site I&#8217;m about to link is irrefutable, since it&#8217;s full of sources, and debates all the necessary details in a fine argumentative order. What I mean by that is that author argues by taking you through the entire thought process. Basically, if you take the time to actually read it, you won&#8217;t be able to refute the information since it&#8217;s fact. Here it is:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.answering-islam.org/Silas/swordverse.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.answering-islam.org/Silas/swordverse.htm</a></p>
<p>If you can seriously read the above, and still question whether or not Islam orders the killing of those who do not convert, then there is a serious problem.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be honest, I feel sorry for some Muslims because they definitely mean very well &#8211; willing to do so much for their god&#8230; Some (false?) Christians could definitely learn from Muslims&#8217; loyalty, commitment and dedication to Allah&#8230; Yahweh made it so easy for His children, and most take it for granted. If any Muslim could just shift their dedication from Allah to Yeshua, how blessed would they be? I believe God&#8217;s heart pains when He sees such things&#8230; People are more commited to false gods than some of His children are to Him. It&#8217;s quite pathetic&#8230;</p>
<p>So in many ways, I admire Muslims. I just pray that the LORD lift the deception and free them from bondage. You mean well, but the devil is a master deceiver, turning good people away from God. How free would they be under Christ? No required scripted prayers, no senseless rituals, no vain babblings, no forced fasts. Just a relationship with the Creator, where it all comes from the heart. The prayers, fasts &#8211; all from the heart. </p>
<p>Lastly, I really have grown to dislike the fact that Muslims are the world&#8217;s scapegoats, or, should I say, the Pope&#8217;s scapegoats. Even evangelicals pointing fingers at Muslims, claiming a Muslim will be the anti-christ and whatnot (I refer to Perry Stone, a preacher that I respect except for his distorted views on politics etc. For example he seems to praise Pope John Paul for ending the USSR &#8211; sigh). Any true Bible believer, who is INTERESTED in finding the real Truth, would know that Jesus gave us a big clue on what race the anti-christ would spring from. If Jesus told the Jews that they didn&#8217;t accept Him, but one day another would come,and they would accept him, then it is clear that a Jew would most fit that description. I can&#8217;t see the Jews accepting a Muslim Messiah.</p>
<p>As for the false prophet &#8211; the pope is the perfect fit. No need to look elsewhere&#8230;</p>
<p>As for Islamic terrorists &#8211; should I lol??? We all know 9/11 was a Gentile + false Jew (Revelations&#8217; synagogue of Satan) operation. The Muslims are scapegoats, and therefore I feel sorry for them. Yes there are cases where the fundamentalist Muslims assert their scriptural authority, but in the end, if you want to be completely honest, it is their right if done within their confines, on their land, to their people of their race and culture. If that&#8217;s their decision, we can&#8217;t force our will upon them. As long as they stay away from Yahweh&#8217;s children, and other innocent peoples.</p>
<p>Lastly, I don&#8217;t feel like arguing Jesus&#8217; divinity, as that is not really what is in question here. You haven&#8217;t read the Bible if you think that there is no claim to Jesus&#8217; divinity there. Why do you think the Jews insisted on His crucifixion? It was because He &#8216;blasphemed&#8217; by saying that He and the Father are One. The Torah insists blasphemers are to be killed, and that&#8217;s how they came to the conclusion that Jesus must be done away with. In the end it was a lack of wisdom of their part, because Jesus told them to search the Scriptures, and they would find evidence of Him. But then again, Jesus also said they would not believe Him, because they never belonged to Him (or the Father) in the first place.</p>
<p>Hope you don&#8217;t find what I say offensive&#8230; I typed this in a rush so excuse any errors :)</p>
<p>The LORD&#8217;s will be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama&#8217;s White Papal Masters by END of UNJUST NWO Crusade War against IRAQ (2003-2011) &#8211; Part 2 &#124; Lefemine for Life</title>
		<link>http://www.vaticanassassins.org/2009/08/white-papal-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-2535</link>
		<dc:creator>END of UNJUST NWO Crusade War against IRAQ (2003-2011) &#8211; Part 2 &#124; Lefemine for Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaticanassassins.org/wp/?p=95#comment-2535</guid>
		<description>[...] U.S. &#8220;President&#8221; Barack Hussein Obama  -   32nd Degree Prince Hall Mason, Papal Servant 2)  Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu  -  Freemason 3)  Palestinian [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] U.S. &#8220;President&#8221; Barack Hussein Obama  -   32nd Degree Prince Hall Mason, Papal Servant 2)  Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu  -  Freemason 3)  Palestinian [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Communist Barry Davis Obama: &#8220;Who&#8217;s Your Daddy?&#8221; by i like reading</title>
		<link>http://www.vaticanassassins.org/2010/01/barry-davis-obama-4/comment-page-1/#comment-2534</link>
		<dc:creator>i like reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=4533#comment-2534</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Good Blog...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found about your blog on yahoo and checked a few of your early posts. I hope you will keep up the very good work. I just added your RSS feed to Feedburner. I&#039;m seeing forward to reading more from you later on!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Good Blog&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found about your blog on yahoo and checked a few of your early posts. I hope you will keep up the very good work. I just added your RSS feed to Feedburner. I&#8217;m seeing forward to reading more from you later on!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Black Protestant Christian Rightly Exposes and Destroys Statue of Papal Virgin Mary by Geus</title>
		<link>http://www.vaticanassassins.org/2012/01/black-protestant-christian-rightly-exposes-and-destroys-statue-of-papal-virgin-mary/comment-page-1/#comment-2533</link>
		<dc:creator>Geus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 02:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=12271#comment-2533</guid>
		<description>I case it is censored in your country, there is a back-up version over here:
http://vimeo.com/35075941</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I case it is censored in your country, there is a back-up version over here:<br />
<a href="http://vimeo.com/35075941" rel="nofollow">http://vimeo.com/35075941</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Black Pope&#8217;s Unfolding International Fascist Crusade: Destroy US, Build EU by MetalHeadViking</title>
		<link>http://www.vaticanassassins.org/2011/12/the-black-popes-unfolding-international-fascist-crusade-destroy-us-build-eu/comment-page-1/#comment-2532</link>
		<dc:creator>MetalHeadViking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 00:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=12226#comment-2532</guid>
		<description>The Euro-krisis seems irrelevant. 

The EU is just using it as an excuse to take more power from the national parlaments. 

It seems the EU only becomes more powerfull after every crisis. 

So even if the Euro does breakup, it doesn´t matter. Because Brussels has concentrated more power towards the Elits than what they ever had before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Euro-krisis seems irrelevant. </p>
<p>The EU is just using it as an excuse to take more power from the national parlaments. </p>
<p>It seems the EU only becomes more powerfull after every crisis. </p>
<p>So even if the Euro does breakup, it doesn´t matter. Because Brussels has concentrated more power towards the Elits than what they ever had before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on History of Islam: Identical Doctrines and Deeds of Satan&#8217;s Roman Jesuit Papacy by logos</title>
		<link>http://www.vaticanassassins.org/2011/12/history-of-islam-identical-doctrines-and-deeds-of-satans-roman-jesuit-papacy/comment-page-1/#comment-2531</link>
		<dc:creator>logos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=12182#comment-2531</guid>
		<description>&quot;Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but (he is) the Messenger of Allah, and the Seal of the Prophets: and Allah has full knowledge of all things.&quot; S. 33:40 

Muslims further reason that since the Lord Jesus clearly stated that false prophets would come to deceive many, this strongly argues that there would be another true prophet to come after Christ. Had there been no more prophets after Christ, there would have been no need for Jesus to give a criterion to distinguish false prophets. Christ could have simply stated that there would be no more prophets at all. (Cf. Matthew 7:15-20; 24:23-26)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but (he is) the Messenger of Allah, and the Seal of the Prophets: and Allah has full knowledge of all things.&#8221; S. 33:40 </p>
<p>Muslims further reason that since the Lord Jesus clearly stated that false prophets would come to deceive many, this strongly argues that there would be another true prophet to come after Christ. Had there been no more prophets after Christ, there would have been no need for Jesus to give a criterion to distinguish false prophets. Christ could have simply stated that there would be no more prophets at all. (Cf. Matthew 7:15-20; 24:23-26)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on March 31, 2010: Cotton Mather Smith; Minister and Patriot, Part 1 by tile and carpet cleaning guru</title>
		<link>http://www.vaticanassassins.org/2010/04/march-31-2010-cotton-mather-smith-minister-and-patriot-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2530</link>
		<dc:creator>tile and carpet cleaning guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=4774#comment-2530</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;tile and carpet cleaning roseville...&lt;/strong&gt;

really good blog . thank you so much for your effort in writing the posts....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>tile and carpet cleaning roseville&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>really good blog . thank you so much for your effort in writing the posts&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 2.453 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-22 12:21:18 -->

